吉林大学学报(信息科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 714-722.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于群体智慧的排序任务多聚合方法比较研究

  

  1. 华南理工大学 工商管理学院, 广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-21 出版日期:2020-11-24 发布日期:2020-12-17
  • 通讯作者: 蔡依陶(1994— ),女,广东茂名人,华南理工大学硕士研究生,主要从事群体决策与智慧研究, (Tel)86-13610253958(E-mail)cai_yitao123@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨雷(1961— ),男,重庆人,华南理工大学教授,主要从事群体决策与智慧、运作管理和精益生产研究,(Tel)86-13336461883(E-mail)yangl@ scut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71771092)

Comparative Study on Multi Aggregation Methods of Sequencing Tasks Based on Group Intelligence

  1. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2020-05-21 Online:2020-11-24 Published:2020-12-17

摘要: 为解决排序任务聚合方法效果不明确的问题, 在群体智慧概念下, 对排序任务问题群体智慧效应发生的条件即集中化机制进行聚合方法的比较研究, 试图找到已知基本事实排序任务问题中使群体智慧效应最显著的排序聚合方法。 创新性提出评估群体智慧的概念即群体智慧效度。 运用实证研究方法对群体进行排序任务重建实验, 以实验测试的排序数据为基础, 使用 7 种不同的排序聚合方法对排序任务问题的所有个体排序进行聚合, 得到相应的群体排序。 测量7 种群体排序和真实排序之间的偏差, 并根据群体智慧效度大小判断不同聚合方法的表现。 实验结果显示, 在基于群体智慧效度的重建排序任务聚合方法中, 众数法的表现最好, 中位数法和 K-Y 方法表现次之。

关键词: 群体智慧, 排序任务, 实验研究, 聚合方法

Abstract: In order to solve the problem that the effect of sorting task aggregation method is not clear, under the concept of group intelligence, a comparative study is performed on the aggregation method under the condition of the grouping effect of the sorting task problem, attempting to find the sorting aggregation method. A concept of evaluating group wisdom-group wisdom validity is proposed. Empirical research methods are used to rebuild the sorting task of the group experiment. Based on the sorting data of the experimental test, seven different sorting aggregation methods are used to aggregate all the individual sorting of the sorting task problem to obtain the corresponding group sorting. The deviation between the seven kinds of group ranking and the real ranking is measured and the performance of different aggregation methods according to the size of the group wisdom validity is judged. The experimental results show that, among the clustering methods of reconstruction and ranking tasks based on the validity of group intelligence, the mode of the majority method performs best, followed by the median method and the K-Y method.

Key words: group wisdom, ranking tasks, experimental research, aggregation method

中图分类号: 

  • TP311. 13