吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 723-733.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200305

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于PCA-SVM算法对稀土元素与稀土判别指标耦合数据集的铀矿床分类

刘云鹏1,2,3, 郭春影1,2, 秦明宽1,2, 吴玉1,2, 裴柳宁1,2   

  1. 1. 中核集团核工业北京地质研究院, 北京 100029;
    2. 中核集团铀资源勘查与评价技术重点实验室, 北京 100029;
    3. 自然资源部东北亚矿产资源评价重点实验室(吉林大学), 长春 130061
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-11 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-07
  • 通讯作者: 郭春影(1982—),男,正高级工程师,博士,主要从事区域成矿学与成矿预测方面的研究,E-mail:guochun-ying106@163.com E-mail:guochun-ying106@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘云鹏(1992—),男,硕士研究生,助理工程师,主要从事地质大数据及机器学习方面的研究,E-mail:mr_liuyunpeng@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    深地资源勘查开采专项(2017YFC0602600);"十三五"国防预先研究项目(3210402);中国核工业地质局地勘费科研项目(地D1802);国土资源部科技创新团队培育计划项目(201708);自然资源部东北亚矿产资源评价重点实验室开放课题(DBY-KF-19-18)

Classification of Uranium Deposits Based on PCA-SVM Algorithm for Coupling Data Set of Rare Earth Elements and Rare Earth Discrimination Indexes

Liu Yunpeng1,2,3, Guo Chunying1,2, Qin Mingkuan1,2, Wu Yu1,2, Pei Liuning1,2   

  1. 1. Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, CNNC, Beijing 100029, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Uranium Resource Exploration and Evaluation Technology, CNNC, Beijing 100029, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia (Jilin University), Ministry of Natural Resources, Changchun 130061, China
  • Received:2020-12-11 Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-07
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Special Project for Exploration and Exploitation of Deep Resources (2017YFC0602600),the Pre-Study on National Defense During the 13th Five-Year Plan Period (3210402),the Geological Prospecting Research Project of China Nuclear Geology (Geology D1802),the Cultivation Program of Science and Technology Innovation Team of Ministry of Land and Resources of China (201708) and the Opening Foundation of Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Evaluation in Northeast Asia,Ministry of Natural Resources (DBY-KF-19-18)

摘要: 不同类型铀矿床的沥青铀矿/晶质铀矿具有不同的稀土元素组成,其组成可作为判别铀矿床类型的重要指标。采用基于Python语言的主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA)与支持向量机(support vector machines,SVM)结合的分类模型,对收集到的全球已知6种类型铀矿床的216组沥青铀矿/晶质铀矿稀土元素数据进行研究。以216组数据为训练集,通过数据清洗、特征缩放、PCA特征提取、网格搜索和交叉验证参数寻优构建SVM分类模型,对24组同变质型胡家峪晶质铀矿进行智能识别。研究结果显示:仅使用稀土元素的14维训练集最优模型判定胡家峪晶质铀矿类型的测试准确率为0.4%;由稀土元素、稀土总量、轻重稀土比、铕异常组成的17维训练集最优模型的测试准确率为75.0%,较14维训练集提高74.6%,模型泛化能力强;而通过传统稀土元素配分曲线、w(ΣREE)-(LREE/HREE)N图解不能有效判定胡家峪晶质铀矿类型。本次研究表明,PCA-SVM算法对增有传统稀土判别指标数据集进行挖掘可有效厘定铀氧化物成因类型,效果明显优于单纯的稀土元素数据集以及传统的稀土配分曲线、w(ΣREE)-(LREE/HREE)N图解。

关键词: 铀氧化物, 稀土元素, 传统稀土判别指标, 主成分分析, 支持向量机, 分类

Abstract: The pitchblende/uraninite of different types of uranium deposits has different composition of rare earth elements, which can be used as an important index to distinguish the types of uranium deposits. Using the Python language-based classification model combined with principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machines (SVM), the data of 216 groups of pitchblende/uraninite rare earth elements collected from six known uranium deposits worldwide were studied. With the 216 groups of data as the training set, the SVM classification model was constructed through data cleaning, feature scaling, PCA feature extraction, grid search and cross-validation for parameter optimization, and 24 groups of syn-metamorphic Hujiayu uraninite were intelligently identified. The test accuracy of the 14-dimensional training set optimal model to determine the type of Hujiayu uraninite using only rare earth elements is 0.4%,and the test accuracy of the optimal model of the 17-dimensional training set composed of rare earth elements, total rare earth elements, ratio of light and heavy rare earth elements,and europium anomalies is 75.0%, an improvement of 74.6% over the 14-dimensional training set. The model has a strong generalization ability. But through traditional rare earth element distribution curve and the w(ΣREE)-(LREE/HREE)N diagram, the type of Hujiayu uraninite cannot be determined effectively. This study shows that the PCA-SVM algorithm can effectively determine the genetic type of uranium oxides by mining the data set with the addition of traditional rare earth discriminating indicators, and the effect is significantly better than the pure rare earth element data set and the traditional rare earth distribution curve, w(ΣREE)-(LREE/HREE)N diagram.

Key words: uranium oxide, rare earth elements, traditional rare earth discriminant index, principal component analysis, support vector machine, classification

中图分类号: 

  • P619.14
[1] 韩帅,李明超,任秋兵,等. 基于大数据方法的玄武岩大地构造环境智能挖掘判别与分析[J].岩石学报,2018,34(11): 3207-3216. Han Shuai, Li Mingchao, Ren Qiubing, et al. Intelligent Determination and Data Mining for Tectonic Settings of Basalts Based on Big Data Methods[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2018, 34(11): 3207-3216.
[2] 焦守涛,周永章,张琪,等. 基于GEOROC数据库的全球辉长岩大数据的大地构造环境智能判别研究[J]. 岩石学报,2018,34(11): 3189-3194. Jiao Shoutao, Zhou Yongzhang, Zhang Qi, et al. Study on Intelligent Discrimination of Tectonic Settings Based on Global Gabbro Data from GEOROC[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2018, 34(11): 3189-3194.
[3] Ueki K, Hino H, Kuwatani T. Geochemical Discrimination and Characteristics of Magmatic Tectonic Settings: A Machine-Learning-Based Approach[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2017, 19(4): 1327-1347.
[4] 韩启迪,张小桐,申维. 基于决策树特征提取的支持向量机在岩性分类中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(2): 611-620. Han Qidi, Zhang Xiaotong, Shen Wei. Application of Support Vector Machine Based on Decision Tree Feature Extraction in Lithology Classification[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(2): 611-620.
[5] 王思琪,王明常,王凤艳,等. 基于SAE-ELM方法的多金属遥感地球化学反演[J]. 世界地质,2020,39(4): 195-202. Wang Siqi, Wang Mingchang, Wang Fengyan, et al. Remote Sensing Geochemical Inversion of Multi Metal Materials Based on SAE-ELM[J]. Global Geology, 2020, 39(4): 195-202.
[6] 徐述腾,周永章. 基于深度学习的镜下矿石矿物的智能识别实验研究[J]. 岩石学报,2018,34(11): 3244-3252. Xu Shuteng, Zhou Yongzhang. Artificial Intelligence Identification of Ore Minerals Under Microscope Based on Deep Learning Algorithm[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2018, 34(11): 3244-3252.
[7] 刘力辉,陆蓉,杨文魁. 基于深度学习的地震岩相反演方法[J]. 石油物探,2019,58(1): 123-129. Liu Lihui, Lu Rong, Yang Wenkui. Seismic Lithofacies Inversion Based on Deep Learning[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019, 58(1): 123-129.
[8] 闫佰忠,孙剑,王昕洲,等. 基于多变量LSTM神经网络的地下水水位预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2020,50(1): 208-216. Yan Baizhong, Sun Jian, Wang Xinzhou, et al. Multivariable LSTM Neural Network Model for Groundwater Levels Prediction[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(1): 208-216.
[9] 刘艳鹏,朱立新,周永章. 卷积神经网络及其在矿床找矿预测中的应用:以安徽省兆吉口铅锌矿床为例[J]. 岩石学报,2018,34(11): 3217-3224. Liu Yanpeng, Zhu Lixin, Zhou Yongzhang. Application of Convolutional Neural Network in Prospecting Prediction of Ore Deposits: Taking the Zhaojikou Pb-Zn Ore Deposit in Anhui Province as a Case[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2018, 34(11): 3217-3224.
[10] Zuo R, Xiong Y. Big Data Analytics of Identifying Geochemical Anomalies Supported by Machine Learning Methods[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2018, 27(1): 5-13.
[11] Ghezelbash R, Maghsoudi A, Carranza E J M. Performance Evaluation of RBF- and SVM-Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Predictive Mineral Prospectivity Modeling: Integration of S-A Multifractal Model and Mineralization Controls[J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2019, 12: 277-293.
[12] Mercadier J, Cuney M, Lach P, et al. Origin of Uranium Deposits Revealed by Their Rare Earth Element Signature[J]. Terra Nova, 2011, 23(4): 264-269.
[13] Frimmel H E, Schedel S, Brätz H. Uraninite Chemistry as Forensic Tool for Provenance Analysis[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2014, 48: 104-121.
[14] Eglinger A, André-Mayer A S, Vanderhaeghe O, et al. Geochemical Signatures of Uranium Oxides in the Lufilian Belt: From Unconformity-Related to Syn-Metamorphic Uranium Deposits During the Pan-African Orogenic Cycle[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2013, 54: 197-213.
[15] Gandhi S S, Potter E G, Fayek M. New Constraints on Genesis of the Polymetallic Veins at Port Radium, Great Bear Lake, Northwest Canadian Shield[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2018, 96: 28-47.
[16] Petrelli M, Perugini D. Solving Petrological Problems Through Machine Learning: The Study Case of Tectonic Discrimination Using Geochemical and Isotopic Data[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2016, 171(10): 81.
[17] Ren Q B, Li M C, Han S. Tectonic Discrimination of Olivine in Basalt Using Data Mining Techniques Based on Major Elements: A Comparative Study from Multiple Perspectives[J]. Big Earth Data, 2019, 3(1): 8-25.
[18] Balboni E, Jones N, Spano T, et al. Chemical and Sr Isotopic Characterization of North America Uranium Ores: Nuclear Forensic Applications[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2016, 74: 24-32.
[19] Abdi H, Williams L J. Principal Component Analysis[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics, 2010, 2(4): 433-459.
[20] Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-Vector Networks[J]. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3): 273-297.
[21] Hsu C W, Lin C J. A Comparison of Methods for Multiclass Support Vector Machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2002, 13(2): 415-425.
[22] 李苍柏,肖克严,李楠,等. 支持向量机、随机森林和人工神经网络机器学习算法在地球化学异常信息提取中的对比研究[J]. 地球学报,2020,41(2): 309-319. Li Cangbai, Xiao Keyan, Li Nan, et al. A Comparative Study of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network Machine Learning Algorithms in Geochemical Anomaly Information Extraction[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 309-319.
[23] 刘祥楼, 贾东旭, 李辉, 等. 说话人识别中支持向量机核函数参数优化研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2010, 10(7): 1669-1673. Liu Xianglou, Jia Dongxu, Li Hui, et al. Research on Kernel Parameter Optimization of Support Vector Machine in Speaker Recognition[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2010, 10(7): 1669-1673.
[24] Arlot S, Celisse A. A Survey of Cross-Validation Procedures for Model Selection[J]. Statistics Surveys, 2010, 4: 40-79.
[25] 宋永东. 支持向量机参数选择的研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学,2013. Song Yongdong. Research of Parameter Selection for Support Vector Machine[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2013.
[26] Rodriguez J D, Perez A, Lozano J A. Sensitivity Analysis of K-Fold Cross Validation in Prediction Error Estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(3): 569-575.
[27] 骆金诚. 粤北花岗岩型铀矿床成因机制研究:矿物学和铀矿物U-Pb年代学及地球化学约束[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学,2015. Luo Jincheng. Genesis of Granite-Hosted Uranium Deposits in the Northern Guangdong, China: Constraints from Mineralogy, Uranium Mineral U-Pb Geochronology and Geochemistry[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015.
[28] McLennan S, Taylor S. Rare Earth Element Mobility Associated with Uranium Mineralization[J]. Nature, 1979, 282: 247-250.
[29] Alexandre P, Kyser T K. Effects of Cationic Substitutions and Alteration in Uraninite, and Implications for the Dating of Uranium Deposits[J]. Canadian Mineralogist, 2005, 43(3): 1005-1017.
[30] Anders E, Grevesse N. Abundances of the Elements: Meteoritic and Solar[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1989, 53(1): 197-214.
[31] 任秋兵,李明超,韩帅. 基于改进遗传算法-神经网络的玄武岩构造环境判别及对比实验[J].地学前缘,2019,26(4): 117-124. Ren Qiubing, Li Mingchao, Han Shuai. Discrimination and Comparison Experiments of Basalt Tectonic Setting Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm-Optimized Neural Network[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(4): 117-124.
[32] 刘承照,韩帅,李明超,等. 耦合PCA-SVM算法的金矿矿床规模预测分析研究[J]. 地学前缘,2019,26(4): 138-145. Liu Chengzhao, Han Shuai, Li Mingchao,et al. Prediction and Analysis of Gold Deposit Sizes Based on Coupled PCA-SVM Algorithm[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(4): 138-145.
[33] 张野,李明超,韩帅,等. 基于金矿规格单元数据的机器学习方法在成矿建模分析中的应用[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2020,44(2): 183-191. Zhang Ye, Li Mingchao, Han Shuai,et al. Machine Learning Methods Application in Gold Mineralization Prediction Based on Gold Unit Data[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2020, 44(2): 183-191.
[34] 任秋兵,李明超,李玉琼,等. 基于全球橄榄石数据的玄武岩构造环境智能判别方法及其验证[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2020,44(2): 212-221. Ren Qiubing, Li Mingchao, Li Yuqiong, et al. An Intelligent Method for Geochemical Discrimination of Tectonic Settings of Basalt Based on Olivine Composition: GWO-SVM Method and Its Verification[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2020, 44(2): 212-221.
[1] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[2] 杨兰, 王运, 邹勇军, 胡宝群, 李满根, 张安, 朱满怀. 基于机器学习的富硒土壤预测模型的构建与比较——以江西省信丰县油山地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1629-1643.
[3] 王民水, 王明常, 王婧瑜, 刘子维.

融合注意力机制和权重平衡算法的遥感图像分类 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 697-704.

[4] 郭春涛, 刘亮, 倪玲梅, 史江涛, 田朋飞, 荆雪婷. 塔里木盆地米兰低凸起寒武系白云岩成因——来自米兰1井的指示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 57-69.
[5] 单玄龙, 王志豪, 卫哲, 张朋霖, 郝国丽, 闫博. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷始新统物源体系展布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1896-1911.
[6] 管耀, 王清辉, 冯进, 杨清, 石磊. 基于机器学习的蚀变火成岩测录井综合岩性识别——以南海北部珠江口盆地惠州26-6井区为例#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 345-358.
[7] 赵忠海, 乔锴, 孙景贵, 陈俊, 崔晓梦, 梁杉杉, Manirambona Alain Jospin. 黑龙江建边农场地区遥感蚀变异常提取方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1275-1275.
[8] 李玉洁, 李成禄, 杨元江, 袁茂文, 李博文, 苏 航. 大兴安岭东北部多宝山矿集区二道坎银铅锌矿床磁铁矿地球化学特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 436-.
[9] 李彦泽, 商琳, 王群会, 孙彦春, 邢建鹏, 蒋东梁, 陈浩. 断陷盆地强非均质低渗-致密砂岩储层综合分类——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1830-1843.
[10] 张强, 李家金, 王毛毛, 唐湘飞. 基于改进主成分分析法的测井曲线岩性分层技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1369-.
[11] 李猛猛, 刘敬党, 梁天意, 谭亮, 王刚, 朱玺.

基于支持向量机算法的岩浆硫化物矿床硫元素预测模型 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 866-878.

[12] 董旭日, 冯晅, 刘财, 田有, 李静, 王天琪, 王鑫, 衣文索. 基于DAS信号和CNN分类算法的人员运动轨迹监测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 1004-1015.
[13] 熊越晗, 刘东燕, 刘东升, 王艳磊, 唐小山. 基于岩样细观图像深度学习的岩性自动分类方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1597-1604.
[14] 王博帅, 蒲东川, 李婷婷, 牛雪峰. 基于多源遥感影像的长春市城市建成区提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1284-1294.
[15] 牟丹, 张丽春, 徐长玲. 3种经典机器学习算法在火山岩测井岩性识别中的对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 951-956.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .