吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 581-593.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201602302

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

各向异性介质中的浅海海洋可控源电磁响应特征

贲放1, 刘云鹤1, 黄威1, 徐驰2   

  1. 1. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026;
    2. 辽宁省水利水电勘测设计研究院, 沈阳 110006
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-31 发布日期:2016-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 刘云鹤(1982-),男,副教授,主要从事电磁法勘探理论模拟与应用研究,E-mail:lyh19820131@163.com E-mail:lyh19820131@163.com
  • 作者简介:贲放(1989-),男,博士研究生,主要从事三维电磁法正反演方法的研究,E-mail:benfangzai2008@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国土资源部老矿山复核项目(中地调研合同[2013]第214号);国家自然科学基金项目(41404093,41404057);国家高技术研究发展计划("863"计划)项目(2012AA09A20103)

MCSEM Responses for Anisotropic Media in Shallow Water

Ben Fang1, Liu Yunhe1, Huang Wei1, Xu Chi2   

  1. 1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    2. Investigation and Design Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110006, China
  • Received:2015-08-31 Published:2016-03-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by Old Mine Review Project of Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China (China Geological Survey Project Agreement[2013] No. 214), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41404093, 41404057) and National High-Tech R&D Program ("863" Program) (2012AA09A20103)

PDF (PC)

752

摘要：

由于受到空气波的影响,浅海海洋可控源电磁数据对海底储油层的反映较弱,如何对浅海数据进行处理和解释一直是海洋电磁理论研究的热点。随着近年来海洋电磁理论的不断完善,浅海数据已经可以被较好地处理与反演,但是其解释水平仍然受基本理论研究不足的制约。针对这一现状,本文开展了海底电各向异性对浅海数据影响规律的研究。具体方法为:利用欧拉旋转建立不同的海底电性各向异性模型,然后采用交错网格有限差分法计算浅海海洋可控源电磁响应,最后通过分析同线情况下电场Ex分量的振幅和相位曲线特征以及海底电场及电流密度分布规律,分析各向异性对浅海海洋可控源电磁响应影响的物理机制,并讨论浅海各向异性情况下海洋电磁对高阻储油层的识别能力。得出的结论为各向异性介质中的浅海海洋电磁响应特征与深海有较大区别,在进行数据的处理、反演和解释时应区别于深海情况。

关键词: 浅海油气资源, 海洋可控源电磁法, 三维正演, 有限差分, 任意各向异性

Abstract:

Due to the impact of air waves, marine CSEM response to oil reservoir is weak in shallow water. Data processing and interpretation in shallow water have long been a hotspot in marine electromagnetic theoretical research. In recent years, with the development of marine CSEM theory, EM data interpretation in shallow water has been improved. However, it is still subject to restriction of fundamental theory. Under this situation, we carry out the research on the effect of electrical anisotropy to MCSEM data in shallow water. We use Euler rotation to establish different anisotropic models for seabed media. Through using the staggered grid finite-difference method to calculate marine CSEM responses in shallow water, we analyze the characteristics of amplitude, phase of inline Ex component, and current density. The physical mechanism of the anisotropic effect on the response of oil reservoir has also been analyzed. We conclude that the characteristics of marine CSEM responses in shallow water are different from that in deep water, and attentions should be paid to the differences when interpreting and inversing the marine CSEM data in shallow water. This research can provide a guideline for marine CSEM data interpretation in shallow water and promote marine CSEM data interpretation in shallow water.

Key words: offshore oil reservoir, marine CSEM, 3D modeling, finite-difference, arbitrary electrical anisotropy

中图分类号: 

  • P631.3

[1] Constable S C. Ten Years of Marine CSEM for Hydrocarbon Exploration[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(5):75A67-75A81.

[2] Mittet R, Morten J P. The Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Method in Shallow Water[J]. Geophysics, 2013, 78(2):E67-E77.

[3] Andreis D, MacGregor L. Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Sounding in Shallow Water:Principles and Applications[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 73(1):F21-F32.

[4] Løseth L O, Amundsen L, Jenssen A J. A Solution to the Airwave-Removal Problem in Shallow-Water Marine EM[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(5):A37-A42.

[5] Chen J, Alumbaugh D L. Three Methods for Mitigating Airwaves in Shallow Water Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Data[J]. Geophysics, 2011, 76(2):F89-F99.

[6] 殷长春, 刘云鹤, 翁爱华, 等. 海洋可控源电磁法空气波研究现状及展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(5):1506-1520. Yin Changchun, Liu Yunhe, Weng Aihua, et al. Research on Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Method Airwave[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(5):1506-1520.

[7] Sasaki Y. 3D Inversion of Marine CSEM and MT Data:An Approach to Shallow-Water Problem[J]. Geophysics, 2012, 78(1):E59-E65.

[8] Weiss C J, Constable S. Mapping Thin Resistors and Hydrocarbons with Marine EM Methods:Part II:Modeling and Analysis in 3D[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(6):G321-G332.

[9] Kong F N, Johnstad S E, Røsten T, et al. A 2.5D Finite-Element-Modeling Difference Method for Marine CSEM Modeling in Stratified Anisotropic Media[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 73(1):F9-F19.

[10] Weidelt P. 3-D Conductivity Models:Implications of Electrical Anisotropy[J]. Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics, 1999, 7:119-137.

[11] Li Y, Dai S. Finite Element Modelling of Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Responses in Two-Dimensional Dipping Anisotropic Conductivity Structures[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2011, 185(2):622-636.

[12] Wiik T, Ursin B, Hokstad K. 2.5 D EM Modelling in TIV Conductive Media and the Effect of Anisotropy in Normalized Amplitude Responses[J]. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):015006.

[13] 殷长春, 贲放, 刘云鹤, 等. 三维任意各向异性介质中海洋可控源电磁法正演研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(12):4110-4122. Yin Changchun, Ben Fang, Liu Yunhe, et al. MCSEM 3D Modeling for Arbitrarily Anisotropic Media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(12):4110-4122.

[14] Newman G A, Commer M, Carazzone J J. Imaging CSEM Data in the Presence of Electrical Anisotropy[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(2):F51-F61.

[15] Newman G A, Alumbaugh D L. Frequency-Domain Modelling of Airborne Electromagnetic Responses Using Staggered Finite Differences[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1995, 43(8):1021-1042.

[16] 翁爱华, 刘云鹤, 贾定宇, 等. 基于电场不连续边界条件的层状介质电磁格林函数计算[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2):603-609. Weng Aihua, Liu Yunhe, Jia Dingyu, et al. Compute Green Function from Discontinuity of Trangential Electrical Fields Inside Source Contained Boundary[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(2):603-609.

[17] Yin C. MMT Forward Modeling for a Layered Earth with Arbitrary Anisotropy[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(3):G115-G128.

[18] Weiss C J, Newman G A. Electromagnetic Induction in a Fully 3-D Anisotropic Earth[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(4):1104-1114.

[19] Freund R W. A Transpose-Free Quasi-Minimal Residual Algorithm for Non-Hermitian Linear Systems[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1993, 14(2):470-482.

[20] Løseth L O, Ursin B. Electromagnetic Fields in Planarly Layered Anisotropic Media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2007, 170(1):44-80.
[1] 崔扬, 刘洋, 李鹏, 刘璐, 陈佳伟.  海洋可控源电磁偶极子振荡噪声局部时频域阈值压制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1038-1050.
[2] 邵逸飞, 龚启舟, 许权 张越, 王言章, 王世隆. 基于八叉树网格的时间域航空电磁深切割地形三维正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2120-2131.
[3] 李航, 孙宇航, 李佳慧, 李学贵, 董宏丽, .

基于波动方程的地震波数值模拟研究综述 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 627-645.
[4] 龙刚, 沈金松, 苏朝阳, 冉尚. 电各向异性海底多金属硫化矿地层时域电磁响应模拟与特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 274-288.
[5] 嵇艳鞠, 邓昌伟, 王宇航, 刘航, 吴琼. 基于时域有限差分法的电性源感应-极化效应三维数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1373-1382.
[6] 雷松达, 王显祥, 刘遂明. 复杂地质条件下浅海区电性源瞬变电磁法三维响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 1016-1030.
[7] 张鑫崇, 殷长春.

基于Debye模型的时间域航空电磁激电效应正演模拟 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1573-1581.
[8] 张志佳, 孙章庆, 王瑞湖, 韩复兴, 陆济璞, 刘亚光, 岑文攀, 高正辉. 复杂地表起伏多重变加密网格有限差分法波动方程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 598-.
[9] 刘志强, 黄磊, 李钢柱, 许磊, 李文宝. 崎岖海底对下伏水平地层反射波特征的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 274-282.
[10] 韩丽, 胥铁潇, 金胜昔, 董文宇, 嵇艳鞠.

基于双电层模型的频域震电响应数值模拟 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 737-743.
[11] 王新宇, 严良俊, 毛玉蓉, 黄鑫, 谢兴兵, 周磊 .

起伏地形条件下长偏移距瞬变电磁三维正演 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 754-765.
[12] 韩复兴, 王若雯, 孙章庆, 高正辉. 地震声波数值模拟中人工边界条件的差别与组合[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 261-.
[13] 汪轩, 沈金松, 王志刚, 孙卫斌. 海洋可控源电磁数据的畸变校正与合成孔径源信号增强方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1872-1880.
[14] 岳崇旺, 王祝文. Kelvin-Voigt黏弹性介质井孔声场有限差分数值模拟与波形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1268-1275.
[15] 邵广周, 赵凯鹏, 吴华. 基于MPI的面波有限差分正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 294-303.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰，迟效国，周燕，王铁夫，金巍，周建波，董春艳，黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来，梁秀娟，崔建铭，兰盈盈,张君，李书兰，梁瑞奇，郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华，王璞珺，印长海，黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷，陈卓，孙文田，尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺，邵 锐，程日辉，张 斌，侯景涛，李金龙，边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明，任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发