J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 177-183.

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

大型地下水封石油洞库场址评价标准及评价方法

陈祥1|许兆义1|张杰坤2   

  1. 1.北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院|北京100044;
    2.中国地质大学工程技术学院|北京100083
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-08 出版日期:2012-01-26 发布日期:2012-01-26
  • 作者简介:陈祥(1980-)|男|副教授|主要从事岩土工程与工程地质方面的研究|E-mail:chx1120@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金“青年基金”项目(41002092)

Comprehensive Classification Criteria and Method to the Building Site of Large Water-Sealed Underground Oil Tank

CHEN Xiang1, XU Zhao-yi1, ZHANG Jie-kun2   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing100044, China;
    2.School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing100083, China
  • Received:2011-04-08 Online:2012-01-26 Published:2012-01-26

摘要:

影响地下水封石油洞库场址条件优劣的因素较多,除了相关的地质环境因素外,同时还应考虑石油运输的经济性和施工的便利性。在我国第一批国家石油储备基地地下储备库调研和勘察工作的基础上,从场址工程地质条件、技术经济条件、施工条件方面提出地质构造、地形地貌、岩体强度等10个影响地下水封石油洞库场址优劣性的因素,并确定了它们对应的量化指标;以这10个影响因素为评价指标,确定了地下水封石油洞库场址优劣等级的评价标准;详细介绍了可拓综合评价方法和程序,并建立了地下水封油库场址优劣等级可拓评价模型。将这套评价方法在惠州地下水封油库工程中进行应用,验证了评价标准和评价方法的可靠性,评价结果表明惠州地下水封油库场址属于优等场址。

关键词: 地下水封石油洞库, 场址优劣等级, 评价标准, 可拓方法

Abstract:

There are many factors to influence the advantage of water-sealed underground oil tank sites, such as geological environment, geological environment and construction convenience. Firstly, ten influence factors such as geologic structure, geomorphology, rock mass strength, and so on, which are generalized from the engineering geological conditions, technologic and economic conditions and construction conditions are put forward on the base of survey and prospecting work of the first underground state oil reserves in China, and their corresponding quantitative indexes are determined. Then the classification criterion of the water-sealed underground oil tank sites was proposed. Based on the criterion, the extension method was used to evaluate the water-sealed underground oil tank sites. Finally the program was applied in the Huizhou water-sealed underground oil tank engineering. The results show the site of that the Huizhou water-sealed underground oil tank is good.

Key words: water-sealed underground oil tank, rank of building site, classification criterion, extension method

中图分类号: 

  • P642.2
[1] 秦雨, 张立杰. 哈尔滨市松北区水库雍水浸没评价[J]. J4, 2010, 40(1): 134-139.
[2] 董清水,王立贤,于文斌,刘招君,张海龙,厚刚福. 油页岩资源评价关键参数及其求取方法[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 899-0903.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .