吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 797-806.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170309

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

增强型地热系统不同注采井网参数分析

樊冬艳1, 孙海1, 姚军1, 李华锋2, 严侠1, 张凯1, 张林1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院, 山东 青岛 266580;
    2. 中国石油集团测井有限公司长庆分公司, 西安 710201
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-27 出版日期:2019-05-26 发布日期:2019-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 孙海(1984-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事非常规油气、地热资源等数值模拟,E-mail:sunhai@upc.edu.cn E-mail:sunhai@upc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:樊冬艳(1985-),女,讲师,博士,主要从事裂缝性储层数值模拟、产能及试井分析,E-mail:fandongyan2010@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（61573018，51774317）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助（17CX02008A）

Parametric Analysis of Different Injection and Production Well Pattern in Enhanced Geothermal System

Fan Dongyan1, Sun Hai1, Yao Jun1, Li Huafeng2, Yan Xia1, Zhang Kai1, Zhang Lin1   

  1. 1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    2. Logging Changqing Branch, CNPC, Xi'an 710201, China
  • Received:2017-12-27 Online:2019-05-26 Published:2019-06-03
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61573018,51774317) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (17CX02008A)

PDF (PC)

424

摘要： 针对增强型地热系统中水通过复杂裂缝系统提取干热岩储层热量的过程，基于离散裂缝网络模型热流耦合构建了增强型地热系统的解析模型，利用Laplace变换得到了干热岩储层解析解，分析了在五点井网开采下注采井网参数对出口端温度及热提取的影响。研究结果表明：不同裂缝网络和井网模型下出口端温度下降幅度和热突破的时间不同；在相同裂缝网络下，井距越大，热突破时间越晚，当井距分别为50.0、100.0和150.0 m时，热突破时间分别为2.0、5.2和15.0 a；注水速率越小，温度下降越慢，当注水速率分别为0.1，0.2和0.3 kg/s时，生产20.0 a，温度下降幅度分别为53.0，34.5和26.8℃；通过正交实验分析方法得到注采参数中井距影响最大，其极差为13.15，其次为注水速率和注水温度，井网模型影响最小。

关键词: 干热岩, 增强型地热系统, 离散裂缝网络模型, 热流耦合, 解析模型

Abstract: According to the process of heat extraction of fracture system in enhanced geothermal system (EGS) dry-hot-rock reservoir, a thermal-hydraulic coupling analytical model was established based on the discrete fracture network model. The Laplace transform was used to obtain the analytical solutions. The influence of the parameters of injection and production of five spot pattern was analyzed for the temperature and heat extraction at outlet. The results show that the temperature drop at outlet and the time of thermal breakthrough are different under different fracture network and well types. Under the same fracture network, the larger the fracture spacing is, the later the thermal breakthrough time is. When the fracture spacing is 50.0, 100.0 and 150.0 m, the thermal breakthrough time is 2.0 a, 5.2 a and 15.0 a, respectively. The smaller the injection rate is, the slower the temperature decreases. When the injection rate is 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 kg/s, in production of 20.0 a, the temperature decreases by 53.0, 34.5, and 26.8℃, respectively; Orthogonal experimental analysis shows that well spacing has the greatest influence on injection-production parameters with a range of 13.15, followed by injection rate and injection temperature, while well type has smallest influence.

Key words: hot-dry-rock, enhanced geothermal system (EGS), discrete fracture network model, thermal-hydraulic coupled, analytical model

中图分类号: 

  • TK521
[1] Tester J, Anderson B, Batchelor A, et al. The Future of Geothermal Energy:Impact Geothermal System (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century[R]. Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006.
[2] 许天福, 袁益龙, 姜振蛟, 等. 干热岩资源和增强型地热工程:国际经验和我国展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4):1139-1152. Xu Tianfu, Yuan Yilong, Jiang Zhenjiao, et al. Hot Dry Rock and Enhanced Geothermal Engineering:International Experience and China Prospect[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016,46(4):1139-1152.
[3] 汪集旸, 胡圣标, 庞忠和, 等. 中国大陆干热岩地热资源潜力评估[J]. 科技导报, 2012,30(32):25-31. Wang Jiyang, Hu Shengbiao, Pang Zhonghe, et al. Estimate of Geothermal Resources Potential for Hot Dry Rock in the Continental Area of China[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2012, 30(32):25-31.
[4] Hori Y, Kitano K, Kaieda H, et al. Present Status of the Ogachi HDR Project, Japan, and Future Plans[J]. Geothermics,1999, 28(4):637-645.
[5] Zeng Yuchao, Zhan Jiemin, Wu Nengyou, et al. Numerical Simulation of Electricity Generation Potential from Fractured Granite Reservoir Through Vertical Well at Yangbajing Geothermal Field[J]. Energy, 130:290-304.
[6] Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N.A Thermos-Hydro-Mechanical Coupled Model in Local Thermal Non-Equilibrium for Fractured HDR Reservoir with Double Porosity[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2012, 117:1-23.
[7] Gan Q, Elsworth D. Production Optimization in Fractured Geothermal Reservoirs Coupled Discrete Fracture Network Modeling[J]. Geothermics, 2016, 62:131-142.
[8] Maffucci R, Bigi S, Corrado S, et al. Quality Assessment of Reservoirs by Means of Outcrop Data and "Discrete Fracture Network" Models:The Case History of Rosario De La Frontera (NW Argentina) Geothermal System[J]. Tectonophysics, 2015, 647:112-131.
[9] 孙致学, 徐轶, 吕抒桓, 等. 增强型地热系统热流固耦合模型及数值模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(6):109-117. Sun Zhixue, Xu Yi, Lü Shuhuan, et al. A Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Model for Numerical Simulation of Enhanced Geothermal Systems[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Natural Science), 2016, 40(6):109-117.
[10] Cao Wenjiong,Huang Wenbo, Jiang Fangming. A Novel Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical Model for the Enhanced Geothermal System Heat Extraction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 100:661-671.
[11] 雷宏武, 金光荣, 李佳琦, 等. 松辽盆地增强型地热系统(EGS)地热能开发热-水动力耦合过程[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5):1633-1646. Lei Hongwu, Jin Guangrong, Li Jiaqi, et al. Coupled Thermal-Hydrodynamic Processes for Geothermal Energy Exploitation in Enhanced Geothermal System at Songliao Basin, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014,44(5):1633-1646.
[12] Sun Zhixue, Zhang Xu, Xu Yi, et al. Numerical Simulation of the Heat Extraction in EGS with Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical Coupling Method Based on Discrete Fractures Model[J]. Energy, 2017, 120:20-33.
[13] Norbert B, Norihiro W, Gorke U, et al. Geoenergy Modeling I:Geothermal Processs in Fractured Porous Media[M]. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2016.
[14] Norihiro W, Guido B, Mauro C, et al. Geoenergy Modeling Ⅲ:Enhanced Geothermal Systems[M]. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2016.
[15] Brian B. Characterizing Flow and Transport in Fractured Geological Media:A Review[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2002, 25:861-884.
[16] Fu Pengcheng, Scott M J, Carrigan R C. An Explicitly Coupled Hydro-Geomechanical Model for Simulating Hydraulic Fracturing in Arbitrary Discrete Fracture Networks[J]. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech, 2013; 37:2278-2300.
[17] 朱家玲, 张国伟, 李君, 等. 裂隙通道内流固换热系数解析解及敏感性分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2016, 37(8):2019-2025. Zhu Jialing, Zhang Guowei, Li Jun, et al. Analytical Solution and Sensitivity Analysis of Fluid-Solid Heat Transfer Coefficient in Fracture Channel[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2016, 37(8):2019-2025.
[18] 同登科, 陈钦雷. 关于Laplace数值反演Stehfest方法的一点注记[J]. 石油学报, 2001, 22(6):91-92. Tong Dengke, Chen Qinlei. A Note on the Laplace Numerical Inversion Stehfest Method[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2001, 22(6):91-92.
[19] Wagner W, Cooper J R, Dittmann A, et al. The IAPWS Industrial Formulation 1997 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Water and Steam[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2000, 122(1):150-182.
[20] Zeng Yuchao, Wu Nengyou, Su Zheng, et al. Numerical Simulation of Heat Production Potential from Hot Dry Rock by Water Circulating Through a Novel Single Vertical Fracture at Desert Peak Geothermal Field[J]. Energy, 2013, 63:268-282.
[1] 陈晨, 李宏达, 姜升, 许振华, 侯星澜, 张山岭, 钟秀平. 干热岩闭环地热系统井壁稳定及热能提取方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 327-341.
[2] 考佳玮, 杨康, 谭鹏, 陈作. 干热岩储层裂缝扩展及采热一体化数值模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 575-586.
[3] 袁益龙, 唐佳伟, 李鹏, 何瑞敏, 郭强, 钟承昊. 热-力耦合作用下花岗岩粗糙裂隙渗透率演化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 179-187.
[4] 冯波, 曹云龙, 齐晓飞 , 崔振鹏, 张兰新. 增强型地热系统开发热-水动力-力学（THM）耦合模拟：以河北马头营凸起区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1892-1906.
[5] 闫佰忠, 李瑶, 秦光雄, 于开宁, 吴云霞, 王亚楠. 基于遥感技术的贵德盆地多元信息干热岩靶区预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1288-1300.
[6] 孙明行, 王瑞湖, 管彦武, 刘德民. 广西陆域干热型地热资源潜力估算[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1302-.
[7] 康志强, 张起钻, 管彦武, 冯波, 袁金福, 孙明行, 刘德民, 王新宇, 杨志强, 陆济璞, 张勤军, 冯民豪. 广西合浦盆地干热岩资源成热条件及潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1151-1160.
[8] 段云星, 杨浩. 增强型地热系统采热性能影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1161-1172.
[9] 周舟, 金衍, 曾义金, 张旭东, 周健, 汪文智, 孟翰. 青海共和盆地干热岩地热储层水力压裂物理模拟和裂缝起裂与扩展形态研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1425-1430.
[10] 吴云霞, 吕凤军, 邢立新, 刘新星. 独山城地区多元信息干热岩预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 880-892.
[11] 高科, 高红通, 谭现锋, 赵长亮, 李梦. 仿生异型齿钻头在干热岩钻探中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1804-1809.
[12] 鲍新华, 张宇, 李野, 吴永东, 马丹, 周广慧. 松辽盆地增强型地热系统开发选区评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 564-572.
[13] 许天福, 袁益龙, 姜振蛟, 侯兆云, 冯波. 干热岩资源和增强型地热工程:国际经验和我国展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1139-1152.
[14] 郭亮亮, 张延军, 许天福, 金显鹏. 大庆徐家围子不同储层改造的干热岩潜力评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 525-535.
[15] 李小林, 吴国禄, 雷玉德, 李重阳, 赵继昌, 白银国, 曾昭发, 赵振, 张珊珊, 赵爱军. 青海省贵德扎仓寺地热成因机理及开发利用建议[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 220-229.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 初凤友，孙国胜，李晓敏，马维林，赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[2] 周丽萍, 申向东, 李学斌, 白忠强. 天然浮石粉水泥土力学性质的试验研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 492 -497 .
[3] 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 邵锐. 火山碎屑岩的储层物性--以松辽盆地营城组为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 227 -236 .
[4] 潘殿琦,张祖培,潘殿彩,陈义民,徐 瑞. 人工冻土纵波波速与温度和含水率的关系[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 588 -591 .
[5] 付 哲，周云轩，刘殿伟，刘万崧. 基于特征的面向对象虚拟GIS数据模型设计与原型系统实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 647 -652 .
[6] 卢进才，李玉宏，魏仙样，魏建设. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 928 -0932 .
[7] 黄继国，黄国鑫，聂广正，魏海娟，吕爱民,王雪松. 中温UBF与UASB两相厌氧系统处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 144 -0147 .
[8] 孙才志,刘玉兰,杨 俊. 下辽河平原地下水生态水位与可持续开发调控研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 249 -254 .
[9] 舒萍,曲延明,王国军,丁日新,艾兴波,纪学雁,唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺. 松辽盆地火山岩储层裂缝地质特征与地球物理识别[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 726 -0733 .
[10] 单玄龙,刘青帝,任利军,赵玉婷. 松辽盆地三台地区下白垩统营城组珍珠岩地质特征与成因[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1146 -1151 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发