构造裂缝产状演化规律表征方法及其应用

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201701108

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 84-94.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201701108

构造裂缝产状演化规律表征方法及其应用

刘敬寿^1,2,3, 戴俊生⁴, 徐珂⁴, 张艺⁵, 丁文龙^1,2,3

1. 中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国地质大学(北京)海相储层演化与油气富集机理教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
3. 中国地质大学(北京)页岩气勘查与评价国土资源部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
4. 中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院, 山东青岛 266555;
5. 中国石油新疆油田分公司风城油田作业区, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2016-04-23 出版日期:2017-01-26 发布日期:2017-01-26
通讯作者: 丁文龙(1965),男,教授、博士生导师,主要从事石油构造分析与控油作用、非常规油气构造和裂缝及其与含气量关系等方面的研究,E-mail:dingwenlong2006@126.com E-mail:dingwenlong2006@126.com
作者简介:刘敬寿(1989),男,博士研究生,主要从事油气区构造解析以及储层构造裂缝预测方面的研究,E-mail:liujingshou@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41372139,41072098）；国家科技重大专项专题（2016ZX05046-003-001,2011ZX05018-001-002,2011ZX05033-004）

Method for the Characterization of the Evolution of Tectonic Fracture Attitudes and Its Application

Liu Jingshou^1,2,3, Dai Junsheng⁴, Xu Ke⁴, Zhang Yi⁵, Ding Wenlong^1,2,3

1. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Marine Reservoir Evolution and Hydrocarbon Abundance Mechanism, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Key Laboratory for Shale Gas Exploitation and Assessment, Ministry of Land and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
4. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, Shandong, China;
5. Fengcheng Oil Field Operation Area, Xinjiang Oil Field Branch Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China

Received:2016-04-23 Online:2017-01-26 Published:2017-01-26
Supported by:
Supported bythe National Natural Science Foundation Project (41372139,41072098), the Major Special Project for National Science and Technology (2016ZX05046-003-001, 2011ZX05018-001-002 and 2011ZX05033-004)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对构造裂缝产状演化规律难以准确定量表征的问题,通过确定研究区裂缝力学性质、岩石力学参数,在恢复古构造形态的基础上,对裂缝形成时期古应力场数值模拟后选择适用性的岩石破裂准则,预测裂缝形成时期的产状分布。提出了造缝期应力场预测古裂缝产状,后期构造活动改造裂缝产状的思路,即通过早期岩层、晚期岩层的三维空间变化规律,建立了不同构造活动时期对应的裂缝空间转换理论模型,利用推导的数学算法,定量分析裂缝的演化规律,进而提高了现今裂缝产状的预测精度。最后,以铜城断裂带东翼阜二段储层为例进行了构造裂缝演化规律定量描述工作,结合构造演化,将阜二段储层构造裂缝演化分为阜宁运动晚期裂缝形成发育、戴南运动期裂缝继承发展、三垛运动期裂缝差异分离3个阶段。

关键词: 构造裂缝, 产状, 演化规律, 定量预测, 岩石力学层, 应用, 铜城断裂带

Abstract: It has been difficult to approach an accurate and quantitative characterization of the evolution of tectonic fracture attitudes. By defining the mechanical properties of fracture and the mechanics parameters of rocks, and on the basis of restoration of the paleo-tectonic morphology, an optimal failure criterion has been selected after the numerical simulation of paleo-stress field during the fracturing, to predict the occurrence and distribution of fractures. This brings forward a new idea to predict paleo-fracture occurrence by paleo-fracture stress field and the fracture was reconstructed by the late tectonic activity. That is, through the three-dimensional spatial variation rule of rock strata of early and late stage a theoretical fracture transformation space model was established, which is corresponding to different tectonic active period. By utilizing the mathematical derivation of the algorithm and quantitative analysis of evolution of fracture, the prediction accuracy of the fracture occurrence is improved. In the end, the Fu-2 Member reservoir in the eastern flank of Tongcheng fault zone is taken as an example for the quantitative prediction of attitudes evolution of structural fracture. Combined with tectonic evolution, the tectonic fracture evolution can be divided into three stages:the Late Funing movement and formation of fracture, the Dainan movement and fracture development, the Sanduo movement and fracture separation.

Key words: tectonic fractures, attitudes, evolution, quantitative prediction, rock mechanical layers, application, Tongcheng fault zone

中图分类号:

P542.33

刘敬寿, 戴俊生, 徐珂, 张艺, 丁文龙. 构造裂缝产状演化规律表征方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 84-94.

Liu Jingshou, Dai Junsheng, Xu Ke, Zhang Yi, Ding Wenlong. Method for the Characterization of the Evolution of Tectonic Fracture Attitudes and Its Application[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 84-94.

参考文献

[1] 周新桂, 张林炎, 屈雪峰, 等. 沿河湾探区低渗透储层构造裂缝特征及分布规律定量预测[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(2):195-200. Zhou Xingui, Zhang Linyan, Qu Xuefeng, et al. Characteristics and Quantitative Prediction of Distribution Laws of Tectonic Fractures of Low-Permeability Reservoirs in Yanhewan Area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(2):195-200.
[2] Titeux M, Janson X, Srinivasan S, et al.Facies Dis-tribution in Collapsed Carbonate Karsts:A Mechanical Approach[C]//AAPG.Houston:AAPG Annual Convention & Exhibition, 2011:1-4.
[3] 季宗镇, 戴俊生, 汪必峰. 地应力与构造裂缝参数间的定量关系[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 33(1):68-72. Ji Zongzhen, Dai Junsheng, Wang Bifeng. Quantitative Relationship Between Crustal Stress and Parameters of Tectonic Facture[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 33(1):68-72.
[4] 陈树民, 姜传金, 刘立, 等. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷火山岩裂缝形成机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6):1816-1826. Chen Shumin, Jiang Chuanjin, Liu Li, et al.Fracture Formation Mechanism of Volcanic Rocks in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression of Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Scicncc Edition), 2014, 44(6):1816-1826.
[5] 李小刚, 徐国强, 韩剑发, 等. 断层裂缝定量描述技术在塔中X井区良里塔格组裂缝研究中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(2):344-352. Li Xiaogang, Xu Guoqiang, Han Jianfa, et al. Application of a New Method for Quantitative Calculating of Fault-Related Fracture:A Case Study from Lianglitage Formation in Tazhong X Well Area,Tarim Basin,China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Scicncc Edition), 2012, 42(2):344-352.
[6] 赵永刚, 陈景山, 李凌, 等. 基于残余岩溶强度表征和裂缝预测的碳酸盐岩储层评价:以塔中西部上奥陶统良里塔格组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1):25-36. Zhao Yonggang, Chen Jingshan, Li Ling, et al. Evaluation of Carbonate Reservoir Based on Residual Karst Intensity Characterization and Structural Fracture Prediction:A Case from the Upper Ordovician Lianglitage Formation in the West of Center Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University:(Earth Scicncc Edition), 2015, 45(1):25-36.
[7] 曾联波. 低渗透砂岩储层裂缝的形成与分布[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2008:18-27, 101-125. Zeng Lianbo. Formation and Distribution of Fractures in Low-Permeability Sandstone Reservoirs[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2008:18-27, 101-125.
[8] 侯贵廷, 潘文庆. 裂缝地质建模及力学机制[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2013:62-147, 180-181. Hou Guiting, Pan Wenqing. Fracture Geological Modeling and Its Mechanism[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2013:62-147, 180-181.
[9] 戴俊生, 冯建伟, 李明, 等. 砂泥岩间互地层裂缝延伸规律探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2011, 18(2):277-283. Dai Junsheng, Feng Jianwei, Li Ming, et al. Discussion on the Extension Law of Structural Fracture in Sand-Mud Interbed Formation[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(2):277-283.
[10] 季宗镇, 戴俊生, 汪必峰, 等. 构造裂缝多参数定量计算模型[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(1):24-28. Ji Zongzhen, Dai Junsheng, Wang Bifeng, et al. Multi-Parameter Puantitative Calculation Model for Tectonic Fracture[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 2010, 34(1):24-28.
[11] 冯建伟, 戴俊生, 马占荣, 等. 低渗透砂岩裂缝参数与应力场关系理论模型[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(4):664-671. Feng Jianwei, Dai Junsheng, Ma Zhanrong, et al. The Theoretical Model Between Fracture Parameters and Stress Field of Low-Permeability Sandstones[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(4):664-671.
[12] 刘月田, 丁祖鹏, 屈亚光, 等. 油藏裂缝方向表征及渗透率各向异性参数计算[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5):842-846. Liu Yuetian, Ding Zupeng, Qu Yaguang, et al.The Characterization of Fracture Orientation and the Calculation of Anisotropic Permeability Parameters of Reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(5):842-846.
[13] 文世鹏, 李德同. 储层构造裂缝数值模拟技术[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 20(5):17-24. Wen Shipeng, Li Detong.Numerical Simulation Technology for Structural Fracture of Reservoir[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Natural Science Edition), 1996, 20(5):17-24.
[14] 戴俊生, 汪必峰, 马占荣. 脆性低渗透砂岩破裂准则研究[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007,28(4):393-395. Dai Junsheng, Wang Bifeng, Ma Zhanrong. Research on Cracking Principles of Brittle Low-Permeability Sands[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28(4):393-395.
[15] 周新桂, 张林炎, 范昆. 含油气盆地低渗透储层构造裂缝定量预测方法和实例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(3):328-333. Zhou Xingui, Zhang Linyan, Fan Kun. Methods for Quantitative Prediction of Tectonic Fractures in Compact Reservoirs in Petroliferous Basins and a Case Study[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007,18(3):328-333.
[16] 冯陈东, 戴俊生, 王霞田, 等. 不同坐标系中裂缝渗透率的定量计算[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1):135-139. Feng Chendong, Dai Junsheng, Wang Xiatian, et al.Quantitative Calculation of the Tectonic Fracture Permeability in Different Coordinate Systems[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1):135-139.
[17] Bai T, Pollard, David D. Closely Space Fractures in Layered Rocks:Initiation Mechanism and Propagation Kinematics[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2000, 22(10):1409-1425.
[18] 刘之的, 汤小燕, 于红果, 等. 基于岩石力学参数评价火山岩裂缝发育程度[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(11):20-24. Liu Zhidi, Tang Xiaoyan, Yu Hongguo, et al.Evaluation of Fracture Development in Volcanic Rocks Based on Rock Mechanical Parameters[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(11):20-24.
[19] Chad A, Underwood M L, Cooke J A, et al. Stra-tigraphic Controls on Vertical Fracture Patterns in Silarian Dolomite, Northeastern Wisconsin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2003, 87(1):121-142.
[20] 叶绍东. 金湖凹陷铜城断层构造特征与油气成藏[J]. 地质力学学报, 2012, 18(2):187-194. Ye Shaodong. Structural Characteristics of Tongcheng Fault and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Jinhu Sag[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2012, 18(2):187-194.
[21] 刘敬寿, 戴俊生, 邹娟, 等. 裂缝性储层渗透率张量定量预测方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(6):1022-1029. Liu Jingshou, Dai Junsheng, Zou Juan,et al. Quantitative Prediction of Permeability Tensor of Fractured Reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(6):1022-1029.
[22] 刘肖军. 苏北盆地桥河口油田阜二段第三砂层组裂缝参数模拟计算[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(2):250-254, 259. Liu Xiaojun. Simulation of Fracture Parameters in the 3^rd Sand Unit of the Paleogene Fu-2 Member in the Qiaohekou Oilfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(2):250-254, 259.
[23] 能源, 漆家福, 张春峰, 等. 金湖凹陷石港断层构造演化及油气聚集特征[J].石油学报, 2009, 30(5):667-671. Neng Yuan, Qi Jiafu, Zhang Chunfeng, et al. Structural Evolution of Shigang Fault and Features of Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Jinhu Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(5), 667-671.
[24] 能源, 漆家福, 张春峰, 等. 金湖凹陷断裂特征及其石油地质意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2012, 36(1):16-23. Neng Yuan, Qi Jiafu, Zhang Chunfeng, et al. Structural Features of the Jinhu Sag in the Subei Basin and Its Petroleum Geological Significance[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2012, 36(1):16-23.
[25] 王伟锋, 周维维, 周杰, 等. 金湖凹陷隐性断裂带形成机制及分布[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5):1395-1405. Wang Weifeng, Zhou Weiwei, Zhou Jie, et al. Formation Mechanism and Distribution of Buried Fault Zones in the Jinhu Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Scicncc Edition), 2014, 44(5):1395-1405.
[26] 张祥成, 戴俊生, 邹娟, 等. 金湖凹陷铜城断裂带断层活动特征[J]. 地质力学学报, 2014, 20(4):424-433. Zhang Xiangcheng, Dai Junsheng, Zou Juan, et al.Fault Activity Features of Tongcheng Fault Zone in Jinhu Sag[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2014,20(4):424-433.
[27] 刘敬寿, 戴俊生, 王珂, 等. 斜井岩心裂缝产状校正方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(1):67-73. Liu Jingshou, Dai Junsheng, Wang Ke, et al.An Approach to Correct the Attitudes of Fracture for Deviated Borehole in Core and Its Application[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1):67-73.
[28] 李俊英, 李培良. 三轴不等应力场下剪切破裂趋势面方向探析[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(1):261-269. Li Junying, Li Peiliang. Analysis of the Direction of Shear Fracture Trend Surface in Triaxial Unequal Stress Fields[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2009, 16(1):261-269.
[29] 薛冈, 卢华复, 朱成宏, 等. 伸展区域平衡剖面法及其在构造分析中的应用[J].高校地质学报, 2001, 7(4):427-434. Xue Gang, Lu Huafu, Zhu Chenghong, et al. Structure Restoration of Balancing Cross Section in Extension Area[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2001, 7(4):427-434.
[30] 汤济广, 梅廉夫, 沈传波, 等. 平衡剖面技术在盆地构造分析中的应用进展及存在的问题[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(6):19-22. Tang Jiguang, Mei Lianfu, Shen Chuanbo, et al. Advances and Problems in the Application of Balanced Cross-Section Technique in Structure Studies of Basins[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(6):19-22.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

构造裂缝产状演化规律表征方法及其应用

Method for the Characterization of the Evolution of Tectonic Fracture Attitudes and Its Application

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李新琦, 霍飞宇, 赵志平, 崔普媛, 李祺. 渤中凹陷中生界火山岩规模性裂缝储层特征及成因#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 483-496.
[2]	朱建峰, 张美华, 冷庆磊, 刘玉虎, 栾颖. 松辽盆地查干花次凹火山岩构造裂缝及应力场[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 745-757.
[3]	蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[4]	李建光, 孙超, 蔡来星, 屈少波, 童雪瑞, 窦中浩, 姜志海. 煤系岩石电性特征与含水饱和度定量关系实验——以山西宁武榆树坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1724-1735.
[5]	崔中良, 周家喜, 罗开. 赣南兴国—宁都萤石成矿带分形结构及成矿与找矿前景#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 108-124.
[6]	郭威, 张鹏宇, 钟秀平, 王晓初, 贾瑞, 陈晨, 王元. 回顾、探索与开创：第十届天然气水合物国际会议评述[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1760-1772.
[7]	马国庆, 王君楠, 孟庆发, 孟兆海, 秦朋波, 王泰涵, 李丽丽. 航空重（磁）多参量梯度探测与反演技术研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1928-1949.
[8]	李堃, 刘飞, 刘凯, 赵少瑞, 汤朝阳, 段其发. 湘西-黔东地区铅锌矿床找矿模型与定量预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 825-841.
[9]	张新荣, 焦洁钰. 黑土形成与演化研究现状[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 553-568.
[10]	刘子侠, 陈剑平, 王凤艳, 韩东亮. 基于活动控制的岩体结构面几何信息快速获取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 1192-1199.
[11]	孙建国. 高频渐近散射理论及其在地球物理场数值模拟与反演成像中的应用——研究历史与研究现状概述以及若干新进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1231-1259.
[12]	孟庆奎, 林品荣, 李勇, 李建华, 朱宏伟, 李荡. 张量CSAMT数据处理技术初步研究与示范应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1846-1854.
[13]	袁慧香, 王杨刚, 任永强, 王春女, 刘娜. 整装勘查信息系统应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1554-1566.
[14]	赵永刚, 陈景山, 李凌, 古永红, 张春雨, 张栋梁, 张文强, 周通. 基于残余岩溶强度表征和裂缝预测的碳酸盐岩储层评价——以塔中西部上奥陶统良里塔格组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 25-36.
[15]	肖克炎，娄德波，孙莉，李景朝，叶天竺. 全国重要矿产资源潜力评价一些基本预测理论方法的进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(4): 1073-1082.