吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 665-677.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160304

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律

刘海1, 林承焰1, 张宪国1, 王宏伟2, 付晓亮2, 李佳1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580;
    2. 中国石油大港油田公司, 天津 300280
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-12 出版日期:2018-05-26 发布日期:2018-05-26
  • 作者简介:刘海(1986-),男,博士,主要从事油气储层地质方面的研究,E-mail:oceliu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41672129)

Reservoir Architecture and Remaining Oil Distribution in Braided River of Guantao Formation, Kongdian Oilfield

Liu Hai1, Lin Chengyan1, Zhang Xianguo1, Wang Hongwei2, Fu Xiaoliang2, Li Jia1   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences, Chinese University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    2. China National Petroleum Corporation, Tianjin 300280, China
  • Received:2017-09-12 Online:2018-05-26 Published:2018-05-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672129)

摘要: 孔店油田新近系馆陶组是该油田的重要储层,发育河流相沉积。其河流相砂体展布特征及连通关系复杂,导致注水开发过程中存在复杂的油水关系,进而控制剩余油的形成和分布。本文从储层构型的角度,综合应用测井、岩心等资料,确定了研究区馆三段沉积类型并建立了沉积模式;然后对储层构型进行精细刻画,对构型控制下的剩余油分布特征进行分析,总结了研究区剩余油的分布规律。研究认为:孔店油田馆三段为辫状河沉积体系,发育辫状河道、心滩、堤岸等主要构型要素。心滩是辫状河体系中最重要的油气富集单元,注水开发会影响并改变心滩内部剩余油分布形式;其内部发育泥质、钙质和物性3种类型的落淤层,平面上心滩可分为滩头、滩主体、滩尾和滩翼4个部分。其中:滩头落淤层保存较差;滩主体落淤层发育较好呈近水平产状;滩尾落淤层保存较好呈低角度倾斜状;滩翼落淤层受坡度影响,坡度较小则落淤层易被水流冲刷保存较差,坡度较大则底部落淤层保存较差但中上部落淤层可完整保存。解剖区心滩分析认为剩余油主要集中在落淤层发育较差滩左翼中部和落淤层遮挡作用明显的滩尾部。

关键词: 孔店油田, 馆陶组, 河流, 沉积特征, 储层构型, 剩余油分布

Abstract: The Guantao Formation (Neogene) is the most important reservoir in the Kongdian oilfield with fluvial facies developed. The complex distribution characteristics and connectivity of the fluvial sand bodies cause a complex relationship between oil and water in the process of water flooding, and which, in turn, control the formation and distribution of the remaining oil. Through the detailed study of the core and logging data, the sedimentary model of the Guantao Ⅲ Member in the study area was determined,and a detailed characterization of the reservoir architecture was completed. On the analysis of the reservoir architecture characteristics, the distribution types of remaining oil were summarized. The authors believe that the third member of Guantao Formation is a braided river with the elements of braided channel, central bar,and levee developed. The central bar is the most important oil and gas enrichment unit in the braided river sediments, and the distribution form of remaining oil can be influenced by water injection. Three types of the silting layers of muddy, calcium and silty exist in the strata. The central bar can be divided into four parts including bar head, bar main part, bar tail, and bar limbs. The silting layer in bar head is poorly preserved; The silting layer in bar main part is preserved relatively complete in a nearly horizontal shape; The silting layer with a low angle in bar tail is preserved relatively well; The silting layer in bar limb is influenced by slope, preserved well in a steepslope but poor in a gentle slope. The remaining oil in a central bar of anatomy area is mainly concentrated in the middle part of the left bar limb and the bar tail that is blocked by a silting layer.

Key words: Kongdian oilfield, Guantao Formation, fluvial, sedimentary characteristics, reservoir architecture, distribution of remaining oil

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 韩大匡.准确预测剩余油相对富集区提高油田注水采收率研究[J].石油学报, 2007,28(2):73-78. Han Dakuang. Precisely Predicting Abundant Remaining Oil and Improving the Secondary Recovery of Mature Oilfields[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(2):73-78.
[2] 孙天建,穆龙新,吴向红,等.砂质辫状河储层构型表征方法:以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例[J].石油学报, 2014,35(4):715-724. Sun Tianjian, Mu Longxin, Wu Xianghong, et al. A Quantitative Method for Architecture Characterization of Sandy Braided-River Reservoirs:Taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an Example[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(4):715-724.
[3] 刘钰铭,侯加根,宋保全,等.辫状河厚砂层内部夹层表征:以大庆喇嘛甸油田为例[J].石油学报, 2011,32(5):836-841. Liu Yuming, Hou Jiagen, Song Baoquan, et al. Characterization of Interlayers Within Braided-River Thick Sandstones:A Case Study on the Lamadian Oilfield in Daqing[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(5):836-841.
[4] 岳大力,吴胜和,刘建民.曲流河点坝地下储层构型精细解剖方法[J].石油学报, 2007,28(4):99-103. Yue Dali, Wu Shenghe, Liu Jianmin. An Accurate Method for Anatomizing Architecture of Subsurface Reservoir in Point Bar of Meandering River[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(4):99-103.
[5] 吴胜和,岳大力,刘建民,等.地下古河道储层构型的层次建模研究[J].中国科学:D辑:地球科学, 2008,8(增刊1):111-121. Wu Shenghe, Yue Dali, Liu Jianmin, et al. Hierarchical Modeling of Reservoir Architecture of Underground Ancient Channel[J]. Science in China:Series D:Earth Sciences, 2008, 8(Sup.1):111-121.
[6] 马世忠,孙雨,范广娟,等.地下曲流河道单砂体内部薄夹层建筑结构研究方法[J].沉积学报, 2008,26(4):632-639. Ma Shizhong, Sun Yu, Fan Guangjuan, et al. The Method for Studying Thin Interbed Architecture of Burial Meandering Channel Sandbody[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2008, 26(4):632-639.
[7] 林煜,吴胜和,王星,等.深水浊积朵叶储层构型模式研究[J].天然气地球科学, 2014,25(8):1197-1204. Lin Yu, Wu Shenghe, Wang Xing, et al. Research on Reservoir Architecture Models of Deep-Water Turbidite Lobes[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(8):1197-1204.
[8] 杨少春,赵晓东,钟思瑛,等.辫状河心滩内部非均质性及对剩余油分布的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,46(3):1066-1074. Yang Shaochun, Zhao Xiaodong, Zhong Siying, et al. Inner HeterogeneityWithin Braided Bar of Braided River Reservoir and Its Influence on Remaining Oil Distribution[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2015, 46(3):1066-1074.
[9] 李顺明,宋新民,蒋有伟,等.高尚堡油田砂质辫状河储集层构型与剩余油分布[J].石油勘探与开发, 2011,38(4):474-482. Li Shunming, Song Xinmin, Jiang Youwei, et al. Architecture and Remaining Oil Distribution of the Sandy Braided River Reservoir in the Gaoshangpu Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(4):474-482.
[10] 邓智浩,尹太举,罗瑜洁,等.基于沉积过程点坝内部结构对剩余油分布影响:以大庆油田萨北地区为例[J].科学技术与工程, 2014,14(32):1671-1815. Deng Zhihao, Yin Taiju, Luo Yujie, et al. Influence of Point Bar Internal Structure on Remaining Oil Distribution Based on the Depositional Process[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(32):1671-1815.
[11] 赵伦,王进财,陈礼,等.三角洲砂体构型对水驱波及特征的影响:以南图尔盖盆地Kumkol South油田J-Ⅱ层为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2017,44(3):407-414. Zhao Lun, Wang Jincai, Chen Li, et al. Influences of Delta Sandstone Architecture on Waterflooding Sweep Characteristics:A case Study of Layer J-Ⅱ of Kumkol South Oilfield in South Turgay Basin, Kazakstan[J]. Petroleum Exporation and Develeopment, 2017, 44(3):407-414.
[12] 侯加根,刘钰铭,徐芳,等.黄骅坳陷孔店油田新近系馆陶组辫状河砂体构型及含油气性差异成因[J].古地理学报, 2008,10(5):459-464. Hou Jiagen, Liu Yuming, Xu Fang, et al. Architecture of Braided Fluvial Sandbody and Origin for Petroliferous Difference of the Guantao Formation of Neogene in Kongdian Oilfield of Huanghua Depression[J]. Journal of Paleogeography, 2008, 10(5):459-464.
[13] 祁鹏,任建业,卢刚臣,等.渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷中北区新生代幕式沉降过程[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2010,35(6):1041-1051. Qi Peng, Ren Jianye, Lu Gangchen, et al. Cenozoic Episodic Subsidence in the Middle and North Part of Huanghua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University o f Geosciences, 2010, 35(6):1041-1051.
[14] 张建坤,杨国涛,吴吉忠,等.黄骅坳陷北部马头营凸起馆陶组砂体成因及展布特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017,47(1):48-60. Zhang Jiankun, Yang Guotao, Wu Jizhong, et al. Genesis and Distribution Characteristics of Sandstone Bodies in the Guantao Formation of Matouying Uplift, the Northern Huanghua Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1):48-60.
[15] 叶琳,张俊霞,卢刚臣,等.黄骅坳陷孔南地区古近纪构造:地层格架和幕式演化过程[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2013,38(2):379-389. Ye Lin, Zhang Junxia, Lu Gangchen, et al. Paleogene Structure-Stratigraphic Framework and Multiple Episode Evolution in Kongnan Area, Huanghua Depression[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University o f Geosciences, 2013, 38(2):379-389.
[16] 谭程鹏,于兴河,李胜利,等.辫状河-曲流河转换模式探讨:以准噶尔盆地南缘头屯河组露头为例[J].沉积学报, 2014,32(3):450-458. Tan Chengpeng, Yu Xinghe, Li Shengli, et al. Discussion on the Model of Braided River Transform to Meandering River:As an Example of Toutunhe Formation in Southern Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(3):450-458.
[17] 陈清华,曾明,章凤奇,等.河流相储层单一河道的识别及其对油田开发的意义[J].油气地质与采收率, 2004,11(3):13-15. Chen Qinghua, Zeng Ming, Zhang Fengqi, et al. Identification of Single Channel in Fluvial Reservoir and Its Significance to the Oilfield Development[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2004, 11(3):13-15.
[18] 张勇,国景星.辫状河心滩特征及其与河道充填的识别:以大芦家地区馆三段为例[J].石油天然气学报, 2011,32(10):25-29. Zhang Yong, Guo Jingxing. Characteristics of Channel Island in Braided River Sedimentary Facies and Difference with Channel Filling:By Taking Dalujia Ng3 in Linpan Oilfield for Example[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2011, 32(10):25-29.
[19] 陈玉琨,吴胜和,王延杰,等.常年流水型砂质辫状河心滩坝内部落淤层展布样式探讨[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2015,35(1):96-101. Chen Yukun, Wu Shenghe, Wang Yanjie, et al. Distribution Patterns of the Fall-Siltseams in the Channel Bar of the Perennial Sandy Braided River:An Approach[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2015, 35(1):96-101.
[20] 印森林,吴胜和,徐长福,等.砂砾质辫状河沉积露头渗流地质差异分析:以准噶尔盆地西北缘三叠系克上组露头为例[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2014,43(2):286-293. Yin Senlin, Wu Shenghe, Xu Changfu, et al. Percolation Differences of Sedimentaty Outcrop in Sand-Gravel Braided River:A Case Study of Triassic Upper Karamay Formation Outcrop in the Northwest Edge of Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2014, 43(2):286-293.
[21] 单敬福,张吉,王继平,等.苏里格气田西区盒8下亚段辫状河沉积论证与分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015,45(6):1597-1607. Shan Jingfu, Zhang Ji,Wang Jiping, et al. Dementration and Analysis of Braided River Deposition in the Lower He 8 Member in Western Sulige Gas Field[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(6):1597-1607.
[22] 陈玉琨,吴胜和,毛平,等.砂质辫状河储集层构型表征:以大港油区羊三木油田馆陶组为例[J].新疆石油地质, 2012,33(5):523-526. Chen Yukun, Wu Shenghe, Mao Ping, et al. Characterization of Sandy Braided River Reservoir Configuration:An Example from Guantao Formation in Yangsanmu Oilfield, Dagang Oil Region[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2012, 33(5):523-526.
[1] 郭敬民, 陈建波, 张章, 谭捷, 曲炳昌. 渤海湾C油田馆陶组Ⅲ段低电阻率油层成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 721-730.
[2] 刘廷玺, 赵心毓, 段利民, 王怡璇, 黎明扬, 李媛康.

锡林河流域草原生态系统地上生物量时空分布特征及其影响因子 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 604-618.

[3] 洪梅, 赵明明, 魏涛, 林豪栋. 基于SWAT模型的滏阳河流域断流河道复流研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 253-263.
[4] 罗超, 李晓颜, 刘渠洋, 张强, 于洲, 代洁, 尹楠鑫, 林魂. 砂质辫状河储层构型差异特征分析——以苏里格气田盒8下亚段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 30-43.
[5] 张斌, 陈圣波, 张梦娇, 张玉峰, 张澜, 赵秀影. 苏子河流域土地利用变化对大伙房水库水量的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 320-327.
[6] 刘强, 汤民强, 贺惠忠, 李正元, 刘文潇. 广东阳西沙扒海域埋藏古河道沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1791-1799.
[7] 薛辉, 韩春元, 朱萍, 汤小琪, 杨经栋, 窦连彬. 金坛储气库阜宁组四段含盐层系沉积特征及成盐模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 363-381.
[8] 杜新强, 王钰升, 冶雪艳, 路莹, 赵婧彤, 张赫轩. 大清河流域平原区地下水人工补给潜力与补给方式分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 535-549.
[9] 王鑫, 林承焰, 马存飞, 陈柄屹, 杜凯, 李志鹏. 东营凹陷北部陡坡带利563区块沙四上亚段砂砾岩扇体沉积特征及沉积模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 705-720.
[10] 陈秀艳, 王剑, 张立平, 马德波, 周波. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区石炭系东河砂岩段碳酸盐胶结物沉积特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 509-517.
[11] 鄢伟, 张光学, 樊太亮, 夏斌, 高志前, 张莉, 杨振, 强坤生. 塔里木盆地塔中—顺托果勒地区奥陶系良里塔格组碳酸盐岩颗粒滩沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 621-636.
[12] 赵佳琦, 高有峰, 刘海波, 王清斌, 张艳, 王璞珺. 辽西北票盆地中侏罗统海房沟组砾岩沉积特征与成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 650-661.
[13] 范廷恩, 王海峰, 张晶玉, 汤婧, 高玉飞, 于斌. 基于中期旋回洪泛面的河流相地层等时划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1316-1329.
[14] 瞿雪姣, 李继强, 张吉, 赵忠军, 戚志林, 罗超. 辫状河致密砂岩储层构型单元定量表征方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1342-1352.
[15] 张建坤, 杨国涛, 吴吉忠, 吴鑫, 王方鲁. 黄骅坳陷北部马头营凸起馆陶组砂体成因及展布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 48-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .