吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 411-419.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170061
李建平, 翁爱华, 李世文, 李大俊, 李斯睿, 杨悦, 唐裕, 张艳辉
Li Jianping, Weng Aihua, Li Shiwen, Li Dajun, Li Sirui, Yang Yue, Tang Yu, Zhang Yanhui
摘要: 为了计算全球尺度电磁感应的响应,本文介绍地磁测深频率域三维正演。正演算法采用球坐标系下的交错网格有限差分方法,从Maxwell方程的积分形式出发,采用PARDISO对离散后的方程组求解,避免了迭代求解的散度校正。为了验证本文结果的正确性和精度,与前人的有限元和有限差分方法进行了对比,一维层状模型的三维交错网格有限差分数值结果和解析解相对误差小于5%,双半球模型的计算结果与前人的计算结果完全吻合。三维"棋盘模型"计算表明磁场分量对异常体的大小和位置具有很好的分辨能力。
中图分类号:
| [1] Karato S I. Remote Sensing of Hydrogen in Earth's Mantle[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry, 2006, 62(1):343-375. [2] Schultz A. On the Vertical Gradient and Associated Heterogeneity in Mantle Electrical Conductivity[J]. Phys Earth Planet Int,1990, 64(1):68-86. [3] Utada H, Koyama T, Obayashi M, et al. A Joint Interpretation of Electromagnetic and Seismic Tomography Models Suggests the Mantle Transition Zone Below Europe is Dry[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2009, 281(3/4):249-257. [4] Shimizu H, Utada H, Baba K, et al. Three-Dimen-sional Imaging of Electrical Conductivity in the Mantle Transition Zone Beneath the North Pacific Ocean by a Semi-Global Induction Study[J]. Phys Earth Planet Int, 2010, 183(1/2):252-269. [5] Semenov A,Kuvshinov A. Global 3-D Imaging of Mantle Conductivity Based on Inversion of Observatory C-Responses:Ⅱ:Data Analysis and Results[J]. Geophysical Journal International,2012, 191(3):965-992. [6] Kelbert A,Schultz A,Egbert G. Global Electromag-netic Induction Constraints on Transition-Zone Water Content Variations[J]. Nature, 2009, 460:1003-1006. [7] Huang X,Xu Y,Karato S I. Water Content in the Transition Zone from Electrical Conductivity of Wadsleyite and Ringwoodite[J]. Nature, 2005, 434:746-749. [8] Yoshino T,Manthilake G,Matsuzaki T,et al. Dry Mantle Transition Zone Inferred from the Conductivity of Wadsleyite and Ringwoodite[J]. Nature, 2008, 451:326-329. [9] Sun J,Egbert G. A Thin-Sheet Model for Global Electromagnetic Induction[J]. Geophysical Journal International,2012, 189(1):343-356. [10] Schmucker U. A Spherical Harmonic Analysis of Solar Daily Variations in the Years 1964-1965:Response Estimates and Source Fields for Global Induction:I:Methods[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1999, 136(2):439-454. [11] Koyama T, Khan A, Kuvshinov A. Three-Dimen-sional Electrical Conductivity Structure Beneath Australia from Inversion of Geomagnetic Observatory Data:Evidence for Lateral Variations in Transition-Zone Temperature, Water Content and Melt[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2014, 196(3):1330. [12] Kuvshinov A. 3-D Global Induction in the Oceans and Solid Earth:Recent Progress in Modeling Magnetic and Electric Fields from Sources of Magnetospheric, Ionospheric and Oceanic Origin[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2008, 29(2):139-186. [13] Everett M E,Schultz A. Geomagnetic Induction in a Heterogeneous Sphere:Azimuthally Symmetric Test Computations and the Response of an Undulating 600-km Discontinuity[J]. J Geophys of Research Atmospheres, 1996, 101(B2):2765-2783. [14] Yoshimura R,Oshiman N. Edge-Based Finite Element Approach to the Simulation of Geoelectromagnetic Induction on a 3-D Sphere[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2002, 29(3):1-4. [15] Ribaudo J T,Constable C G,Parker R L. Scripted Finite Element Tools for Global Electromagnetic Induction Studies[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2012, 188(2):435-446. [16] Uyeshima M,Schultz A. Geoelectromagnetic Induc-tion in a Heterogeneous Sphere:A New Three-Dimensional Forward Solver Using a Conservative Staggered-Grid Finite Difference Method[J]. Geophysical Journal International,2000, 140(3):636-650. [17] Kelbert A, Egbert G D, Schultz A. Non-Linear Conjugate Gradient Inversion for Global EM Induction:Resolution Studies[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2008, 173(2):365-381. [18] Weiss C J. Triangulated Finite Difference Methods for Global-Scale Electromagnetic Induction Simulations of Whole Mantle Electrical Heterogeneity[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems,2010,11(11):129-143. [19] Tarits P, Mande A M. The Heterogeneous Electrical Conductivity Structure of the Lower Mantle[J]. Physics of the Earth & Planetary Interiors, 2010, 183(1/2):115-125. [20] Martinec Z. Spectral-Finite Element Approach to Three-Dimensional Electromagnetic Induction in a Spherical Earth[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1999, 136(1):229-250. [21] Velímsk J, Martinec Z. Time-Domain, Spherical Harmonic-Finite Element Approach to Transient Three-Dimensional Geomagnetic Induction in a Spherical Heterogeneous Earth[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2005, 161(1):81-101. [22] Kelbert A, Kuvshinov A, Velímsk J, et al. Global 3-D Electromagnetic Forward Modelling:A Benchmark Study[J]. Geophysical Journal Internationa,2014, 197(2):785-814. [23] 陈伯舫. 中国东南部地幔高导层的埋藏深度[J]. 地震学报, 1986,8(2):172-178. Chen Bofang. Buried Depth of the High Conductivity Layer Beneath the Region of South-East China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica,1986, 8(2):172-178. [24] 杜兴信, 鲁秀玲. 用单台Z/H法研究陕西地区深部电导率[J]. 内陆地震, 1994,8(4):333-338. Du Xingxin, Lu Xiuling. Investigation on Deep Electroconductivity of Shaanxi Region by Means of Z/H Method with Single Station[J]. Inland Earthquake,1994, 8(4):333-338. [25] 范国华, 姚同起, 顾左文,等. 利用磁梯度法研究我国地幔导电率[J]. 地震学报, 1997,19(2):164-173. Fan Guohua, Yao Tongqi, Gu Zuowen, et al. Research on Mantle Conductivity of China with Gradient Method[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1997, 19(2):164-173. [26] 赵国泽,汤吉,梁竞阁,等. 用大地电磁网法在长春等地探测上地幔电导率结构[J]. 地震地质,2001, 23(2):143-152. Zhao Guoze,Tang Ji,Liang Jingge,et al. Measurement of Network-MT in Two Areas of NE China for Study of Upper Mantle Conductivity Structure of the Back-Arc Region[J]. Seismology and Geology,2001, 23(2):143-152. [27] 徐光晶,汤吉,黄清华,等. 华北地区上地幔及过渡带电性结构研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2015, 58(2):566-575. Xu Guangjing,Tang Ji,Huang Qinghua,et al. Study on the Conductivity Structure of the Upper Mantle and Transition Zone Beneath North China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2015, 58(2):566-575. [28] Rokityansky I I. Geoelectromagnetic Investigation of the Earth's Crust and Mantle[M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1982. [29] 李大俊,翁爱华,杨悦,等. 地-井瞬变电磁三维交错网格有限差分正演及响应特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5):1552-1561. Li Dajun, Weng Aihua, Yang Yue,et al. Three-Dimension Forward Modeling and Characteristics for Surface-Borehole Transient Electromagnetic by Using Staggered-Grid Finite Difference Method[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(5):1552-1561. [30] Smith J T. Conservative Modeling of 3-D Electromag-netic Fields:Part 1:Properties and Error Analysis[J]. Geophysics, 1996, 61(5):1308-1318. [31] Schultz A,Larsen J C. On the Electrical Conductivity of the Mid-Mantle:I:Calculation of Equivalent Scalar Magnetotelluric Response Functions[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1987, 88(3):733-761. [32] Schmucker U. Substitute Conductors for Electromag-netic Response Estimates[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1987, 125(2):341-367. [33] Fujii I, Schultz A. The 3D Electromagnetic Response of the Earth to Ring Current and Auroral Oval Excitation[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2002, 151(3):689-709. [34] Medin A E,Parker R L,Constable S. Making Sound Inferences from Geomagnetic Sounding[J]. Physics of the Earth & Planetary Interiors, 2007, 160(1):51-59. [35] 李世文,翁爱华,李建平,等. 浅部约束的地磁测深C-响应一维反演[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017,60(3):1201-1210. Li Shiwen, Weng Aihua, Li Jianping, et al. 1-D Inversion of C-Response Data from Geomagnetic Depth Sounding with Shallow Resistivity Constraint[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 201760(3):1201-1210. [36] Shimizu H, Koyama T, Baba K. Three-Dimensional Geomagnetic Response Functions for Global and Semi-Global Scale Induction Problems[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2009, 178(1):123-144. |
| [1] | 邵逸飞, 龚启舟, 许权 张越, 王言章, 王世隆. 基于八叉树网格的时间域航空电磁深切割地形三维正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2120-2131. |
| [2] | 李航, 孙宇航, 李佳慧, 李学贵, 董宏丽, . 基于波动方程的地震波数值模拟研究综述 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 627-645. |
| [3] | 龙刚, 沈金松, 苏朝阳, 冉尚. 电各向异性海底多金属硫化矿地层时域电磁响应模拟与特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 274-288. |
| [4] | 嵇艳鞠, 邓昌伟, 王宇航, 刘航, 吴琼. 基于时域有限差分法的电性源感应-极化效应三维数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1373-1382. |
| [5] | 雷松达, 王显祥, 刘遂明. 复杂地质条件下浅海区电性源瞬变电磁法三维响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 1016-1030. |
| [6] | 张鑫崇, 殷长春. 基于Debye模型的时间域航空电磁激电效应正演模拟 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1573-1581. |
| [7] | 张志佳, 孙章庆, 王瑞湖, 韩复兴, 陆济璞, 刘亚光, 岑文攀, 高正辉. 复杂地表起伏多重变加密网格有限差分法波动方程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 598-. |
| [8] | 刘志强, 黄磊, 李钢柱, 许磊, 李文宝. 崎岖海底对下伏水平地层反射波特征的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 274-282. |
| [9] | 韩丽, 胥铁潇, 金胜昔, 董文宇, 嵇艳鞠. 基于双电层模型的频域震电响应数值模拟 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 737-743. |
| [10] | 王新宇, 严良俊, 毛玉蓉, 黄鑫, 谢兴兵, 周磊 . 起伏地形条件下长偏移距瞬变电磁三维正演 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 754-765. |
| [11] | 韩复兴, 王若雯, 孙章庆, 高正辉. 地震声波数值模拟中人工边界条件的差别与组合[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 261-. |
| [12] | 岳崇旺, 王祝文. Kelvin-Voigt黏弹性介质井孔声场有限差分数值模拟与波形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1268-1275. |
| [13] | 邵广周, 赵凯鹏, 吴华. 基于MPI的面波有限差分正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 294-303. |
| [14] | 刘明忱, 孙建国, 韩复兴, 孙章庆, 孙辉, 刘志强. 基于自适应加权广义逆矢量方向滤波估计地震同相轴倾角[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 881-889. |
| [15] | 殷长春, 卢永超, 刘云鹤, 张博, 齐彦福, 蔡晶. 多重网格准线性近似技术在三维航空电磁正演模拟中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 252-260. |
|