吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1512-1521.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170089

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

非均匀介质地震AVO响应模拟及分析

刘财1, 裴思嘉1, 郭智奇1, 符伟1, 张宇生2, 刘喜武3,4   

  1. 1. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026;
    2. 中石油东方地球物理公司, 河北 涿州 072751;
    3. 中国石化页岩油气勘探开发重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    4. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-05 出版日期:2018-09-26 发布日期:2018-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭智奇(1980-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事储层地球物理、岩石物理、各向异性地震波场正反演等方面的研究,E-mail:guozhiqi@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:guozhiqi@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘财(1963-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事复杂地震波场的正反演理论和技术、高分辨率地震信号处理等方面的研究,E-mail:liucai@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（41430322，41404090）；中国石油科学研究与技术开发项目（2016A-33）

Seismic AVO Simultation and Analysis in Heterogeneous Media

Liu Cai1, Pei Sijia1, Guo Zhiqi1, Fu Wei1, Zhang Yusheng2, Liu Xiwu3,4   

  1. 1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    2. Bureau of Geophysical Prospecting INC, CNPC, Zhuozhou 072751, Hebei, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Shale Oil/Gas Exploration and Production Technology, SinoPEC, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SinoPEC, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2018-01-05 Online:2018-09-26 Published:2018-11-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41430322,41404090) and CNPC Science Research and Technology Development Project(2016A-33)

PDF (PC)

700

摘要： 地震AVO （amplitude versus offset）技术是一项利用振幅信息研究岩性、检测油气的地震勘探技术。常规方法基于Zoeppritz方程计算模型界面处的反射系数，而实际地下非均匀介质中地震反射特征不仅与入射角度、物性差异有关，还与入射波频率、地层厚度、薄互层结构等因素有关。为此，应用传播矩阵理论充分考虑与这些因素有关的调谐干涉等传播效应，针对实际数据计算非均匀地下介质的高精度合成地震记录，对比Zoeppritz方程、Shuey二项近似方程、Shuey三项近似方程以及传播矩阵算法的模拟效果。研究发现：在小角度入射时Zoeppritz方程、Shuey二项近似方程和Shuey三项近似方程的反射振幅和波形基本一致，大角度入射时Zoeppritz方程与Shuey三项近似方程接近；Zoeppritz算法的模拟结果在小角度入射和浅层情况下与传播矩阵算法差别较小，而在大角度入射和深层情况下与传播矩阵差别较大，说明层间多次波的调谐干涉等传播效应不可忽略。

关键词: Zoeppritz方程, Shuey方程, 传播矩阵理论, 非均匀介质

Abstract: AVO (amplitude versus offset) is a technique for studying lithology and detecting hydrocarbon seismic exploration by using amplitude information. Conventional single interface reflection coefficient can be calculated by Zoeppritz equation; however, the reflection characteristics of layered media seismic wave is not only related to incident angle, but also differences of physical property, incident wave frequency, formation thickness, thin interbedded structure, the formation non-uniformity and other factors, and all the factors related tuning effects are fully considered in the theory of propagation matrix. Based on the data calculation of high-precision synthetic seismogram in heterogeneous underground media, we compared the simulation results of Zoeppritz equation, Shuey two-term approximation equation, Shuey three-term approximate equation, and propagation matrix algorithm. The study shows that at a small incident angle, the reflection amplitude and waveforms of Zoeppritz equation, Shuey two-terms, and Shuey three-term approximation are basically the same; while at a large incident angle, those of Zoeppritz equation and Shuey three-term approximation are closer. Under the condition of small incident angles and shallow layers, the seismic responses of Zoeppritz equation and propagation matrix algorithm is almost the same, but different at large incident angles and deep layers. It is illustrated that the tuning effects and multiple wave interferences cannot be ignored.

Key words: Zoeppritz equation, Shuey equation, propagator matrix, inhomogeneous medium

中图分类号: 

  • P631.4
[1] Zoeppritz K. Über Reflexionad Durchgang Seismischer Wellen Durch Unstetigkeitsflächen[J]. Erdbebenwellen,1919, VⅡb:66-84.
[2] Bortfeld R. Approximations to the Reflection and Transmission Coefficients of Plane Longitudinal and Transverse Waves[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1961, 9(4):485-502.
[3] Chapman C H. Exact and Approximate Generalized Ray Theory in Vertically Inhomogeneous Media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1976, 46(2):201-233.
[4] Richards P G, Frasier C W. Scattering of Elastic Eaves from Depth-Dependent Inhomogeneities[J]. Geophysics, 1976, 41(3):441.
[5] Koefoed O. On the Effect of Poission's Ratios of Rock Strata on the Reflection Coefficients of Plane Wave[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1955, 3(4):381-387.
[6] Aki K, Richards P G. Quantitative Seismology:Theory and Methods[M]. San Francisco:Freeman,1980.
[7] Shuey B R T. A Simplification of the Zoeppritz-Equations[J]. Geophysics, 1985,50(4):609-614.
[8] Fuchs K, Müller G. Computation of Synthetic Seis-mograms with the Reflectivity Method and Comparison with Observations[J]. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1971, 23(4):417-433.
[9] Kennett B L. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media[M]. Cambridge:Cambrigde University Press, 1983.
[10] Fryer G J, Frazer L N. Seismic Waves in Stratified Anisotropic Media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1984, 78(3):691-710.
[11] Carcione J M. AVO Effects of a Hydrocarbon Source-Rock Layer[J]. Geophysics, 2012, 66(2):419-427.
[12] Liu Y, Schmitt D R. Amplitude and AVO Responses of a Single Thin Bed[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(4):1161-1168.
[13] 郭智奇,刘财,李向阳,等. 非弹性层状介质地震波频变AVO响应模拟及分析[J]. 地球物理学报,2016,59(2):664-672. Guo Zhiqi, Liu Cai, Li Xiangyang, et al. Modeling and Analysis of Frequency-Dependent AVO Responses in Inelastic Stratified Media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59(2):664-672.
[14] 郭智奇,刘财,冯晅,等. 各向异性衰减与AVO分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2010,40(2):432-438. Guo Zhiqi, Liu Cai, Feng Xuan, et al. Attenuation Anisotropy and AVO Analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2010, 40(2):432-438.
[15] 郭智奇,刘财,张凤琴. 层状粘弹性介质中SH波的反射、透射问题[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(增刊1):61-65. Guo Zhiqi, Liu Cai, Zhang Fengqin. Reflection and Transmission Problem of SH Waves in Layered Viscoelastic Medium[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2005, 35(Sup. 1):61-65.
[16] 兰慧田. 裂缝性孔隙介质波场模拟与频变AVO储层参数反演[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2014. Lan Huitian. Wave Field Modeling in Fractured Porous Media and Frequency-Dependent AVO Reservoir Parameters Inversion[D]. Changchun:Jilin University,2014.
[17] Rokhlin S I, Wang Y J. Equivalent Boundary Con-ditions for Thin Orthrotropi Clayer Between Two Solids:Reflection, Refraction, and Interface Waves[J]. Journal of Acoustic Society of America,1992, 91:1875-1887.
[18] Ursin B, Stovas A. Reflection and Transmission Res-ponses of a Layered Isotropic Viscoelastic Medium[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(1):307-323.
[19] Carcione J M. AVO Effects of a Hydrocarbon Source-Rock Layer[J]. Geophysics, 2012, 66(2):419-427.
[20] 逄硕,刘财,郭智奇,等. 基于岩石物理模型的页岩孔隙结构反演及横波速度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(2):606-615. Pang Shuo, Liu Cai, Guo Zhiqi, et al. Estimation of Pore-Shape and Shear Wave Velocity Based on Rock-Physics Model in Shale[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017,47(2):606-615.
[1] 丁乾龙, 沈金松, 陈双全, 冉尚, 龙刚. 频率域传播矩阵法地震AVA多参数反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 957-969.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫，刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣，张炯飞，权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力，梁海安，张文娟，荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运，蒋忠诚，叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章，迟宝明，刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊，刘连登，孙景贵，陈国华，张洪喜，闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发