J4 ›› 2010, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 1323-1332.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

龙门山冲断带北段前山带构造分带性及山前带变形特征

孙晓猛|杜继宇|单玄龙|程日辉|王英德|许强伟|田景雄   

  1. 吉林大学 |地球科学学院|长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2010-04-17 出版日期:2010-11-26 发布日期:2010-11-26
  • 作者简介:孙晓猛(1954-)|男|吉林白山人|教授|主要从事区域、盆地构造和地层学方面研究|E-mail:sunxiaomeng5210@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国土资源部油气资源战略研究中心项目(2009GYXQ14);国家“973”计划项目(2009CB219305)

Tectonic Zonation of Front Range and Deformation Features of Foreland in Northern Longmen Mountain Thrust Zone

SUN Xiao-meng,DU Ji-yu,SHAN Xuan-long,CHENG Ri-hui,WANG Ying-de, XU Qiang-wei,TIAN Jing-xiong   

  1. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130026,China
  • Received:2010-04-17 Online:2010-11-26 Published:2010-11-26

摘要:

龙门山冲断带构造分带性是龙门山构造研究中的核心内容和关键科学问题。在野外实测地质大剖面以及路线地质调查的基础上,根据冲断带不同部位构造样式的不同,将龙门山冲断带北段前山带划分出3个构造亚带,即唐王寨-仰天窝飞来峰-滑覆体构造亚带、楼子坝-雁门坝-马角坝叠瓦冲断亚带、矿山梁-天井山-二廊庙冲断背斜亚带。各亚带具有不同构造变形特征:飞来峰-滑覆体构造亚带具有“推覆加滑覆”的构造叠加和演变特征;叠瓦冲断亚带中冲断构造十分发育,从北西至南东方向,不同系、同一系中不同组、同一组中不同段的地层依次由老向新逆冲,组成典型的叠瓦状构造样式,逆冲断裂向西呈铲式倾斜,并收敛于逆冲断裂系底板断层之上。构造岩片中褶皱构造十分发育,以断层传播褶皱为主,其轴迹走向和轴面产状与叠瓦冲断亚带中各条断层的总体产状几乎相同,均倒向前陆方向。冲断背斜亚带具有双重构造特点,在浅层表现为近直立的短轴背斜,构造样式以断层转折褶皱为主,深层由多个逆冲岩片叠置而成。下寺-金子山-厚坝山前带浅部层次中冲断稀少、规模较小、变形微弱,主要表现为向南东倾斜的单斜构造,深部层次发育有大型隐伏逆冲断裂。从前山带和山前带总体上具有变形强度向前陆方向有规律递减、卷入构造的地层逐渐变新、变形层次逐渐变浅的趋势,反映了冲断构造具有前展式特征。冲断构造是晚三叠世与新生代两期构造变形的产物:晚三叠世构造变形强烈,是龙门山前陆冲断带的主要形成期;新生代变形较弱,叠加和改造了晚三叠世的构造变形。

关键词: 龙门山, 冲断带, 前山带, 山前带, 构造分带, 构造特征, 构造地质学

Abstract:

The tectonic zonation of Longmen Mountain thrust zone is the key problem in the study of Longmen Mountain structure. According to the field measured geologic section and the geological survey as well as the different structural types of the different part within the thrust zone, the northern front range of Longmen Mountain thrust zone is divided into three tectonic sub-belts, Tangwangzhai-Yangtianwo klippe and gliding nappe tectonic subbelt, Louziba-Yanmenba-Majiaoba imbricate thrust subbelt and Kuangshanliang-Tianjingshan-Erlangmiao thrust and anticline subbelt, namely. Each has the different tectonically deformation. The klippe and gliding nappe tectonic subbelt is characterized by structural superimposition and tectonic evolution of nappe and addition gliding nappe. The thrust structure of the imbricate thrust subbelt is well developed, different systems, different formation in the same system as well as the different member in the same formation in the imbricate thrust subbelt thrusts from northwest to southeast, from older to younger in turn and forms the typical imbricate structural type. The thrust faults take on listric inclination westward and converge above the basal thrust plane of the thrust zone. There well developed fault-propagation folds in the structural rock fragments. These folds have almost the same axial strike and axial-plane occurrence as those faults in the imbricate thrust zone, and all fall toward foreland. The thrust anticline subbelt has the dual feature, on the one hand, it shows as brachyanticline on the surface or the near surface, on the other hand, thrust sheets are distributed in the deep crust of earth. In Xiasi-Jinzishan-Houba foreland, the thrusts are of scarcity, small scale and weak deformation in the shallow which mainly shows that monoclinal structure dipps toward southeast. Whereas, buried thrust faults has been well developed in the depth. Thrust zone has the tendency of regular decreasing gradually in its deformation strength, the involved strata gradually becoming new and the deformation levels gradually becoming shallow from front range to foreland, which demonstrates that thrust structures have the fore-expanding feature. Thrust structures are the product of both Later Triassic and Cenozoic era tectonic deformation. The tectonical deformation during Later Triassic is intensive and belongs to the major formation stage of  Longmen Mountain foreland thrust zone, the tectonical deformation in Cenozoic era, however, is weak and superposed and changed the tectonical deformation formed in Later Triassic era.

Key words: Longmen Mountain, thrust zone, front range, foreland, tectonic zonation, structural feature, geology tectonics

中图分类号: 

  • P641.8
[1] 刘希雯, 刘志宏, 高 翔. 孙吴—嘉荫盆地沾河断陷构造变形及其对沉积作用的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 393-.
[2] 于婳, 赵国春, 刘建民, 张家齐, 毕广源, 郭祺, 房兴, 徐刚, 刘福兴, 霍延达, 边惠惠. 辽东青城子白云金矿床成矿期构造特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1720-1739.
[3] 张鹏辉, 张小博, 方慧, 王小江, 刘建勋. 地球物理资料揭示的嫩江—八里罕断裂中段深浅构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 261-272.
[4] 李启成, 郭雷, 何书耕, 齐庆杰. 龙门山断层破裂的频率非平稳特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 865-871.
[5] 侯方辉, 郭兴伟, 吴志强, 朱晓青, 张训华, 祁江豪, 王保军, 温珍河, 蔡来星, 庞玉茂. 南黄海有关地层与构造的研究进展及问题讨论[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 96-105.
[6] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[7] 朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[8] 周刚, 郑荣才, 赵罡, 文华国, 温龙斌. 川西北甘溪地区吉维特阶核形石特征、成因及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 405-417.
[9] 杜小弟, 李锋, 邱海峻, 李昭, 徐银波. 准东博格达山山前带二叠系芦草沟组重油的发育特征及其指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 368-378.
[10] 潘荣, 朱筱敏, 张剑锋, 何敏, 邸宏利. 克拉苏冲断带深层碎屑岩有效储层物性下限及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1011-1020.
[11] 孟宪纲,薄万举,刘志广,刘勇,畅柳,李朝柱,王子平. 芦山7.0级地震与巴颜喀拉块体中东段的活动性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1705-1711.
[12] 程海艳. 库车褶皱冲断带西段盐底辟成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1134-1141.
[13] 刘志宏,梅梅,高军义,吴相梅,黄超义,林东成,孙理难. 东北东部虎林盆地的构造特征、成盆机制及敦-密断裂带北东段的形成时代[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 480-489.
[14] 苏生瑞,李鹏,王琦,苏卫卫,张莹. 叠瓦状逆断层的变形规律和力学机理物理模拟试验:以龙门山断裂带为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1): 249-258.
[15] 邓宾, 李智武,刘树根,孙东,钟勇,李金玺,汤聪. 大巴山城口弧形断裂带右旋走滑构造特征及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1501-1516.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰,迟效国,周燕,王铁夫,金巍,周建波,董春艳,黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来,梁秀娟,崔建铭,兰盈盈,张君,李书兰,梁瑞奇,郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华,王璞珺,印长海,黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷,陈卓,孙文田,尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺,邵 锐,程日辉,张 斌,侯景涛,李金龙,边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明,任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .