吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 536-549.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240192

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术

刁国君1, 何昕2   

  1. 1.中铁隧道局集团路桥工程有限公司,天津300308

    2.吉林大学交通学院,长春130025

  • 出版日期:2025-03-26 发布日期:2025-05-10
  • 基金资助:

    基金项目:吉林省科技发展计划项目(20240304126SF)


Key Technology of Local Underground and Enlarged Excavation Construction of Subway Open-Cut Station Underpassing Existing Buildings

Diao Guojun 1,He Xin2   

  1. 1. Road and Bridge Engineering Co., Ltd. ,China Railway Tunnel Group Co. ,Ltd. ,Tianjin 300308, China

    2. Transportation College,Jilin University,Changchun 130025,China

  • Online:2025-03-26 Published:2025-05-10
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Science and Technology Development Project of Jilin Province (20240304126SF)

摘要: 针对成都地铁某明挖车站局部穿越既有建筑物的复杂工程挑战,通过综合对比分析和有限元模拟,采用了局部暗扩挖的施工策略。提出了明暗挖分界点的科学判定方法,并深入探讨了沉降控制、暗挖初期支护和二次衬砌等施工关键技术的多个方面,包括施工前的降水处理、地表注浆加固与数值模拟分析,以及施工中的超前支护、开挖步骤控制和二次衬砌结构施工等。结果表明:相较于传统的明挖法,暗挖扩挖技术能显著降低拆迁难度,工程成本投入减少约1.04亿元,施工周期缩短2个月;施工成功的关键在于精确确定明暗挖分界点,建议该分界点设在结构腋角外侧,距离房屋基础3 m处,同时结合袖阀管地表注浆与管井降水等措施有效控制地表沉降。施工过程中,需根据暗挖隧道跨度及围岩特性灵活选择施工方法,妥善处理初期支护结构节点,确保二次衬砌施工与初期支护结构破除的有效衔接,并高度重视施工监测的应用。

关键词: 地铁, 穿越既有建筑物, 局部暗扩挖, 数值模拟, 暗挖法, 明挖法, 明暗挖分界点, 沉降

Abstract:

Addressing the complex engineering challenges of a excavated metro station in Chengdu that partially traverses existing buildings, this study adopted a localized undercut and expansion excavation strategy through comprehensive comparative analysis and finite element simulation. The research proposed a scientific method for determining the boundary between open and undercut excavation, and delved into various aspects of key construction technologies such as settlement control, primary support for undercut excavation, and secondary lining, including pre-construction dewatering, ground surface grouting reinforcement, and numerical simulation analysis, as well as advanced support during construction, excavation sequence control, and secondary lining structure construction. The research results indicate that, compared to the traditional open-cut method, the undercut and expansion excavation technique can significantly reduce demolition difficulties, It has significantly cut the investment in project costs by approximately 104 million yuan and shortened the construction period by two months. The key to successful construction lies in accurately determining the boundary between open and undercut excavation, which is recommended to be set outside the structural haunch and 3 m away from the building foundation. Meanwhile, combining sleeve valve pipe ground surface grouting with tube well dewatering measures can effectively control ground surface settlement. During construction, it is necessary to flexibly select construction methods based on the span of the undercut tunnel and the characteristics of surrounding rocks, properly handle the nodes of the primary support structure, ensure effective connection between secondary lining construction and the removal of the primary support structure, and attach great importance to the application of construction monitoring.

Key words: subway, crossing existing buildings, local underground excavation with enlargement, numerical simulation, underground excavation method, open cut method, boundary between underground and open excavation, settlement

中图分类号: 

  • TU455
[1] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[6] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[7] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[8] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[9] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[10] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[11] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[12] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[13] 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[14] 韩长玉, 赵浩汀.

路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580.

[15] 刘国东, 杜成鸿, 侯杰, 杨梦溪, 陈宇, 谢杨.

基于用高斯分布生成管道的岩溶地下水流数值模拟 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 592-603.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 于 平,李瑞磊,付 雷,郝 雪,张向军,廉国芬. 松辽盆地滨北地区区域构造特征及意义--地震长剖面给出的证据[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 611 -615 .
[2] 张原庆, 宋炳忠, 王玉福, 张宁. 鲁西铜石岩体金成矿规律和成矿预测[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1287 -1294 .
[3] 李建平,李桐林,张 辉,徐凯军. 不规则回线源层状介质瞬变电磁场正反演研究及应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 790 -0795 .
[4] 高松, 宋莹, 王琳,蒋步新. 水体中秋兰姆特效降解菌的筛选及其降解性能研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 455 -457 .
[5] 张凤君,李 卿,马玖彤,于广菊. 膜蒸馏处理糠醛废水的实验研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 270 -0273 .
[6] 卢双舫,李吉君,薛海涛,徐立恒. 油成甲烷碳同位素分馏的化学动力学及其初步应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(05): 825 -829 .
[7] 丁志宏,冯平,毛慧慧. 考虑径流年内分布影响的丰枯划分方法及其应用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 276 -0280 .
[8] 任何军, 刘娜,高松,张兰英,张玉玲,周睿. 假单胞菌DN2对多氯联苯的降解及bphA1核心序列测定[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 312 -0316 .
[9] 黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 康志强, 唐萍萍. 半干旱区岩溶碳汇原位监测方法适宜性研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 240 -246 .
[10] 熊晓亮,孙红月,张世华,蔡岳良. 高扬程虹吸保障条件分析与合理管径选择数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1595 -1601 .