吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1011-1020.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201504105

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

克拉苏冲断带深层碎屑岩有效储层物性下限及控制因素

潘荣1,2, 朱筱敏1,2, 张剑锋2, 何敏3, 邸宏利4   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京)油气与资源探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
    2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    3. 中国石油西南油气田分公司重庆气矿, 重庆 400021;
    4. 中国石油塔里木油田分公司, 新疆 库尔勒 841000
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-14 发布日期:2015-07-26
  • 作者简介:潘荣(1985),女,博士,主要从事储层地质学研究,E-mail:rongfenxiang@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家"973"计划项目(2011CB201104);国家重大专项课题(2011ZX05001-002);国家自然科学基金项目(41272133)

Lower Physical Property Limit and Controlling Factors on Deep Effective Clastic Reservoirs in Kelasu Structure Zone

Pan Rong1,2, Zhu Xiaomin1,2, Zhang Jianfeng2, He Min3, Di Hongli4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    3. Chongqing Gas District, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Company, Chongqing 400021, China;
    4. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2014-11-14 Published:2015-07-26

摘要:

库车坳陷克拉苏冲断带深层白垩系碎屑岩储层为研究区内一套优质储层和主要产层,埋深2 300~7 900 m,取心偏少,有效储层分布预测难度大.综合运用岩心、储层实验分析和测井、压汞、试油等资料,分别利用分布函数曲线法、含水饱和度上限值法、最小有效孔喉半径法及排驱压力法,求取了白垩系巴什基奇克组储层不同深度下有效储层的物性下限,并运用回归分析方法求取了物性下限与深度之间的函数方程,实现了物性下限与深度的动态拟合.结果表明:研究区内有效储层孔隙度下限取2.63%,有效储层埋深下限预测达8 320 m;而理论上,克拉苏冲断带有效储层孔隙度下限可达1.69%,埋深下限可达9 860 m,勘探前景非常广阔.本文在物性下限研究的基础上,结合岩性特征、埋深、地层压力及成岩作用特征探讨了深层有效储层发育的控制因素.储层质量差异主要受控于储层的埋深、溶蚀作用及构造破裂作用.

关键词: 克拉苏冲断带, 有效储层, 物性下限, 控制因素, 巴什基奇克组, 库车坳陷

Abstract:

The Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation is a high-quality sandstone reservoir and a primary oil/gas-producing bed in Kelasu structure zone. As its burial depth is between 2 300 m to 7 900 m, and cores are relatively limited, and the prediction of effective reservoirs is considerably difficult. Based on the comprehensive application of the core, well logging data, mercury injection data, and oil production test, the lower physical property limit of deep clastic reservoirs in Kelasu structure zone is determined by the distribution function curve method, the upper limit of water saturation method, the lowest effective pore throat radius method, and the entry pressure method. The functional equation between lower physical property limit and depth is obtained. The lower porosity limit of effective reservoirs is 2.63%. The lower burial depth limit of effective reservoirs is predicted to be about 8 320 m, which indicates a bright exploration prospect. The lower porosity limit and the lower burial depth limit would be 1.69% and 9 860 m in theory. On the basis of the research of lower physical property limit, combining the analysis of the sedimentary characteristics, buried depth, reservoir pressure, and diagenesis characteristics of Bashijiqike Formation sandbodies, the controlling factors of effective reservoirs are discussed. The main controlling factors of the effective reservoir include buried depth, dissolution and fissure.

Key words: Kelasu structure area, effective reservoir, lower physical property limit, controlling factors, Bashijiqike Formation, Kuqa depression

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.23

[1] 贾进华, 顾家裕, 郭庆银, 等. 塔里木盆地克拉2气田白垩系储层沉积相[J]. 古地理学报, 2001, 3(3): 67-75. Jia Jinhua, Gu Jiayu, Guo Qingyin, et al. Sedimentary Facies of Cretaceous Reservoir in Kela-2 Gas Field of Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2001, 3(3): 67-75.

[2] 邹华耀, 郝芳, 杨申谷, 等. 超压流体排放通道与溶蚀孔隙的形成:以库车坳陷克拉苏构造带喀桑托开背斜带为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(1): 16-21. Zou Huayao, Hao Fang, Yang Shengu, et al. Overpressure Fluid-Discharging Pathes and Dissolved Pore Generation[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2008, 30(1): 16-21.

[3] 王波, 张荣虎, 任康绪, 等. 库车坳陷大北克拉苏深层构造带有效储层埋深下限预测[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(2): 212-218. Wang Bo, Zhang Ronghu, Ren Kangxu, et al. Prediction of the Lower Limit of Burial Depth for Effective Reservoirs in the Dabei-Kelasu Deep Structural Belt of Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(2): 212-218.

[4] 张荣虎, 姚根顺, 寿建峰, 等. 沉积、成岩、构造一体化孔隙度预测模型[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2011, 38(2): 145-151. Zhang Ronghu, Yao Genshun, Shou Jianfeng, et al. An Integration Porosity Forecast Model of Deposition, Diagenesis and Structure[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(2): 145-151.

[5] 王艳忠, 操应长. 车镇凹陷古近系深层碎屑岩有效储层物性下限及控制因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(4): 752-761. Wang Yanzhong, Cao Yingchang. Lower Property Limit and Controls on Deep Effective Clastic Reservoirs of Paleogene in Chezhen Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(4):752-761.

[6] Lu H F, Howell D G, Jia D, et al. Rejuvenation of the Kuqa Foreland Basin, Northern Flank of the Tarim Basin, Northern China[J]. International Geology Review, 1994, 36: 1151-1158.

[7] 赵靖舟. 前陆盆地天然气成藏理论及应用[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003: 7-15. Zhao Jingzhou. Reservoiring Theory of Natural Gas in Foreland Basins and Its Application[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2003: 7-15.

[8] 程海燕. 库车褶皱冲断带西段盐底辟成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2014, 44(4): 1134-1141. Chen Haiyan. Salt Diapirs and Its Mechanism in the West of Kuqa Fold Thrust Belt, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2014, 44(4): 1134-1141.

[9] 朱玉新, 郭庆银, 邵新军, 等. 新疆塔里木盆地库车坳陷北缘白垩系储层沉积相研究[J]. 古地理学报, 2000, 2(4): 58-65. Zhu Yuxin, Guo Qingyin, Shao Xinjun, et al. Study on Reservoir Sedimentary Facies of the Cretaceous in the North of Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2000, 2(4): 58-65.

[10] 朱如凯, 郭宏莉, 高志勇, 等. 塔里木盆地北部地区中、新生界层序地层、沉积体系与储层特征[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2009: 11. Zhu Rukai, Guo Hongli, Gao Zhiyong, et al. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Sequence Formation, Sedimentary System and Reservoir Characteristics in Northern Tarim Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2009: 11.

[11] 贾承造, 魏国齐, 李本亮, 等. 中国中西部两期前陆盆地的形成及其控气作用[J]. 石油学报, 2003, 24(2): 13-17. Jia Chengzao, Wei Guoqi, Li Benliang, et al. Tectonic Evolution of Two-Epoch Foreland Basin and Its Control for Natural Gas Accumulation in China's Mid-Western Areas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, 24(2): 13-17.

[12] 付晓飞, 宋岩, 吕延防, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷膏盐质盖层特征与天然气保存[J]. 石油实验地质, 2006, 28(1): 25-29. Fu Xiaofei, Song Yan, Lü Yangfang, et al. Rock Mechanic Characteristics of Gypsum Cover and Conservation Function to Gas in Kuche Depression, the Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2006, 28(1): 25-29.

[13] 胡文瑞. 低渗透油气田概论[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2009: 11-13. Hu Wenrui. Theory of Low-Permeability Reservoir[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2009: 11-13.

[14] 郭睿. 储集层物性下限值确定方法及其补充[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(5): 140-144. Guo Rui. Supplement to Determining Method of Cut-Off Value of Net Pay[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(5): 140-144.

[15] 葸克来, 操应长, 周磊, 等. 廊固凹陷河西务构造带沙四上亚段有效储层成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2014, 44(5): 1451-1465. Xi Kelai, Cao Yingchang, Zhou Lei, et al. Genetic Mechanism of Effective Reservoirs in the Upper Part of the Fourth Member of Shahejie Formation in Hexiwu Structural Zone of Langgu Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2014, 44(5): 1451-1465.

[16] 操应长, 王艳忠, 徐涛玉, 等. 东营凹陷西部沙四上亚段滩坝砂体有效储层的物性下限及控制因素[J]. 沉积学报,2009, 27(2): 230-237. Cao Yingchang, Wang Yanzhong, Xu Taoyu, et al. The Petrophysical Parameter Cutoff and Controlling Factors of the Effective Reservoir of Beach and Bar Sandbodies of the Upper Part of the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in West Part of Dongying Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009, 27(2): 230-237.

[17] 万玲, 孙岩, 魏国齐. 确定储集层物性参数下限的一种新方法及其应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地中部气田为例[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(3): 454-457. Wan Ling, Sun Yan, Wei Guoqi. A New Method Used to Determine the Lower Limit of the Petrophysical Parameters for Reservoir and Its Application: A Case Study on Zhongbu Gas Field in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(3): 454-457.

[18] 于雯泉, 叶绍东, 陆梅娟. 高邮凹陷阜三段有效储层物性下限研究[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2011, 4(1): 5-9. Yu Wenquan, Ye Shaodong, Lu Meijuan. Study on Lower Limit of Physical Properties of E1f3 Effective Reservoir in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2011, 4(1): 5-9.

[19] 沈扬, 马玉杰, 赵力彬, 等. 库车坳陷东部古近系白垩系储层控制因素及有利勘探区[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(2): 136-142. Shen Yang, Ma Yujie, Zhao Libin, et al. Controlling Factors of the Paleogene-Cretaceous Reservoirs and Potential Exploration Areas in the Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009, 30(2): 136-142.

[20] 戴俊生, 冯建伟, 李明, 等. 砂泥岩间互地层裂缝延伸规律探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2011, 18(2): 277-283. Dai Junsheng, Feng Jianwei, Li Ming, et al. Discussion on the Extension Law of Structural Fracture in Sand-Mud Interbed Formation[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2011, 18(2): 277-283.

[21] Osborne M J, Swarbrick R E. Diagenesis in North Sea HPHT Clastic Reservoirs-Consequences for Porosity and Overpressure Prediction[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1999, 16(2): 337-353.

[22] 王占国. 异常高压对储层物性的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(6): 31-33. Wang Zhanguo. Influence of Abnormal High Pressure on Physical Properties of Reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2005, 12(6): 31-33.

[23] 刘春, 张惠良, 韩波, 等. 库车坳陷大北地区深部碎屑岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(4): 504-512. Liu Chun, Zhang Huiliang, Han Bo, et al. Reservoir Characteristics and Control Factors of Deep-Burial Clastic Rocks in Dabei Zone of Kuche Sag[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009, 20(4): 504-512.

[24] 宋岩, 洪峰, 夏新宇, 等. 异常压力与油气藏的同生关系:以库车坳陷为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(3): 303-308. Song Yan, Hong Feng, Xia Xinyu, et al. Syngenesis Relationship Between Abnormal Overpressure and Gas Pool Formation[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2006, 33(3): 303-308.

[25] 王良书, 李成, 刘绍文, 等. 塔里木盆地北缘库车前陆盆地地温梯度分布特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(3): 403-407. Wang Liangshu, Li Cheng, Liu Shaowen, et al. Geotemperature Gradient Distribution of Kuqa Foreland Basin, North of Tarim, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2003, 46(3): 403-407.

[1] 易定红, 刘应如, 李积永, 李红哲, 徐晓玲, 吴颜雄, 王爱萍, 马元琨, 涂加沙, 贾正良. 柴达木盆地南八仙地区渐新世沉积环境及储层物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 705-720.
[2] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[3] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[4] 胡佳, 王丽丽, 王立贤, 韩昊天, 陶鹏, 唐华风.

基于岩浆汇聚区和上升通道特征的火山岩分布规律——以松辽盆地长岭断陷下白垩统营城组为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 429-446.

[5] 赵越, 李磊, 司运航, 王会敏. 浅层页岩气储层孔隙分形特征及控制因素——以云南昭通地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1813-1829.
[6] 张立亚, 徐 文, 沈艳杰. 松辽盆地南部深层致密砂岩气储层形成机制及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1707-1717.
[7] 徐春强, 张新涛, 王晨杰, 张震, 刘丰. 渤中凹陷中生界火山岩特征及优质储层控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1027-.
[8] 刘宗宾, 程奇, 吕坐彬, 房娜, 王双龙.

渤海海域锦州南油田太古宇变质岩潜山储层特征及其发育模式 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 829-839.

[9] 薛辉, 韩春元, 朱萍, 汤小琪, 杨经栋, 窦连彬. 金坛储气库阜宁组四段含盐层系沉积特征及成盐模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 363-381.
[10] 冯佳睿1, 2, 高志勇1, 2, 张宇航1, 2, 李晓红1, 2, 周 鹏3, 尚江伟4, 李晨晨5. 库车坳陷大北克深井区白垩系储层含盐特征与分布规律#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 38-.
[11] 张丹凤, 方石, 邱善坤. 断层封启性的研究现状与发展方向[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 65-80.
[12] 高坤顺, 叶涛, 孙哲, 鲁凤婷, 陈心路, 邓辉. 渤海海域JZ25-1S太古宇潜山储层特征及其油气产能差异控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 694-704.
[13] 林孟雄, 刘立, 张一果, 常森, 夏阳. 苏里格气田东二区气水分布及产水控制因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 627-634.
[14] 苗长盛, 徐文, 刘玉虎, 谢荣祥. 松辽盆地南部火山岩储层特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 635-643.
[15] 赵汉卿, 陈晓明, 李超, 吴穹螈, 王迪. 渤海湾盆地垦利L油田古近系沙三上段优质储层物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 653-661.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 崔建军, 刘晓春, 胡娟, 曲玮. 桐柏杂岩中印支期变质岩包体的变质作用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 618 -629 .
[2] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[3] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[4] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[5] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[6] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[7] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[8] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[9] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[10] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .