吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 724-735.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201503107

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地肇州区块沙河子组层序格架特征及其对沉积和烃源岩的控制作用

蔡来星1, 卢双舫2, 李昂1, 石蕾1, 刘爽2   

  1. 1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    2. 中国石油大学(华东)非常规油气与新能源研究院, 山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-03 发布日期:2015-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 卢双舫(1962),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气地球化学及油气地质学研究,E-mail:lushuangfang@qq.com。 E-mail:lushuangfang@qq.com
  • 作者简介:蔡来星(1985),男,博士研究生,主要从事致密油气成藏研究,E-mail:qingxin717717@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家油气重大专项项目(2011ZX05007-001);中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(24720132103A)

Sequence Stratigraphy Characteristics and Its Control Action on Sedimentary and Source Rock in Shahezi Formation of Zhaozhou Area in Songliao Basin

Cai Laixing1, Lu Shuangfang2, Li Ang1, Shi Lei1, Liu Shuang2   

  1. 1. College of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. Research Institute of Unconventional Petroleum and Renewable Energy, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-09-03 Published:2015-05-26

摘要:

以Vail经典层序地层学理论为指导,综合利用钻井岩心、地震、测井及地化分析测试等资料,通过地震反射特征分析、小波变换法、声波时差曲线和电阻率曲线交汇图法多种方法,将松辽盆地肇州地区下白垩统沙河子组整体划分为1个二级层序和由下至上的SQ1SQ4 4个三级层序。其中:这4个三级层序均具有二分结构,发育湖侵和湖退两个体系域;顶部的SQ4遭受严重剥蚀,在盆缘地带仅残留湖侵域。在层序地层单元划分和对比的基础上,结合研究区构造活动背景、物源供给情况等因素,认为研究区沙河子组主要发育西部扇三角洲、东部辫状河三角洲和湖泊相3种沉积相类型,而沉积体系演化主要受控于层序格架发育情况,表现为"格架控砂、继承演化、分源沉积、连片发育"的特征。在底部SQ1和顶部SQ4发育时期,盆小而水浅,西部扇三角洲和东部辫状河三角洲展布范围较小,扇体多呈朵叶体状分布,此时,泥岩含量低且有机质丰度差,优质烃源岩基本不发育;在SQ2和SQ3发育时期,湖盆持续水进造成盆阔而水深的沉积背景,加之物源供应充足,形成了扇体连片发育的特征,其中,水下分流河道作为前缘亚相中的主力砂体存在,而湖相暗色泥岩厚度大、品质好且有机质丰度高,在SQ2和SQ3最大湖泛面附近发育两套最优质的烃源岩。

关键词: 肇州区块, 沙河子组, 层序地层格架, 沉积特征, 烃源岩, 控制作用, 松辽盆地

Abstract:

Based on Vail's sequence stratigraphy theory,the sequence stratigraphy framework of Early Cretaceous Shahezi Formation in Zhaozhou area in Songliao basin is established through the study of cores,seismic data,logging data, and other materials. Shahezi Formation is one second grade sequence, and it includes four third grade sequences from the bottom to the top,SQ1-SQ4. Each third grade sequence develops dichotomy structure,transgressive system tract, and regressive system tract. Among them,Top SQ4 suffered serious erosion, its transgressive system tract exists only in the basin margin. Based on the contrast of the sequence stratigraphic division,combined with the background of the tectonic activity,source supply, and the other conditions in the study area,three types of sedimentary facies were developed in Shahezi Formation:fan delta in the west, braided river delta in the east, and lake facies. The sedimentary evolution was mainly controlled by the development of the sequence stratigraphy as described:"stratigraphic control sand body,sedimentary facies development inheritance,sedimentary deposits from different provenance and development regionally". In the development of SQ1 and SQ4,the basin was small and water was shallow. The lobate fan delta and the braided river delta distribute in a small range,the content of shale is low and the abundance of organic matter is poor; while in the stages of SQ2 and SQ3,both water and other source supply entered adequately into the lake basin, this resulted in the contiguous development of the fan-shaped body (lake facies?), in which the dark mudstone is large and thick with abundant organic matter. In addition, the underwater distributary exists as the main sand body in the leading edge subfacies. In such a sedimentary environment, two sets of optimal hydrocarbon source rocks were developed during the largest lake flooding period in SQ2 and SQ3.

Key words: Zhaozhou area, Shahezi Formation, sequence stratigraphic framework, sedimentary characteristics, source rocks, controlling action, Songliao basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13

[1] Jiang Z X,Lu H B,Yu W Q,et al. Transformation of Accommodation Space of the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,the Songliao Basin,NE China[J].Basin Research,2005,17(4):569-580.

[2] 姜在兴.沉积体系及层序地层学研究现状及发展趋势[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(5):535-541. Jiang Zaixing. Studies of Depositional Systems and Sequence Stratigraphy the Present and the Future[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2010,31(5):535-541.

[3] 吴因业,朱如凯,罗平,等.沉积学与层序地层学研究新进展: 第18届国际沉积学大会综述[J].沉积学报,2011,29(1):199-206. Wu Yinye,Zhu Rukai,Luo Ping,et al. Advance on Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy: A Summary from 18th International Sedimentology Congress[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2011,29(1):199-206.

[4] 胡菲,刘招君,孟庆涛,等. 敦化盆地新生界层序与沉积特征及其对烃源岩发育的控制作用[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(增刊2):33-42. Hu Fei,Liu Zhaojun,Meng Qingtao,et al. Cenozoic Sequence and Sedimentary Characteristics and Its Control on Source Rock in Dunhua Basin,Yanbian Area[J].Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition,2012,42(Sup.2):33-42.

[5] 卜淘.松辽盆地北部断陷期层序地层特征[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(4):382-384. Bu Tao. Sequence Stratigraphy Characteristics During the Faulting Period in the North of Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Chengdu University of technology,1999,26(4):382-384.

[6] 平贵东. 三肇凹陷葡萄花油层多边断层成因机制及控藏机理研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2011. Ping Guidong. Research on Polygonal Faults Genetic Mechanism and Controlling Petroleum Migration and Accumulation in Sanzhao Depression[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2011.

[7] 夏利.徐家围子沙河子组沉积体系与烃源岩预测[D].北京:中国地质大学,2009. Xia Li. Research on Depositional System and Forecast of Source Rocks of Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences,2009.

[8] 殷进垠,刘和甫,迟海江. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷构造演化[J].石油学报,2002,23(2):26-29. Yin Jinyin,Liu Hefu,Chi Haijiang. Evolution and Gas-Accumulation of Xujiaweizi Depression in Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2002,23(2):26-29.

[9] 曹瑞成,李军辉,卢双舫,等. 海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷白垩系层序地层特征及沉积演化[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2010,40(3),535-541. Cao Ruicheng,Li Junhui,Lu Shuangfang,et al. Sequence Stratigraphic Character and Sedimentary Evolution in Cretaceous in Huhehu Depression in Hailaer Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition,2010,40(3):535-541.

[10] 李顺明,宋新民,刘曰强,等.温米退积型与进积型浅水辫状河三角洲沉积模式[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2011,41(3),665-672. Li Shunming,Song Xinmin,Liu Yueqiang,et al. Depositional Models of Regressive and Progressive Shoal Braided Deltas in Wenmi Oilfield[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition,2011,41(3),665-672.

[11] 万传彪,乔秀云,孔惠,等. 黑龙江北安地区早白垩世孢粉组合[J].微体古生物学报,2002,19(1):83-90. Wan Chuanbiao,Qiao Xiuyun,Kong Hui,et al. Early Cretaceous Spore-Pollen Assemblages from Beian Area,Hei Longjiang Province[J]. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica,2002,19(1):83-90.

[12] 刘震,常迈,赵阳,等.低勘探程度盆地烃源岩早期预测方法研究[J].地学前缘,2007,14(4):159-167. Liu Zhen,Chang Mai,Zhao Yang,et al. Method of Early Prediction on Source Rocks in Basins with Low Exploration Activity[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2007,14(4):159-167.

[13] 胡明,付广,吕延防,等.松辽盆地徐家围子断陷断裂活动时期及其与深层气成藏关系分析[J].地质论评,2010,56(5):710-718. Hu Ming,Fu Guang,Lü Yanfang,et al. The Fault Activity Period and Its Relationship to Deep Gas Accumulation in the Xujiaweizi Depression,Songliao Basin[J].Geological Review,2010,56(5):710-718.

[14] 赵彦德,刘洛夫,张枝焕,等.南堡凹陷古近系层序地层格架中烃源岩分布与生烃特征研究[J].沉积学报,2008,26(6):1077-1085. Zhao Yande,Liu Luofu,Zhang Zhihuan,et al. Distribution and Hydrocarbon Generation of the Eogene Source Rocks in a Sequence Stratigraphic Framework in the Nanpu Sag[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2008,26(6):1077-1085.

[1] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[2] 吴小奇, 刘全有, 王萍, 黎华继, 朱东亚, 李朋朋. 沉积盆地天然气藏中氦气贫化机理及资源潜力:以四川盆地新场气田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1837-1850.
[3] 冯波, 谢一平, 田海龙, 封官宏, 杨金钢. 基于GIS-MCDA的松辽盆地南部中央坳陷区咸水层CO2地质封存适宜性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[4] 蔡嵩, 郑金云, 李振升, 舒梁锋, 靳瑶瑶, .

珠江口盆地番禺低隆区构造调控下断陷湖盆源—汇响应特征  [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1420-1433.

[5] 季金礁, 边伟华, 唐华风, 李元哲, 王璞珺. 松辽盆地莺山断陷营城组凝灰熔岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1051-1060.
[6] 朱建峰, 张美华, 冷庆磊, 刘玉虎, 栾颖. 松辽盆地查干花次凹火山岩构造裂缝及应力场[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 745-757.
[7] 王常东, 郝晓飞, 杨东光, 宁君, 翁海蛟, 严兆彬, 张韶华, 武飞. 松辽盆地南部新生代辉绿岩及其与砂岩型铀成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 775-788.
[8] 原家鹏, 张云峰.

 开鲁盆地陆东凹陷白垩系九佛堂组上段米兰科维奇旋回及沉积响应特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 375-386.

[9] 仝立华, 单玄龙, 张家强, 李锋, 石磊, 李耀华, 徐银波, 刘衍彤.

松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 363-374.

[10] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[11] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[12] 殷文. 低勘探程度地区层序地层分析及沉积规律——以五墩凹陷侏罗系为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 70-83.
[13] 高阳东, 龙祖烈, 陈聪 , 姜大朋 , 马宁.  珠江口盆地开平凹陷南部区域中深层原油地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1883-1896.
[14] 李永刚.  长岭断陷查干花次凹火石岭组水下喷发火山岩相测井响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2061-2074.
[15] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .