Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 2329-2339.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250105

Previous Articles    

Mechanisms of traffic conflicts in expressway weaving areas under different weather condition

Bei ZHOU1(),Qian-xi ZHOU1,Zhuang-lin MA1(),Ling-xiao CAI2,Xi LU3   

  1. 1.School of Transportation Engineering,Chang'an University,Xi'an 710064,China
    2.Guizhou Provincial Private Economy and Regional Economy Development Center,Guizhou Provincial Development and Reform Commission,Guiyang 550081,China
    3.China Academy of Transportation Science,Ministry of Transport,Beijing 100029,China
  • Received:2025-02-11 Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-07
  • Contact: Zhuang-lin MA E-mail:bzhou3@chd.edu.cn;zhuanglinma@chd.edu.cn

Abstract:

Aiming at the mechanism of traffic conflicts in urban expressway weaving areas under different weather conditions, a traffic conflict identification algorithm based on vehicle bounding box information was proposed. The peak over threshold extreme value theory was employed to determine severe conflict thresholds under distinct weather conditions, and machine learning models combined with interpretability analysis methods were utilized to systematically investigate the impact of weather on traffic conflict characteristics. By leveraging high-precision trajectory data, the limitations of traditional conflict metric extraction methods, such as insufficient accuracy, subjectivity in threshold selection, and the lack of exploration into weather-related influences were addressed. The results demonstrate that the severe conflict thresholds for sunny and rainy conditions are 1.75 s and 1.85 s, respectively, with the proportion of severe conflicts in rainy conditions (39.1%) being significantly higher than in sunny conditions (9.7%). Through interpretability analysis, the following findings are revealed: ①Weather conditions significantly modulate the influencing factors of traffic conflicts; ②Under sunny conditions, spatial vehicle positions (particularly whether the conflicted vehicle is located in a ramp or weaving lane) dominate the severity of conflicts; ③In rainy conditions, the intensity of influencing factors increases markedly, and traffic flow characteristics emerge as the predominant factors. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for differentiated management and safety prevention and control in weaving areas.

Key words: transportation planning and management, traffic conflict, weather impact, model interpretability, time to collision

CLC Number: 

  • U491.3

Fig.1

Overview diagram of the study area"

Fig.2

Schematic diagram of rear-end conflict TTC calculation"

Fig.3

Schematic diagram of collision point detection"

Fig.4

Density distribution of TTC values in sunny and rainy conditions"

Fig.5

Stability analysis of TTC threshold in sunny conditions"

Fig.6

Mean residual life plot of TTC in sunny conditions"

Fig.7

Stability analysis of TTC threshold in rainy conditions"

Fig.8

Mean residual life plot of TTC in rainy conditions"

Table 1

Table of conflict severity classification"

数据划分TTC阈值/s严重冲突数量比例/%
晴天1.758509.7
雨天1.853 33339.1

Table 2

Classification information for secondary intervals"

所处路段位置区间编号区间长度/m
交织段W130
W230
W340
W430
W530

Table 3

Variable information"

变量单位及描述变量单位及描述
前3 min路段车流速度均值m/s前3 min前方区间车流速度均值m/s
前3 min路段车流速度标准差-前3 min前方区间车流速度标准差-
前3 min路段车流密度均值pcu/km前3 min前方区间车流密度均值-
前3 min路段车流密度标准差-前3 min前方区间车流密度标准差-
前3 min路段车流量均值pcu/h前3 min前方区间车流量均值pcu/h
前3 min路段车流量标准差-前3 min前方区间车流量标准差-
前3 min自身区间车流速度均值m/s前3 min后方区间车流速度均值m/s
前3 min自身区间车流速度标准差-前3 min后方区间车流速度标准差-
前3 min自身区间车流密度均值pcu/km前3 min后方区间车流密度均值pcu/km
前3 min自身区间车流密度标准差-前3 min后方区间车流密度标准差-
前3 min自身区间车流量均值pcu/h前3 min后方区间车流量均值pcu/h
前3 min自身区间车流量标准差-前3 min后方区间车流量标准差-
瞬时路段车流量pcu/h冲突车辆行驶方向角度一阶差分标准差-
瞬时路段车流密度pcu/km被冲突车辆行驶方向角度一阶差分标准差-
瞬时路段车流速度m/s冲突车辆位于匝道和交织车道0-否;1-是
主线至主线流量pcu冲突车辆位于主线外侧车道0-否;1-是
主线至匝道流量pcu冲突车辆位于主线中间车道0-否;1-是
匝道至主线流量pcu冲突车辆位于主线内侧车道0-否;1-是
匝道至匝道流量pcu被冲突车辆位于匝道和交织车道0-否;1-是
交织比%被冲突车辆位于主线外侧车道0-否;1-是
交织段车流密度pcu/km被冲突车辆位于主线中间车道0-否;1-是
交织段与上游段车流密度差pcu/km被冲突车辆位于主线内侧车道0-否;1-是
交织段与下游段车流密度差pcu/km是否晚高峰0-否;1-是

Table 4

Hyperparameter optimization results"

参数含义晴天TTC模型取值雨天TTC模型取值
subsample每棵树训练时随机选择的样本比例,防止过拟合0.61.0
num_leaves单棵树的最大节点数,控制树的复杂度10031
n_estimators模型迭代的次数5001 500
min_child_samples一个节点上最小的样本数量2030
max_depth树的最大深度,限制树的生长,防止过拟合。设置为-1时,深度不受限制-15
learning_rate学习率,控制每次迭代更新的步长0.0010.1
colsample_bytree每棵树随机采样的特征比例0.60.6

Fig.9

SHAP value analysis of the LightGBM model in sunny conditions"

Fig.10

SHAP value analysis of the LightGBM model in rainy conditions"

[1] 曹倩, 李志慧, 陶鹏飞, 等. 考虑风险异质特性的路网交通事故风险评估方法[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2023, 53(10): 2817-2825.
Cao Qian, Li Zhi-hui, Tao Peng-fei, et al. Traffic accident risk assessment method for road network consider risk heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(10): 2817-2825.
[2] Wang L, Abdel-Aty M, Shi Q, et al. Real-time crash prediction for expressway weaving segments[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 61: 1-10.
[3] 穆松成. 基于交通冲突极值统计的事故预测模型研究[D]. 威海: 哈尔滨工业大学汽车工程学院, 2022.
Mu Song-cheng. Research on crash prediction model based on extreme statistics of traffic conflicts[D]. Weihai: School of Automotive Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2022.
[4] 姜雪. 城市快速路交织区交通冲突机理研究[D]. 大连: 大连交通大学交通工程学院, 2021.
Jiang Xue. Study on traffic conflict mechanism in urban expressway weaving areas[D]. Dalian: School of Traffic Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University,2021.
[5] Yuan R, Abdel-Aty M, Xiang Q. A study on diversion behavior in weaving segments: individualized traffic conflict prediction and causal mechanism analysis[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 205: No.107681.
[6] 李佳硕, 郑展骥, 顾欣, 等. 考虑快速路交织区驾驶人强行变道行为的交通冲突机理分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(3): 1-11.
Li Jia-shuo, Zheng Zhang-ji, Gu Xin, et al. An analysis of the mechanism of traffic conflicts considering risky lane-changing behavior in weaving sections of expressways[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(3): 1-11.
[7] 马菲. 基于轨迹数据的快速路交织区交通风险评估[D]. 济南: 山东大学齐鲁交通学院, 2024.
Ma Fei. Risk assessment of expressway weaving sections based on trajectory data[D]. Jinan: School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, 2024.
[8] 卢启慧. 基于交通冲突预测模型的城市快速路交织区安全评价方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学交通学院, 2024.
Lu Qi-hui. Research on safety evaluation method of urban expressway weaving areas based on traffic conflict prediction model[D]. Nanjing: School of Transportation, Southeast University, 2024.
[9] Onelcin P, Alver Y. A new lane change index for lane change conflicts at weaving segments[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2023, 24(7): 559-566.
[10] Xia Y, Qin Y, Li X, et al. Risk identification and conflict prediction from videos based on TTC-ML of a multi-lane weaving area[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14: No.4620.
[11] 赵涛, 张宁, 王小超, 等. 基于图神经网络轨迹预测的合流区交通冲突预测方法[J]. 山东大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 54(2): 36-46.
Zhao Tao, Zhang Ning, Wang Xiao-chao, et al. A traffic conflict prediction method for merging areas based on trajectory prediction with graph neural network[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2024, 54(2): 36-46.
[12] Zheng O, Abdel-Aty M, Yue L, et al. CitySim: a drone-based vehicle trajectory dataset for safety oriented research and digital twins[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2023, 2678(4): 606-621.
[13] 史道济. 实用极值统计方法[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 2006.
[14] Lundberg S M, Lee S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions[C]∥Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, CA, USA, 2017: 4768-4777.
[15] 温惠英, 何梓琦, 李秋灵, 等. 高速公路货车换道冲突预测及其影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 54(10): 2827-2836.
Wen Hui-ying, He Zi-qi, Li Qiu-ling, et al. Traffic conflict prediction and influencing factors analysis of truck lane change on expressway[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(10): 2827-2836.
[1] Yan-li WANG,Chen-xi WANG,Xin-ran ZHAO,Bing WU. Prediction of route selection behavior for mixed road network considering multi⁃class attributes [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(8): 2067-2076.
[2] Kang-lin LIU,Ze-yu ZHANG,Jing-wen JIANG,Xun GONG,Yao CHEN. Distributionally robust optimization for drone delivery facility location and allocation problem [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(2): 464-472.
[3] Yi ZHANG,Sha-wen CHEN,Yan CHEN,Xiang-yu FAN,Si-qi WANG,Huan WU,Peng-fei JIAO. Dynamic operation and maintenance evaluation and predictive maintenance of mechanical and electrical equipment on highways [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(1): 170-182.
[4] Yao SUN,Dong-xuan BAI,Bao-zhen YAO,Zi-jian BAI. Characteristics analysis of port and city transportation network based on percolation theory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(1): 199-208.
[5] Hong-fei JIA,Bo ZHUANG,Qing-yu LUO,Ling LIU,Qiu-yang HUANG. Decision optimization of urban road network performance restoration under waterlogged conditions [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 2969-2977.
[6] Dong WANG,Yu-xuan LI,Huan WU,Fang ZONG. Rating algorithm for open test road of intelligent connected vehicle based on random forest [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 2998-3006.
[7] Hui-zhi XU,Dong-sheng HAO,Xiao-ting XU,Shi-sen JIANG. Expressway small object detection algorithm based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(6): 2003-2014.
[8] Qing-ling HE,Yu-long PEI,Lin HOU,Jing LIU,Sheng PAN. Hybrid strategy improves WOA⁃BiLSTM speed prediction of expressway exit ramp [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(6): 2038-2049.
[9] Wen-jing WU,Chun-chun DENG,Hong-fei JIA,Shu-hang SUN. Evaluation of road network unblocked reliability and identification of critical sections under influence of flooding [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1250-1257.
[10] Hao YUE,Xiao CHANG,Jian-ye LIU,Qiu-shi QU. Customized bus route optimization with vehicle window [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1266-1274.
[11] Xiang-hai MENG,Guo-rui WANG,Ming-yang ZHANG,Bi-jiang TIAN. Traffic accident prediction model of mountain highways based on selection integration [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1298-1306.
[12] Tian-yang GAO,Da-wei HU,Rui-sen JIANG,Xue WU,Hui-tian LIU. Optimization study of zonal-based flexible feeder bus routes based on modular vehicle system [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 537-545.
[13] Yu-ran LI,Fei WANG,Cai-hua ZHU,Fei HAN,Yan LI. Chain-effect utility of factors influencing residents' commuting mode choice in polluted weather [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 577-590.
[14] Shu-hong MA,Jun-jie ZHANG,Xi-fang CHEN,Guo-mei LIAO. Identifying urban functional structures using time-series taxi data [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 603-613.
[15] Da-yi QU,Shou-chen DAI,Yi-cheng CHEN,Shan-ning CUI,Yu-xiang YANG. Modeling of vehicle game cut-out and merging behavior based on trajectory data [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(10): 3208-3220.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!