Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 1139-1150.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190146

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pumping Treatment Technology to Pump out Contaminated Groundwater: Extraction Efficiency and Extraction Endpoint

Gong Zhiqiang1,2, Tian Xizhao2, Liu Weijiang1, Chen Jian1, Kang Yang1, Yang Guang1, Dang Zhiwen3   

  1. 1. Yangtze River Economic Zone Ecological Environment Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China;
    2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Hebei Geological Environmental Monitoring Institute, Shijiazhuang 050021, China;
    3. Department of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2109-07-23 Online:2020-07-26 Published:2020-07-29
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Water Pollution Control and Governance Major Project (2018ZX07109-001),National Survey and Evaluation Project of Groundwater Environmental Basic Conditions (2110302) and Hebei Provincial Department of Science and Technology Soft Science Research Project (18453621)

Abstract: In the process of recovery of polluted groundwater by pumping treatment technology,the extraction efficiency of pump decreases gradually over time,and it is difficult to determine the end point of pumping treatment. In order to improve the efficiency of extraction, reduce repair costs, repair time of the treatment, multiple optimization of pumping scheme is proposed. By using the analytic hierarchy process and expert scoring method, the index weight, quantitative characterization of the optimal time node, and the extraction endpoint are realized. Taking a chromium salt plant in Hebei as an example, the above method was applied to optimize the pumping scheme. The results showed that when the pumping efficiency was 20%-40%, the proportion of the pumping scheme (P3) was the largest. In the first time optimization, P3 should be re-arranged after 100 d pumping. The second optimization plan is to combine with other rehabilitation technologies after the first optimization, that is to continue pumping for 300 d after the first optimized pumping scheme was used; and then, to treat the remaining contaminated groundwater of the site with other rehabilitation technologies. After evaluation, the second optimization can effectively improve the pumping efficiency of the pumping well, shorten the repair time by 600 d, and increase the removal rate of hexavalent chromium in the aquifer by 8.31% in the same time.

Key words: extraction efficiency, extraction endpoint, evaluation index system, analytic hierarchy process, optimization

CLC Number: 

  • X703
[1] 王燕.硝酸盐地下水污染数值模拟与抽出-处理技术抽水井优化研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2014:10-12. Wang Yan. Numerical Simulation of Nitrate Groundwater Pollution and Optimization of Pumping Well with Extraction and Treatment Technology[D]. Baoding:Agricultural University of Hebei, 2014:10-12.
[2] 姜烈, 何江涛, 姜永海, 等. 地下水硝酸盐污染抽出处理优化方法模拟研究[J]. 环境科学, 2014(7):2572-2578. Jiang Lie, He Jiangtao, Jiang Yonghai,et al. Simulation Study on Optimal Extraction and Treatment Method of Groundwater Nitrate Pollution[J]. Environmental Science, 2014(7):2572-2578.
[3] 郑春苗.地下水污染物迁移模拟[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2009. Zheng Chunmiao. Ground Water Pollutant Migration Simulation[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2009.
[4] Kazemzadeh-Parsi M J, Daneshmand F, Ahmadfard M A, et al. Optimal Groundwater Remediation Design of Pump and Treat Systems via a Simulation-Optimization Approach and Firefly Algorithm[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2015(1):1-17.
[5] Park Y C, Cost-Effective Optimal Design of a Pump-and-Treat System for Remediating Groundwater Contaminant at an Industrial Complex[J]. Geosciences Journal, 2016(6):891-901.
[6] 宫志强,刘明柱,刘伟江,等.单井捕获地下水污染羽的优化方法[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(10):2468-2474. Gong Zhiqiang, Liu Mingzhu, Liu Weijiang, et al. Optimization Method for Single Well Capture of Groundwater Pollution Plume[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 202,13(10):2468-2474.
[7] 宫志强,陈坚,杨鑫鑫,等.某铬污染场地地下水抽水方案优化[J].环境工程,2019,37(5):1-3,75. Gong Zhiqiang, Chen Jian, Yang Xinxin, et al. Optimization of Groundwater Pumping Scheme for a Chrome-Polluted Site[J]. Environmental Engineering, 204,37(5):1-3,75.
[8] 刘苑. 地下水污染区抽水井优化研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2008. Liu Yuan. Optimization of Pumping Wells in Groundwater Pollution Areas[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2008.
[9] 赵勇胜.地下水污染场地风险管理与修复技术筛选[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(5):1426-1433. Zhao Yongsheng. Selection of Risk Management and Remediation Techniques for Groundwater Contaminated Sites[J]. Journal of Lilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012,42(5):1426-1433.
[10] 万鹏,张旭,李广贺,等.基于模拟-优化模型的某场地污染地下水抽水方案设计[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(11):1608-1616. Wan Peng, Zhang Xu, Li Guanghe, et al. Design of Groundwater Pumping Scheme for Contaminated Ground Based on Simulation-Optimization Model[J]. Environmental Science Research, 2016,29(11):1608-1616.
[11] 蒲敏. 污染场地地下水抽出处理技术研究[J]. 环境工程, 2017(4):12-14. Pu Min. Study on Groundwater Extraction and Treatment Technology for Contaminated Sites[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2017(4):12-14.
[12] Satkin R L, Bedient P B. Effectiveness of Various Aquifer Restoration Schemes Under Variable Hydrogeologic Conditions[J]. Groundwater, 2010, 26(4):488-498.
[13] 刘姝媛, 王红旗. 地下水污染修复技术研究进展[J]. 科学, 2014, 66(4):38-40. Liu Shuyuan, Wang Hongqi. Research Progress of Groundwater Pollution Remediation Technology[J]. Science, 2014, 66(4):38-40.
[14] 潘静静, 杨月锋, 刘家财. 基于层次分析法的教学方法评价:以《现代仓储管理》课程为例[J]. 高教论坛, 2015(6):87-89. Pan Jingjing, Yang Yuefeng, Liu Jiacai. Teaching Method Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process:A Case Study of Modern Warehouse Management[J]. Higher Education Forum, 2015(6):87-89.
[15] 张耀辉, 郭瑞, 胡蕊,等. 基于层次分析法的地下水水质综合评价[J]. 兰州交通大学学报, 2015, 34(6):17-22. Zhang Yaohui, Guo Rui, Hu Rui, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2015, 34(6):17-22.
[16] 李霄, 王长琪, 崔健. 基于层次分析法提出的辽西地下水污染防治区划[J]. 地质论评, 2017(4):351-352. Li Xiao, Wang Changqi, Cui Jian. Groundwater Pollution Prevention Regionalization in Western Liaoning Province Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Geological Review, 2017(4):351-352.
[17] 吕敦玉, 余楚, 周爱国,等. 某油田区地下水综合防污性能评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2012, 39(3):81-85. Lü Dunyu, Yu Chu, Zhou Aiguo, et al. Evaluation of Comprehensive Anti-Pollution Performance of Groundwater in an Oil Field[J]. Hydrogeology Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(3):81-85.
[18] 葛世伦. 用1-9标度法确定功能评价系数[J]. 价值工程, 1989(1):33-34. Ge Shilun. Determination of Functional Evaluation Coefficient by 1-9 Scale Method[J]. Value Engineering, 1989(1):33-34.
[19] 张凤然,马全铭.层次分析法与模糊综合评判法在评价教师课堂教学质量中的应用[J].高师理科学刊,2013,33(6):18-20. Zhang Fengran, Ma Quanming. Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method in Evaluating Teachers' Classroom Teaching Quality[J]. Journal of Science of Normal University, 2013,33(6):18-20.
[20] 肖云云,欧阳金琼.塔里木河流域农业气候资源综合评价与区域比较:基于模糊层次分析法[J].塔里木大学学报, 2018, 30(3):87-94. Xiao Yunyun, Ouyang Jinqiong. Comprehensive Evaluation and Regional Comparison of Agricultural Climate Resources in Tarim River Basin:Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Tarim University, 2018, 30(3):87-94.
[21] 虞未江,贾超,狄胜同,等.基于综合权重和改进物元可拓评价模型的地下水水质评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(2):539-547. Yu Weijiang, Jia Chao, Di Shengtong,et al. Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Based on Comprehensive Weight and Improved Matter-Element Extension Evaluation Model[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Sciences Edition), 209,49(2):539-547.
[22] 王亚维,王中美,王益伟,等.基于GRA-AHP模型的岩溶地下水水质评价[J].水力发电,2019,45(8):1-3,62. Wang Yawei, Wang Zhongmei, Wang Yiwei,et al. Evaluation of Karst Groundwater Quality Based on GRA-AHP Model[J]. Hydropower, 2019,45(8):1-3,62.
[23] 江思义,王启耀,李春玲,等.基于专家-层次分析法的地下空间适宜性评价[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(5):1290-1299. Jiang Siyi, Wang Qiyao, Li Chunling, et al. Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Based on Expert-Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(5):1290-1299.
[24] 建设用地土壤污染风险管控和修复监测技术导则:HJ 25.2-2019[S].北京:中国环境出版社,2019. Technical Guidelines for Soil Pollution Risk Control and Remediation Monitoring of Construction Land:HJ 25.2-2019[S]. Beijing:China Environmental Press, 2019.
[25] 污染地块地下水修复和风险管控技术导则:HJ 25.6-2019[S].北京:中国环境出版社,2019. Technical Guidelines for Groundwater Remediation and Risk Control in Contaminated Land Plots:HJ 25.6-2019[S]. Beijing:China Environmental Press, 2019.
[1] Zhou Sunchao, Song Tengjiao , Wang Yan, Cai Zongyou. Application of BP Neural Network Model Based on Crayfish Optimization Algorithm in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2026, 56(3): 937-950.
[2] Yi Liangpeng, Zhang Yuxin. Rural Spatial Suitability Analysis and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment from Perspective of “Production-Living-Ecology” Space: A Case Study of  Zhaojiayu Village, Jizhou District, Tianjin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2026, 56(2): 557-567.
[3] Hu Feiyue, Xu Haoxiang, Deng Chengjian, Yang Shuduo. Susceptibility Evaluation of Karst Collapse Based on Deep Learning Models: A Case Study of  Guangzhou-Foshan-Zhaoqing Area [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2026, 56(2): 584-597.
[4] Han Fuxing, Wang Yuan, Gao Zhenghui, Chang Zhimiao, Ma Fei, Qin Hao, Shang Hao. CRS Stack Imaging Technology Based on the NEWUOA Derivative-Free Optimization Algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2026, 56(1): 386-396.
[5] Feng Bo, Xie Yiping, Tian Hailong, Feng Guanhong, Yang Jingang.  Suitability Assessment of CO2 Geological Storage in Saline Aquifer for Central Depression of Southern Songliao Basin Based on GIS-MCDA [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2025, 55(6): 1981-2000.
[6] Ren Hejun, Shen Tianqi, Zhang Fengkun, Li Yanling. Design and Response Surface Optimization of Fluoride Solidification/Stabilization Agent for Lake and Reservoir Dredging Sediment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2025, 55(5): 1671-1679.
[7] Liu Gang, Peng Yiqun, Xu Hao, Pei Jiangtao, Luo Zujiang.

Optimization Design of Land Subsidence Monitoring Network Based on Statistics [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1240-1255.

[8] Zhang Shengyu, Shen Wenchao, Su Xiaosi.  Risk Assessment of Regional Groundwater Nitrate Pollution Based on Random Forest Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2025, 55(3): 943-956.
[9] Xie Renwei. Revised Method and Application of Load Calculation Formula of Horizontal Stratified Rock Tunnel. [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2024, 54(3): 943-953.
[10] Liu Huaishi, Zhao Xuejiao, Liu Yuxin, Fang Tingrui, Zhang Jing, Ji Yanju. Multi-Parameter Extraction of Superparamagnetic Effect Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[11] Wu Dongzhe, Jiang Qigang, Gu Zongrui, Zhang Sen, Fu Changliang.

Evaluation of Eco-Geological Environment Quality in Strait Coastal Areas Based on AHP:Taking Southwest Coastal Areas of Malaysia

of North Coast of Malacca Strait as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2024, 54(2): 619-632.

[12] Bai Qinglin, Liu Xuanliang, Zhang Junhua, Wang Fujin, Liu Zhongwei, Jiao Hongyan.

Sand Body Thickness Prediction of Underwater Distributary Channel Based on CV-XGBoost Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(5): 1602-1610.

[13] Zhang Xiaoqing, Kang Yuguo, Sun Bin, Sun Qinping, Yang Qing. Enrichment Characteristics of Coalbed Methane and Optimization of Favorable Areas in Qitaihe Fault Depression, Boli Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(4): 1033-1047.
[14] Xu Zhengyu , Fu Nengyi, Zhou Jie, Fu Zhihong. Comparison of Nonlinear Optimization Inversion Algorithms of Transient Electromagnetic Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(3): 744-753.
[15] Lin Hungchou, Guo Yi, Bai Jianbang, Peng Jianbing. Use of Numerical Optimization to Determine Response Time of Tensiometer [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 526-534.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] You Minxin,Liu Jianmin. Application Status and Progress of Isotopic Geochemistry in Research of Emeishan Large Igneous Province (ELIP)[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] YANG Chun-mei, LI Hong-qi,LU Da-wei,ZHANG Fang-li,GAO Yuan,SHAO Ying-chao. The Relationship Between Rock Resistivity and Water Saturation in WaterDriveOil and OilDriveWater Process[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] ZHU Hong-chen,ZHANG Jiong-fei,QUAN Heng. Two Stages of Mesozoic Lithogenesis and Mineralization in Daxing’anling Mountains[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] ZHU Jian-wei, ZHAO Gang, LIU Bo, GUO Wei, CHENG Jun. Identification Technology and It’s Application of Well-Logging About Oil Shale[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] CHEN Li, LIANG Hai-an,ZHANG Wen-juan,RONG Fan. Application of Fuzzy Mathematics in Division of Engineering Geo-Environment of Cities-An Example of Fushun City[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] GAO Gui-mei,SU Ke,WANG Wen-ying,GAN Shu-cai,LIU Zhao-jun. Study on Rare Earth and Trace Elements in Oil Shale Samples, Huadian, Jilin Province[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] WU Kong-yun,JIANG Zhong-cheng,YE Ye. Influence of Different Plant Communities On Erosion Rates of Limestone Rock Blocks[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] ZHOU Yan-zhang, CHI Bao-ming, LIU Zhong-pei. Mode of Structural Control about Groundwater Pour-in Mechanism in Xiadian Gold Deposits in Shandong Province[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] ZHANG Yuan, LIU Lian-deng,SUN Jing-gui,CHEN Guo-hua,ZHANG Hong-xi,YAN Fu-chuan, YANG Kai-chun. Two Phase Overprinting Mineralization in Huangbuling Gold Deposit in Northwestern Jiaodong Peninsula[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] LU Cheng-peng, SHU Long-cang, YUAN Li-bo, ZHANG Rong-rong, HUANG Bi-juan, WANG Bin-bin. Determination of Hydrogeologic Parameters of Karst Aquifer Based on Tracer Test[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .