吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (8): 2137-2149.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250034

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

考虑混动车NO x 排放工况影响的交叉口信号配时优化模型

陈兴辉1(),刘皓冰1,2(),胡兴华3   

  1. 1.同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海 201804
    2.上海创智学院,上海 200231
    3.重庆交通大学 交通运输学院,重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-10 出版日期:2026-08-01 发布日期:2026-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 刘皓冰 E-mail:chenxinghui@tongji.edu.cn;liuhaobing@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈兴辉(1998-),男,博士研究生. 研究方向:机动车能耗与排放模型.E-mail: chenxinghui@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFB3906900);国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(52202420)

Intersection signal timing optimization model considering influence of hybrid vehicles NO x emission conditions

Xing-hui CHEN1(),Hao-bing LIU1,2(),Xing-hua HU3   

  1. 1.The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering,Ministry of Education,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China
    2.Shanghai Innovation Institute,Shanghai 200231,China
    3.College of Traffic & Transportation,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China
  • Received:2025-01-10 Online:2026-08-01 Published:2026-09-02
  • Contact: Hao-bing LIU E-mail:chenxinghui@tongji.edu.cn;liuhaobing@tongji.edu.cn

摘要:

基于机动车比功率(VSP)模型,重点考虑了插电式混合动力车型特性,分别针对其电量消耗和电量维持两种模式提出NO x 排放因子的计算方法。以交叉口范围内车均NO x 排放最小为优化目标,以车均延误、平均停车次数等为约束条件,建立以燃油车与混动车构成的混合交通环境下交叉口信号配时优化模型。分析结果表明,本文模型优化后的车均NO x 排放减少率达到31.29%,同时车均延误以及平均停车次数与车均NO x 排放呈同向变化趋势,其减少率分别为43.99%和28.88%,优于仅考虑交通流量条件的Webster模型。最后,通过参数敏感性分析发现,不同交通量水平、左转车辆比例以及混动车渗透率对车均NO x 排放的影响较为显著。本文提出的平衡环境效益和通行效率的交叉口信号配时优化方法为城市交通管理和政策制定提供了有效依据。

关键词: NO x 排放, 交叉口信号配时优化, 燃油车与混动车VSP, 参数敏感性分析

Abstract:

Based on the vehicle specific power(VSP) model, with particular emphasis on the characteristics of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles(PHEVs), this study proposes NO x emission factor calculation methods for both charge-depleting and charge-sustaining modes. With the objective of minimizing average per-vehicle NO x emissions within the intersection area, and subject to constraints including average per-vehicle delay and average number of stops, a signal timing optimization model is established for intersections under mixed traffic environments comprising conventional fuel vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles. Analysis results indicate that the proposed model achieves a 31.29% reduction in average per-vehicle NO x emissions. Meanwhile, average per-vehicle delay and average number of stops exhibit consistent variation trends with average per-vehicle NO x emissions, with reduction rates of 43.99% and 28.88%, respectively, outperforming the Webster model which considers only traffic flow conditions. Finally, parameter sensitivity analysis reveals that traffic volume levels, left-turn vehicle proportions, and hybrid vehicle penetration rates exert significant influences on average per-vehicle NO x emissions. The intersection signal timing optimization method proposed in this study, which balances environmental benefits and traffic efficiency, provides an effective basis for urban traffic management and policy formulation.

Key words: NO x emissions, intersection signal timing optimization, VSP for fuel and hybrid vehicles, parametric sensitivity analysis

中图分类号: 

  • U491

图1

交叉口信号控制对车辆排放与通行效率的影响"

表1

主要变量及参数的符号说明"

符号说 明单位
i信号相位的索引-
j交叉口进口道方向的索引-
α车型的索引,α=1时表示小型车,α=2时表示大型车-
β车辆能源类型的索引,β=1时表示燃油车,β=2时表示混动车-
Dˉ车辆通过交叉口的车均延误s/pcu
Dij相位i进口道j的车均延误s/pcu
Eˉ车辆通过交叉口的车均NO x 排放g/pcu

表2

不同类型燃油车VSP区间对应的NO x 排放因子"

序号VSP区间/(kW·t-1NO x 排放因子/(g·s-1
LDGVHDDT
1<-20.000 139 5010.056 210 565
2[-2, 0)0.000 459 8700.072 015 277
3[0, 1)0.001 056 4530.065 285 324
4[1, 4)0.001 182 0000.120 159 943
5[4, 7)0.001 344 6930.155 863 268
6[7, 10)0.001 557 1080.200 919 449
7[10, 13)0.001 957 6620.222 890 678
8[13, 16)0.002 641 8830.256 653 830
9[16, 19)0.003 205 1420.247 436 625
10[19, 23)0.002 766 1940.228 227 500
11[23, 28)0.002 080 366-
12[28, 33)0.001 501 203-
13[33, 39)0.000 487 878-
14≥ 390.000 725 076-

图2

PEMS实车试验设备"

图3

CD与CS模式下NO x 排放因子与VSP的三次多项式拟合曲线图"

图4

车辆到达-驶离信号交叉口的行驶工况"

图5

交叉口信号配时优化问题的遗传算法求解流程"

图6

信号交叉口交通量分布及信号相位配时"

表3

各进口道方向不同车型与能源类型的实际 交通量和饱和流量"

进口道方向

不同车型与能源类型的

实际交通量/(辆·h-1

饱和流量/(pcu·h-1

小型

燃油车

大型

燃油车

小型

混动车

南进口直行308921163 265
左转266101 555
北进口直行297491123 350
左转4436171 430
东进口直行334123 015
左转13551 405
西进口直行357133 020
左转10112383 170

图7

信号周期时长对目标函数的影响"

图8

优化后的最佳信号配时方案"

表4

交叉口信号配时优化前后的结果"

配时方案

信号

周期/s

车均NO x 排放/(g·pcu-1车均NO x 排放减少率/%
现状控制方案1600.703 2
Webster模型1400.518 826.22
信号交叉口配时优化模型1400.483 131.29

图9

信号周期时长对车均延误及平均停车次数的影响"

图10

交叉口不同类型车辆NO x 排放情况"

图11

不同交通量水平对车均NO x 排放、车均延误及平均停车次数的影响"

图12

不同左转车辆比例对车均NO x 排放、车均延误及平均停车次数的影响"

图13

混动车不同渗透率对车均NO x 排放的影响"

[1] Hu X, Chen X, Guo J, et al. Optimization model for bus priority control considering carbon emissions under non-bus lane conditions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 402: No.136747.
[2] Akcelik R. Traffic Signals: Capacity and Timing Analysis[M]. Melbourne: Australian Road Research Board, 1981.
[3] Liu H, Gayah V V, Levin M W. A max pressure algorithm for traffic signals considering pedestrian queues[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2024, 169: No.104865.
[4] Fan J, Baumann M, Jokhio S, et al. Evaluating the impact of signal control on emissions at intersections[C]∥Proceedings of KES-STS International Symposium,Singapore,2022: 104-111.
[5] Harrington W. A Behavioral Analysis of EPA's Mobile Emission Factor Model[M]. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, 1998.
[6] Barth M, Malcolm C, Younglove T, et al. Recent validation efforts for a comprehensive modal emissions model[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2001, 1750(1): 13-23.
[7] U.S. EPA. Draft motor vehicle emission simulator (MOVES) 2009: software design reference manual[R]. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency, 2009.
[8] 姜壁刚, 何超, 王艳艳,等. 道路坡度对轻型柴油车二氧化碳排放的影响[J]. 公路交通科技, 2025, 42(2): 207-214.
Jiang Bi-gang, He Chao, Wang Yan-yan, et al. Influence of road gradient on CO₂ emission from light-duty diesel vehicles[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2025, 42(2): 207-214.
[9] 吉喆, 王鑫, 尹航,等. 考虑实际路况下排气温度的重型柴油车NO x 排放模型[J]. 华南理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2024, 52(2): 136-144.
Ji Zhe, Wang Xin, Yin Hang, et al. NO x emission model of heavy-duty diesel vehicles considering exhaust temperature under real-world driving conditions[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(2): 136-144.
[10] Xu J, Tu R, Ahmed U, et al. An eco-score system incorporating driving behavior, vehicle characteristics, and traffic conditions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 95: No.102866.
[11] 杨楠, 肖军. 序列二次规划算法下城市智能交通运行节能优化控制[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2024, 54(8): 2223-2228.
Yang Nan, Xiao Jun. Energy saving optimization control of urban intelligent transportation under sequential quadratic programming algorithm[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(8): 2223-2228.
[12] Chen J, Wang K, Yu H, et al. A novel VSP-based CO2 emission model for ICEs and HEVs based on internally observable variables: engine operating speeds[J]. Energy, 2024, 313: No.133892.
[13] 彭飞, 宋国华, 尹航,等. 面向实际交通状态的混合动力汽车能耗和CO2排放模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(6): 316-326.
Peng Fei, Song Guo-hua, Yin Hang, et al. Energy consumption and CO2 emission model for hybrid vehicles in real traffic conditions[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(6): 316-326.
[14] Frey H, Unal A, Chen J. Methodology for developing modal emission rates for EPA's multi-scale motor vehicle & equipment emission system[R]. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency, 2022.
[15] 张硕, 曹自强, 张春梅,等. 插电式混合动力汽车全生命周期评价及情景模拟[J]. 环境科学, 2025,46(6): No. 202405052.
Zhang Shuo, Cao Zi-qiang, Zhang Chun-mei, et al. Life cycle assessment and scenario simulation of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles[J]. Environmental Science, 2025, 46(6): No. 202405052.
[16] 曾小华, 王星琦, 宋大凤,等. 考虑电池寿命的插电式混合动力汽车能量管理优化[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2019, 53(11): 2206-2214.
Zeng Xiao-hua, Wang Xing-qi, Song Da-feng, et al. Battery-health conscious energy management optimization in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2019, 53(11): 2206-2214.
[17] Hu J, Frey H C, Sandhu G S, et al. Method for modeling driving cycles, fuel use, and emissions for over snow vehicles[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(14): 8258-8265.
[18] Fernandes P, Ferreira E, Macedo E, et al. Unraveling roundabout dynamics: Analysis of driving behavior, vehicle performance, and exhaust emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2024, 133: No.104308.
[19] 赵慧雄, 陈艳艳, 张斌,等. 考虑交通和环境效益的公交优先信号配时研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2024, 41(2): 212-222.
Zhao Hui-xiong, Chen Yan-yan, Zhang Bin, et al. Study on transit signal priority timing considering traffic and environmental benefit[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2024, 41(2): 212-222.
[20] Niroumand R, Tajalli M, Hajibabai L, et al. Joint optimization of vehicle-group trajectory and signal timing: Introducing the white phase for mixed-autonomy traffic stream[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 116:No.102659.
[1] 周遊,洪伟,解方喜,刘宇,宫洵,李小平. 气门控制策略对无节气门发动机性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(1): 55-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!