3种无机盐催化热解油页岩

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170100

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 1043-1049.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170100

3种无机盐催化热解油页岩

日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义

吉林大学建设工程学院, 长春 130026

收稿日期:2017-11-11 出版日期:2018-07-26 发布日期:2018-07-26
通讯作者: 孙友宏(1965-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程、科学钻探、油页岩等方向的研究,E-mail:syh@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:syh@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:日比娅(1984-),女,硕士研究生(留学生),主要从事油页岩热解新方法研究,E-mail:3082851324@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51604123）；吉林省科技发展计划项目（20150520073JH）；国土资源部复杂条件钻采技术重点实验室开放课题（2016-2017）

Catalytic Pyrolysis of Oil Shale in the Presence of Three Kinds of Inorganic Salt

Abakar Rabiea, Sun Youhong, Han Jing, Guo Mingyi

College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China

Received:2017-11-11 Online:2018-07-26 Published:2018-07-26
Supported by:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51604123), Science and Technology Development Project of Jilin Province, China (20150520073JH) and Open Project of Key Laboratory of Complicated Condition Drilling Technology of Ministry of Land and Resources, China (2016-2017)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了发展油页岩催化热解方法，本文对油页岩中干酪根在催化剂（SnCl₂，MoCl₅，ZnCl₂）作用下的热解转化进行了研究。运用傅里叶变换红外光谱（FT-IR）、X射线衍射（XRD）、热重（TG）分析等手段对样品在较低温度下（350℃）热解前后的半焦产物进行了分析，利用Coats-Redfern方法计算了热解后的残余半焦动力学参数。结果表明，催化剂可以使干酪根在350℃发生热解反应，同时也能够降低残余半焦的活化能，其中SnCl₂、MoCl₅和ZnCl₂催化处理后残余半焦的活化能分别降低15.10、10.66和20.58 kJ/mol。

关键词: 油页岩, 热解, 催化剂, 动力学

Abstract: The pyrolysis of oil shale in the presence of the catalysis metal chloride (stannous chloride, molybdenum chloride, zinc chloride) was evaluated. Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis were conducted to characterize the solid residues. Moreover, the kinetic parameters were calculated using the Coats-Redfern method. The results showed that catalysts can promote the organic conversion to oil and gas at low temperature, and also effect on the activation energy of the solid residues, particularly with stannous chloride, molybdenum chloride and zinc chloride, with which the activation energy decreased about 15.10, 10.66 and 20.58 kJ/mol respectively compared to those with no catalyst therein.

Key words: oil shale, pyrolysis, catalyst, kinetics

中图分类号:

P618.12

日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.

Abakar Rabiea, Sun Youhong, Han Jing, Guo Mingyi. Catalytic Pyrolysis of Oil Shale in the Presence of Three Kinds of Inorganic Salt[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.

参考文献

[1] Na Jeong geol, Lm Cheol hyun, Chung Soo hyun, et al. Effect of Oil Shale Retorting Temperature on Shale Oil Yield and Properties[J]. Fuel, 2012, 95(1):131-135.
[2] 钱家麟,王剑秋,李述元. 世界油页岩资源利用和发展趋势[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(6):877-887. Qian Jialin, Wang Jianqiu, Li Shuyuan. World Oil Shale Utilization and Its Future[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):877-887.
[3] Jiang X M, Han X X, Cui Z G. Progress and Recent Utilization Trends in Combustion of Chinese Oil Shale[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2007, 33(6):552-579.
[4] Pan Yi, Zhang Xiaoming, Liu Shouhui, et al. A Review on Technologies for Oil Shale Surface Retort[J]. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan, 2012, 34(6):1331-1338.
[5] Al-Makhadmeh L, Maier J, Scheffknecht G. Oxyfuel Technology:No Reduction During Oxy-Oil Shale Conditions[J]. Fuel, 2014, 128(21):155-161.
[6] Tiwari P, Deo M, Lin C L, et al. Characterization of Oil Shale Pore Structure Before and After Pyrolysis by Using X-Ray Micro CT[J]. Fuel, 2013, 107(9):547-554.
[7] Yan Junwei, Jiang Xiumin, Han Xiangxin, et al. A TG-FTIR Investigation to the Catalytic Effect of Mineral Matrix in Oil Shale on the Pyrolysis and Combustion of Kerogen[J]. Fuel, 2013, 104(2):307-317.
[8] Allawzi M, Al-Otoom A, Allaboun H, et al. CO₂ Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Jordanian Oil Shale Utilizing Different Co-Solvents[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2011, 92(10):2016-2023.
[9] Liu Zhaojun, Dong Qingshui, Ye Songqing, et al. Oil Shale Character and Exploitation & Utilization Prospect[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(3):315-323.
[10] Han Shuangbiao, Zhang Jinchuan, Li Yuxi, et al. Evaluation of Lower Cambrian Shale in Northern Guizhou Province, South China:Implications for Shale Gas Potential[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(6):2933-2941.
[11] 刘招君,董清水,叶松青,等.中国油页岩资源现状[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006,36(5):869-876. Liu Zhaojun, Dong Qingshui, Ye Songqing, et al. The Situation of Oil Shale Resources in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):869-876.
[12] Sun P, Sachsenhofer R F, Liu Z, et al. Organic Matter Accumulation in the Oil Shale-and Coal-Bearing Huadian Basin (Eocene; NE China)[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 105:1-15.
[13] Sun Youhong, Bai Fengtian, Liu Baochang, et al. Characterization of the Oil Shale Products Derived via Topochemical Reaction Method[J]. Fuel, 2014, 115(1):338-346.
[14] Guo Hongfan, Bie Yansong,Wang Kuikui, et al. Retorting Oil Shale by a Self-Heating Route[J]. Energ & Fuel, 2013, 27(5):2445-2451.
[15] Ballice L. Stepwise Chemical Demineralization of Göynük (Turkey) Oil Shale and Pyrolysis of Demineralization Products[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(3):906-912.
[16] Patterson J H. A Review of the Effects of Minerals in Processing of Australian Oil Shales[J]. Fuel, 1994, 73(3):321-327.
[17] Wlliams P T, Chishti H M. Two Stage Pyrolysis of Oil Shale Using a Zeolite Catalyst[J]. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 2000, 55(2):217-234.
[18] Metecan I H, Saglam M, Yanik J, et al. Effect of Pyrite Catalyst on the Hydroliquefaction of Goynuk (Turkey) Oil Shale in the Presence of Toluene[J]. Fuel, 1999, 78(5):619-622.
[19] Tiikma L, Johannes I, Luik H, et al. Thermal Dissolution of Estonian Oil Shale[J]. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis, 2009, 85(1):502-507.
[20] Jiang Haifeng, Song Lihua, Cheng Zhiqiang, et al. Influence of Pyrolysis Condition and Transition Metal Salt on the Product Yield and Characterization via Huadian Oil Shale Pyrolysis[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 112(1):230-236.
[21] Pulushev D A, Rossa J R H. Catalysis for Conversion of Biomass to Fuels via Pyroly is and Gasification[J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 171:1-13.
[22] Espitalie J, Madec M, Tissot B. Role of Mineral Matrix in Kerogen Pyrolysis:Influence on Petroleum Generation and Migration[J]. AAPG Bull, 1980, 64(1):59-66.
[23] Wei Z, Moldowan J M, Paytan A. Diamondoids and Molecular Biomarkers Generated from Modern Sediments in the Absence and Presence of Minerals During Hydrous Pyrolysis[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2006, 37(8):891-911.
[24] ASTM D4749-1987(2012) Standard Test Method for Performing the Sieve Analysis of Coal and Designating Coal Size[S/OL].[2012-05-10]. http://www.zbgb.org/48/StandardDetail2310510.htm.
[25] GB 474-2008煤样的制备方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2008. GB 474-2008 Method for Preparation of Coal Sample[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2008.
[26] Kok M V. Effect of Clay on Crude Oil Combustion by Thermal Analysis Techniques[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis Calorimetry, 2006, 84(2):361-366.
[27] Coats A W, Redfern J P. Kinetic Parameters from Thermogravimetric Data[J]. Nature, 1964, 201:68-69.
[28] Bolonkin A, Friedlander J, Neumann S, et al. Innovative Unconventional Oil Extraction Technologies[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 124(10):228-242.
[29] 刘德勋,王红岩,郑德温,等. 世界油页岩原位开采技术进展[J]. 天然气工业,2009,29(5):128-132. Liu Dexun, Wang Hongyan, Zheng Dewen, et al. World Progress of Oil Shale In-Situ Exploitation Methods[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(5):128-132.
[30] Bhargava S, Awaja F, Subasinghe N D, et al. Characterisation of Some Australian Oil Shale Using Thermal, X-Ray and IR Techniques[J]. Fuel, 2005, 84(6):707-715.
[31] Adams M J, Awaja F, Bhargava S, et al. Prediction of Oil Yield from Oil Shale Minerals Using Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy[J]. Fuel, 2005, 84(14):1986-1991.
[32] Wlliams D J, Akira S. Clay Minerals and Petroleum-Forming Reactions During Burial and Diagenesis[J]. AAPG Bull1, 1972, 56(11):2160-2167.
[33] Wlliams D J. Clay Mineral Catalysis and Petroleum Generation[J]. Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences, 1979, 7(1):183-198.

相关文章 15

[1]	于影, 陈俊杰, 林耿煨, 李青松. 多孔结构CuFe2O4-P材料制备及其催化过一硫酸盐降解咖啡因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1002-1012.
[2]	杨立红, 刘莹, 罗弋卜, 曾皓, 苏建政, 李迎超. 油页岩原位开采中高温腐蚀下的选材[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1091-1102.
[3]	程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞. 微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.
[4]	魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[5]	徐鑫, 刘阳, 张勇, 褚小磊, 徐智恺, 孙景贵, 刘晨. 大兴安岭东坡中北段六九山斑岩铜成矿系统浅成岩成因与地球动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1558-1574.
[6]	张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[7]	左鹏飞, 刘财, 郭智奇, 冯晅. 基于近场动力学理论的裂纹模型波场数值模拟及频散特性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1250-1261.
[8]	常翔, 孙景贵, 陈旭, 刘艳鹏, 柏铖璘, 徐智恺. 吉林省南部集安大石湖-大台子铜矿化区中生代中酸性杂岩岩石成因与地球动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 920-945.
[9]	孙景贵, 刘阳, 徐智恺, 徐智涛, 褚小磊, 古阿雷. 试论中国东北部陆缘晚中生代浅成热液大规模成矿与深部地质过程对成矿制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 651-692.
[10]	高家俊, 孟庆涛, 曾文人, 李金国, 李丽, 康嘉楠, . 依兰盆地始新统达连河组油页岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 60-72.
[11]	谢明贤, 陈广坡, 苏玉平. 海拉尔盆地侏罗系烃源岩特征及发育模式——以红旗凹陷为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1065-.
[12]	彭恺然, 刘红帅, 平新雨, 程旷. CFD-DEM耦合模拟中拖曳力模型精度[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1400-1407.
[13]	陈晨, 张颖, 朱江, 朱颖, 翟梁皓, 沈国军, 潘栋彬. 油页岩原位开采区注浆封闭浆液优化及其防渗效果实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 815-824.
[14]	李成博, 宁传奇, 钟长林, 任建超, 徐人吁, 殷淑芹. 中国油页岩矿勘查控制程度探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 13-21.
[15]	张文婷, 唐雯雯. 基于水动力学模型的沿海城市洪水实时演进模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 212-221.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

3种无机盐催化热解油页岩

Catalytic Pyrolysis of Oil Shale in the Presence of Three Kinds of Inorganic Salt

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10