吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 1535-1543.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210040

• 绿色岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

黏性土中静压桩沉桩过程现场试验及桩土界面桩侧土压力分析

王永洪1, 桑松魁2,3, 张明义1, 李长河4, 韩勃5, 袁炳祥6, 项俊宁7, 王振杰7, 刘慧宁7   

  1. 1. 青岛理工大学土木工程学院, 山东 青岛 266033;
    2. 中基久瑞岩土工程有限公司, 山东 青岛 266061;
    3. 青岛绿色理工岩土工程有限公司, 山东 青岛 266033;
    4. 青岛理工大学机械与汽车工程学院, 山东 青岛 266520;
    5. 山东大学土建与水利学院, 济南 250061;
    6. 广东工业大学土木与交通工程学院, 广州 510006;
    7. 山东高速工程建设集团有限公司, 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-03 出版日期:2021-09-26 发布日期:2021-09-29
  • 作者简介:王永洪(1984-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事地基基础及岩土工程测试方面的研究,E-mail:hong7986@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51708312);山东省重点研发计划项目(2018GSF117010)

Analysis of Earth Pressure at Interface of Piles-Soil in Pile Sinking Under Static Pressure in Cohesive Soil

Wang Yonghong1, Sang Songkui2,3, Zhang Mingyi1, Li Changhe4, Han Bo5, Yuan Bingxiang6, Xiang Junning7, Wang Zhenjie7, Liu Huining7   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, Shandong, China;
    2. Zhongji Jiurui Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266061, Shandong, China;
    3. Qingdao Green Technology Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266033, Shandong, China;
    4. School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, Shandong, China;
    5. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China;
    6. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China;
    7. Shandong Hi-Speed Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2021-02-03 Online:2021-09-26 Published:2021-09-29
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708312) and the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong (2018GSF117010)

摘要: 为了揭示黏性土中静压桩贯入过程中桩土界面桩侧土压力的受力特性,依托山东东营某桩工程开展了现场足尺试验,得到了静压桩沉桩过程中桩土界面桩侧土压力随贯入深度的变化规律,分析了贯入过程中不同土层桩侧土压力的分布特性,明确了桩侧土压力在沉桩过程中存在明显的退化效应,探讨了桩土界面桩侧土压力与桩侧上覆土体竖向土压力的比值关系。结果表明:桩土界面桩侧土压力与土层性质密切相关;随着传感器贯入深度的逐渐增加,桩侧土压力逐渐增大,并且增大幅度随土层的不同而不同;在同一贯入深度处,桩土界面桩侧土压力存在明显的退化现象,粉土中的退化幅度明显小于粉质黏土中的退化幅度;同一土层中桩土界面桩侧土压力与桩侧上覆土体竖向土压力的比值为常数,并且粉土中的比值明显大于粉质黏土中的比值。

关键词: 静压桩, 桩侧土压力, 退化效应, 现场试验

Abstract: In order to reveal the changes of the earth pressure at the pile-soil interface during the penetration of the jacked pile in the cohesive soils, based on a pile project in Dongying, Shandong Province, a full-scale field test was carried out. The variation law of the earth pressure on the side of the pile with the penetration depth during the process of jacked pile sinking was obtained. The distribution characteristics of the earth pressure on the side of piles in different soil layers were analyzed. It is clear that the earth pressure on the pile sides has obvious degradation effect in the process of pile sinking. The relationship between the soil pressure at the pile sides and the overburden soil weight at the pile-soil interface was discussed. The results show that the earth pressure at the pile-soil interface is closely related to the soil properties. As the penetration depth of the sensor increases, the soil pressure on the side of the pile increases gradually, and the increase rate varies with different soil layers. At the same depth, the earth pressure at the pile-soil interface degrades obviously, and the degradation rate in silt soil is less than that in silty clay. In the same soil layer, the ratio of the earth pressure on the pile-soil interface to the soil weight on the pile-soil interface is constant, and the ratio in silt soil is obviously greater than that in silty clay.

Key words: jacked pile, earth pressure on pile side, degradation effect, field test

中图分类号: 

  • TU473.11
[1] Zhang Q, Liu S, Zhang S, et al. Simplified Non-Linear Approaches for Response of a Single Pile and Pile Groups Considering Progressive Deformation of Pile-Soil System[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2016, 56(3):473-484.
[2] Tehrani F S, Han F, Salgado R, et al. Effect of Surface Roughness on the Shaft Resistance of Non-Displacement Piles Embedded in Sand[J]. Géotechnique, 2016, 66(5):386-400.
[3] Khanmohammadi M, Fakharian K. Numerical Modelling of Pile Installation and Set-up Effects on Pile Shaft Capacity[J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 13(5):484-498.
[4] 郑华茂. 砂土中静压管桩模型试验及受力性能研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2015. Zheng Huamao. Model Text and Analysis of Jacked Tubular Pile in Sand[D]. Zhengzhou:Zhengzhou University, 2015.
[5] 李雨浓, Lehane B M. 双层高岭黏土中沉桩特性模型试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6):1778-1784. Li Yunong, Lehane B M. Later Stress for Model Jacked Piles in Two-Layered Kaolin Clay[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(6):1778-1784.
[6] 张宇超, 陆烨. 基于模型试验的桩周土压力[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 24(2):296-303. Zhang Yuchao, Lu Ye. Soil Pressure Induced by Pile Driving Based on Model Test[J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Natural Science), 2018, 24(2):296-303.
[7] 陆烨, 王校勇, 孙汉清, 等. 室内静压沉桩试验桩周土体全过程位移场分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(10):1366-1373. Lu Ye, Wang Xiaoyong, Sun Hanqing, et al. Analyses on Soil Displacement Field Cause by Press in Process of Process of Pile Model Teste[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2018, 46(10):1366-1373.
[8] 李林, 李镜培, 孙德安, 等. 考虑天然黏土应力各向异性的静压沉桩效应研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(5):1055-1064. Li Lin, Li Jingpei, Sun De'an, et al.Pile Jacking-in Effects Considering Stress Anisotropy of Natural Clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(5):1055-1064.
[9] 张亚国, 李镜培. 静压沉桩引起的土体应力与孔压分布特征[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(12):1587-1593. Zhang Yaguo, Li Jingpei. Distribution Characteristics of Stress and Pore Pressure Induced by Pile Jacking[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018, 52(12):1587-1593.
[10] 李镜培, 操小兵, 李林, 等. 静压沉桩与CPTU贯入离心模型试验及机理研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12):1-8. Li Jingpei, Cao Xiaobing, Li Lin, et al. Centrifugal Model Test and Mechanism Study of Jacked Pile and CPTU Penetration[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12):1-8.
[11] Hwang J H, Liang N, Chen C S. Ground Response During Pile Driving[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(11):939-949.
[12] 唐世栋, 何连生, 傅纵. 软土地基中单桩施工引起的超孔隙水压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2002, 23(6):725-729. Tang Shidong, He Liansheng, Fu Zong. Excess Pore Water Pressure Induced by Single Pile Construction in Soft Soil Foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(6):725-729.
[13] 张忠苗, 谢志专, 刘俊伟, 等. 淤质与粉质互层土中管桩沉桩过程的土压力[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2011, 45(8):1430-1434. Zhang Zhongmiao, Xie Zhizhuan, Liu Junwei, et al. The Earth Pressure During Pile Driving in Silty Soil with Mucky Soil Interbed[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engeering Science), 2011, 45(8):1430-1434.
[14] Doherty P D, Gavin K G. Shaft Capacity of Open-Ended Piles in Clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137(11):1090-1120.
[15] 唐世栋, 何连生, 叶真华. 软土地基中桩基施工引起的侧向土压力增量[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(6):752-755. Tang Shidong, He Liansheng, Ye Zhenhua. Increment of Lateral Pressure Caused by Installation of Pile in Soft Foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(6):752-755.
[16] 李雨浓, Barry M Lehane, 刘清秉. 黏土中静压沉桩离心模型[J]. 工程科学学报, 2018, 40(3):285-292. Li Yunong, Lehane B M, Liu Qingbing. Centrifuge Modeling of Jacked Pile in Clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2018, 40(3):285-292.
[17] Bond A J, Jardine R J. Shaft Capacity of Displacement Piles in High OCR Clay[J]. Geotechnique, 1995, 45(1):3-23.
[1] 王永洪, 徐泽强, 张明义, 张利杰, 韩勃, 梁作栋, 蒿雨露. 黏性土中不同直径静压桩贯入特性室内模型试验及颗粒流数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1619-1628.
[2] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[3] 王永洪, 银吉超, 张明义, 方翔, 桑松魁, 张广帅, 刘慧宁, 刘宪. 黏性土中静力沉桩过程桩土界面土压力模型试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 196-206.
[4] 王永洪, 黄永峰, 张明义, 李长河, 苏雷, 仉文岗, 林沛元, 崔纪飞, 焉振. 静压桩承载力时间效应的研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1490-1505.
[5] 桑松魁, 王永洪, 张明义, 孔亮, 吴文兵, 陈志雄, 李兆龙, 张启军. 粉土与粉质黏土互层中静压桩桩土界面孔隙水压力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1551-1559.
[6] 张明义, 刘雪颖, 王永洪, 白晓宇, 桑松魁. 粉土及粉质黏土对静压沉桩桩端阻力影响机制现场试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1804-1813.
[7] 李雨浓, 李镜培, 赵仲芳, 朱火根. 层状地基静压桩贯入过程机理试验[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1409-1414.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .