吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 39-52.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160278

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例

李志明1,2,3,4, 张隽1,2,3,4, 鲍云杰1,2,3,4, 曹婷婷1,2,3,4, 徐二社1,2,3,4, 芮晓庆1,2,3,4, 陈红宇1,2,3,4, 杨琦1,2,3,4, 张庆珍1,2,3,4   

  1. 1. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏 无锡 214126;
    2. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏 无锡 214126;
    3. 国家能源页岩油研发中心, 江苏 无锡 214126;
    4. 中国石化油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏 无锡 214126
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-26 出版日期:2018-01-26 发布日期:2018-01-26
  • 作者简介:李志明(1968-),男,研究员,主要从事油气地球化学、油气地质综合评价研究,E-mail:lizm.syky@sinopec.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”计划)项目(2014CB239101);中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发部项目(P12012,P14157)

Characteristics of Petrology and Pore Configuration of Lacustrine Source Rock Rich in Organic Matter from the First Member of Shahejie Formation in Bonan Sag, Zhanhua Depression: A Case Study on Well Luo 63 and Yi 21 Cored Interval

Li Zhiming1,2,3,4, Zhang Jun1,2,3,4, Bao Yunjie1,2,3,4, Cao Tingting1,2,3,4, Xu Ershe1,2,3,4, Rui Xiaoqing1,2,3,4, Chen Hongyu1,2,3,4, Yang Qi1,2,3,4, Zhang Qingzhen1,2,3,4   

  1. 1. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, RIPEP, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
    3. State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
    4. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, SINOPEC, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2016-12-26 Online:2018-01-26 Published:2018-01-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Key Basic Research Program("973" Program) of China (2014CB239101)and Projects of Science and Technology Development Section, SINOPEC(P12012, P14157)

摘要: 以沾化凹陷渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙一段取心段为例,依据研究样品的热解、全岩与黏土矿物X射线衍射、有机岩石学、孔隙度、氩离子抛光+扫描电镜以及微孔隙结构等分析结果,开展了沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征研究,结果表明:罗63井和义21井沙一段取心段富有机质烃源岩主要由碳酸盐矿物、黏土矿物和石英组成,另含少量长石、黄铁矿和石膏,其中黏土矿物主要由伊/蒙混层、伊利石组成,由取心段顶部至底部,碳酸盐矿物质量分数明显增高,而黏土矿物和石英则显著降低,呈现由钙质或灰质泥岩至演变为泥质灰岩的特征,岩石构造类型包括层状、纹层状和块状3类;罗63井和义21井沙一段取心段富有机质烃源岩平均孔隙度分别为2.09%和4.43%,具纹层状构造的烃源岩具有相对高的孔隙度;主要发育矿物基质孔隙(即粒间孔隙和粒内孔隙)和裂缝型孔隙两大类,而有机质孔隙不发育,孔隙半径从十几微米至几纳米的孔隙均有分布,以发育孔径50 nm以上的宏孔为主。

关键词: 矿物组成, 孔隙结构, 富有机质烃源岩, 罗63井, 义21井, 沙一段, 渤南洼陷

Abstract: The paper focuses on the petrology and pore configuration of lacustrine source rock rich in organic matter, on the basis of the analysis of whole rock and clay mineral X-ray diffraction, organic petrology, maturity, porosity, argon ion polishing+SEM, and MP, through a case study of the First Member of Shahejie Formation from Well Luo 63 and Yi 21 cored interval in Bonan sag, Zhanhua depression. The results show that the source rock rich in organic matter is mainly composed of carbonate minerals, clay minerals and quartz, with a little feldspar, pyrite and gypsum, and the clay minerals are consisted of mixed layer of illite/smectite, and illite. From the top to the bottom of the cored interval, the contents of carbonate minerals increase, the clay minerals and quartz decrease, and the lithologic character changes from the calcareous mudstone to the argillaceous limestone. The source rocks are layered, or laminar and block like. The average porosity of the source rocks from the Well Yi 21 and Luo 63 is 2.09% and 4.43% respectively, and the porosity of the source rock with laminar structure is relatively high. The pore types of the source rock rich in organic matter are dominated by mineral matrix pores (inter-particleand intra-particle) and fracture pores with no organic-matter pores. The pore radius is from several nanometers to several micrometers, dominated by macro-pore with its pore diameter larger than 50 nanometers.

Key words: mineral component, pore configuration, source rock rich in organic matters, Well Luo 63, Well Yi 21, First Member of Shahejie Formation, Bonan sag

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 张善文,王永诗,张林晔,等. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷页岩油气形成条件研究[J]. 中国工程科学,2012, 14(6): 49-55. Zhang Shanwen, Wang Yongshi, Zhang Linye, et al. Formation Conditions of Shale Oil and Gas in Bonan Sub-Sag, Jiyang Depression[J]. China Engineering Sciences, 2012, 14(6): 49-55.
[2] 侯读杰,张善文,肖建新,等. 陆相断陷湖盆优质烃源岩形成机制与成藏贡献-以济阳坳陷为例[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2008:134-138. Hou Dujie, Zhang Shanwen, Xiao Jianxin, et al. The Forming Mechanism and Contribution to Reservoirs of High Grade Source Rocks in Continental Fault Depression with Lacustrine Sedimentation: A Case Study of Jiyang Depression[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2008: 134-138.
[3] 侯读杰,张善文,肖建新,等. 济阳坳陷优质烃源岩特征与隐蔽油气藏的关系分析[J]. 地学前缘,2008,15(2):137-146. Hou Dujie, Zhang Shanwen, Xiao Jianxin, et al. The Excellent Source Rocks and Accumulation of Stratigraphic and Lithologic Traps in the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(2): 137-146.
[4] 王永诗,李政,巩建强,等. 济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法: 以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(1):83-91. Wang Yongshi, Li Zheng, Gong Jianqiang, et al. Discussion on an Evaluation Method of Shale Oil and Gas in Jiyang Depression: A Case Study on Luojia Area in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1):83-91.
[5] 朱德顺,王勇,朱德燕,等. 渤南洼陷沙一段夹层型页岩油界定标准及富集主控因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2015,22(5):15-20. Zhu Deshun, Wang Yong, Zhu Deyan, et al. Analysis on Recognition Criteria and Enrichment Factors of Interlayer Shale Oil of Es1 in Bonan Sub-Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(5):15-20.
[6] 朱光有,金强,郭长春,等. 渤海湾盆地东营沾化凹陷油气聚集的差异性及控制因素[J]. 石油实验地质,2003,25(4):353-356. Zhu Guangyou, Jin Qiang, Guo Changchun, et al. Differences of Hydrocarbon Accumulations in the Dongying and the Zhanhua Depressions of the Bohaiwan Basin and Their Control Factors[J]. Petroleum Geoloogy & Experiment, 2003,25(4):353-356.
[7] 罗胜元. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷超压系统与油气成藏研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学,2014: 20-42. Luo Shengyuan. Study on the Overpressure Characteristic and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Bonan Depression, Zhanhua Sub-Basin[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2014: 20-42.
[8] 宋国奇,刘华,蒋有录,等. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙河街组原油成因类型及分布特征[J]. 石油实验地质,2014,36(1):33-38,45. Song Guoqi, Liu Hua, Jiang Youlu, et al. Genetic Types and Distribution Characteristics of Crude Oils from Shahejie Formation in Bonan Sub-Sag, Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(1): 33-38, 45.
[9] 刘华, 蒋有录,谷国翠,等. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷古近系压力特征及成因机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(4):46-51. Liu Hua, Jiang Youlu, Gu Guocui, et al. Pressure Characteristics and Formation Mechanisms of Paleogene in Bonan Sag, Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2013, 37(4):46-51.
[10] 戴俊生,陆克政,漆家福,等. 渤海湾盆地早第三纪构造样式的演化[J]. 石油学报,1998,19(4):16-20. Dai Junsheng, Lu Kezheng, Qi Jiafu, et al. The Evolution of the Paleogene Structural Styles in Bohai Gulf Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1998, 19(4):16-20.
[11] 张凡芹,王伟锋,戴俊生. 沾化凹陷断层活动性及其对层序发育的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2003,24(3):253-258. Zhang Fanqin, Wang Weifeng, Dai Junsheng. Fault Activities and Their Controls on the Development Lithologic Sequences in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003,24(3):253-258.
[12] 刘培,蒋有录,刘华,等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷断层活动与新近系油气成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):541-547. Liu Pei, Jiang Youlu, Liu Hua, et al. The Relationship Between Fault-Activity and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Neogene in Zhanhua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(3):541-547.
[13] 周心怀,牛成民,藤长宇. 环渤中地区新构造运动期断裂活动与油气成藏关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009,30(4):469-482. Zhou Xinhuai, Niu Chengmin, Teng Changyu. Relationship Between Faulting and Hydrocarbon Pooling During the Neotectonic Movement Around the Central Bohai Bay[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(4): 469-482.
[14] 池英柳,杨池银,周建生. 渤海湾盆地新生代断裂活动与含油气系统形成[J]. 勘探家,2000, 5(3):41-48. Chi Yingliu, Yang Chiyin, Zhou Jiansheng. Cenozoic Faulting and Its Influence on the Formation of Petroleum Systems in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Explorationist, 2000, 5(3): 41-48.
[15] 罗文生,张善文,王永诗,等. 渤南洼陷古近系-新近系断层活动与油气成藏[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2007,14(3):34-37. Luo Wensheng, Zhang Shanwen, Wang Yongshi, et al. Fault Activity and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Tertiary of Bonan Sub-Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2007, 14(3): 34-37.
[16] 王志刚. 沾化凹陷裂缝型泥质岩油藏研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2003,30(1):41-43. Wang Zhigang. A Study of Shale-Fractured Reservoirs in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003,30(1):41-43.
[17] 徐福刚,李琦,康仁华,等. 沾化凹陷泥岩裂缝油气藏研究[J]. 矿物岩石,2003,23(1):74-76. Xu Fugang, Li Qi, Kang Renhua, et al.The Characteristics of Fractured Shale Reservoir in Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of Mineral and Petrology, 2003,23(1):74-76.
[18] 智凤琴,李琦,樊德华,等. 沾化凹陷泥岩裂缝油气藏油气运移聚集研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2004,11(5):27-29. Zhi Fengqin, Li Qi, Fan Dehua, et al. Study on Migration and Accumulation of Oil and Gas in Fractured Shale Reservoir in Zhanhua Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004,11(5):27-29.
[19] 刘魁元,孙喜新,李琦,等. 沾化凹陷泥质岩储层中裂缝类型及其成因研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004, 28(4):12-15. Liu Kuiyuan, Sun Xixin, Li Qi, et al. Fracture Pattern and Genesis of Mudstone Reservoir in Zhanhua Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Sciences), 2004, 28(4): 12-15.
[20] 张美珍,李志明,秦建中,等. 东营凹陷有效烃源岩成熟度评价[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,23(3):12-16. Zhang Meizhen, Li Zhiming, Qin Jianzhong, et al. Assessment of the Thermal Maturity of the Effective Hydrocarbon Source Rocks in Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 23(3):12-16.
[21] 李志明,秦建中,徐旭辉,等. 镜质体反射率抑制与烃源岩质量关系: 以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩为例[J]. 石油实验地质,2008,30(3):276-280. Li Zhiming, Qin Jianzhong, Xu Xuhui, et al. The Relationship Between Vitrinite Reflectance Suppression and Source Rock Quality: A Case Study on Source Rocks from the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2008, 30(3):276-280.
[22] 李志明,张隽,余晓露,等. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷烃源岩成熟度厘定及其意义[J]. 石油实验地质,2013,35(1):76-80. Li Zhiming, Zhang Jun, Yu Xiaolu, et al. Determination of Maturity for Source Rocks in Biyang Sag of Nanxiang Basin and Its Significance[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013, 35(1):76-80.
[23] Wilkiins R W T, Wilmshurst J R, Russell N J, et al. Fluorescence Alteration and the Suppression of Vitrinite Reflectance[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1992, 18:629-640.
[24] Wilkiins R W T, Wilmshurst J R, Hladky G, et al. Should Fluorescence Alteration Replace Vitrinite Reflectance as a Major Tool for Thermal Maturity Determination in Oil Exploration?[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1995, 22:191-209.
[25] 赵澄林. 沉积学原理[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2001: 75. Zhao Chenglin. Principles of Sedimentology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001: 75.
[26] 王冠民,熊周海,张婕. 岩性差异对泥页岩可压裂性的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(4):1080-1089. Wang Guanmin, Xiong Zhouhai, Zhang Jie. The Impact of Lithology Differences to Shale Fracturing[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4): 1080-1089.
[27] 崔景伟,邹才能,朱如凯,等. 页岩孔隙研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2012,27(2):1319-1325. Cui Jingwei, Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, et al. New Advances in Shale Porosity Research[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27(2): 1319-1325.
[28] Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al. Spectrum of Pore Types and Networks in Mudrocks and a Descriptive Classification for Matrix-Related Mudrock Pores[J]. AAPG, 2012, 96(6):1071-1098.
[29] 李志明,芮晓庆,黎茂稳,等. 北美典型混合页岩油气系统特征和启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):1060-1072. Li Zhiming, Rui Xiaoqing, Li Maowen, et al. Characteristics of Typical Hybrid Shale-Oil System in North American and Its Implications[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(4): 1060-1072.
[1] 王梓麟, 时婧玥, 杨英, 徐栋, 曾泉树, 张益畅. 深层煤岩孔隙结构表征及压裂缝导流能力影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1061-1076.
[2] 路研, 刘宗宾, 廖新武, 李超, 王亚. 低渗透砂岩油藏水驱渗流特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1077-1090.
[3] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[4] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 马奎前, 路研, 刘超. 基于LDA协同SSOM算法的低渗透砂岩孔隙结构评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 298-311.
[5] 刘宗宾, 李超, 路研, 王亚, 黄建廷. 基于孔隙结构表征的低渗透砂岩流体赋存特征及渗透率评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1124-1136.
[6] 谢通, 陈威, 潘诗洋, 石万忠, 王亿, 张焱林, 段轲, 任志军. 鄂西地区二叠系大隆组含气页岩岩相类型及储层特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1154-1176.
[7] 张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[8] 熊安亮, 程国峰, 李东涛, 丁维盼, 刘宇羲, 陈刚, 杨磊, 袁耀利, 朱玉双, 刘林玉. 超低渗储层微观孔隙结构及剩余油分布特征——以吴起油田白豹地区长4+5为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1338-1351.
[9] 赵越, 李磊, 司运航, 王会敏. 浅层页岩气储层孔隙分形特征及控制因素——以云南昭通地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1813-1829.
[10] 黄鑫, 段冬平, 刘彬彬, 李炳颖, 丁芳, 王伟, 娄敏. 西湖凹陷花港组绿泥石成因及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 669-679.
[11] 张益明, 秦小英, 郭智奇, 牛聪, 王迪, 凌云. 针对致密砂岩气储层复杂孔隙结构的岩石物理模型及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 927-939.
[12] 吴蒙, 秦勇, 王晓青, 李国璋, 朱超, 朱士飞. 中国致密砂岩储层流体可动性及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 35-51.
[13] 魏博, 赵建斌, 魏彦巍, 李振林, 熊葵. 福山凹陷白莲流二段储层分类方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1639-1647.
[14] 杨坤, 王付勇, 曾繁超, 赵久玉, 王聪乐. 基于数字岩心分形特征的渗透率预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1003-1011.
[15] 王璐, 杨胜来, 彭先, 刘义成, 徐伟, 邓惠. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩气藏多类型储集层孔隙结构特征及储渗能力——以四川盆地高石梯-磨溪地区灯四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 947-958.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .