Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1512-1521.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170089

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Seismic AVO Simultation and Analysis in Heterogeneous Media

Liu Cai1, Pei Sijia1, Guo Zhiqi1, Fu Wei1, Zhang Yusheng2, Liu Xiwu3,4   

  1. 1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    2. Bureau of Geophysical Prospecting INC, CNPC, Zhuozhou 072751, Hebei, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Shale Oil/Gas Exploration and Production Technology, SinoPEC, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SinoPEC, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2018-01-05 Online:2018-09-26 Published:2018-11-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41430322,41404090) and CNPC Science Research and Technology Development Project(2016A-33)

Abstract: AVO (amplitude versus offset) is a technique for studying lithology and detecting hydrocarbon seismic exploration by using amplitude information. Conventional single interface reflection coefficient can be calculated by Zoeppritz equation; however, the reflection characteristics of layered media seismic wave is not only related to incident angle, but also differences of physical property, incident wave frequency, formation thickness, thin interbedded structure, the formation non-uniformity and other factors, and all the factors related tuning effects are fully considered in the theory of propagation matrix. Based on the data calculation of high-precision synthetic seismogram in heterogeneous underground media, we compared the simulation results of Zoeppritz equation, Shuey two-term approximation equation, Shuey three-term approximate equation, and propagation matrix algorithm. The study shows that at a small incident angle, the reflection amplitude and waveforms of Zoeppritz equation, Shuey two-terms, and Shuey three-term approximation are basically the same; while at a large incident angle, those of Zoeppritz equation and Shuey three-term approximation are closer. Under the condition of small incident angles and shallow layers, the seismic responses of Zoeppritz equation and propagation matrix algorithm is almost the same, but different at large incident angles and deep layers. It is illustrated that the tuning effects and multiple wave interferences cannot be ignored.

Key words: Zoeppritz equation, Shuey equation, propagator matrix, inhomogeneous medium

CLC Number: 

  • P631.4
[1] Zoeppritz K. Über Reflexionad Durchgang Seismischer Wellen Durch Unstetigkeitsflächen[J]. Erdbebenwellen,1919, VⅡb:66-84.
[2] Bortfeld R. Approximations to the Reflection and Transmission Coefficients of Plane Longitudinal and Transverse Waves[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1961, 9(4):485-502.
[3] Chapman C H. Exact and Approximate Generalized Ray Theory in Vertically Inhomogeneous Media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1976, 46(2):201-233.
[4] Richards P G, Frasier C W. Scattering of Elastic Eaves from Depth-Dependent Inhomogeneities[J]. Geophysics, 1976, 41(3):441.
[5] Koefoed O. On the Effect of Poission's Ratios of Rock Strata on the Reflection Coefficients of Plane Wave[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1955, 3(4):381-387.
[6] Aki K, Richards P G. Quantitative Seismology:Theory and Methods[M]. San Francisco:Freeman,1980.
[7] Shuey B R T. A Simplification of the Zoeppritz-Equations[J]. Geophysics, 1985,50(4):609-614.
[8] Fuchs K, Müller G. Computation of Synthetic Seis-mograms with the Reflectivity Method and Comparison with Observations[J]. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1971, 23(4):417-433.
[9] Kennett B L. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media[M]. Cambridge:Cambrigde University Press, 1983.
[10] Fryer G J, Frazer L N. Seismic Waves in Stratified Anisotropic Media[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1984, 78(3):691-710.
[11] Carcione J M. AVO Effects of a Hydrocarbon Source-Rock Layer[J]. Geophysics, 2012, 66(2):419-427.
[12] Liu Y, Schmitt D R. Amplitude and AVO Responses of a Single Thin Bed[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(4):1161-1168.
[13] 郭智奇,刘财,李向阳,等. 非弹性层状介质地震波频变AVO响应模拟及分析[J]. 地球物理学报,2016,59(2):664-672. Guo Zhiqi, Liu Cai, Li Xiangyang, et al. Modeling and Analysis of Frequency-Dependent AVO Responses in Inelastic Stratified Media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59(2):664-672.
[14] 郭智奇,刘财,冯晅,等. 各向异性衰减与AVO分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2010,40(2):432-438. Guo Zhiqi, Liu Cai, Feng Xuan, et al. Attenuation Anisotropy and AVO Analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2010, 40(2):432-438.
[15] 郭智奇,刘财,张凤琴. 层状粘弹性介质中SH波的反射、透射问题[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(增刊1):61-65. Guo Zhiqi, Liu Cai, Zhang Fengqin. Reflection and Transmission Problem of SH Waves in Layered Viscoelastic Medium[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2005, 35(Sup. 1):61-65.
[16] 兰慧田. 裂缝性孔隙介质波场模拟与频变AVO储层参数反演[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2014. Lan Huitian. Wave Field Modeling in Fractured Porous Media and Frequency-Dependent AVO Reservoir Parameters Inversion[D]. Changchun:Jilin University,2014.
[17] Rokhlin S I, Wang Y J. Equivalent Boundary Con-ditions for Thin Orthrotropi Clayer Between Two Solids:Reflection, Refraction, and Interface Waves[J]. Journal of Acoustic Society of America,1992, 91:1875-1887.
[18] Ursin B, Stovas A. Reflection and Transmission Res-ponses of a Layered Isotropic Viscoelastic Medium[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(1):307-323.
[19] Carcione J M. AVO Effects of a Hydrocarbon Source-Rock Layer[J]. Geophysics, 2012, 66(2):419-427.
[20] 逄硕,刘财,郭智奇,等. 基于岩石物理模型的页岩孔隙结构反演及横波速度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(2):606-615. Pang Shuo, Liu Cai, Guo Zhiqi, et al. Estimation of Pore-Shape and Shear Wave Velocity Based on Rock-Physics Model in Shale[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017,47(2):606-615.
[1] Ding Qianlong, Shen Jinsong, Chen Shuangquan, Ran Shang, Long Gang.  Frequency-Domain Propagation Matrix Method for Seismic AVA Multi-Parameter Inversion [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2025, 55(3): 957-969.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] You Minxin,Liu Jianmin. Application Status and Progress of Isotopic Geochemistry in Research of Emeishan Large Igneous Province (ELIP)[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] YANG Chun-mei, LI Hong-qi,LU Da-wei,ZHANG Fang-li,GAO Yuan,SHAO Ying-chao. The Relationship Between Rock Resistivity and Water Saturation in WaterDriveOil and OilDriveWater Process[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] ZHU Hong-chen,ZHANG Jiong-fei,QUAN Heng. Two Stages of Mesozoic Lithogenesis and Mineralization in Daxing’anling Mountains[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] ZHU Jian-wei, ZHAO Gang, LIU Bo, GUO Wei, CHENG Jun. Identification Technology and It’s Application of Well-Logging About Oil Shale[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] CHEN Li, LIANG Hai-an,ZHANG Wen-juan,RONG Fan. Application of Fuzzy Mathematics in Division of Engineering Geo-Environment of Cities-An Example of Fushun City[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] GAO Gui-mei,SU Ke,WANG Wen-ying,GAN Shu-cai,LIU Zhao-jun. Study on Rare Earth and Trace Elements in Oil Shale Samples, Huadian, Jilin Province[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] WU Kong-yun,JIANG Zhong-cheng,YE Ye. Influence of Different Plant Communities On Erosion Rates of Limestone Rock Blocks[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] ZHOU Yan-zhang, CHI Bao-ming, LIU Zhong-pei. Mode of Structural Control about Groundwater Pour-in Mechanism in Xiadian Gold Deposits in Shandong Province[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] ZHANG Yuan, LIU Lian-deng,SUN Jing-gui,CHEN Guo-hua,ZHANG Hong-xi,YAN Fu-chuan, YANG Kai-chun. Two Phase Overprinting Mineralization in Huangbuling Gold Deposit in Northwestern Jiaodong Peninsula[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] LU Cheng-peng, SHU Long-cang, YUAN Li-bo, ZHANG Rong-rong, HUANG Bi-juan, WANG Bin-bin. Determination of Hydrogeologic Parameters of Karst Aquifer Based on Tracer Test[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .