吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 1184-1202.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240235

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

东濮凹陷卫城—古云集地区古近系沙三段地球化学特征及古环境重建

张振国1,2,马瑞雪1,2,付文钊1,高莲凤1,2,张平1,2,杨雨1,2   

  1. 1.辽宁工程技术大学矿业学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
    2.辽宁省矿产资源绿色开发重点实验室,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-29 出版日期:2026-07-26 发布日期:2026-08-11
  • 作者简介:张振国(1967—),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿产资源勘查与评价、矿山地质与环境地质、海洋资源与环境方面的教学与研究工作,E-mail:zzg0351@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41972004);辽宁工程技术大学学科创新团队资助项目(LNTU20TD-14)

Geochemical Characteristics and Paleoenvironment Reconstruction of the Paleogene Sha 3 Member in the Weicheng-Guyunji Area, Dongpu Depression

Zhang Zhenguo1,2, Ma Ruixue1,2, Fu Wenzhao1, Gao Lianfeng1,2, Zhang Ping1,2, Yang Yu1,2   

  1. 1. College of Mining, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Green Development of Mineral Resources, Liaoning Province, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2024-09-29 Online:2026-07-26 Published:2026-08-11
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China      (41972004) and the Project of the Discipline Innovation Team of Liaoning Technology University  (LNTU20TD-14)

摘要: 沉积环境是制约油气成藏的重要因素,而沉积物地球化学特征是追溯古环境演化的有效途径。为探讨渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷卫城—古云集地区古近系沙三段时期的沉积特征,论文以层序地层学、地球化学和地球物理测井等方法,对目标区进行了较为系统的分析。利用测井曲线将东濮凹陷Y3井古近系沙三段划分为三个长期层序,从下到上依次为:层序一、层序二、层序三。通过主、微量元素及稀土元素的地球化学特征,在三个层序内开展古盐度、古气候、古氧化还原条件及构造背景分析,进而说明东濮凹陷卫城—古云集地区古近系沙三段的地球化学特征及古环境。结果表明:Y3井3个层序球粒陨石标准化后REE模式与后太古代澳大利亚页岩(PAAS)基本一致,呈现“V”形,总体为右倾斜型,且变化趋势平缓,说明轻稀土元素相对富集,重稀土元素相对亏损。研究区沙三段样品的Sr/Ba值变化范围为0.50~16.33,平均值为2.65,表明沙三段沉积期水体环境为咸水—半咸水环境;Sr/Cu值变化范围为5.88~653.31,平均值为90.41,表明沙三段沉积时期总体为干旱炎热气候;LaN/YbN值变化范围为7.85~12.25,平均值为10.14,表明在沙三段沉积过程中,气候环境为干热环境;V/(V+Ni)变化范围为0.45~0.79,平均值为0.69,指示研究区属于水体分层不强的厌氧环境;δCe变化范围为0.90~1.02,平均值为0.94,表明沙三段深沉水体整体为还原环境。整体看来,研究区沙三段气候整体干燥,处于还原、咸水—半咸水环境。根据La/Th-w(Hf)与La/Yb-w(REE)判别图解,源岩主要为中酸性长英质岩石和混合长英质/基性岩。

关键词: 沙三段, 层序划分, 地球化学特征, 古环境, 东濮凹陷, 沙三段, 层序划分, 地球化学特征, 古环境

Abstract: Sedimentary environments serve as a critical constraint on hydrocarbon accumulation, while the geochemical characteristics of sediments provide an effective proxy for tracing paleoenvironmental evolution. To investigate the sedimentary characteristics of the Sha 3 Member of the Paleogene in the Weicheng-Guyunji area of the Dongpu depression, Bohai Bay basin, this paper conducts a systematic analysis of the target interval utilizing sequence stratigraphy, geochemistry, and geophysical well logging. Based on well logging curves, the Sha 3 Member in Well Y3 of the Dongpu depression is divided into three long-term sequences, which are designated as sequence Ⅰ, sequence Ⅱ, and sequence Ⅲ from bottom to top. Based on the geochemical characteristics of major, trace, and rare earth elements, this study evaluates paleosalinity, paleoclimate, paleo-redox conditions, and tectonic settings within these three sequences, and elucidates the geochemical characteristics and paleoenvironmental evolution of the Sha 3 Member in the Weicheng-Guyunji area of the Dongpu depression. The results indicate that the chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the three sequences in Well Y3 are generally consistent with those of post-Archean Australian shale (PAAS). These patterns exhibit a “V” shape and an overall right-inclined trend with a gentle variation. This indicates a relative enrichment of light rare earth elements and a relative depletion of heavy rare earth elements. The Sr/Ba ratios of the Sha 3 Member samples in the study area range from 0.50 to 16.33, with an average of 2.65, indicating that the depositional water body during the Sha 3 Member period was characterized by a saline to brackish environment. The Sr/Cu ratios range from 5.88 to 653.31, with an average of 90.41, suggesting that the study area experienced an overall arid and hot climate during this period. Similarly, the LaN/YbN ratios range from 7.85 to 12.25, with an average of 10.14, which further corroborates the dry and hot paleoclimate during the deposition of the Sha 3 Member. The V/(V+Ni) ratios range from 0.45 to 0.79, with an average of 0.69, indicating that the study area was characterized by an anoxic environment with weak water column stratification. Furthermore, the δCe values range from 0.90 to 1.02, with an average of 0.94, indicating that the deep water body of the Sha 3 Member was predominantly in a reducing environment. Overall, the climate in the study area during the deposition of the Sha 3 Member was predominantly arid, with reducing conditions and a saline to brackish water environment. Discrimination diagrams of La/Th versus Hf and La/Yb versus ΣREE indicate that the source rocks were composed primarily of intermediate to acidic felsic rocks, as well as mixed felsic/mafic rocks.

Key words: Dongpu depression, Sha 3 Member, sequence division, geochemical characterization, paleoenvironment

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 史冀忠, 姜亭, 韩小锋, 王宝文, 许伟, 宋博. 甘蒙北山地区扎格高脑盆地白垩系黑色页岩地球化学特征及沉积古环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(4): 1203-1226.
[2] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[3] 王万能, 李锁明, 张耀堂, 袁永盛, 庞占基, 赵见波. 滇中禄丰川街盆地中—晚侏罗世温室地球气候环境演变特征及其对生物埋藏的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1530-1543 .
[4] 丁恺, 赵福海, 高莲凤, 李丙喜, 付文钊, 高晨阳, 靳雪彬. 基于变分模态分解的营四段厚层砂砾岩地层细分层序[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1406-1418.
[5] 游洋, 李婧婧, 张恩楼. 甲藻甾醇在海洋和湖泊古环境重建中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 752-772.
[6] 邓高山.

准噶尔盆地沙湾凹陷原油地球化学特征与油源分析 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 389-412.

[7] 叶希青, 孙立影, 徐智涛, 闫东晗, 冯靖乔, 曹戎机. 吉林中部靠山地区早侏罗世正长花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学特征及其动力学意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 964-983.
[8] 龚思敏, 蒋有录, 侯帅, 谢宝国, 周艳. 辽河东部凹陷牛居—长滩洼陷沙河街组天然气成因类型及来源[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1781-1790.
[9] 丁清峰, 吴睿哲, 张强, 周轩. 青海东昆仑洪水河铁矿床新元古代含铁建造铁同位素特征及其成因意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1497-1511.
[10] 殷 越1, 2, 贾鹏飞3, 黄志龙2, 吴红烛4, 金 希4, 刘国杰4. 三塘湖盆地马东地区卡拉岗组烃源岩特征与致密油意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 26-.
[11] 李天军, 黄志龙, 王瑞, 苟红光, 张品, 殷越. 银根—额济纳旗盆地天草凹陷下白垩统巴音戈壁组有效烃源岩地球化学特征及其形成环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 957-972.
[12] 史冀忠, 牛亚卓, 许伟, 宋博, 王宝文. 银额盆地石板泉西石炭系白山组碳酸盐岩地球化学特征及其环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 680-693.
[13] 李玉超, 王诚煜, 于成广. 辽宁丹东地区土壤Se元素地球化学特征及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1766-1775.
[14] 何玉平. 东海盆地西湖凹陷天台区始新世平湖组风暴岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 500-508.
[15] 李维禄, 高思宇, 张翼, 张金亮, 韩春花. 末端扇—滨浅湖滩坝组合沉积机制与演化分布:以东濮凹陷卫城油田沙河街组四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 31-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[3] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[4] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[5] 李雪平,唐辉明. 基于GIS的分组数据Logistic模型在斜坡稳定性评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 361 -0365 .
[6] 赵宏光,孙景贵,陈军强,赵俊康,姚凤良,段 展. 延边小西南岔富金斑岩铜矿床的含矿流体起源与演化——H,O,C,S,Pb同位素示踪[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 601 -606 .
[7] 殷 文,印兴耀, 张繁昌. 基于并行遗传算法的地震属性优化研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 672 -676 .
[8] 赵 峰,范海峰,田竹君,王志刚. 吉林省中部不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀强度变化分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 661 -666 .
[9] 姜月华,殷鸿福,王润华,康晓钧. 湖州市土壤磁化率与重金属元素分布规律及其相关性研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 653 -660 .
[10] 魏 喜,邓晋福,陈亦寒. 南海盆地中生代海相沉积地层分布特征及勘探潜力分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 456 -0461 .