吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (3): 705-720.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230348

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

柴达木盆地南八仙地区渐新世沉积环境及储层物性控制因素

易定红1,刘应如1,李积永2,李红哲1,徐晓玲2,吴颜雄2,王爱萍1,马元琨2,涂加沙2,贾正良2#br#   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院,兰州730020
    2.中国石油青海油田公司,甘肃敦煌736202
  • 出版日期:2025-05-26 发布日期:2025-06-06
  • 作者简介:易定红(1975—),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事储层沉积学方面的研究,E-mail:dingyh_04@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油天然气股份有限公司基础性前瞻性科技项目(2021DJ08,2021DJ1705)

Oligocene Sedimentary Environment and Controlling Factors of Reservoir Physical Properties in Nanbaxian Area, Northern Qaidam Basin

Yi Dinghong1, Liu Yingru1, Li Jiyong2, Li Hongzhe1, Xu Xiaoling2, Wu Yanxiong2,Wang Aiping1, Ma Yuankun2, Xu Jiasha2,Jia Zhengliang2 #br#   

  1. 1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development-Northwest, Lanzhou 730020, China
    2.  PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736202 ,Gansu,China 
  • Online:2025-05-26 Published:2025-06-06
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Fundamental & Prospective Science & Technology Project of PetroChina Company Limited (2021DJ08,2021DJ1705)

摘要: 为了明确柴达木盆地北缘南八仙地区中深层油气勘探前景,预测有利储层分布区域,以古近系渐新统下干柴沟组上段为研究对象,在精细岩心观察和钻(测)井资料综合分析的基础上,结合铸体薄片、黏土矿物组合、泥岩岩屑氯离子质量分数、孔渗变化特征等参数综合分析结果,对该地区下干柴沟组上段沉积时期的沉积环境、碎屑岩储层物性变化特征及其控制因素进行了深入研究。结果表明:南八仙地区下干柴沟组上段沉积时期为辫状河三角洲前缘沉积环境,湖泊水体主要为淡水—微咸水;储层主要为岩屑长石砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩,砂岩的成分成熟度变化大、结构成熟度较低;气候干旱温暖,黏土矿物组合以伊利石和伊/蒙混层为主,高岭石和绿泥石含量少,不含蒙脱石;南八仙地区下干柴沟组上段有利储层是Ⅳ-1—Ⅳ-4砂组辫状河三角洲前缘水下分流河道砂体和河口坝砂体,孔隙度平均为16.3%,渗透率平均为37.4×10-3 μm2,为中孔低渗储层和中孔中渗储层,原生粒间孔为主要孔隙类型,其中,Ⅳ-1—Ⅳ-4砂组砂体物性优于Ⅳ-5砂组,水下分流河道砂体物性优于河口坝砂体;沉积(微)相和胶结作用是南八仙地区下干柴沟组上段储层物性优劣的主要控制因素,其次是压实作用和溶蚀作用,高含量的次生方解石胶结物是Ⅳ-5砂组储层物性变差的主要因素。

关键词: 沉积环境, 储层物性, 油气, 控制因素, 下干柴沟组上段, 南八仙地区, 柴达木盆地

Abstract:  In order to clarify the oil and gas exploration prospects in the middle and deep layers of Nanbaxian area in the northern margin of Qaidam basin and predict the distribution area of favorable reservoirs, this paper takes the Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in the Late Oligocene of Paleogene as the research object. Based on the comprehensive analysis of detailed core observation and drilling (logging) data, combined with the comprehensive analysis results of casting thin sections, clay mineral assemblages, chloride ion content of mudstone cuttings, porosity and permeability variation characteristics, the sedimentary environment of the Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in this area during the sedimentary period, the characteristics of clastic reservoir physical properties and their controlling factors were studied deeply. The results show that: (1) The sedimentary period of the Upper Member of the Xiaganchaigou Formation in the Nanbaxian area is the sedimentary environment of the braided river delta front. The lake water is mainly fresh-brackish, and the reservoir is mainly lithic feldspar sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone. The compositional maturity of sandstone varies greatly and the structural maturity is low. The climate is dry and warm, and the clay mineral assemblage is dominated by illite and illite-montmorillonite mixed layer. The content of kaolinite and chlorite is low, and montmorillonite is absent. (2) The favorable reservoir of the Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in Nanbaxian area is the underwater distributary channel sand body and the mouth bar sand body of the braided river delta front in the Ⅳ-1-Ⅳ-4 sand group, with an average porosity of 16.3% and an average permeability of 37.4 × 10-3μm2. It is a medium porosity and low permeability reservoir and a medium porosity and medium permeability reservoir. The primary intergranular pore is the main pore type. Among them, the physical properties of the sand body of theⅣ-1-Ⅳ-4 sand group are better than those of the Ⅳ-5 sand group, and the physical properties of the underwater distributary channel sand body are better than those of the mouth bar sand body. (3) The controlling factors of reservoir physical properties in the Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation in Nanbaxian area are mainly sedimentary facies and cementation, followed by compaction and dissolution. The high content of secondary calcite cement is the main reason for the poor reservoir physical properties of Ⅳ-5 sand group.


Key words: sedimentary environment, reservoir physical properties, oil gas, control factors, Upper Member of Xiaganchaigou Formation, Nanbaxian area, Qaidam basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 吴宇灏, 于祥江, 芮 雪, 于 航, 鞠天航, 李德靖. 地质环境演变对青藏高原古人类聚落的影响:以柴达木盆地诺木洪文化塔里他里哈遗址为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 915-923.
[2] 杨烁, 丁毅, 杜发述, 祖贺川, 张君毅, 刘强, 张祺, 苏涛. 二连盆地阿南凹陷腾格尔组构造-岩性油气藏形成条件及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 754-767.
[3] 王振军. 油气储层裂缝预测进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 469-482.
[4] 许中杰, 冷龙, 朱占平, 段煜, 张芳霞, 徐大志. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷古近纪构造背景分析:来自碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学的证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 229-251.
[5] 唐华风, 付琦, 尹永康, 高有峰, 户景松, 武海超, 田志文. 花岗岩潜山储层地质研究回顾[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1806-1836.
[6] 柳蓉, 何天鑫, 张浩然, 刘强浩, 张苡铭. 中国典型含油气盆地热液作用及其对沉积环境的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1785-1805.
[7] 王伟明, 胡美硕, 焦立新, 杨斌, 苗长盛, 孙宏亮, 周志超, 曲希玉, .

三塘湖盆地下石炭统新层系石油地质条件及勘探潜力 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1401-1419.

[8] 周元发, 王腾飞, 周维维. 沉积型磷质岩粒度特征及其指示意义:以云南镇雄县羊场磷矿为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 758-774.
[9] 官大勇, 张宏国, 牛成民, 王启明, 李晓辉.

渤海湾盆地辽中凹陷地区东营组湖底扇关键成藏认识与勘探实践 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 351-362.

[10] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[11] 单玄龙, 徐长贵, 衣健, 牛成民, 郝国丽, 郭剑南, 闫博. 中国近海典型含油气盆地中生代岩浆活动与岩浆岩潜山油气藏[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1773-1787.
[12] 徐春强, 王晨杰, 王蔚. 渤中凹陷北部中生界火山岩储层发育特征及油气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1801-1814.
[13] 黄志, 叶涛, 肖述光, 李飞, 高文博, 戴建芳. 渤海湾盆地沙垒田西北斜坡带碳酸盐岩潜山储层形成与油气成藏[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1815-1828.
[14] 刘翔宇, 单玄龙, 衣健, 苏思远, 李嘉慧, 庞赫, 邹玉洁. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷义县组火山喷发旋回及其分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1829-1845.
[15] 何元琴, 朱红涛, 丁琳, 陶文芳, 王维, 曾智伟. 珠一坳陷古近系火山物质分类、鉴定识别方法及其深层油气地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1860-1882.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .