吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 908-917.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201503206

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

裂隙-管道介质泉流域水文地质模拟试验

束龙仓, 范建辉, 鲁程鹏, 张春艳, 唐然   

  1. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-24 发布日期:2015-05-26
  • 作者简介:束龙仓(1964),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下水资源评价与管理、地下水与生态环境研究,E-mail:lcshu@hhu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41172203,41201029)

Hydrogeological Simulation Test of Fissure-Conduit Media in Springs Watershed

Shu Longcang, Fan Jianhui, Lu Chengpeng, Zhang Chunyan, Tang Ran   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210098, China
  • Received:2014-07-24 Published:2015-05-26

摘要:

为了深入认识岩溶泉流域的流量过程影响因素和作用机制,以西南岩溶泉流域水文地质概念模型为原型,建立了实验室尺度下的裂隙-管道介质物理模型和数值模型。选取补给雨强、泉口直径、落水洞与开采井的位置作为影响因子,模拟了泉流量过程。试验结果表明:单次降水试验可以观测得到泉流量增加、平稳波动和衰减共三个阶段;同一泉口直径条件下,补给强度对泉流量衰减系数的影响极小,直径为3,4,5,7 mm的泉口直径对应的衰减系数分别为0.003 6,0.006 7,0.011 5,0.012 9,泉口直径与衰减系数呈近似对数关系;落水洞汇流水量占泉流量的比例远大于裂隙;2~3 mm是微小裂隙与较大裂隙的过渡区域,两种类型的介质泉流量过程差异明显;开采井分别位于泉口附近、模型中间位置和落水洞时,泉流量衰减系数依次减小。

关键词: 裂隙-管道介质, 泉流量过程, 物理试验, 数值模拟, 落水洞, 开采井

Abstract:

In order to deeply understand the factors and mechanism of the flow process in a karst spring basin, a fracture-conduit media physical model and a numerical model are established according to the hydrogeological conceptual model in a karst area of Southwest China. Recharge, spring vent, sinkhole, and pumping well are selected as the impacting factors to the simulate spring flow process. The results of the experiments show three phases of spring flow process under the single rainfall test: increase, stability, and attenuation. The results also show that recharge has a very small impact on the attenuation coefficient with the same spring vent diameter; the corresponding attenuation coefficients with 3,4,5,7 mm diameter are 0.003 6, 0.006 7, 0.011 5, 0.012 9, a logarithmic relationship; the proportion of sinkhole flow is much larger than the fissure's. 2-3 mm is the transition zone of the larger fissure to the small cracks, the spring flows of the two types of media are quite different. The location of pumping wells is an important factor affecting the spring flow decay process, and the attenuation coefficients are decreased when the pumping well are located at near the spring vent, center of the model, and in the sinkhole.

Key words: fissure-conduit media, spring flow process, physical experiment, numerical simulation, sinkhole, pumping well

中图分类号: 

  • P641

[1] 覃小群,朱明秋,蒋忠诚.近年来我国西南岩溶石漠化研究进展[J].中国岩溶,2006, 25(3):234-238. Qin Xiaoqun, Zhu Mingqiu, Jiang Zhongcheng.A Review on Recent Advances in Rocky Desertification in Southwest China Karst Region[J].Carsologica Sinica, 2006, 25(3):234-238.

[2] 周志芳,王锦国,黄勇.裂隙介质水动力学原理[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007. Zhou Zhifang,Wang Jinguo,Huang Yong. Theory on Dynamics of Fluids in Fractured Medium[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007.

[3] 速宝玉,詹美礼,赵坚.光滑裂隙水流模型试验及其机理初探[J].水利学报,1994(5):19-24. Su Baoyu, Zhan Meili, Zhao Jian.The Model Test of the Flow in Smooth Fracture and the Study of Its Mechanism[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1994(5):19-24.

[4] 李文兴,王刚.岩溶管道水流的等效管束组合模拟[J].中国岩溶,1997, 16(3):40-46. Li Wenxing, Wang Gang.Combination Simulation of Equivalent Conduits of Karst Conduit Flow[J].Carsologica Sinica,1997, 16(3):40-46.

[5] Salve R,Wang J S, Doughty C.Liquid-Release Tests in Unsaturated Fractures Welded Tuffs:Ⅰ:Field Investigations[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 256(1/2):60-79.

[6] 沈振中,陈雰,赵坚.岩溶管道与裂隙交叉渗流特性试验研究[J].水利学报,2008,39(2):137-145. Shen Zhenzhong, Chen Fen, Zhao Jian. Experimental Study on Seepage Characteristics of the Intersection of Tubular Karst Passage and Fissure[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008,39(2):137-145.

[7] 董贵明,束龙仓,田娟,等. 西南岩溶地下河系统水流运动数值模型[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2011,41(4): 1136-1143,1156. Dong Guiming,Shu Longcang,Tian Juan,et al.Numerical Model of Groundwater Flow in Karst Underground River System,Southwestern China[J].Journal of Jilin University:Erath Science Edition, 2011,41(4): 1136-1143,1156.

[8] 刘丽红,束龙仓,鲁程鹏. 基于管道流模型的岩溶含水系统降雨泉流量响应规律:以贵州后寨典型小流域为例[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2010,40(5), 1083-1089. Liu Lihong, Shu Longcang,Lu Chengpeng.Precipitation and Discharge Responsemechanism Based on Conduit Flow Model in Karstic Water System:Application the Houzhai Karstic Watersystem of Guizhou Province[J] Journal of Jilin University:Erath Science Edition, 2010,40(5), 1083-1089.

[9] 陈崇希.岩溶管道-裂隙-孔隙三重空隙介质地下水流模型及模拟方法研究[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,1995,20(4):361-366. Chen Chongxi. Groundwater Flow Model and Simulation Method in Triple Media of Karstic Tube-Fissure-Pore[J]. EarthSciene:Journal of China University of Geosciences,1995,20(4):361-366.

[10] 李静.洪山泉流量动态系统分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2004(2):79-82. Li Jing.Dynamic System Analysis for Flux of the Hongshan Spring[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2004(2):79-82.

[11] 孙晨,束龙仓,鲁程鹏,等.裂隙-管道介质泉流量衰减过程试验研究及数值模拟[J].水利学报,2014,45(1):50-64. Sun Chen,Shu Longcang,Lu Chengpeng,et al.Physical Experiment and Numerical Simulation of Spring Flow Attenuation Process in Fissure-Conduit Media[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014,45(1):50-64.

[12] 束龙仓,陶玉飞,董贵明,等.岩溶多重介质泉水流量衰减过程的室内模拟及分析[J].工程勘察,2008(9):32-35. Shu Longcang,Tao Yufei,Dong Guiming,et al. Spring Flow Attenuation Process Simulation and Analysis of the Karst Multi-Media[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying,2008(9):32-35.

[13] 程星,杨子江.影响喀斯特地下水调蓄功能的因素的探讨[J].中国岩溶,2000,19(1):54-59. Cheng Xing, Yang Zijiang.A Discussion on the Factors of Underground Water Regulation in Karst Areas[J].Carsologica Sinica, 2000,19(1):54-59.

[14] Thomas E R. System and Boundary Conceptualization in Ground-Water Flow Simulation[R].Washington D C:United States Government Printing Office,2001.

[15] 陈崇希,林敏.地下水动力学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1999. Chen Chongxi,Lin Min.Groundwater Dynamics[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,1999.

[16] 徐海珍,李国敏,张寿全,等.北京市平谷盆地地下水三维数值模拟及管理应用[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2011,38(2):27-34. Xu Haizhen, Li Guomin, Zhang Shouquan,et al. Development of a 3-D Numerical Groundwater Flow Model of the Pinggu Basin and Groundwater Resources Management[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(2):27-34.

[17] 卢文喜,李平,王福林,等.挠力河流域三维地下水流数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2007,37(3): 541-545. Lu Wenxi, Li Ping,Wang Fulin,et al.Three Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Groundwater in Naolihe Watershed[J].Journal of Jilin University:Erath Science Edition, 2007,37(3): 541-545.

[18] Neretnieks I,Eriksen T,Tähtinen P.Tracer Movement in a Single Fissure in Granitic Rock: Some Experimental Results and Their Interpretation[J]. Water Resource Research,1982,18(4):849-858.

[19] 刘昌军,赵华,张顺福,等. 台兰河地下水库辐射井抽水过程的非稳定渗流场的有限元分析[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2013,43(3): 922-930. Liu Changjun,Zhao Hua,Zhang Shunfu,et al.Finite Element Analysis on Unsteady Seepage Field of Groundwater Reservoir of Tailan River During the Pumping Water of the Radiation Well[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Erath Science Edition, 2013,43(3): 922-930.

[20] 梁彬,朱明秋,裴建国,等.岩溶水资源开发利用与综合治理经验:以湘西岩溶区为例[J]. 水资源保护,2007,23(2): 64-69. Liang Bin,Zhu Mingqiu,Pei Jianguo,et al.Experience on Development and Comprehensive Management of Karst Water Resources: A Case Study of Karst Regions in West Hunan[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2007,23(2): 64-69.

[1] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[6] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[7] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[8] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[9] 刁国君, 何昕.

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.

[10] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[11] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[12] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[13] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[14] 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[15] 韩长玉, 赵浩汀.

路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[2] 周丽萍, 申向东, 李学斌, 白忠强. 天然浮石粉水泥土力学性质的试验研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 492 -497 .
[3] 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 邵锐. 火山碎屑岩的储层物性--以松辽盆地营城组为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 227 -236 .
[4] 潘殿琦,张祖培,潘殿彩,陈义民,徐 瑞. 人工冻土纵波波速与温度和含水率的关系[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 588 -591 .
[5] 付 哲,周云轩,刘殿伟,刘万崧. 基于特征的面向对象虚拟GIS数据模型设计与原型系统实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 647 -652 .
[6] 滕吉文, 刘财, 韩立国, 阮小敏, 闫雅芬, 张永谦. 汶川—映秀MS8.0地震的介质破裂与深部物质运移的动力机制[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 559 -583 .
[7] 卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,魏建设. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 928 -0932 .
[8] 黄继国,黄国鑫,聂广正,魏海娟,吕爱民,王雪松. 中温UBF与UASB两相厌氧系统处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 144 -0147 .
[9] 孙才志,刘玉兰,杨 俊. 下辽河平原地下水生态水位与可持续开发调控研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 249 -254 .
[10] 舒萍,曲延明,王国军,丁日新,艾兴波,纪学雁,唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺. 松辽盆地火山岩储层裂缝地质特征与地球物理识别[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 726 -0733 .