吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1853-1862.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200053

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

煤化工渣高效吸附去除水中全氟辛酸

刘娜1,2, 王金鑫1,2, 焦昕倩1,2, 雒峰3,4   

  1. 1. 吉林大学新能源与环境学院, 长春 130021;
    2. 教育部地下水资源与环境重点实验室(吉林大学), 长春 130021;
    3. 吉林大学材料科学与工程学院, 长春 130022;
    4. 教育部汽车材料实验室(吉林大学), 长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-07 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
  • 通讯作者: 雒锋(1986-),男,高级工程师,主要从事固体废弃物再利用方面的研究,E-mail:luofeng@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:luofeng@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘娜(1977-),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境污染治理与修复方面的研究,E-mail:liuna@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41572217);国家"111"项目(B16020)

Removal of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Aqueous Solution Using Highly Adsorptive Coal Chemical Slag

Liu Na1,2, Wang Jinxin1,2, Jiao Xinqian1,2, Luo Feng3,4   

  1. 1. College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment(Jilin University), Ministry of Education, Changchun 130021, China;
    3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China;
    4. Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials(Jilin University), Ministry of Education, Changchun 130022, China
  • Received:2020-04-07 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572217) and the "111" Project of China (B16020)

摘要: 为高效快速去除水中全氟辛酸,选择工业废物煤化工渣对全氟辛酸进行吸附去除探究。采用不同的处理方法制备了4种煤化工渣(粒径从大到小为CGA1、CGA2、CGA3和CGA4),研究其在水溶液中的全氟辛酸吸附性能。利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、拉曼光谱、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)和X射线光电子能谱(XPS)对4种煤化工渣的结构特征进行表征分析,并考察了全氟辛酸初始质量浓度和初始pH对吸附进程的影响。实验结果表明:煤化工渣对全氟辛酸有高效的吸附能力,伪二级动力学模型和Langmuir等温模型可以较好地描述4种煤化工渣对全氟辛酸的吸附行为及过程,其中CGA4去除全氟辛酸的最大吸附量为25.51 mg/g;随着全氟辛酸溶液初始质量浓度升高,煤化工渣对全氟辛酸的吸附容量逐渐增加;初始pH对CGA3和CGA4的影响微弱,CGA1和CGA2在酸性条件下显示出更优越的吸附性能。由此得出,4种煤化工材料中粒径最小的CGA4具有最优的全氟辛酸去除能力且基本不受pH限制。FTIR分析表明,吸附过程中氢键的形成占主导地位,XPS和Zeta电位检测结果表明,物理吸附和静电吸附在去除过程中也发挥了重要作用。

关键词: 煤化工渣, 全氟辛酸, 吸附, 废物利用

Abstract: Industrial waste coal chemical residues were selected as absorbent to remove perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in water. Four kinds of coal chemical slag (particle size range from large to small was CGA1, CGA2, CGA3, and CGA4) prepared by different treatment methods were used to evaluate their sorption performance for PFOA. Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Raman, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to characterize the structures of the four kinds of coal chemical slag, and the effects of initial concentration and pH of the PFOA solution on the adsorption process were investigated. The results showed that the absorbents had high efficiency for PFOA removal. The adsorption was well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Langmuir isothermal model. With the increase of the initial concentration of PFOA solution, the adsorption capacity of the coal chemical slag for PFOA increased gradually. The initial pH value had almost no impact on CGA3 and CGA4; While for CGA1 and CGA2, it showed better adsorption performance under acidic conditions than alkaline conditions. It is concluded that CGA4 (the smallest particle size) has the best PFOA removal ability and is almost unrestricted by pH. The maximum adsorption capacity of CGA4 is 25.51 mg/g. The FTIR analysis suggested that the formation of hydrogen bonds dominates the adsorption process. The results of XPS and zeta potential showed that physical and electrostatic adsorption also plays important roles in the removal progress. Therefore, coal chemical slag can be used as a promising adsorbent to remove the difficult-to-treat pollutants and promote the recycling of waste and sustainable development.

Key words: coal chemical slag, perfluorooctanoic acid, adsorption, waste disposal

中图分类号: 

  • X705
[1] Qian J, Shen M, Wang P, et al. Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Adsorption on Powder Activated Carbon:Effect of Phosphate (P) Competition, pH, and Temperature[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 182:215-222.
[2] Santos A, Rodríguez S, Pardo F, et al. Use of Fenton Reagent Combined with Humic Acids for the Removal of PFOA from Contaminated Water[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 563:657-663.
[3] Zhang D, Luo Q, Gao B, et al. Sorption of Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Perfluoroheptanoic Acid on Granular Activated Carbon[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 144:2336-2342.
[4] Maimaiti A, Deng S, Meng P, et al. Competitive Adsorption of Perfluoroalkyl Substances on Anion Exchange Resins in Simulated Afff-Impacted Groundwater[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 348:494-502.
[5] Appleman T D, Dickenson E R V, Bellona C, et al. Nanofiltration and Granular Activated Carbon Treatment of Perfluoroalkyl Acids[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 260:740-746.
[6] Du Z, Deng S, Bei Y, et al. Adsorption Behavior and Mechanism of Perfluorinated Compounds on Various Adsorbents:A Review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 274:443-454.
[7] Zhi Y, Liu J. Surface Modification of Activated Carbon for Enhanced Adsorption of Perfluoroalkyl Acids from Aqueous Solutions[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 144:1224-1232.
[8] Ochoa-Herrera V, Sierra-Alvarez R. Removal of Perfluorinated Surfactants by Sorption onto Granular Activated Carbon, Zeolite and Sludge[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(10):1588-1593.
[9] Yang B, Han Y, Yu G, et al. Efficient Removal of Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAAS) from Aqueous Solution by Electrocoagulation Using Iron Electrode[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 303:384-390.
[10] Guo H, Liu Y, Ma W, et al. Surface Molecular Imprinting on Carbon Microspheres for Fast and Selective Adsorption of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 348:29-38.
[11] Hisao H, Ari Y, Etsuko H, et al. Efficient Decomposition of Environmentally Persistent Perfluorocarboxylic Acids by Use of Persulfate as a Photochemical Oxidant[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(7):2383-2388.
[12] Xue A, Yuan Z W, Sun Y, et al. Electro-Oxidation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid by Carbon Nanotube Sponge Anode and the Mechanism[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 141:120-126.
[13] Kucharzyk K H, Darlington R, Benotti M, et al. Novel Treatment Technologies for Pfas Compounds:A Critical Review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 204:757-764.
[14] Liu J, Li C, Qu R, et al. Kinetics and Mechanism Insights into the Photodegradation of Hydroperfluorocarboxylic Acids in Aqueous Solution[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 348:644-652.
[15] Tang H, Xiang Q, Lei M, et al. Efficient Degradation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid by Uv-Fenton Process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 184:156-162.
[16] Park S, Zenobio J E, Lee L S. Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) Removal with Pd0/nFe0 Nanoparticles:Adsorption or Aqueous Fe-Complexation, Not Transformation?[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 342:20-28.
[17] Zaggia A, Conte L, Falletti L, et al. Use of Strong Anion Exchange Resins for the Removal of Perfluoroalkylated Substances from Contaminated Drinking Water in Batch and Continuous Pilot Plants[J]. Water Research, 2016, 91:137-146.
[18] Deng S, Yu Q, Huang J, et al. Removal of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate from Wastewater by Anion Exchange Resins:Effects of Resin Properties and Solution Chemistry[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(18):5188-5195.
[19] Li J, Li Q, Li L, et al. Removal of Perfluorooctanoic Acid from Water with Economical Mesoporous Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin Microsphere[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 320:501-509.
[20] Wang F, Shih K. Adsorption of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) on Alumina:Influence of Solution pH and Cations[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45(9):2925-2930.
[21] Johnson R L, Anschutz A J, Smolen J M, et al. The Adsorption of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate onto Sand, Clay, and Iron Oxide Surfaces[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2007, 52(4):1165-1170.
[22] Zhang D, He Q, Wang M,et al. Sorption of Perfluoroalkylated Substances (PFASs) onto Granular Activated Carbon and Biochar[J]. Environmental Technology, 2019, doi:10.1080/09593330.2019.1680744.
[23] Liu Y, David W B, Carol J P,et al. Removal of Pharmaceutical Compounds, Artificial Sweeteners, and Perfluoroalkyl Substances from Water Using a Passive Treatment System Containing Zero-Valent Iron and Biochar[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 691:165-177.
[24] Johansson L, Gustafsson J P. Phosphate Removal Using Blast Furnace Slags and Opoka-Mechanisms[J]. Water Research, 2000, 34(1):259-265.
[25] Yang J, Wang S, Lu Z, et al. Converter Slag-Coal Cinder Columns for the Removal of Phosphorous and Other Pollutants[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 168(1):331-337.
[26] Tang W, Huang H, Gao Y, et al. Preparation of a Novel Porous Adsorption Material from Coal Slag and Its Adsorption Properties of Phenol from Aqueous Solution[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 88:1191-1200.
[27] Yang X, Tang W, Liu X, et al. Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica from Coal Slag and CO2 for Phenol Removal[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 208:1255-1264.
[28] Tran H N, You S J, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, et al. Mistakes and Inconsistencies Regarding Adsorption of Contaminants from Aqueous Solutions:A Critical Review[J]. Water Research, 2017, 120:88-116.
[29] 孙博,马军.离子交换树脂对水中全氟羧酸的吸附去除[J]. 水处理技术, 2017, 43(1):22-26. Sun Bo, Ma Jun. Adsorption and Removal of Perfluorocarboxylic Acid in Water by Ion Exchange Resin[J]. Water Treatment Technology, 2017, 43(1):22-26.
[30] 刘娜,张朋朋,丁隆真,等.氮掺杂碳材料活化过硫酸盐降解4-氯苯酚[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2020,50(4):1173-1181. Liu Na, Zhang Pengpeng, Ding Longzhen, et al. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Material Activate Persulfate to Degrade 4-Chlorophenol[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020,50(4):1173-1181.
[31] Fagbayigbo B O, Opeolu B O, Fatoki O S, et al. Removal of PFOA and PFOS from Aqueous Solutions Using Activated Carbon Produced from Vitis Vinifera Leaf Litter[J]. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 2017, 24(14):1-14.
[32] Chang P H, Jiang W T, Li Z. Removal of Perfluorooctanoic Acid from Water Using Calcined Hydrotalcite:A Mechanistic Study[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 368:487-495.
[33] Xu C, Chen H, Jiang F. Adsorption of Perflourooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) on Polyaniline Nanotubes[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2015, 479:60-67.
[34] Li X, Pignatello J J, Wang Y, et al. New Insight into Adsorption Mechanism of Ionizable Compounds on Carbon Nanotubes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(15):8334-8341.
[35] Zhou Y, He Z, Tao Y, et al. Preparation of a Functional Silica Membrane Coated on Fe3O4 Nanoparticle for Rapid and Selective Removal of Perfluorinated Compounds from Surface Water Sample[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 303:156-166.
[36] Shao Q, Xu C, Wang Y, et al. Dynamic Interactions Between Sulfidated Zerovalent Iron and Dissolved Oxygen:Mechanistic Insights for Enhanced Chromate Removal[J]. Water Research, 2018, 135:322-330.
[37] Inyang M, Dickenson E R V. The Use of Carbon Adsorbents for the Removal of Perfluoroalkyl Acids from Potable Reuse Systems[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 184:168-175.
[1] 李洋, 欧丽, 黄琨, 刘鹏, 刘燕红, 李曼曼, 唐金平. 基于同步辐射技术研究锌在废弃稀土矿区土壤中的吸附及垂向迁移特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 233-244.
[2] 龚凤鸣, 侯大力, 强贤宇, 向雪妮, 黄思婧, 韩鑫, 余洋阳, 顾康福.

钠基蒙脱石狭缝中CH4-CO2竞争吸附与CO2埋存 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 470-478.

[3] 余光展, 王健, 吴楠, 徐清海, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区延长组7段致密砂岩微观孔隙结构评价#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 83-95.
[4] 张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[5] 张少杰, 刘适搏, 杨武, 陈思齐. 粉末活性炭增强臭氧氧化去除铁锰[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1228-1237.
[6] 杨悦锁, 朱一丹, 张文卿, 武宇辉, Yu Tong, 张大志. 地下水系统中镍污染和天然胶体共迁移特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 226-233.
[7] 董军, 李文德, 陈建隆, 吴玥, 鹿豪杰. 电容去离子化去除地下水中镉的影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 1129-1136.
[8] 何俊, 王小琦, 颜兴, 万娟, 朱志政. 溶液和温度作用下膨润土防水毯的渗透性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 807-816.
[9] 宋志伟, 李婷, 易宏云, 邱杰, 张迪, 陈丹凤. 好氧颗粒污泥对有机污染物的吸附机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 868-873.
[10] 刘娜, 杨亚冬, Alberto Bento Charrua, 王航, 叶康, 吕春欣. 响应曲面法优化生物质炭去除水溶液中的阿特拉津[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1199-1207.
[11] 王飞宇, 冯伟平, 关晶, 贺志勇. 湖相致密油资源地球化学评价技术和应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 388-397.
[12] 张凤君, 贾晗, 刘佳露, 董佳新, 卢伟, 吕聪. 有机氯代烃在壤土中的吸附和解吸特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1515-1522.
[13] Alkali Mohammed,杨悦锁,杜新强,杨明星,Abdullahi Musa. 内分泌干扰物的环境危害:雌激素及其硫酸盐在土壤中的吸附规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 573-0581.
[14] 邹东雷, 唐抒圆, 熊厚峰, 唐绍福, 李春华, 陈鹏. β-环糊精交联聚合物对氯苯的吸附特性[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 1166-1172.
[15] 张先富, 李卉, 洪梅, 宋博宇, 张福全, 梁爽. 苏打盐碱土对氮转化的影响[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 1145-1150.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[2] 周丽萍, 申向东, 李学斌, 白忠强. 天然浮石粉水泥土力学性质的试验研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 492 -497 .
[3] 黄玉龙, 王璞珺, 邵锐. 火山碎屑岩的储层物性--以松辽盆地营城组为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 227 -236 .
[4] 潘殿琦,张祖培,潘殿彩,陈义民,徐 瑞. 人工冻土纵波波速与温度和含水率的关系[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 588 -591 .
[5] 付 哲,周云轩,刘殿伟,刘万崧. 基于特征的面向对象虚拟GIS数据模型设计与原型系统实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 647 -652 .
[6] 卢进才,李玉宏,魏仙样,魏建设. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 928 -0932 .
[7] 黄继国,黄国鑫,聂广正,魏海娟,吕爱民,王雪松. 中温UBF与UASB两相厌氧系统处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 144 -0147 .
[8] 孙才志,刘玉兰,杨 俊. 下辽河平原地下水生态水位与可持续开发调控研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 249 -254 .
[9] 舒萍,曲延明,王国军,丁日新,艾兴波,纪学雁,唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺. 松辽盆地火山岩储层裂缝地质特征与地球物理识别[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 726 -0733 .
[10] 单玄龙,刘青帝,任利军,赵玉婷. 松辽盆地三台地区下白垩统营城组珍珠岩地质特征与成因[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1146 -1151 .