吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1471-1479.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201705201

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的形成机理——以祖师庙滑坡为例

李鹏1,2,3, 苏生瑞1, 马驰1,4, 黄璜1, 徐继维1,3   

  1. 1. 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 西安 70054;
    2. 国土资源部岩土工程开放研究实验室, 西安 710054;
    3. 国土资源部黄土地质灾害重点实验室, 西安 710054;
    4. 中煤西安设计工程有限责任公司, 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-15 出版日期:2017-09-26 发布日期:2017-09-26
  • 作者简介:李鹏(1987),男,博士研究生,主要从事地质工程方面的研究,E-mail:lipeng198782@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费项目(310826151048);国土资源部黄土地质灾害重点实验室开放基金项目(KLGLAMLR201506);四川交通建设科技项目(2015A1-3)

Formation Mechanism of Landslides with Accumulation Layer-Bedrock Contact Surface:Taking Zushimiao Landslide as an Example

Li Peng1,2,3, Su Shengrui1, Ma Chi1,4, Huang Huang1, Xu Jiwei1,3   

  1. 1. College of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China;
    2. Open Research Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering, MLR, Xi'an 710054, China;
    3. Key Laboratory for Geo-Hazards in Loess Area, MLR, Xi'an 710054, China;
    4. China Coal Xi'an Design Engineering Co., LTD., Xi'an 710054, China
  • Received:2016-12-15 Online:2017-09-26 Published:2017-09-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China(310826151048),Key Laboratory Program of the Key Laboratory for Geo-Hazards in Loess Area, MLR(KLGLAMLR201506)and Sichuan Transportation Construction Science and Technology Project(2015A1-3)

摘要: 为了研究堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的形成机理,以陕西省岚皋县广泛分布的堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡为研究对象,采用野外调查和数理统计的方法,总结了该类型滑坡的基本特征,并以祖师庙滑坡为例,借助室内试验和数值模拟手段,研究了堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的形成机理。结果表明:1)堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡主要发育在坡度为20 °~40 °、下伏基岩为碎裂状结构的斜坡,多为浅表层滑坡;2)碎石土和堆积层-基岩接触面的内摩擦角随含水量增大而降低,堆积层-基岩接触面是斜坡变形破坏的软弱结构面;3)细颗粒物质的增加降低了堆积层-基岩接触面的内摩擦角,且细颗粒粒径越小,内摩擦角也越小,在饱和状态下降幅度越大;4)因细颗粒物质在堆积层-基岩接触面处聚集造成的强度降低和因水文地质条件改变造成的滑带土饱和是祖师庙滑坡主要的诱发因素。研究结果对揭示堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的形成机理和地质灾害防治具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 堆积层-基岩接触面, 滑坡, 碎石土, 软弱结构面, 岚皋县, 形成机理

Abstract: In order to research the mechanism of the landslides with accumulation layer-bedrock contact surface, which are widely distributed in Langao County, Shaanxi Province, the authors summarized the basic characteristics of the landslides through field investigation, laboratory test and numerical simulation, and mathematical statistics by taking the Zushimiao landslide as an example. The formation mechanism of landslide with accumulation layer-bedrock contact surface is concluded as follows:1) The landslides with accumulation layer-bedrock contact surface are mainly developed in the slopes with 20°-40° gradient and their underlying bedrock fragmented, mostly the shallow surface landslides; 2) The internal friction angle of gravel soil and the accumulation layer-bedrock contact surface decreases with the increasing of the water content, and the contact surface is the weak structural plane of the slope deformation; 3) The increase of fine particles reduces the internal friction angle of the contact surface, and the smaller the particle diameter is, the smaller the internal friction angle, and the greater the decrease in the saturated state; 4) The strength decrease caused by the small particle soil at the interface between accumulation layer and bedrock and the saturation of slip zone soil caused by the change of hydro-geological conditions are the main predisposing factors of the Zushimiao landslide. The research results have certain guiding significance for revealing the formation mechanism of landslide and the prevention and control of geological hazards.

Key words: accumulation layer-bedrock contact surface, landslide, gravel soil, weak structural plane, Langao County, formation mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • P642.21
[1] 刘传正,王恭先,崔鹏.地质灾害防治研究现状与展望[C]//中国科学技术学会.2008-2009地质学学科发展报告.北京:中国科学技术出版社,2008:17. Liu Chuanzheng, Wang Gongxian, Cui Peng. Status and Outlook on Geohazards Mitigation[C]//China Association for Science and Technology. Report on Advances in Geological Science. Beijing:China Science and Technology Press,2008:17.
[2] 成永刚.近二十年来国内滑坡研究的现状及动态[J].地质灾害与环境保护, 2003, 14(4):1-5. Cheng Yonggang. Current Situation and Developments of Landslide Study in China in Recent Twenty Years[J].Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2003, 14(4):1-5.
[3] 刘广润,晏鄂川,练操.论滑坡分类[J].工程地质学报,2002,10(4):339-342. Liu Guangrun, Yan Echuan, Lian Cao. Discuss on Classical of Landslides[J].Journal of Engineering Geology, 2002,10(4):339-342.
[4] 贺可强,阳吉宝,李显忠,等.堆积层滑坡预测预报及其防治[M].北京:地震出版社,1996. He Keqiang, Yang Jibao, Li Xianzhong, et al. Prediction and Mitigation of Accumulation Landslide[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1996.
[5] 蒋建平,罗国煜.土坡中的优势结构面分析[J].工程地质学报,2000,8(4):438-441. Jiang Jianping, Luo Guoyu. Analysis of Preferred Plane in the Soil Slope[J].Journal of Engineering Geology, 2000,8(4):438-441.
[6] 罗国煜,王培清,吴浩,等.敷溪口松动变形边坡稳定性和破坏机制浅析[J].湖南水利,1981,1(1):12-16. Luo Guoyu, Wang Peiqing, Wu Hao, et al. Analysis on Stability and Failure Mechanism of Loose and Deformed Slope in Fuxikou[J].Hunan Hydro, 1981,1(1):12-16.
[7] 朱大鹏.三峡库区典型堆积层滑坡复活机理及变形预测研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2010. Zhu Dapeng. Revival Mechanism and Deformation Prediction of Typical Accumulative Landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir[D].Wuhan:China University of Geoscience, 2010.
[8] 蒋建平,李晓昭,罗国煜.岩土优势结构面的储运水效应[J].水科学进展,2007,18(1):34-38. Jiang Jianping, Li Xiaozhao, Luo Guoyu. Storage and Movement Effect of Water on Rock-Soil Preferred Structural Plane[J]. Advance in Water Science,2007,18(1):34-38.
[9] Jeager J C. Friction of Rocks and Stability of Rock Slopes[J]. Geotechnique, 1971,21:91-134.
[10] Barton N R, Choubey V. The Shear Strength of Rock Joint in Theory and Practice[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1977,10:1-54.
[11] 孙广忠.岩体结构力学[M].北京:科学出版社,1988. Sun Guangzhong. Rock Mass Structure Mechanics[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1988.
[12] 夏才初,孙宗颀.工程岩体节理力学[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2002. Xia Caichu, Sun Zongqi. Engineering Mechanics of Rock Joints[M]. Shanghai:Tongji University Press, 2002.
[13] 冯大阔.粗粒土与结构接触面三维本构规律、机理与模型研究[D].北京:清华大学,2012. Feng Dakuo. Three-Dimensional Constitutive Laws, Mechanism and Model of Gravel-Structure Interfaces[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University,2012.
[14] 施建勇,钱学德,朱月兵.垃圾填埋场土工合成材料的界面特性试验方法研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(5):688-692. Shi Jianyong, Qian Xuede, Zhu Yuebing. Experimental Methods for Interface Behaviors of Geosynthetics in Landfills[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010,32(5):688-692.
[15] 马伟.钢-土界面特性及钢护筒嵌岩桩承载性状研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2013. Ma Wei. Mechanism Properties of Steel-Soil Interface and Bearing Behaviors of Rock-Socketed Piles with Steel Tube[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2013.
[16] 熊炜.秦巴山区软弱变质岩浅表层滑坡成因机理研究[D].西安:长安大学,2012. Xiong Wei. Study on the Cause Mechanism of Shallow Landslide of Weak Metamorphic in the Qin-Ba Mountain Region[D]. Xi'an:Chang'an University, 2012.
[17] 徐彬,殷宗泽,刘述丽.膨胀土强度影响因素与规律的试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2011,32(1):44-50. Xu Bin, Yin Zongze, Liu Shuli. Experimental Study of Factors Influencing Expansive Soil Strength[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011,32(1):44-50.
[18] 唐晓松,邓楚键,郑颖人.三峡库区碎石土地基浸水试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2008,4(2):225-229. Tang Xiaosong, Deng Chujian, Zheng Yingren. Study on the Test of Immersed Gravelly Soil Foundation in the Three-Gorges Zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2008,4(2):225-229.
[19] 时卫民,郑宏录,刘文平,等.三峡库区碎石土抗剪强度指标的试验研究[J].重庆建筑,2005(2):30-35. Shi Weimin, Zheng Honglu, Liu Wenping, et al. Experiment Research on Shear Strength Index of Gravel-Soil in Three Gorge Reservoir Area[J]. Chongqing Architecture, 2005(2):30-35.
[20] 高玮,胡瑞林. 基质胶结对土石混合体强度变形特性影[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):1164-1172. Gao Wei, Hu Ruilin. Experimental Research on Strength Characteistics of Soil-Rock Mixture with Different Matrix Bonding[J]. Journal of Jilin Universtiy (Earth Science Edition), 2015,45(4):1164-1172.
[21] 马驰.堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的变形特征及形成机理研究[D].西安:长安大学,2016. Ma Chi. Study on Features and Cause Mechanism of Debris-Bedrock Interface Landslide[D]. Xi'an:Chang'an University, 2016.
[1] 周孙超, 宋腾蛟, 王琰, 蔡宗佑. 基于小龙虾优化算法的BP神经网络模型在滑坡易发性评价中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 937-950.
[2] 张文, 王骏城, 陈俊淇, 崔洪海, 孔祥礼, 郭涛, 王明, 王佳, 张书睿, 孙琦, 张涵, . 长白山山脉基本地质概况与火成岩崩滑灾变类型及机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 568-583.
[3] 安雪莲, 密长林, 孙德亮, 文海家, 李晓琴, 辜庆渝, 丁悦凯. 基于不同评价单元的三峡库区滑坡易发性对比——以重庆市云阳县为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1629-1644.
[4] 王芃, 邵广周, 恒翔天, 蓝笛瑄, 王国顺, 霍科宇. 滑坡面瑞雷波波场模拟及H/V谱比探测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 1031-1041.
[5] 年廷凯, 王国栋, 郑德凤, 王大伟. 南海北部陆坡区典型峡谷陡坡群地震稳定性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1785-1798.
[6] 熊超, 孙红月. 基于多因素-多尺度分析的阶跃型滑坡位移预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1175-1184.
[7] 陈剑平, 李兴华, 王 清, 韩 岩, 刘 经, 韩梦霞. 乾安碳酸型盐渍土的孔隙特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 491-.
[8] 束龙仓, 温中琦, 张岩, 李进, 马倩, 陆小明. 苏北沿海地区潜水水化学特征及形成机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1223-.
[9] 唐军峰, 唐雪梅, 周基, 钟辉亚, 谢尚智. 滑坡堆积体变形失稳机制——以贵州剑河县东岭信滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 503-516.
[10] 张田田, 杨为民, 万飞鹏, . 浑河断裂带地质灾害发育特征及其成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 149-.
[11] 雷怡, 帅飞翔, 孙红月, 张泽坤, 熊超. 边坡负压排水非稳定流研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 162-.
[12] 周越, 曾昭发, 唐海燕, 张建民, 何滔. 公路勘察中滑坡体的地球物理特征与分析——以张榆线公路勘察为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 638-644.
[13] 安玉科, 樊江, 马胜午, 马建全, 高娟, 毛立军. 堆积阶地古老滑坡识别方法及其在线状工程地质勘察中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1787-1794.
[14] 林松, 王薇, 邓小虎, 查雁鸿, 周红伟, 程邈. 三峡库区典型滑坡地质与地球物理电性特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 273-284.
[15] 常晓军, 葛伟亚, 于洋, 赵宇, 叶龙珍, 张泰丽, 魏振磊. 福建省永泰县东门旗山滑坡诱发机理与防治措施[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 1063-1072.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔建军, 刘晓春, 胡娟, 曲玮. 桐柏杂岩中印支期变质岩包体的变质作用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 618 -629 .
[2] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[3] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[4] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[5] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[6] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[7] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[8] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[9] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[10] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .