吉林大学学报(地球科学版)

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

滇池固化淤泥重塑土的重塑时机及强度恢复特性试验

桂跃,余志华,刘海明,丁祖德,张庆   

  1. 昆明理工大学土木学院,昆明650051
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-18 出版日期:2014-11-26 发布日期:2014-11-26
  • 作者简介:桂跃(1982-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事软土力学及基坑工程等方面的教学与科研工作,E-mail:gydrgui@kmust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51108217);云南省科技厅应用基础研究计划项目(2011FZ047)

Suitable Compaction Moment and Strength Recovery Properties of Remodeled Stabilized Dredged Soil from Dianchi Lake

Gui Yue, Yu Zhihua, Liu Haiming, Ding Zude, Zhang Qing   

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming650051,China
  • Received:2014-03-18 Online:2014-11-26 Published:2014-11-26

摘要:

采用无侧限抗压强度试验和直剪试验,从单轴抗压强度、黏聚力、内摩擦角的角度探求了淤泥固化土重塑时导致的强度折减和重塑后土的强度恢复特性,并分析了重塑前养护龄期(T)、重塑后养护龄期(T)、水泥掺灰比(ac)的影响。试验结果表明,重塑时机的选择对淤泥固化土的强度折减程度有显著的影响:T越长,破碎过程带来的强度折减越严重,且大致满足ac越大、强度折减越严重的规律。从强度恢复特性来看:小水泥掺灰比的固化淤泥土经过T,其强度恢复较好;大掺灰比的重塑土其强度则较难恢复至固化土的水平,T越长,强度恢复越不利。从而得出了大掺灰比固化土宜早重塑,小掺灰比的重塑时间可适当延长的规律。

关键词: 疏浚淤泥, 固化, 重塑时机, 强度折减, 强度恢复

Abstract:

To determine the suitable compaction moment and strength recovery properties of remodeled stabilized dredged soil, the unconfined compression test and direct shear test were conducted. The mechanism of strength reduction and recovery were analyzed in term of cohesive strength and internal frictional angle of stabilized dredged soil and remodeled stabilized dredged soil. And three factors including the curing period before remolded, the curing period after remolded, cement content impact on the strength of stabilized dredged soil and remodeled stabilized dredged soil were explored. Test results show that the curing period before remolded causes a significant impact on the strength reduction of remodeled stabilized dredged material. The strength reduction ratio increased with the curing period before remolded increased. And the strength reduction ratio increased with the cement content increased too. After curing, the unconfined strength of remodeled stabilized dredged soil with small cement content recover well, however the large one was difficult to recover to close to the level of stabilized dredged soil. And the curing period extends are adverse to the strength recovery of remodeled stabilized dredged soil. To conclude, the stabilized dredged soil with small cement content may be remodeled sooner rather than later, however, the large one can be prolong remodeled time properly.

Key words: dredged sludge, stabilization, compaction moment, strength reduction, strength recovery

中图分类号: 

  • P642.1
[1] 任何军, 沈天琪, 张凤鲲, 李艳玲. 湖库清淤底泥氟固化/稳定化药剂设计及响应面优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1671-1679.
[2] 张海清, 贾会会, 聂庆科. 土体抗拉强度对均质边坡稳定性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1324-1337.
[3] 徐文刚, 余旭荣, 年廷凯, 曹琦, 曹爱武, 裴振伟. 基于FLAC3D的三维边坡稳定性强度折减法计算效率改进算法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1347-1355.
[4] 胡高建, 杨天鸿, 张飞. 抚顺西露天矿南帮边坡破坏机理及内排压脚措施[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 1082-1092.
[5] 王科,王常明,王彬, 姚康,王天佐. 基于MorgensternPrice法和强度折减法的边坡稳定性对比分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 902-907.
[6] 年廷凯,张克利,刘红帅,徐海洋. 基于强度折减法的三维边坡稳定性与破坏机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 178-185.
[7] 刘红帅, 年廷凯, 万少石. 三维边坡稳定性分析中的边界约束效应[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 638-644.
[8] 张晨,陈剑平,肖云华. 基于神经网络对有限元强度折减法分析[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 114-0118.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .