吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1740-1752.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210027

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

攀西红格钒钛磁铁矿矿田富钴硫化物中钴的地球化学特征及其地质意义

张贵山1,2, 邱红信1, 温汉捷1,3, 彭仁1, 孟乾坤1   

  1. 1. 长安大学地球科学与资源学院, 西安 710065;
    2. 自然资源部岩浆作用成矿与找矿重点实验室, 西安 710065;
    3. 中国科学院地球化学研究所矿床地球化学国家重点实验室, 贵阳 550081
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-24 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
  • 通讯作者: 温汉捷(1971-),男,研究员,博士,主要从事矿床地球化学方面的研究,E-mail:wenhanjie@vip.gyig.an.cn E-mail:wenhanjie@vip.gyig.an.cn
  • 作者简介:张贵山(1971-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事矿床地球化学方面的研究,E-mail:zygszh@chd.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41073027);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(310827172003);陕西省自然科学基金项目(2019JM-161);财通矿山新兴关键矿产资源综合研究项目(030216190040)

Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of Cobalt in Cobalt-Rich Sulfide of Hongge V-Ti Magnetite Ore Field, Panxi

Zhang Guishan1,2, Qiu Hongxin1, Wen Hanjie1,3, Peng Ren1, Meng Qiankun1   

  1. 1. School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710065, China;
    2. Key Laboratory for the Study of Focused Magmatism and Giant Ore Deposits, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi'an 710065, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
  • Received:2021-01-24 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41073027),the Projects of Foundatental Research Funds of the Central Universities (310827172003), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province,China (2019-JM-161) and the Comprehensive Research Project on Emerging Key Mineral Resources of Caitong Mine (030216190040)

摘要: 攀西红格钒钛磁铁矿矿田白草矿区发育富钴硫化物矿物,关于其成因和形成环境方面的研究较为薄弱。本文采用矿物学、矿物化学、地球化学等方法对其进行系统研究。矿石中主要富钴硫化物为磁黄铁矿(Po)、黄铁矿(Py)、镍黄铁矿(Pn)、硫钴镍矿(Se)。磁黄铁矿Co、Ni平均质量分数分别为0.21%、0.42%,Co/Ni平均值为1.10;黄铁矿Co、Ni平均质量分数分别为0.18%、0.29%,Co/Ni平均值为0.77;镍黄铁矿Co、Ni平均质量分数分别为2.67%、34.30%,Ni/Fe平均值为1.08、S/Fe平均值为1.91、M/S#平均值为1.13;硫钴镍矿Co、Ni平均质量分数分别为24.30%、22.90%,Co/Ni平均值为1.06。根据Po-Py矿物温度计,白草矿区富钴硫化物结晶温度在267~490℃之间,表明其形成于中高温的条件。通过与地幔包体镍黄铁矿S/Fe、M/S#特征值的对比,结合磁黄铁矿具有陨硫铁(Tr)同质多象晶体的特征,认为白草矿区硫化物具有地幔源的特征,说明成矿物质来源于地幔。白草矿区钴地球化学特征研究表明,在硫化物熔体分离过程中,钴迁移至单硫化物固溶体形成Po-Py固溶体,再由Po-Py固溶体中迁移至Pn、Se,形成了Se、Pn、Po-Py、Ccp(黄铜矿)中Co质量分数依次递减的现象。

关键词: 富钴硫化物, 钴, 电子探针, 地球化学, 白草矿区, 红格钒钛磁铁矿矿田

Abstract: Cobalt rich sulfide minerals are developed in Baicao mining area of Hongge ore field in Panxi. The research on their genesis and formation environment is relatively weak. In this paper, the mineralogy and mineral chemistry are used for a systematic study. The results show that the main cobalt-rich sulfides in the ore are pyrrhotite, pyrite, pentlandite, and siegenite. The average contents of Co and Ni in pyrrhotite are 0.21% and 0.42% respectively, and the average value of Co/Ni is 1.10; The average contents of Co and Ni in pyrite are 0.18% and 0.29% respectively, and the average value of Co/Ni is 0.77; The average contents of Co and Ni in pentlandite are 2.67% and 34.30% respectively, and the average value of Ni/Fe,S/Fe and M/S# are 1.08,1.91 and 1.13 respectively; The average contents of Co and Ni in siegenite are 24.30% and 22.90% respectively, and the average value of Co/Ni is 1.06. According to the pyrrhotite-pyrite mineral thermometer, the crystallization temperature of the Baicao cobalt rich sulfide is about 267-490℃, which indicates that it was formed at medium high temperature. Compared with the characteristic values of S/Fe and M/S# of the mantle xenolith pentlandite, the pyrrhotite has the characteristics of troilite (Tr) homomorphic polycrystal, which reflects that the ore-forming materials were derived from the mantle. The geochemical characteristics of cobalt in Baicao mining area show that in the process of sulfide melt separation, cobalt migrated to mono-sulfide solid solution to form Po-Py solid solution, and then migrated further to form Pn and Se solid solution, forming the phenomenon that the content of Co in Se, Pn, Po-Py and Ccp decreases gradually.

Key words: cobalt-rich sulfide, cobalt, EPMA, geochemistry, Baicao mining area, Hongge V-Ti magnetite ore field

中图分类号: 

  • P571
[1] 刘英俊, 曹励明, 李兆麟, 等. 元素地球化学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1984:101-112. Liu Yingjun, Cao Liming, Li Zhaolin, et al. Geochemistry of Eelement[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1984:101-112.
[2] 宋谢炎, 陈列锰, 于宋月, 等. 峨眉大火成岩省钒钛磁铁矿矿床地质特征及成因[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2018, 37(6):1003-1018. Song Xieyan, Chen Liemeng, Yu Songyue, et al. Geological Features and Genesis of the V-Ti Magenetite Deposits in the Emeishan Large Igneous Province, SW China[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2018, 37(6):1003-1018.
[3] Wang D C, Hou T, Wang M, et al. New Constraints on the Open Magma Chamber Processes in the Formation of Giant Hongge Fe-Ti-V Oxide Deposit[J]. Lithos, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105704.
[4] Lu Y G, Lesher C M, Deng J. Geochemistry and Genesis of Magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) and PGE-(Cu)-(Ni) Deposits in China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2019, 107:863-887.
[5] Liang Q L, Song X Y, Wirth R, et al. Implications of Nano-and Micrometer-Size Platinum-Group Element Minerals in Base Metal Sulfides of the Yangliuping Ni-Cu-PGE Sulfide Deposit, SW China[J]. Chemical Geology, 2019, 517:7-21.
[6] Ding X, Ripley E M, Wang W Z, et al. Iron Isotope Fractionation During Sulfide Liquid Segregation and Crystallization at the Lengshuiqing Ni-Cu Magmatic Sulfide Deposit, SW China[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2019, 261:327-341.
[7] Tang Q Y, Li C, Ripley E M, et al. Sr-Nd-Hf-O Isotope Constraints on Crustal Contamination and Mantle Source Variation of Three Fe-Ti-V Oxide Ore Deposits in the Emeishan Large Igneous Province[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2021, 292:364-381.
[8] Xiong Y Q, Shao Y Q, Jiang S Y, et al. Distal Relationship of the Taihexian Pb-Zn-(Au) Deposit to the Dengfuxian Magmatic-Hydrothermal System, South China:Constraints from Mineralogy, Fluid Inclusion, H-O-Pb and in Situ S Isotopes[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2020, 127:103826.
[9] Wang K, Dong H, Liu R. Genesis of Giant Fe-Ti Oxide Deposits in the Panxi Region, SW China:A Review[J]. Geological Journal, 2019.doi:10.1002/gj.3632.
[10] Wang Y J, Zhu W G, Zhong H, et al. Using Trace Elements of Magnetite to Constrain the Origin of the Pingchuan Hydrothermal Low-Ti Magnetite Deposit in the Panxi Area, SW China[J]. Acta Geochimica, 2019, 38:376-390.
[11] Liu P P, Zhou M F, Wei T C, et al. In-Situ LA-ICP-MS Trace Elemental Analyses of Magnetite:Fe-Ti-(V) Oxide-Bearing Mafic-Ultramafic Layered Intrusions of the Emeishan Large Igneous Province, SW China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 65(4):853-871.
[12] Wei C, Ye L, Hu Y S, et al. LA-ICP-MS Analyses of Trace Elements in Base Metal Sulfides from Carbonate-Hosted Zn-Pb Deposits, South China:A Case Study of the Maoping Deposit[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021, 130(2):103945.
[13] Zhang Z Z, Qin J F, Lai S C, et al. Origin of Late Permian Syenite and Gabbro from the Panxi Rift, SW China:The Fractionation Process of Mafic Magma in the Inner Zone of the Emeishan Mantle Plume[J]. Lithos, 2019, 346/347:105160.
[14] 曹永华. 攀枝花层状岩体岩浆演化及钒钛磁铁矿矿床的成因研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院广州地球化学研究所, 2019:1-26. Cao Yonghua. Magmatic Processes of the Panzhihua Layered Intrusion and Associated Fe-Ti-(V) Oxide Ore Deposit[D]. Guangzhou:Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019:1-26.
[15] Desborough G A, Carpenter R H. Phase Relations of Pyrrhotite[J]. Economic Geology, 1965, 60(7):1431-1450.
[16] Mansur E T, Barnes S J, Duran C J. An Overview of Chalcophile Element Contents of Pyrrhotite, Pentlandite, Chalcopyrite, and Pyrite from Magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE Sulfide Deposits[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2020,56:179-204.
[17] 张斌, 张革利, 陈浩,等. 陕西凤县二里河铅锌矿床金属硫化物标型特征及地质意义[J]. 世界地质, 2021, 40(2):265-272. Zhang Bin, Zhang Geli, Chen Hao, et al. Typomorphic Characteristics and Geological Signifit Cance of Metal Sulfide from Erlihe Pb-Zn Deposit in Fengxian County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Global Geology, 2021, 40(2):265-272.
[18] 杨阳, 唐菊兴, 吴纯能, 等. 西藏甲玛铜多金属矿床磁黄铁矿标型矿物学特征及其地质意义[J]. 矿床地质, 2020, 39(2):337-350. Yang Yang, Tang Juxing, Wu Chunneng, et al. Typomorphic Mineralogical Characteristics of Pyrrhotite in Jiama Cu Polymetallic Deposit, Tibet, and Its Geological Significance[J].Mineral Deposits, 2020, 39(2):337-350.
[19] 陈殿芬. 我国一些铜镍硫化物矿床主要金属矿物的特征[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 1995, 14(4):345-354. Chen Dianfen. Characteristics of Main Metallic Minerals in Some Copper-Nickel Sulfide Deposits of China[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 1995, 14(4):345-354.
[20] 吕林素, 李宏博, 周振华, 等. 吉林红旗岭富家矿床矿石矿物化学和硫同位素特征:对铜镍硫化物矿床成因及成矿过程的约束[J]. 地球学报, 2017, 38(2):193-207. Lü Linsu, Li Hongbo, Zhou Zhenhua, et al. Mineral Chemistry and Sulfur Isotopic Characteristics of Ores from the Fujia Deposit in Hongqiling Area, Jilin Province:Constraints on the Genesis and Ore-forming Processes of Ni-Cu Sulfide Deposit[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2017, 38(2):193-207.
[21] Nekrasov I J, Besmen N I. Pyrite-Pyrrhotite Geothermometer. Distribution of Cobalt, Nickel and Tin[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 1979, 11:767-771.
[22] 王玉往, 王京彬, 王莉娟,等. 岩浆铜镍矿与钒钛磁铁矿的过渡类型:新疆哈密香山西矿床[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(1):61-73. Wang Yuwang, Wang Jingbin, Wang Lijuan, et al. A Intermediate Type of Cu-Ni Sulfide and V-Ti Magnetite Deposit:Xiangshanxi Deposit,Hami, Xinjiang, China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(1):61-73.
[23] 徐国风, 邵洁涟. 黄铁矿的标型特征及其实际意义[J]. 地质论评, 1980, 26(6):541-546. Xü Guofeng, Shao Jielian. The Typomorphic Characteristics of Pyrite and Its Significance[J]. Geological Review, 1980, 26(6):541-546.
[24] 王汾连, 赵太平, 陈伟, 等. 峨眉山大火成岩省赋Nb-Ta-Zr矿化正长岩脉的形成时代和锆石Hf同位素组成[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(10):3519-3532. Wang Fenlian, Zhao Taiping, Chen Wei, et al. Zircon U-Pb Ages and Lu-Hf Isotopic Compositions of the Nb-Ta-Zr-Bearing Syenitic Dikes in the Emeishan Large Igneous Province[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(10):3519-3532.
[25] 范思文, 樊金虎, 孙立秋,等. 内蒙古特尼格尔图矽卡岩型铅锌矿床地质特征及矿床成因[J]. 世界地质, 2020, 39(4):826-837. Fan Siwen, Fan Jinhu, Sun Liqiu, et al. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of Tenige'ertu Lead-Zinc Deposit, Inner Mongolia[J]. Global Geology, 2020, 39(4):826-837.
[26] 骆华宝. 中国主要硫化铜镍及其成因研究[D]. 北京:中国地质科学院矿床研究所, 1990:43-65. Luo Huabao. The Major Nickel-Copper Sulfide Deposits and Their Genesis of China[D]. Beijing:Institute of Mineral Deposits, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 1990:43-65.
[27] 顾连新, B. 康伯尔. 不同成因类型磁黄铁矿中镍、钴的地球化学[J]. 地质与勘探, 1974, 10(3):65-71. Gu Lianxin, Kangboer B. Co and Ni Geochemistry of Different Genetic Pyrrhotite[J]. Geology and Prospecting, 1974, 10(3):65-71.
[28] 黄式庭, 于晓飞, 吕志成, 等. 甘肃北山老金厂金矿床载金矿物特征、原位硫同位素组成及其对成矿的指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(5):1387-1403. Huang Shiting, Yu Xiaofei, Lü Zhicheng, et al. Characteristics of Gold-Bearing Minerals and Compositions of In-Situ Sulfur of Laojinchang Gold Deposit in Beishan, Gansu Province and Its Ore-Forming Implications[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(5):1387-1403.
[29] 李洪梁, 李光明, 丁俊,等. 藏南扎西康铅锌多金属矿床成因:硫化物原位硫同位素证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(5):1289-1303. Li Hongliang, Li Guangming, Ding Jun, et al. Genesis of Zhaxikang Pb-Zn Polymetallic Deposit in Southern Tibet:Evidencefrom in Situ S Isotopes of Sulfides[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(5):1289-1303.
[30] 宋谢炎. 岩浆硫化物矿床研究现状及重要科学问题[J]. 矿床地质, 2019, 38(4):699-710. Song Xieyan. Current Research Status and Important Issues of Magmatic Sulfide Deposits[J].Mineral Deposits, 2019, 38(4):699-710.
[31] 王焰, 钟宏, 曹勇华, 等. 我国铂族元素、钴和铬主要矿床类型的分布特征及成矿机制[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(33):3825-3838. Wang Yan, Zhong Hong, Cao Yonghua, et al. Genetic Classification, Distribution and Ore Genesis of Major PGE, Co and Cr Deposits in China:A Critical Review[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(33):3825-3838.
[32] 宋谢炎, 肖家飞, 朱丹, 等. 岩浆通道系统与岩浆硫化物成矿研究新进展[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(1):153-163. Song Xieyan, Xiao Jiafei, Zhu Dan, et al. New Insights on the Formation of Magmatic Sulfide Deposits in Magma Conduit System[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(1):153-163.
[33] 暴宏天, 王焰, 曹勇华. 新疆北山地区坡一岩体橄榄石成分特征及其对地幔源区的制约[J]. 地球化学, 2020, 49(4):353-367. Bao Hongtian, Wang Yan, Cao Yonghua. Compositions of the Olivine From the Poyi Ultramafic Intrusion in the Beishan Area, Xinjiang:Constraints on the Nature of Its Mantle Source[J]. Geochimica, 2020, 49(4):353-367.
[34] 张腾蛟, 李佑国, 张月姣, 等. 川西盐边县红格钒钛磁铁矿中镍钴硫化物的铂族元素地球化学特征[J]. 地质论评, 2017, 63(4):1050-1063. Zhang Tengjiao, Li Youguo, Zhang Yuejiao, et al. PGE Geochemical Characteristics of Massive Sulfide in V-Ti Magnetite at Hongge Area,Yanbian County, Western Sichuan[J]. Geological Review, 2017, 63(4):1050-1063.
[35] 张月姣. 四川红格钒钛磁铁矿矿床铂族元素地球化学研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2014:5-18. Zhang Yuejiao. The Platinum-Group Elements Geochemical Characteristecs of Vanadiumtitano-Magnetite Deposits in Hongge, Sichuan[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2014:5-18.
[36] Sarah A S, Barnes S J, Prichard H M. The Distribution of Platinum Group Elements(PGE) and Other Chalcophile Elements Among Sulfides from the Creighton Ni-Cu-PGE Sulfide Deposit, Sudbury, Canada, and the Origin of Palladium in Pentlandite[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2010, 45:765-793.
[37] Barnes S J, Achterbergh E V, Makovicky E, et al. Proton Probe Results for Partitioning of Platinum Group Elements Between Monosulphide Solid Solution and Sulphide Liquid[J]. South African Journal of Geology, 2001, 104(4):275-286.
[38] Clifford P, Sarah J B, Edmond A M. Textural Variations in MORB Sulfide Droplets Due to Differences in Crystallization History[J]. Canadian Mineralogist, 2012, 50:675-692.
[1] 任宪军, 石云倩. 松辽盆地南部下白垩统火石岭组钙碱性火山岩地球化学特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 818-834.
[2] 王常东, 董小宇, 郝晓飞, 姜山, 于兵, 周舰, 王天奇. 广兴—芝瑞盆地上伙房地段流纹斑岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 835-851.
[3] 刘宇泰, 李碧乐, 陈晓琳, 李浩然, 史雨凡, 孙亚明.  东昆仑沟里地区瓦勒尕南矿区花岗闪长岩地球化学特征、锆石U-Pb年代学及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 875-895.
[4] 张海洪, 乔锦燃, 陈国强, 薛晓刚, 邓馨卉, 苗长盛, 李 雪, 郜春生. 张广才岭南部早侏罗世两类I型花岗岩成因:年代学、地球化学和锆石Hf同位素证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 896-914.
[5] 赵振, 秦光雄, 闫佰忠, 马苗苗. 青海省互助土族自治县地热田水化学特征及成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 986-1001.
[6] 何天鑫, 柳蓉, 刘强浩, 宁婷, . 银额盆地下白垩统巴音戈壁组纤维状方解石脉成因机制——热水沉积与同位素证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 497-510.
[7] 李阳, 周文博, 王长虹, 刘娜, 苟军, 孙文博, 孙家兴, 孙德有. 海拉尔盆地克鲁伦凹陷赋铀地层沉积物源#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 522-539.
[8] 徐骏, 高阳, 刘军, 王晓彤, . 大兴安岭北段三矿沟铁铜矿床成因——来自石榴子石U-Pb定年及元素地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 540-556.
[9] 张佳琦, 王志新, 梁琛岳, 郑常青, 刘永江. 吉中地区范家屯组变沉积岩碎屑锆石年代学与Hf同位素示踪——对古亚洲洋东段闭合的约束[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 149-172.
[10] 高心如, 梁琛岳, 郑常青, 刘永江, 周建波, 宋志伟, 贾祥鹤, 殷浚哲, 洪雨萱, 谭卓, 张佳琦. 蒙古—鄂霍茨克构造域东段晚中生代演化历史——来自岩浆岩和沉积岩的证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 36-65.
[11] 陈卓, 周建波, 李功宇, 辛中华, 王红燕, 孙宁辰. 北方造山带东段微陆块构造属性与超大陆重建[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 1-16.
[12] 柳蓉, 何天鑫, 张浩然, 刘强浩, 张苡铭. 中国典型含油气盆地热液作用及其对沉积环境的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1785-1805.
[13] 张万仁, 吴保祥, 韦枫, 杨维刚, 刘杰. 甘肃省宕昌—崖湾地区水系沉积物地球化学特征与锑找矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1462-1480.
[14] 郑伟, 刘东宏, 吴晓东, 孙煜恒, 邢波. 粤西石菉Cu-Mo矿床石榴子石与符山石地球化学特征及其对成矿流体演化的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1481-1505.
[15] 杨维刚, 李永胜, 任文秀, 王玉玺, 黄增保, 牛鹏飞, 王怀涛, 张家瑞, 贾志磊, 李小强. 西秦岭九寨沟县下草地村含金花岗斑岩特征及其金矿找矿指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1506-1524.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .