吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 627-634.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190316

• 油气勘探开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏里格气田东二区气水分布及产水控制因素分析

林孟雄1, 刘立2, 张一果1, 常森1, 夏阳1   

  1. 1. 长庆油田分公司第五采气厂地质研究所, 西安 710000;
    2. 自然资源部油气资源战略研究中心, 北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-27 出版日期:2020-03-26 发布日期:2020-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 刘立(1966-),女,研究员,博士,主要从事油气资源勘查开发及管理研究,E-mail:liuli1837@126.com E-mail:liuli1837@126.com
  • 作者简介:林孟雄(1981-),男,高级工程师,主要从事气田开发管理方面的工作,E-mail:linmengxiong_ng_cq@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    “十三五”国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05004-006)

Analysis of Gas-Water Distribution and Water Production Control Factors in the East 2nd Area of Sulige Gas Field

Lin Mengxiong1, Liu Li2, Zhang Yiguo1, Chang Sen1, Xia Yang1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geology, No.5 Gas Production Plant, Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an 710000, China;
    2. Oil and Gas Resources Strategic Research Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2019-12-27 Online:2020-03-26 Published:2020-03-31
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project During the "13th Five-Year Plan" Period(2016ZX05004-006)

摘要: 针对低孔、低渗的致密砂岩气藏高效持续开发急需解决的气水分布及产水控制因素问题,通过苏里格气田东二区气藏地质和生产动态资料的综合分析,得出以下主要认识:地质构造和生烃强度控制本区气水分布的宏观格局,高产气井绝大多数发育在近烃源岩的低洼部位或微幅构造上;储层物性参数对气水分布起着关键的控制作用,物性好的砂体毛细管阻力小,天然气更易于驱替储集条件好的砂岩储层中的地层水形成气层,研究区气层孔隙度介于7%~14%之间,渗透率为(0.50~2.00)×10-3 μm2;泥岩隔层等因素造成气水分布的复杂化,随着下伏山1段泥岩隔层厚度的增大,对应区域盒8段日产气量减小,日产水量增加;致密砂岩气藏产能受开发方式的影响很大,在气藏合理配产过程中,需要考虑压敏及速敏效应的影响:投产时间越长、配产及生产压差越大,气井出水速率越快,出水量越大。采用水平井开发,可增加气井的泄流面积、减小生产压差、提高产能、降低水气比,可以实现延长无水或低水采气期,从而提高采收率。

关键词: 苏里格气田, 气水分布, 孔隙度, 渗透率, 控制因素, 开发方式, 采收率

Abstract: Aiming at the gas and water distribution and control factors needed for the efficient and sustainable development of low-porosity and low-permeability tight sandstone gas reservoirs, a comprehensive analysis of gas reservoir geological and production dynamic data was conducted in the East 2nd area of Sulige gas field. The results show that:1) the geological structure and the intensity of hydrocarbon generation control the macro-pattern of gas-water distribution in this area, and the gas reservoirs are developed on the low-lying part or micro-structure near the source rocks; 2) the physical parameters of reservoir play a key role in controlling the gas-water distribution; 3) the sand bodies with good physical properties have less capillary resistance, and natural gas is more likely to displace the formation water in sandstone reservoirs to form gas layers. The porosity of the gas layers in the study area is between 7% and 14%, and the permeability is between 0.50×10-3 and 2.00×10-3 μm2. The factors such as mudstone barriers complicate the gas-water distribution. The thickness increase of the mudstone barrier in the first Member of Shanxi Formation leads to the decrease of daily gas production but increase water production in the 8th Member of Shihezi Formation in the corresponding area. It is concluded that the production capacity of tight sandstone gas reservoirs is greatly affected by the development method. The pressure sensitive and velocity sensitive effects should be considered for a reasonable production allocation of gas reservoirs:the longer the production time is, the greater the production pressure difference is, the faster the gas well water production rate, and the larger the water production volume. The horizontal well development can increase the drainage area of gas wells, and it can, in turn, reduce the production pressure difference and the water-gas ratio, increase productivity, and extend the water-free or low-water gas recovery period and recovery ratio.

Key words: Sulige gas field, gas-water distribution, porosity, permeability, control factors, development method, recovery ratio

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 付金华,范立勇,刘新社,等.苏里格气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报,2019,40(2):240-256. Fu Jinhua, Fan Liyong, Liu Xinshe,et al Gas Accumulation Conditions and Key Exploration and Development in Technologies in the Sulige Gas Field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(2):240-256.
[2] 何自新, 付金华, 席胜利,等. 苏里格大气田成藏地质特征[J].石油学报, 2003, 24(2):6-12. He Zixin, Fu Jinhua, Xi Shengli,et al. Geological Features of Reservoir Formation of Sulige Gas Field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, 24(2):6-12.
[3] Yu Z,Sun L Y,Wu X N,et al. Characteristics and Controlling Factors of the Middle Array of Ordovician Majiagou Reservoirs to the West of Jingbian Gas Gield,Ordos Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2012,17(4):49-56.
[4] 费世祥,冯强汉,安志伟,等. 苏里格气田中区下石盒子组盒8段沉积相研究[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2013, 36(2):17-22. Fei Shixiang, Feng Qianghan, An Zhiwei, et al.Sedimentary Facies of Shihezi 8 Member in Middlearea, Sulige Gasfield[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2014, 36(2):17-22.
[5] 朱志良,张万,张成功,等.苏里格气田苏59井区气水分布规律研究[J].重庆科技学院学报,2015,17(4):1-5. Zhu Zhiliang, Zhang Wan,Zhang Chenggong, et al. Study on Gas-Water Distribution Law in Su 59 Well Area of Sulige Gas Field[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology, 2015, 17(4):1-5.
[6] 代金友,李建霆,王宝刚,等.苏里格气田西区气水分布规律及其形成机理[J].石油勘探与开发,2012, 39(5):524-529. Dai Jinyou, Li Jianting,Wang Baogang,et al. Gas and Water Distribution in the Western Area of Sulige Gas Field and Its Formation Mechanism[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(5):524-529.
[7] 郭建林.苏里格气田相对高产富集储层分布规律研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2008. Guo Jianlin. Study on the Distribution of Relatively High-Yield and Enriched Reservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2008.
[8] 李进步, 付斌, 赵忠军,等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏储层表征技术及其发展展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(12):35-41. Li Jinbu, Fu Bin, Zhao Zhongjun, et al. Characterization Technology for Tight Sandstone Gasreservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin, and Its Development Prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(12):35-41.
[9] Yang H,Han J,Sun C, et al. A Development Model and Petroleum Exploration of Karst Reservoirs of Ordovician Yingshan Formation in the Northern Slope of Tazhong Palaeouplift[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(2):199-205.
[10] 金文辉.低渗透砂岩气藏气水分布规律研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2013. Jin Wenhui.Study on Gas-Water Distribution Law of Low Permeability Sandstone Gas Reservoir[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2013.
[11] 管岩,田国庆,薛萧敏,等.储层非均质性对低渗透气藏富集规律的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏X区盒8段为例[J].国外测井技术,2019,40(5):48-51. Guan Yan,Tian Guoqing,Xue Xiaomin,et al. Influence of Reservoir Heterogeneity on Enrichment Law of Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs:Taking the P2h8 of Su X Block of Sulige Gas Field in Ordos Basin as an Example[J].World Well Logging Technology,2019,40(5):48-51.
[12] 窦伟坦,刘新社,杜涛.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田地层水成因及气水分布规律[J].石油学报,2010,31(5):767-773. Dou Weitan, Liu Xinshe,Du Tao. Formation of Water and Gas-Water Distribution in the Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petroleum Sinica, 2010,31(5):767-773.
[13] 李仲冬.榆林子洲地区山2段地层水成因及分布规律研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2008. Li Zhongdong. Study on the Genesis and Distribution of Stratigraphic Water in the Shan 2 Member of the Yulinzizhou Area[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2008.
[14] 金文辉,周文.苏西盒8气藏气井产水成因剖析[J].物探化探计算技术, 2012,34(6):708-712. Jin Wenhui, Zhou Wen. Analysis of the Genesis of Gas Production in Suxi Box 8 Gas Reservoir[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Technology, 2012,34(6):708-712.
[15] Zhang Hualiang, Janson X, Liu Li, et al. Lithofacies, Diagenesis, and Reservoir Quality Evaluation of Wolfcamp Unconventional Succession in the Midland Basin,West Texas[M]. Houston Texas:AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, 2017.
[16] 李洪玺.榆林气田陕141井区气井生产动态特征分析[J].天然气工业, 2005, 25(12):89-91. Li Hongxi. Analysis of Dynamic Characteristics of Gas Well Production in Shaan 141 Well Area of Yulin Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(12):89-91.
[17] 王蕾蕾,何顺利,代金友.苏里格气田西区产水类型研究[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2010,33(4):41-44. Wang Leilei, He Shunli, Dai Jinyou. Research on Water Production Types in the West Area of Sulige Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2010, 33(4):41-44.
[18] 袁恩来.大牛地气田老区山1气藏气水分布特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2011. Yuan Enlai. Study on Gas-Water Distribution Characteristics of Shan 1 Gas Reservoir in the Old Area of Daniudi Gas Field[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2011.
[19] 费世祥,陈兴官,靳锁宝,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田有效砂体展布规律与开发方式研究:以苏东南区为例[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2018,41(4):55-61. Fei Shixiang,Chen Xingguan, Jin Suobao, et al. Distribution Laws and Development Modes of Effective Sandbodies in Sulige Gas Field:Examples from Southeast Sulige Block[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2018,41(4):55-61.
[20] 孙恩慧,杨威,汪巍,等.底水油藏高含水期油水两相水平井产能预测[J].石油化工应用,2019,38(9):21-26. Sun Enhui,Yang Wei,Wang Wei, et al.Application Productivity Analysis Method of Oil and Water Two-Phase Horizontal Well of High Water Cut Stage in Bottom Water Reservoir[J]. Petrochemical Industry, 2019,38(9):21-26.
[21] 曹海,詹国卫,余小群,等.深层页岩气井产能的主要影响因素:以四川盆地南永川区块为例[J].天然气工业,2019,19(增刊1):118-122. Cao Hai, Zhan Guowei, Yu Xiaoqun, et al. Main Factors Affecting the Productivity of Deep Shale Gas Wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(Sup.1):118-122.
[22] 彭神奇,董文玉,景琛.大牛地气田大8-大10井区水平井产能影响因素[J].中外能源,2019,24(11):51-57. Peng Shenqi,Dong Wenyu,Jing Chen. Influencing Factors of Horizontal Well Productivity in Da8-Da10 Well Block of Daniudi Gas Field[J]. Sino-Global Energy,2019,24(11):51-57.
[23] 王羲.低渗气藏分支水平井气水两相产能影响因素分析[J].钻采工艺,2019,42(3):41-43. Wang Xi. Study on Gas-Water Produtivty of Multi-Lateral Horizontal Wells in Low Permibility Gas Reservoir and Facters[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2019,42(3):41-43.
[1] 杨国鑫, 庞玉茂, 马瑞山, 郭兴伟, 曹慧, 蔡来星. 孔隙及流体介质对碎屑岩热导率的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1728-1741.
[2] 路研, 刘宗宾, 廖新武, 李超, 王亚. 低渗透砂岩油藏水驱渗流特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1077-1090.
[3] 易定红, 刘应如, 李积永, 李红哲, 徐晓玲, 吴颜雄, 王爱萍, 马元琨, 涂加沙, 贾正良. 柴达木盆地南八仙地区渐新世沉积环境及储层物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 705-720.
[4] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[5] 袁益龙, 唐佳伟, 李鹏, 何瑞敏, 郭强, 钟承昊. 热-力耦合作用下花岗岩粗糙裂隙渗透率演化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 179-187.
[6] 郑轩, 宗兆云, 付亚群, 骆坤. 海域油气盖层叠前地震反演预测方法及应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2128-2141.
[7] 胡佳, 王丽丽, 王立贤, 韩昊天, 陶鹏, 唐华风.

基于岩浆汇聚区和上升通道特征的火山岩分布规律——以松辽盆地长岭断陷下白垩统营城组为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 429-446.

[8] 罗超, 李晓颜, 刘渠洋, 张强, 于洲, 代洁, 尹楠鑫, 林魂. 砂质辫状河储层构型差异特征分析——以苏里格气田盒8下亚段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 30-43.
[9] 赵越, 李磊, 司运航, 王会敏. 浅层页岩气储层孔隙分形特征及控制因素——以云南昭通地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1813-1829.
[10] 徐春强, 张新涛, 王晨杰, 张震, 刘丰. 渤中凹陷中生界火山岩特征及优质储层控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1027-.
[11] 刘宗宾, 程奇, 吕坐彬, 房娜, 王双龙.

渤海海域锦州南油田太古宇变质岩潜山储层特征及其发育模式 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 829-839.

[12] 张丽华, 王敏, 单刚义, 潘保芝, 曹玥. 不同岩性火山岩孔隙度压力敏感性及其影响因素:以长岭断陷火山岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 382-389.
[13] 薛辉, 韩春元, 朱萍, 汤小琪, 杨经栋, 窦连彬. 金坛储气库阜宁组四段含盐层系沉积特征及成盐模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 363-381.
[14] 崔裔曈, 王祝文, 徐方慧, 韩锐羿, 齐兴华. 基于斯通利波及电成像测井数据对火成岩裂缝地层的特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 624-632.
[15] 侯贤沐, 王付勇, 宰芸, 廉培庆. 基于机器学习和测井数据的碳酸盐岩孔隙度与渗透率预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 644-653.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔建军, 刘晓春, 胡娟, 曲玮. 桐柏杂岩中印支期变质岩包体的变质作用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 618 -629 .
[2] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[3] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[4] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[5] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[6] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[7] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[8] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[9] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[10] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .