吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 46-56.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201601105

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

升平油田葡萄花油层高分辨率层序地层格架及储层特征

刘为付1, 刘双龙2, 孙立新2, 张绍臣1   

  1. 1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江大庆 163318;
    2. 大庆试油试采公司, 黑龙江大庆 163412
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-15 出版日期:2016-01-26 发布日期:2016-01-26
  • 作者简介:刘为付(1962),男,在站博士后,主要从事沉积学与储层地质学方面研究,E-mail:liuwfdq@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    全国油气资源战略选区调查与评价项目(XQ2014-1211302108019);东北石油大学培育基金项目(XN2014119)

High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphic Framework and Reservoir Characteristics of Putaohua Reservoir in Shengping Oilfield

Liu Weifu1, Liu Shuanglong2, Sun Lixin2, Zhang Shaochen1   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. Well Testing and Perforating Company, Daqing Oilfield Co, Ltd, Daqing 163412, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2015-05-15 Online:2016-01-26 Published:2016-01-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by National Land and Resources Investigation and Evaluation of Oil and Gas Resources Strategic Selection of China (XQ2014-1211302108019) and Northeast Petroleum University Cultivation Foundation (XN2014119)

摘要:

利用高分辨率层序地层理论分析方法,在升平油田葡萄花油层三维地震资料及15口井岩心和356口井测井资料综合研究的基础上,通过不同级次基准面旋回界面特征的识别,将本区划分为1个长期、2个中期、6个短期和13个超短期层序,以超短期层序为目标,建立了单砂体等时对比单元的地层格架。以超短期层序为控制目标,详细研究了葡萄花油层沉积微相及单砂体分布规律:基准面上升期是三角洲河道砂体发育最有利时期,单砂体厚度大连续分布广;湖泛期细粒沉积物分布广泛,储集层不发育;基准面下降期受下切作用影响,河道砂体不发育。提出了葡萄花油层超短期旋回层序由于同沉积构造抬升作用所导致的从北到南逐渐减薄超覆尖灭新地层模式。

关键词: 储层, 升平油田, 葡萄花油层, 高分辨率层序, 基准面, 地层格架

Abstract:

According to the three-dimensional seismic, 15 well cores,and 356 well logging data, by using the high-resolution sequence stratigraphy theory, the authors identified the cycle surfaces of Putaohua reservoir at different time base level cycle in Shengping oilfield. The stratigraphy is divided into one long-term, two medium-term, six short-term and 13 super short-term cyclic sequences. The high resolution sequence stratigraphic framework has been established by taking the super short-term cycle sequence as the isochronous stratigraphic correlation unit in the region. The gradually southward thinning and missing stratigraphic model has been proposed in Putaohua super short-term base level cycle sequence, which was resulted from the tectonic uplift. The main sand distribution of Putaohua reservoir has been clarified through the research on the characteristics of single sand body distribution in the super short-term base level cycle. It is indicated that the continuous stacking thick sandbodies developed at the ascending hemicycle in the delta channel and the fine-grained sediments deposited at the descending hemicycle represent the main development stage of regional restraining barrier and cap rock. Based on the above analysis and application of the high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, the isopach map of sandstone, the ratio of sandstone to mudstone, the sedimentary microfacies map, and 3-D simulation of sequence indicator of sandbody distribution are plotted in a chronological stratigraphic framework.

Key words: reservoir, Shengping oilfield, Putaohua reservoir, high resolution sequence, base level, stratigraphic framework

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13

[1] Cross T A.High-Resolution Stratigraphic Correlation from the Perception of Base-Level Cycles and Sediment Accommodation[C].Proceeding of Northwestern Europian Sequence Stratigraphy Congress. Paris:Techniq,1994:105-123.

[2] 邓宏文.高分辨率层序地层学应用中的问题探析[J].古地理学报,2009,11(5):471-480. Deng Hongwen.Discussion on Problems of Applying High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2009,11(5):471-480.

[3] 姜洪福,张世广.复杂断块油田高分辨率层序地层学及砂体几何学特征:以海塔盆地贝尔凹陷呼和诺仁油田贝301区块南屯组二段为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(5):1419-1431. Jiang Hongfu,Zhang Shiguang.High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy and Sandbody Geometry Characteristics of Complicated Fault Oilfield:Take Second Segment of Nantun Group in Bei 301 Region of Huhenuoren Oilfield of Beier Depression in Haita Basin for Example[J].Journal of Jiling University(Earth Science Edition),2014,44(5):1419-1431.

[4] 李志鹏,林承焰,张家锋,等.高浅南区NmⅡ和NmⅢ油组高分辨率层序构型及其对储层构型的控制[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(1):20-26. Li Zhipeng,Lin Chengyan,Zhang Jiafeng,et al.High Resolution Sequence Architecture and Its Control over Reservoir Architecture in NmⅡ & NmⅢ Oil Groups,Gaoqiannan Area[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2012,36(1):20-26.

[5] Wang Tong,Shao Longyi,Tian Ye,et al.Sequence Stratigraphy of the Jurassic Coal Measures in Northwestern China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(3):769-778.

[6] Zhu Xiaomin,Dong Yanlei,Yang Junsheng,et al.Sequence Stratigraphic Framework and Distribution of Depositional Systems for the Paleogene in Liaodong Bay Area[J].Science in China:Series D:Earth Sciences,2008,51(2):1-10.

[7] 王训练.露头层序地层学研究中定义和识别不同级别沉积层序的标准[J].中国科学(D辑),2003,33(11):1067-1067. Wang Xunlian. The Define of Outcrop Sequence Stratigraphy and the Identification of Different Levels Standard in Sedimentary Sequence[J].Science in China(Series D),2003,33(11):1057-1068.

[8] 朱筱敏,刘媛,方庆,等.大型坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲形成条件和沉积模式:以松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶余油层为例[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):89-99. Zhu Xiaomin,Liu Yuan,Fang Qing,et al.Formation and Sedimentary Model of Shallow Delta in Large-Scale Lake:Example from Cretaceous Quantou Formation in Sanzhao Sag,Songliao Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):89-99.

[9] 刘宗堡,赵淼,吕延防,等.松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层地层减薄模式及控油意义[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(4):984-990. Liu Zongbao,Zhao Miao,Lü Yanfang,et al.Formation Reduce Model and Govern Oil Significance of Putaohua Oil Layer in Sanzhao Depression Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2012,42(4):984-990.

[10] 阮壮,谭广辉,于炳松,等.浅水湖盆内砂体类型及其控制因素分析:以松辽盆地喇萨杏地区PI油层为例[J].地层学杂志,2013,37(3):321-330. Ruan Zhuang,Tan Guanghui,Yu Bingsong,et al.Sand Bodies in a Shallow Lake Basin:The PI Oil Bed in the Lasaxing Area,Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Stratigraphy,2013,37(3):321-330.

[11] 孙雨,马世忠,闫百泉,等.浅水湖盆河控三角洲短期基准面旋回结构样式与沉积演化:以松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部扶余油层为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(8):3405-3414. Sun Yu,Ma Shizhong,Yan Baiquan,et al.Sedimentary Evolution and Structure Types of Short-Term Base-Level Cycle Sequences of Shallow Lacustrine Fluvial-Dominated Delta Example of Fuyu Oil Layer in Southern Fuxin Uplift of Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology Edition),2013,44(8):3405-3414.

[12] 郭巍,刘招君,董惠民,等.松辽盆地层序地层特征及油气聚集规律[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(2):216-221. Guo Wei,Liu Zhaojun,Dong Huimin,et al.The Sequence Strati-Graphic Features and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Jiling University(Earth Science Edition),2004,34(2):216-221.

[13] 张世广,柳成志,卢双舫,等.高分辨率层序地层学在河、湖、三角洲复合沉积体系的应用:以朝阳沟油田扶余油层开发区块为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2009,39(3):361-368. Zhang Shiguang, Liu Chengzhi, Lu Shuangfang, et al. The Application of High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy in Multiplex Deposition System of the River,Lake and Delta:To Take the Development Block of Fuyu Oil Layer in Chaoyanggou Reservoir for Example[J].Journal of Jiling University(Earth Science Edition),2009,39(3):361-368.

[14] 郑荣才,周祺,王华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长北气田山西组2段高分辨率层序构型与砂体预测[J].高校地质学报,2009,15(1):69-79. Zheng Rongcai,Zhou Qi,Wang Hua,et al.The Sequence Architecture and Sandbody Predicition of the Second Member of Shanxi Formation in Changbei Gas Field,Ordos Basin[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2009,15(1):69-79.

[15] 管红,孙明亮,董月霞,等.南堡凹陷南部东营组高分辨率层序地层学分析[J].地层学杂志,2008,32(2):177-181. Guan Hong,Sun Mingliang,Dong Yuexia,et al.High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of Dongying Formation in Southern Nanpu Sag[J].Journal of Stratigraphy,2008,32(2):177-181.

[16] 郑荣才,彭军,彭光明,等.高分辨率层序分析在油藏开发工程中的应用:以百色盆地仑35块那二段油藏为例[J].沉积学报,2003,21(4):654-662. Zheng Rongcai,Peng Jun,Peng Guangming,et al.Analysis of High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of the Second Member of Nadu Formation in Lun-35 Block of Baise Basin and Its Application in Development of Oil Reservoir[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2003,21(4):654-662.

[1] 唐华风, 张亚东, 邹明倬, 陆国超, 户景松, 张津铭, 卞海越. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷K油田中生界火山岩储层定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 739-753.
[2] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[3] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[4] 王蓓东, 杨胜来 , 赵帅 , 邓惠 , 张钰祥 , 白浩言, 李沁怡, 姜艺. 高磨地区震旦系灯影组四段台内储层储集空间类型及其孔喉结构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 804-817.
[5] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[6] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[7] 丁梦颜, 冯晅, 刘财. 裂缝对岩石非线性弹性特征的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1051-1061.
[8] 刘涛, 刘宗堡, 张可佳, 张岩, 张瑞雪, 刘晓文, 徐翠云.

基于深度学习的致密砂岩储层薄片图像生成与识别方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 724-738.

[9] 周三栋, 张伟鑫, 成巧耘, 魏佳成, 周国栋, . 深部煤储层中煤层水可动性评价方法及动力学机制研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 397-412.
[10] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[11] 王振军. 油气储层裂缝预测进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 469-482.
[12] 黄玉龙, 张皓, 郭强, 陈昌.

低阻玄武岩的矿物学特征及其油气地质意义——以辽河坳陷古近系为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 511-521.

[13] 唐华风, 付琦, 尹永康, 高有峰, 户景松, 武海超, 田志文. 花岗岩潜山储层地质研究回顾[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1806-1836.
[14] 王伟明, 胡美硕, 焦立新, 杨斌, 苗长盛, 孙宏亮, 周志超, 曲希玉, .

三塘湖盆地下石炭统新层系石油地质条件及勘探潜力 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1401-1419.

[15] 刘静怡, 陈守民, 申战勇, 王筱晔, 董宪鹏, 张雯, 朱玉双, .

致密储层微观孔隙结构特征及其对渗流特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长6储层为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1434-1444.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .