吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1603-#VALUE.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180176

• 中国水利学会勘测专业委员会专栏 • 上一篇    

大石峡高面板坝筑坝砂砾料现场大型相对密度试验

董承山1, 杨正权2, 王龙2, 何冰2, 刘莹光3   

  1. 1. 中水北方勘测设计研究有限责任公司, 天津 300222;
    2. 中国水利水电科学研究院, 北京 100048;
    3. 北京电力经济技术研究院, 北京 100055
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-24 出版日期:2018-09-26 发布日期:2018-11-20
  • 作者简介:董承山(1980-),男,高级工程师,主要从事地质工程与岩土工程研究,E-mail:spikedong@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0404902);国家自然科学基金项目(51509272,51679264);水利部公益性行业科研专项项目(201501035);中国水科院基本科研业务费项目(GE0145B292017)

Field Large-Scale Relative Density Tests of Gravel Soil of Dashixia High Concrete Faced Rock-Fill Dam

Dong Chengshan1, Yang Zhengquan2, Wang Long2, He Bing2, Liu Yingguang3   

  1. 1. China Water Resources Beifang Investigation, Design and Research Co. Ltd, Tianjin 300222, China;
    2. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China;
    3. Beijing Electric Power Economic Technology Institute, Beijing 100055, China
  • Received:2018-05-24 Online:2018-09-26 Published:2018-11-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0404902), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51509272, 51679264), Public Service Sector R&D Project of Ministry of Water Resource of China (201501035) and Special Scientific Research Foundation of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (GE0145B292017)

摘要: 当前,主要采用相对密度来表征筑坝砂砾料的密实程度,并以此来评价大坝的施工碾压质量。受试验设备尺寸和击实功能的限制,室内试验难以反映现场实际筑坝砂砾料粒径大、采用大型碾压机具进行高强度碾压的实际情况,试验确定砂砾料最大干密度值偏低,难以直接用于指导实际工程。针对大石峡高面板坝筑坝砂砾料,在工地现场采用实际筑坝碾压设备和大型相对密度桶,对原级配坝料开展相对密度试验,研究了坝料的压实特性,确定了不同级配(含砾量)坝料的相对密度特性指标。研究表明:比较室内试验成果,现场试验确定砂砾料最大干密度值有较大提高;随着含砾量的增加,砂砾料的最大、最小干密度值先增加、后减小,存在压实密度最高的最优含砾量特征值;强振碾压使得弱胶结砂砾料产生不同程度的颗粒破碎效应,颗粒破碎的程度和土料的原始级配特性相关联。

关键词: 筑坝砂砾料, 现场相对密度试验, 最大干密度, 三因素图, 颗粒破碎, 大石峡高面板坝

Abstract: The compaction rate of gravel soil is usually characterized by the "relative density", which is used to evaluate the compaction quality of dam construction. Restricted by the size and energy limitation of the laboratory test equipment, the laboratory tests are difficult to reflect the actual situation of high strength compaction of gravel soil by large rolling equipment;and the maximum dry density of the gravel soils obtained in laboratory tests is often much lower than the actual one, so it cannot be directly used in practical engineering. To the sand and gravel materials for the Dashixia high concrete faced rock-fill dam, the field large-scale relative density test of original gravel soil was carried out by using the actual rolling equipment and large relative density bucket on the site, the compaction characteristics of soil was studied, and further the relative density characteristic indexes of soils with different gradation (coarse grain content) were determined. The test results show that the maximum dry density of gravel soil determined by field test is greatly improved compared to a general laboratory test; the minimum and maximum dry densities of gravel soil show a tendency of increasing at first and then decreasing with the increase of the coarse grain content, and there is an optimal coarse grain content value with the highest compaction density of soil; the strong vibration compaction results in different degrees of particle crushing effect on weakly cemented gravel materials, and the degree of particle crushing is related to the original grading characteristics of soil materials.

Key words: gravel soil of dam, field relative density test, maximum dry density, three factors chart, particle crushing, Dashixia high concrete faced rock-fill dam

中图分类号: 

  • P642.2
[1] 郭庆国. 粗粒土的工程特性及应用[M]. 郑州:黄河水利出版社, 1998. Guo Qingguo. Research and Application of the Engineering Properties of Coarse-Grained Soil[M]. Zhengzhou:Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 1984.
[2] 孙明,朱俊高,沈靠山,等. 密实度对砂卵砾石料强度及变形特性的影响[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2015(4):43-47. Sun Ming, Zhu Jungao. Shen Kaoshan, et al. Density Effects on Strength and Deformation Behaviour of Sandy Gravel[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2015(4):43-47.
[3] 潘政,朱俊高,方智荣. 相对密实度对砂卵砾石料强度影响的试验研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2016, 38(2):130-133. Pan Zheng, Zhu Jungao, Fang Zhirong. Study on Relative Density Effects on Strength Behaviour of Sand-Gravel Material by Triaxial Test[J]. Yellow River, 2016, 38(2):130-133.
[4] 郭庆国,李鹏,徐彦文. 土石坝的压实标准及应用中存在的问题[J]. 西北水电, 2001(3):33-37. Guo Qingguo, Li Peng, Xu Yanwen. Compacting Standard for Embankment Dams and Problems in Applications[J]. Northwest Hydropower, 2001(3):33-37.
[5] 朱俊高,翁厚洋,吴晓铭,等. 粗粒料级配缩尺后压实密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(8):2394-2398. Zhu Jungao, Weng Houyang, Wu Xiaoming, et al. Experimental Study of Compact Density of Scaled Coarse-Grained Soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(8):2394-2398.
[6] 翁厚洋,朱俊高,余挺,等. 粗粒料缩尺效应研究现状与趋势[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(4):425-429. Weng Houyang, Zhu Jungao, Yu Ting, et al. Status Quo and Tendency of Studies on Scale Effects of Coarse-Grained Materials[J]. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2009, 37(4):425-429.
[7] 凌华,殷宗泽,朱俊高,等. 堆石料强度的缩尺效应试验研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(5):540-544. Ling Hua, Yin Zongze, Zhu Jungao, et al. Experimental Study of Scale Effect on Strength of Rockfill Materials[J]. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2011,39(5):540-544.
[8] 郭万里,朱俊高,温彦锋. 对粗粒料4种级配缩尺方法的统一解释[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(8):1473-1480. Guo Wanli, Zhu Jungao, Wen Yanfeng. Unified Description for Four Grading Scale Methods for Coarse Aggregate[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(8):1473-1480.
[9] 陈志波, 朱俊高, 王强. 宽级配砾质土压实特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(3):446-449. Chen Zhibo, Zhu Jungao, Wang Qiang. Compaction Property of Wide Grading Gravelly Soil[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(3):446-449.
[10] 朱俊高,轩向阳,薄以霆. 表面振动压实仪法测定粗粒土密度的影响因素[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2013(2):15-19. Zhu Jungao, Xuan Xiangyang, Bo Yiting. Influence Factors of Dry Density of Coarse-Grained Soil Measured by Surface Vibrating Compactor[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2013(2):15-19.
[11] 田树玉. 用渐近线辅助拟合法确定大粒径砂卵石最大干容重[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1992, 14(1):35-43. Tian Shuyu. Determining the Max Dry Density of Coarse Grained Sandy Gravels by the Method of Curve-Fitting with Asymptotic Line[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1992, 14(1):35-43.
[1] 胡飞跃, 徐昊翔, 邓成坚, 杨舒铎. 基于深度学习模型的岩溶塌陷易发性评价——以广佛肇地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 584-597.
[2] 孙振兴, 杨忠年, 辛泽宇, 王荣昌, 张莹莹, 凌贤长 . 橡胶纤维加筋膨胀土的剪切强度与强度预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1644-1654.
[3] 韩红闪, 朱琳, 郭高轩, 李炳华, 卢灿. 新水情背景下北京平原朝阳—通州沉降区地面沉降特征及其影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1326-1338.
[4] 文海家, 胡吉威, 张辉, 向学坤, 黄勤. 泥石流危险范围Laharz修正模型及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 905-918.
[5] 欧阳琦, 陈欣, 危润初, 伍诗梦, 朱志远.

紫鹊界梯田失稳机制 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 581-591.

[6] 王常明, 刘辛磊, 王飞. 品字形桩林防护结构对泥石流冲击桥墩作用的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1773-1784.
[7] 刘鑫, 张文, 李根, 刘波. 高位远程崩滑碎屑流-泥石流灾害链的演变过程与影响范围预测:以“4·5”四川洪雅县铁匠湾地质灾害链为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1799-1811.
[8] 熊超, 孙红月. 基于多因素-多尺度分析的阶跃型滑坡位移预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1175-1184.
[9] 王福刚, 盘惠林, 李胜伟, 王东辉, 吴铭杰, 平世飞, 曹玉清. 含膏岩地层地下水环境对混凝土建筑侵蚀实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1185-1194.
[10] 唐军峰, 唐雪梅, 周基, 钟辉亚, 谢尚智. 滑坡堆积体变形失稳机制——以贵州剑河县东岭信滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 503-516.
[11] 林鸿州, 郭怡, 白建帮, 彭建兵. 数值优化方法在确定张力计反应时间上的应用性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 526-534.
[12] 雷怡, 帅飞翔, 孙红月, 张泽坤, 熊超. 边坡负压排水非稳定流研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 162-.
[13] 吕建航, 杨忠年, 时伟, 李国玉, 凌贤长, 张莹莹. 冻融循环下加筋膨胀土边坡稳定性模型试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1587-1596.
[14] 程蕊, 朱琳, 周佳慧, 郭高轩, 郭琳, 李蕙君, 陈蓓蓓. 北京潮白河冲洪积扇地面沉降时空异质性特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1182-1192.
[15] 王孔伟, 路永强, 聂进, 滕明明, 王宵亮. 三峡库区仙女山和九畹溪断裂带水库地震变化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 624-637.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔建军, 刘晓春, 胡娟, 曲玮. 桐柏杂岩中印支期变质岩包体的变质作用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 618 -629 .
[2] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[3] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[4] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[5] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[6] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[7] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[8] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[9] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[10] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .