Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (10): 2535-2545.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250495

Previous Articles    

Trajectory prediction method of integrated vehicle motion states under single-vehicle intelligence conditions

Hong-yan GUO1,2(),Hong-nan XIE1,2,Qing-yu MENG1,2()   

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Automotive Chassis Integration and Bionics,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
    2.College of Communication Engineering,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
  • Received:2025-06-05 Online:2026-10-01 Published:2026-10-09
  • Contact: Qing-yu MENG E-mail:guohy11@jlu.edu.cn;qymeng@jlu.edu.cn

Abstract:

To achieve accurate prediction of surrounding vehicles' future trajectories for autonomous vehicles under single-vehicle intelligence, a trajectory prediction method integrating vehicle perception bounding boxes and motion states is proposed. By fusing data from onboard camera images, LiDAR, and ego-vehicle motion information, the proposed method extensively extracts the motion features of target vehicles and the motion trends of the ego vehicle. First, the target vehicle's trajectory and displacement are encoded, and a cross-modal attention mechanism with visual feature fusion is established. Second, an ego-vehicle displacement-difference/angle-difference encoder is designed; combined with optical flow features, it accurately captures the ego vehicle's motion trend, and a Transformer architecture is employed to achieve deep fusion of the target vehicle's motion features with the ego vehicle's motion features. Finally, the fused features, together with the target vehicle's optical flow features, are fed into a decoder to generate the predicted trajectory of the target vehicle. The proposed trajectory prediction model was trained and tested on the NuScenes dataset and deployed on a modified Dongfeng AX7 intelligent vehicle for real-vehicle experiments. The results demonstrate that the proposed method has advantages in both prediction accuracy and deployment capability.

Key words: vehicle trajectory prediction, LiDAR, visual features, optical flow information, multimodal fusion

CLC Number: 

  • U495

Fig.1

Integrated vehicle motion state trajectory prediction model"

Table 1

Comparison of ADE in ablation experiments"

模 型平均位移误差(ADE)/m
0.5 s1.0 s1.5 s2.0 s2.5 s3.0 s

本文方法

消融图像特征

消融光流特征

消融自车特征

0.59

0.79

0.63

0.67

0.87

1.05

0.92

0.99

1.17

1.35

1.24

1.32

1.51

1.69

1.58

1.69

1.88

2.06

1.95

2.08

2.27

2.46

2.34

2.50

仅编码解码器0.901.331.782.242.723.22

Table 2

Comparison of FDE in ablation experiments"

模 型最终位移误差(FDE)/m
0.5 s1.0 s1.5 s2.0 s2.5 s3.0 s

本文方法

消融图像特征

消融光流特征

消融自车特征

0.59

0.79

0.63

0.67

1.15

1.32

1.22

1.31

1.79

1.94

1.87

1.99

2.54

2.71

2.62

2.80

3.35

3.55

3.43

3.67

4.22

4.44

4.30

4.58

仅编码解码器0.901.772.663.624.655.73

Table 3

Comparison of proposed method with other models"

模 型minADE5minADE10minFDE5minFDE10
本文方法2.021.753.863.12
DSF?AF2.061.664.673.71
DLow?AF2.111.784.703.58
MID2.151.854.703.90

Fig.2

Visualization results of trajectory prediction on target vehicle under different operating conditions"

Fig.3

Images and configurations of the host vehicle and target vehicle"

Table 4

Real vehicle hardware platform parameters"

硬件名称参数介绍
车载计算单元型号为Nuvo?6108GC;CPU为Intel Xeon E3?1275 v5,4 核 8 线程,主频 3.6 GHz;GPU为NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080,8 GB GDDR6;内存为32 GB;操作系统为Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
摄像头5 000 万像素;Sony IMX800 / 光影猎人900,f/1.6,等效 23 mm,OIS,8K@24 fps,4K@60/30 fps;支持 OIS + EIS
激光雷达32 线机械旋转式;激光波长为905 nm;激光等级为Class 1;测距精度为±3 cm;测距范围为0.4 m~200 m,目标反射率 为20 %;视场角为360°× 40°;输出三维空间坐标、反射强度

Fig.4

Real vehicle test straight-running condition"

Fig.5

Real vehicle test steering condition"

Table 5

Comparison of ADE in real vehicle experiment"

工况平均位移误差(ADE)/m
0.5 s1.0 s1.5 s2.0 s2.5 s3.0 s
直行0.290.400.670.820.840.80
转向0.640.891.071.201.271.28

Table 6

Comparison of FDE in real vehicle experiment"

工况最终位移误差(FDE)/m
0.5 s1.0 s1.5 s2.0 s2.5 s3.0 s
直行0.290.511.211.280.940.56
转向0.641.141.421.581.571.31
[1] 黄玲, 崔躜, 游峰, 等. 适用于多车交互场景的车辆轨迹预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 54(5): 1188-1195.
Huang Ling, Cui Zan, You Feng, et al. Vehicle trajectory prediction model for multi-vehicle interaction scenarios[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(5): 1188-1195.
[2] Xing Y, Lü C, Cao D. Personalized vehicle trajectory prediction based on joint time-series modeling for connected vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019, 69(2): 1341-1352.
[3] 张新锋, 赵娟, 刘国华, 等. 基于图时空注意力的多车交互轨迹预测模型[J]. 汽车技术, 2025(3): 30-38.
Zhang Xin-feng, Zhao Juan, Liu Guo-hua, et al. Multi-vehicle interactive trajectory prediction model based on graph spatio-temporal attention[J]. Automobile Technology, 2025(3): 30-38.
[4] Malla S, Dwivedi I, Dariush B, et al. Nemo: Future object localization using noisy ego priors[C]∥IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITSC), Macau, China, 2022: 3704-3711.
[5] Dasgupta K, Das A, Das S, et al. Spatio-contextual deep network-based multimodal pedestrian detection for autonomous driving[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(9): 15940-15950.
[6] Monjurul Karim M, Qin R, Wang Y. Fusion-GRU: a deep learning model for future bounding box prediction of traffic agents in risky driving videos[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2024, 2678(9): 699-709.
[7] Gu J, Hu C, Zhang T, et al. Vip3D: end-to-end visual trajectory prediction via 3D agent queries[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, Canada, 2023: 5496-5506.
[8] 周亦威, 劳逸男, 赵靖, 等. 考虑多类型交通参与者的图遍历多模态车辆轨迹预测[J]. 公路交通科技, 2025, 42(3): 1-10.
Zhou Yi-wei, Lao Yi-nan, Zhao Jing, et al. Graph-traversal based multimodal vehicle trajectory prediction considering multiple types of traffic participants[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2025, 42(3): 1-10.
[9] Hu Y, Yang J, Chen L, et al. Planning-oriented autonomous driving[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, Canada,2023: 17853-17862.
[10] Liang Ming, Yang Bin, Zeng Wen-yuan, et al. Pnpnet: end-to-end perception and prediction with tracking in the loop[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Online,2020:11553-11562.
[11] Cheng H, Liu M, Chen L, et al. Gatraj: a graph-and attention-based multi-agent trajectory prediction model[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2023, 205: 163-175.
[12] Ren Y, Lan Z, Liu L, et al. EMSIN: enhanced multistream interaction network for vehicle trajectory prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2024, 33(1): 54-68.
[13] 袁静, 夏英. 基于时空图注意力卷积神经网络车辆轨迹预测[J]. 计算机科学, 2024, 51(12): 157-165.
Yuan Jing, Xia Ying. Vehicle trajectory prediction based on spatio-temporal graph attention convolutional neural network[J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(12): 157-165.
[14] Schmidt J, Jordan J, Gritschneder F, et al. Crat-pred: Vehicle trajectory prediction with crystal graph convolutional neural networks and multi-head self-attention[C]∥International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA), Philadelphia, USA, 2022: 7799-7805.
[15] 陈文强, 王东丹, 朱文英, 等. 基于时空图注意力网络的车辆多模态轨迹预测模型[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2025, 59(3): 443-450.
Chen Wen-qiang, Wang Dong-dan, Zhu Wen-ying, et al. Multimodal vehicle trajectory prediction model based on spatio-temporal graph attention network[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2025, 59(3): 443-450.
[16] Sun Z, Wang Z, Halilaj L, et al. Semanticformer: holistic and semantic traffic scene representation for trajectory prediction using knowledge graphs[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024,9(9): 7381-7388.
[17] Li L, Wang X, Yang D, et al. Real-time heterogeneous road-agents trajectory prediction using hierarchical convolutional networks and multi-task learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2023, 9(2): 4055-4069.
[18] 周亦威, 夏莫, 朱冰. 城市道路场景下考虑多类交通参与者的多模态车辆轨迹预测方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2024, 46(3): 396-406.
Zhou Yi-wei, Xia Mo, Zhu Bing. Research on multimodal vehicle trajectory prediction method considering multiple types of traffic participants in urban road scenarios[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(3): 396-406.
[19] Teed Z, Deng J. Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow[C]∥The 16th European Conference on Computer Vision(ECCV), Glasgow, UK, 2020: 402-419.
[20] Caesar H, Bankiti V, Lang A H, et al. nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Online, 2020: 11621-11631.
[21] Mohamed A, Qian K, Elhoseiny M, et al. Social-stgcnn: a social spatio-temporal graph convolutional neural network for human trajectory prediction[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Online, 2020: 14424-14432.
[22] Lu Y, Wang W, Hu X, et al. Vehicle trajectory prediction in connected environments via heterogeneous context-aware graph convolutional networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 24(8): 8452-8464.
[23] Yuan Y, Weng X, Ou Y, et al. Agentformer: Agent-aware transformers for socio-temporal multi-agent forecasting[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, Canada, 2021: 9813-9823.
[24] Wang J, Guo J, Feng M, et al. Trajectory grid diffusion for multimodal trajectory prediction in autonomous vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024: 3495037.
[1] Sheng JIANG,Qi LU,Miao-lei XIA,Jia-yu WANG. RGB⁃D semantic segmentation algorithm based on feature fusion attention [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(9): 2435-2443.
[2] Li LI,Yu-jian BAO,Wen-chen YANG,Qing-ling CHU,Gui-ping WANG. Standardized constructing method of a roadside multi-source sensing dataset [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 529-536.
[3] Xin CHENG,Sheng-xian LIU,Jing-mei ZHOU,Zhou ZHOU,Xiang-mo ZHAO. 3D object detection algorithm fusing dense connectivity and Gaussian distance [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(12): 3589-3600.
[4] Xue-mei LI,Chun-yang WANG,Xue-lian LIU,Da XIE. Time delay estimation of linear frequency-modulated continuous-wave lidar signals via SESTH [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 950-958.
[5] Chang-fu ZONG,Long WEN,Lei HE. Object detection based on Euclidean clustering algorithm with 3D laser scanner [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1): 107-113.
[6] PAN Hai-yang, LIU Shun-an, YAO Yong-ming. Depth information-basd autonomous aerial refueling [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(6): 1750-1756.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!