吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 1506-1513.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200270

• 绿色岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

新桩贯入对邻近再利用既有桩的影响

崔纪飞1, 饶平平1, 李镜培2   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学环境与建筑学院, 上海 200093;
    2. 同济大学土木工程学院, 上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-21 出版日期:2021-09-26 发布日期:2021-09-29
  • 作者简介:崔纪飞(1991-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事桩基服役性能演化和再利用研究,E-mail:cuijifei@usst.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41972274)

Influence of New Pile Penetration on Adjacent Reused Pile

Cui Jifei1, Rao Pingping1, Li Jingpei2   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China;
    2. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2020-11-21 Online:2021-09-26 Published:2021-09-29
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972274)

摘要: 采用理论分析的方法,首先基于半无限土体中改进的球孔扩张理论,求解新桩沉桩挤土效应引起的土体位移场。然后将其作为已知条件施加于邻近既有桩,分析既有桩变形和内力变化规律,探讨既有桩桩端约束条件、桩身刚度及土体模量对既有桩响应的影响;同时结合数值分析,对本文理论方法进行验证。最后分析了新旧桩之间距离和新桩半径对挤土效应引起的既有桩变形和内力的影响。结果表明:桩端约束形式仅影响桩端附近桩身变形;随着新旧桩之间距离的增加,既有桩变形和内力显著减小;随着桩径的增加,既有桩变形和内力均逐渐增大。最后提出采用远离既有桩和采用长细桩的措施来降低新桩施工对既有桩的影响。

关键词: 既有桩, 再利用, 贯入, 挤土位移, 变形

Abstract: The cavity expansion theory of semi-infinite soil is adopted to obtain the displacement field of soil caused by the new pile driving, and then it is applied to the existing pile based on the two-stage method to analyze the deformation and internal force changes of the existing pile. The constraint condition of the existing pile bottom, the rigidity of the pile body, and the soil modulus on the response of the existing pile was studied, meanwhile, the theoretical method was verified by using the numerical analysis, and also the influence of the distance between the new and used piles and the radius of the new piles was analyzed. The results show that the constraint of the pile tip only affects the deformation of the pile body near the pile tip:With the increase of the distance between the new and old piles, the deformation and internal force of the existing piles decrease significantly; The deformation and internal force of the existing pile increase gradually with the increase of the new pile diameter. The measures to stay away from existing piles and using long and thin piles are proposed to reduce the impact of new pile construction on existing piles.

Key words: existing pile, reuse, penetration, compaction displacement, deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 贾水钟, 贾晓峰. 浅析静安顺德苑工程的老桩利用问题[J]. 建筑结构, 2007, 37(增刊1):477-480. Jia Shuizhong, Jia Xiaofeng. Settlement Design of Making Use of the Old Bored Pile in Jing'an Shunde Building[J]. Building Structure, 2007, 37(Sup.1):477-480.
[2] 姚建平. 既有桩再利用及新旧桩混合使用条件下的静压新桩施工控制工艺研究[J]. 建筑施工, 2016, 38(4):402-405. Yao Jianping. Study on Construction Control Technology for New Static Pressure Piles Under Condition of Recycled Existing Piles and New-Old Mixed Piles[J]. Building Construction, 2016, 38(4):402-405.
[3] 王龙胜, 衣倩倩, 张斌. 既有桩基耐久性评估及再利用分析研究[J]. 工程建设, 2017, 49(5):25-28. Wang Longsheng, Yi Qianqian, Zhang Bin. Analytical Study on Reuse of Existing Pile Foundation and Its Durability Evaluation[J]. Engineering Construction, 2017, 49(5):25-28.
[4] Leung C F, Chow Y K, Shen R F. Behavior of Pile Subject to Excavation Induced Soil Movement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000, 126(11):947-954.
[5] Leung C F, Lim J K, Shen R F, et al. Behavior of Pile Groups Subject to Excavation-Induced Soil Movement[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(1):58-65.
[6] Leung C F, Ong D E L, Chow Y K. Pile Behavior due to Excavation-Induced Soil Movement in Clay:II:Collapsed Wall[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(1):45-53.
[7] Poulos H G, Chen L T, Hull T S. Model Tests on Single Piles Subjected to Lateral Soil Movement[J]. Soil and Foundations, 1995, 35(4):85-92.
[8] Chen L T, Poulos H G, Hull T S. Model Tests on Pile Groups Subjected to Lateral Soil Movement[J]. Soil and Foundations, 1997, 37(1):1-12.
[9] Sagaseta C. Analysis of Undrained Soil Deformation due to Ground Loss[J]. Géotechnique, 1987, 37(3):67-86.
[10] Sagaseta C, Whittle A J. Prediction of Ground Movements due to Pile Driving in Clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(1):55-66.
[11] 周火垚, 施建勇. 饱和软黏土中足尺静压桩挤土效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(11):3291-3296. Zhou Huoyao, Shi Jianyong. Test Research on Soil Compacting Effect of Full Scale Jacked-in Pile in Saturated Soft Clay[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(11):3291-3296.
[12] 张明义, 刘雪颖, 王永洪, 等. 粉土及粉质黏土对静压沉桩桩端阻力影响机制现场试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6):1804-1813. Zhang Mingyi, Liu Xueying, Wang Yonghong, et al. Feild Test on Influencing Mechanism of Silty Soil and Silty Clay on Tip Resistance of Static Pressure Pile[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(6):1804-1813.
[13] 罗战友, 夏建中, 龚晓南, 等. 考虑孔压消散的静压单桩挤土位移场研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(增刊1):2765-2772. Luo Zhanyou, Xia Jianzhong, Gong Xiaonan, et al. Study of Compacting Soil Displacements Around Jacked Single Pile Based on Excess Pore Pressure Dissipation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(Sup. 1):2765-2772.
[14] 张亚国, 李镜培. 软黏土中静压沉桩引起的侧向挤土位移分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(12):1801-1806. Zhang Yaguo, Li Jingpei.Lateral Displacements of Ground Caused by Piles Installation in Soft Clay[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(12):1801-1806.
[15] 朱宁, 施建勇, 陈海丰. 一种半无限土体中圆孔扩张的分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(2):257-260. Zhu Ning, Shi Jianyong, Chen Haifeng. A Method for Cavity Expansion in Semi-Infinite Soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(2):257-260.
[16] Vesic A S. Bending of Beams Resting on Isotropic Elastic Solids[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, 1961, 87(2):35-53.
[1] 黄华, 王圆圆, 裴志勇, 邓小芹, 方火浪. 设防地震作用下深厚覆盖层上土石混合体高填方人工半岛动力反应及抗震性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 598-610.
[2] 孙路华, 梁琛岳, 郑常青, 宋志伟, 周建波. 辽西医巫闾山地区晚中生代伸展变形事件识别及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 173-198.
[3] 杨忠平, 赵凯, 高宇豪, 向宫固, 刘新荣. 基于模型试验的欠固结深厚土石混合回填区隧道施工力学响应[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1945-1957.
[4] 孙旭, 孙永河, 郑金云, 蔡嵩, 张慧敏, 李明, 魏建光. 珠江口盆地陆丰X洼断裂系统变形机制及其控洼-控源作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1986-1997.
[5] 刘希雯, 刘志宏, 高 翔. 孙吴—嘉荫盆地沾河断陷构造变形及其对沉积作用的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 393-.
[6] 赵一行, 詹刚毅, 石钰锋, 简庆华. 土岩复合地层超深圆形基坑内衬墙作用效果及优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 526-.
[7] 曾章波, 黄华, 梅龙喜, 裴志勇, 方火浪. 饱和砾性土不排水动力强度及变形特性试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 207-217.
[8] 唐军峰, 唐雪梅, 周基, 钟辉亚, 谢尚智. 滑坡堆积体变形失稳机制——以贵州剑河县东岭信滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 503-516.
[9] 秦亚, 冯佐海, 万磊, 吴疆, 吴杰, 邢全力, 薛云峰. 桂北龙胜上朗变镁铁质岩锆石UPb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 109-.
[10] 刘建民, 赵国春, 徐刚, 邱海成, 李建锋, 肖昌浩, 沙德铭, 刘福兴, 毕广源, 房兴, 张家奇, 郭祺, 于婳. 辽东半岛金矿成矿作用与深部资源勘查[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1613-1635.
[11] 黄达, 马昊, 石林. 反倾层状岩质边坡倾倒变形机理与影响因素的离散元模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1770-1782.
[12] 李立云, 王子英, 王晓静, 杜修力. 近铁路基坑通风井段变形特征及其机制分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1441-1451.
[13] 苏亮, 时伟, 水伟厚, 曹建萌. 高能级强夯法处理深厚吹填砂土地基现场试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1560-1569.
[14] 石磊, 周喜文, 郑常青, 董云峰, 周枭, 郭腾达. 浙西南遂昌—大柘地区八都岩群印支期变质变形序列[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1658-1671.
[15] 陈永珍, 吴斌, 杨帆, 吴纲, 翁杨. 充气截排水渗流与变形耦合数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(2): 485-492.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 于 平,李瑞磊,付 雷,郝 雪,张向军,廉国芬. 松辽盆地滨北地区区域构造特征及意义--地震长剖面给出的证据[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 611 -615 .
[2] 张原庆, 宋炳忠, 王玉福, 张宁. 鲁西铜石岩体金成矿规律和成矿预测[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1287 -1294 .
[3] 李建平,李桐林,张 辉,徐凯军. 不规则回线源层状介质瞬变电磁场正反演研究及应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 790 -0795 .
[4] 高松, 宋莹, 王琳,蒋步新. 水体中秋兰姆特效降解菌的筛选及其降解性能研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 455 -457 .
[5] 张凤君,李 卿,马玖彤,于广菊. 膜蒸馏处理糠醛废水的实验研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 270 -0273 .
[6] 卢双舫,李吉君,薛海涛,徐立恒. 油成甲烷碳同位素分馏的化学动力学及其初步应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(05): 825 -829 .
[7] 丁志宏,冯平,毛慧慧. 考虑径流年内分布影响的丰枯划分方法及其应用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 276 -0280 .
[8] 任何军, 刘娜,高松,张兰英,张玉玲,周睿. 假单胞菌DN2对多氯联苯的降解及bphA1核心序列测定[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 312 -0316 .
[9] 黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 康志强, 唐萍萍. 半干旱区岩溶碳汇原位监测方法适宜性研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 240 -246 .
[10] 熊晓亮,孙红月,张世华,蔡岳良. 高扬程虹吸保障条件分析与合理管径选择数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1595 -1601 .