侧向测井电极系结构影响分析及阵列化测量新方法

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201606306

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对目前广泛使用的侧向测井电极系结构和聚焦方式，利用有限元数值模拟方法研究了三种常见的侧向测井电极系结构对电极系数、井眼影响系数、径向探测深度的影响；对比硬件聚焦中监督电极残余电位差对测井响应的影响，引入聚焦系数，提出了一种利用软件聚焦实现阵列化测量的新方法；利用Oklamoha标准地层模型验证了方法的正确性。结果表明，不同电极系结构和电极系的不同部分对测井响应的作用不同，其中电极系绝缘部分长度对探测特性的影响很大，在电极系设计过程中应重视绝缘尺寸对探测特性的影响。采用软件聚焦方式，不仅消除了硬件聚焦方式中残余电位差的影响，而且在不改变双侧向电极系结构的基础上，选择聚焦系数为0~1.1，得到了不同径向探测深度的测井曲线，实现了类似于阵列侧向测井中的阵列化测量。测量结果表明，电极系数随着聚焦系数的增大而减小，井眼影响系数保持在0.80~1.16，并提高了径向探测能力，最大探测深度达到2.0 m以上，获得更丰富的地层电阻率分布信息。

关键词: 侧向测井, 电极系结构, 软件聚焦, 聚焦系数, 有限元方法, 电阻率

Abstract: Based on the widely used electrode array structures and focusing ways in laterolog, effects of three conventional electrode array structures on electrode coefficient, borehole effect and radial investigation have been studied systematically using the finite element method. In addition, we have analyzed the effects of hardware focusing way and software focusing way on logging responses using the contrast of vision. An array measurement method using software focusing has been presented simultaneously, which had been tested using the Oklamoha standard formation. The results show that different electrode array structures and different parts have various effects on the detection characteristics. The status of insulator section should be attached great importance to, because their influence on detection characteristics is extraordinary obvious. The software way not only eliminates the negative influence of remainder potential difference in hardware focusing way, but also realizes array measurement similar to the array laterolog based on the importing of focusing coefficient with the range of 0-1.1, nevertheless, the electrode structure is consistent with the dual laterolog. The electrode coefficient decreases with the increase of focusing coefficient, borehole effect correction ranges from 0.8 to 1.16 and this method improves the radial investigation depth with the largest one exceeding 2.0 m, obtaining more abundant radial formation resistivity information.

Key words: laterolog, electrode array structure, software focusing, focusing coefficient, finite element method, resistivity

中图分类号:

P631.8

高建申, 孙建孟, 姜艳娇, 崔利凯. 侧向测井电极系结构影响分析及阵列化测量新方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1874-1883.

Gao Jianshen, Sun Jianmeng, Jiang Yanjiao, Cui Likai. Effect of Electrode Array Structures in Laterolog and a New Array Measurement Method[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6): 1874-1883.

参考文献

[1] Suau J, Grimaldi P, Poupon A, et al. The Dual La-terolog: R_xo Tool[C]//Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME. San Antonio: Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc, 1972: 1-44.
[2] Davies D H,Faivre O, Gounot M T. Azimuthal Re-sistivity Imaging: A New-Generation Laterolog[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1994, 9(3): 165-174.
[3] Smits J, Benimeli D, Dubourg I, et al. High Re-solution from a New Laterolog with Azimuthal Imaging[C]//Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas: Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc, 1995: 563-576.
[4] Smits J, Dubourg I, Luling M G, et al. Improved Resistivity Interpretation Utilizing a New Array Laterolog Tool and Associated Inversion Processing[C]//Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans: Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc, 1998: 831-843.
[5] Itskovich G, Mezzatesta A, Strack K, et al. High-Definition Lateral Log-Resistivity Device: Basic Physics and Resolution[C]//SPWLA 39th Annual Logging Symposium. Keystone: Society of Petrophysicists & Well Log Analysts, 1998:1-12.
[6] Li S J, Martin L E S, Bittar S M, et al. Multi-Array Laterolog Tools and Methods with Differential Voltage Measurements: US Patent, 2013/0234718 A1[P]. 2013:9-12.
[7] 朱军, 冯琳伟, 李剑浩, 等. 一种新型的高分辨率双侧向测井方法[J]. 测井技术, 2007, 31(2):118-123. Zhu Jun, Feng Linwei, Li Jianhao, et al. A New High Resolution Dual Laterolog Logging Method[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2007,31(2):118-123.
[8] 童茂松, 宋建华. 0.2 m分辨率双侧向测井仪器数值模拟[J]. 地球物理学进展,2014, 29(5):2251-2257. Tong Maosong, Song Jianhua. Numeric Simulation of 0.2 m Vertical-Resolution Dual Laterolog Tool[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(5): 2251-2257.
[9] 贺飞, 马骁, 冯琳伟, 等. HAL6505阵列侧向测井仪[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2013, 32(2): 59-62. He Fei, Ma Xiao, Feng Linwei, et al. HAL6505 Array Laterolog Logging Tool[J]. Oil Forum, 2013, 32(2): 59-62.
[10] 朱军, 黄继贞, 汪功礼, 等. 贴井壁方位电阻率测井研究[C]//第十二届测井年会论文集. 北京:石油工业出版社,2001: 68-73. Zhu Jun, Huang Jizhen, Wang Gongli, et al. Sidewall Way Azimuthal Resistivity Logging[C]//The 12th Logging Symposium Proceedings. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001: 68-73.
[11] Yin C F, Ke S Z, Xu Wei, et al. 3D Laterolog Array Sonde Design and Response Simulation[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2014,11(2): 223-234.
[12] 丁柱, 陈国华, 王艳梅, 等. 数值合成聚焦原理及算法实现[J]. 国外测井技术, 2001, 16(2): 8-9. Ding Zhu, Chen Guohua, Wang Yanmei, et al. Numerical Synthesis Focusing Principle and Algorithm Implementation[J]. Foreign Well Logging Technology, 2001, 16(2): 8-9.
[13] 胡海涛, 白庆杰, 肖占山, 等. 基于合成聚焦的高分辨率侧向测井仪数值模拟研究[J].地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(5): 2178-2182. Hu Haitao, Bai Qingjie, Xiao Zhanshan, et al. Numerical Simulation of High Resolution Laterolog Tool Based on Computed Focusing[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(5): 2178-2182.
[14] 祝鹏, 林承焰, 李智强, 等. 水平井和大斜度井中阵列侧向测井响应数值模拟[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1862-1869. Zhu Peng, Lin Chengyan, Li Zhiqiang, et al. Numerical Simulation of Array Laterolog Response in Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(6): 1862-1869.
[15] 李大潜,郑宋穆,谭永基,等. 有限元素在电法测井中的应用[M].北京: 石油工业出版社, 1980. Li Daqian, Zheng Songmu, Tan Yongji, et al. The Application of Finite-Element Method in Electric Well Logging[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1980.
[16] 张庚骥. 电法测井[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1992. Zhang Gengji. Electrical Logging[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1992.
[17] 梁晓成, 宋建华, 苑娜. 软件聚焦在双侧向测井仪器中的应用[J]. 电子世界, 2013(17):116. Liang Xiaocheng, Song Jianhua, Yuan Na. Application of Software Focusing in Dual Laterolog Instrument[J]. Electronics World, 2013(17): 116.
[18] Gao G Z. Simulation of Borehole Electromagnetic Measurements in Dipping and Anisotropic Rock Formations and Inversion of Array Induction Data[D]. Austin: the University of Texas at Austin, 2005.

相关文章 15

[1]	黄玉龙, 张皓, 郭强, 陈昌. 低阻玄武岩的矿物学特征及其油气地质意义——以辽河坳陷古近系为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 511-521.
[2]	刘长胜, 高菲. 基于地空频率域电磁法的深部地层极化效应探测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 366-376.
[3]	柳杰, 刘海飞, 李星, 赵莹杰, 张宇豪, 李小强, 柳建新. 受限观测场地三维电阻率层析成像[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1309-1320.
[4]	孙旭东, 马举举, 凌嘉宣, 杨化军, 马强, 李昆. 侵入岩模型直流电响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1321-1335.
[5]	郭敬民, 陈建波, 张章, 谭捷, 曲炳昌. 渤海湾C油田馆陶组Ⅲ段低电阻率油层成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 721-730.
[6]	李建光, 孙超, 蔡来星, 屈少波, 童雪瑞, 窦中浩, 姜志海. 煤系岩石电性特征与含水饱和度定量关系实验——以山西宁武榆树坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1724-1735.
[7]	宋俊磊, 周丹, 肖国强, 周华敏, 董凯锋, 晋芳, 莫文琴, 惠亚娟. 面向渗漏探测的堤防磁场分布特性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1362-1372.
[8]	徐俊杰, 陈松, 刘广宁, 刘道涵, 余绍文. 鄱阳湖湖滨多宝沙山成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1383-1395.
[9]	胡向阳, 秦敏, 张恒荣, 杨冬, 袁伟. 基于SVR的定向井随钻电磁波测井层厚影响快速计算[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 589-.
[10]	叶青, 王晓, 杜学彬, 解滔, 范晔, 周振贵, 刘高川. 中国地震井下地电阻率研究进展 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 669-683.
[11]	范雨霏, 潘保芝, 郭宇航, 张丽华. 利用数字岩心技术评价含黏土砂岩导电模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 919-926.
[12]	周越, 曾昭发, 唐海燕, 张建民, 何滔. 公路勘察中滑坡体的地球物理特征与分析——以张榆线公路勘察为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 638-644.
[13]	秦敏, 申辉林, 丁磊, 刘欢, 黄信雄, 章利民. 基于微元动态物质平衡法模型确定水淹层混合液电阻率[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 919-928.
[14]	束龙仓, 王明昭, 张惠潼, 张含明, 张乃鹏, 孙影, 孙超, 袁鹏杰. 咸淡水界面位置确定的综合方法(TEcG)及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1706-1713.
[15]	朱广祥, 郭秀军, 余乐, 孙翔, 贾永刚. 高黏粒含量海洋土电阻率特征分析及模型构建[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1457-1465.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed