吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 1401-1419.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240275

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

三塘湖盆地下石炭统新层系石油地质条件及勘探潜力

王伟明1,2,胡美硕1,2,焦立新3,杨斌4,苗长盛5,孙宏亮4,周志超3,曲希玉1,2   

  1. 1.深层油气全国重点实验室(中国石油大学(华东)),山东青岛266580

    2.中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院,山东青岛266580

    3.中国石油吐哈油田公司勘探开发研究院,新疆哈密839009

    4.中国石油吐哈油田分公司勘探事业部,新疆哈密839000

    5.长春工程学院勘查与测绘工程学院,长春130012

  • 出版日期:2025-09-26 发布日期:2025-11-15
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(42272145,41672125);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2020MD027);吉林省自然科学基金项目(20220101183JC);第二批天山英才培养计划青年托举人才项目(2023TSYCQNTJ0041) 


Petroleum Geology Conditions and Exploration Potential of New Stratigraphic Series in Lower Carboniferous of Santanghu Basin

Wang Weiming1,2,Hu Meishuo1,2,Jiao Lixin3,Yang Bin4,Miao Changsheng5,Sun Hongliang4,Zhou Zhichao3,Qu Xiyu1,2

#br#   

  1. 1. National Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas (China University of Petroleum (East China)), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China

    2. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China

    3. The Institute of Exploration and Development of   Tuha Oilfield,   PetroChina,Hami 839009, Xinjiang, China

    4. Petroleum Exploration Division, Tuha Oilfield Company, Hami 839000, Xinjiang, China

    5. College of Surveying and Mapping Engineering, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun 130012,China

  • Online:2025-09-26 Published:2025-11-15
  • Supported by:
    Supported of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272145,41672125), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020MD027), the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province   (20220101183JC) and the Second Batch of Tianshan Talent Training Program Youth Lift Talent Project (2023TSYCQNTJ0041)

摘要: 基于三塘湖盆地油气资源勘探程度最低、资源前景最不明朗的下石炭统,开展了新层系的石油地质条件与勘探潜力分析评价工作。采用野外露头、地球化学分析及储层薄片观察等研究手段,揭示了目的层纵向沉积环境演化、烃源岩及储层等成藏地质特征。研究表明:三塘湖盆地早石炭世为残留海弧后盆地,具有浅海相沉积特征,下石炭统纵向沉积环境经历了岛弧火山活动和陆源碎屑充填、古洋封闭半深水—深水环境、挤压抬升陆源碎屑充填浅水环境和造山抬升盆地萎缩4个演化阶段。其中,封闭半深水环境和浅水沉积环境中烃源岩广泛分布,有机质类型达到中等烃源岩标准,岩石薄片中存在大量沥青,证实下石炭统烃源岩不仅具备生烃能力,而且也发生过大量排烃过程。下石炭统发育火成岩与碎屑岩两大类储层,尽管储层整体致密,但裂缝与溶孔发育,改善了储集油气条件,尤其是花岗岩裂缝的发育对溶蚀孔隙具有明显的连通作用。综合分析,围绕下石炭统烃源岩可发育自生自储和下生上储两类油气藏。自生自储油气藏发育在远离油源断裂的构造稳定区,具有原生藏的特点;下生上储油气藏发育在石炭系内部油源断裂附近,与断层岩性油气藏有关。

关键词: 三塘湖盆地, 下石炭统, 油气, 储层, 石油地质条件, 成藏模式, 勘探潜力

Abstract:

This paper aims to conduct the first analysis and evaluation of the oil and gas geological conditions and exploration potential of the Lower Carboniferous strata in the Santanghu basin, which has the lowest level of exploration and the most uncertain resource prospects. Based on field outcrop observations, geochemical analysis, and reservoir thin section observations, the vertical sedimentary environment evolution, hydrocarbon source rocks, and reservoir geological characteristics of the target layer are revealed. The study indicates that the Santanghu basin in the Early Carboniferous was a residual back-arc basin with shallow marine sedimentary characteristics. The vertical sedimentary environment of the Lower Carboniferous strata experienced four stages of evolution: Island arc volcanic activity, closure of ancient oceans leading to semi-deep water environments, compression and uplift of continental-derived clastic sediment filling shallow water environments, and orogenic uplift basin contraction. Among them, hydrocarbon source rocks are widely distributed in the semi-deep water environment and shallow water sedimentary environment, and the organic matter type meets the standard of moderate hydrocarbon source rocks. The presence of abundant asphalt in rock thin sections also confirms that the hydrocarbon source rocks of the Lower Carboniferous not only have hydrocarbon generation ability but also have undergone a large amount of hydrocarbon expulsion processes. The Lower Carboniferous strata developed two major types of reservoirs: Igneous rocks and clastic rocks. Although the reservoirs are generally tight, the development of fractures and dissolution pores has improved the conditions for oil and gas accumulation, especially the development of granite fractures, which has a significant connectivity effect on dissolution pores. Comprehensive analysis suggests that around the hydrocarbon source rocks of the Lower Carboniferous, two types of oil and gas reservoirs can be developed: Self-generated and self-stored, and lower-generated and upper-stored. Among them, self-generated and self-stored oil and gas reservoirs are developed in structurally stable areas far from the oil source faults and have the characteristics of primary reserves. Lower-generated and upper-stored oil and gas reservoirs are developed near oil source faults within the Carboniferous system and are related to fault lithology oil and gas reservoirs.

Key words: Santanghu basin, Lower Carboniferous, oil and gas, reservoir, petroleum geologic conditions, reservoir forming model, exploration potential

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 唐华风, 张亚东, 邹明倬, 陆国超, 户景松, 张津铭, 卞海越. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷K油田中生界火山岩储层定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 739-753.
[2] 杨烁, 丁毅, 杜发述, 祖贺川, 张君毅, 刘强, 张祺, 苏涛. 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾格尔组构造-岩性油气藏形成条件及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 754-767.
[3] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[4] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[5] 王蓓东, 杨胜来 , 赵帅 , 邓惠 , 张钰祥 , 白浩言, 李沁怡, 姜艺. 高磨地区震旦系灯影组四段台内储层储集空间类型及其孔喉结构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 804-817.
[6] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[7] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[8] 丁梦颜, 冯晅, 刘财. 裂缝对岩石非线性弹性特征的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1051-1061.
[9] 刘涛, 刘宗堡, 张可佳, 张岩, 张瑞雪, 刘晓文, 徐翠云.

基于深度学习的致密砂岩储层薄片图像生成与识别方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 724-738.

[10] 周三栋, 张伟鑫, 成巧耘, 魏佳成, 周国栋, . 深部煤储层中煤层水可动性评价方法及动力学机制研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 397-412.
[11] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[12] 王振军. 油气储层裂缝预测进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 469-482.
[13] 黄玉龙, 张皓, 郭强, 陈昌.

低阻玄武岩的矿物学特征及其油气地质意义——以辽河坳陷古近系为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 511-521.

[14] 许中杰, 冷龙, 朱占平, 段煜, 张芳霞, 徐大志. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近纪构造背景分析:来自碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学的证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 229-251.
[15] 唐华风, 付琦, 尹永康, 高有峰, 户景松, 武海超, 田志文. 花岗岩潜山储层地质研究回顾[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1806-1836.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .