快速路短交织区车辆交互风险预测及影响因素分析

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250346

Abstract

Abstract:

To clarify the key influencing factors of vehicle interaction risk characteristics and severity in the short weaving area of urban expressways， the Dashuying Interchange in Kunming City was taken as the research object. Based on the trajectory data extracted from drone aerial videos， a dataset of two vehicle interaction risk values was calculated through a driving risk field model. The cumulative frequency method was used to divide the interaction risk into four levels of different risk severity. The results showed that severe risks were mainly distributed in the upper half of lane 1， lane 3， and lane 4. Selecting 11 key factors that affect the severity of interaction risk as feature variables， XGBoost and RF algorithms were used to construct interaction risk severity prediction models. The results showed that the accuracy of XGBoost algorithm prediction was 92.92%， and the F₁ score was 92.91%. The accuracy of RF algorithm prediction is 90.22%， and the F₁ score is 90.19%. To further reveal the mechanism of action of feature variables， SHAP was introduced to quantify the contribution of 11 feature variables to the severity of interaction risk. The results showed that longitudinal spacing， lateral spacing， target vehicle speed， and two vehicle speed difference were the top four variables in terms of contribution. The research results can provide a basis for active vehicle prevention and control and traffic safety management in short weaving areas of expressways.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, expressway, interactive risk prediction, machine learning

CLC Number:

U491.3

Li-wei HU,Yi-chen LIU,Chen CHEN. Risk prediction and influencing factors analysis of vehicle interaction in short weaving areas of expressway[J].Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(10): 2578-2586.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table2

Fig.6

Table 3

Fig.7

Table 4

Fig.8

Fig.9

References 16

[1]	彭博, 王玉婷, 谢济铭, 等. 城市干线短交织区元胞自动机多级换道决策模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(4): 41-48, 70.
	Peng Bo, Wang Yu-ting, Xie Ji-ming, et al. Multi-stage lane changing decision model of urban trunk road's short weaving area based on cellular automata[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(4): 41-48, 70.
[2]	Kim J K, Ulfarsson G F, Kim S, et al. Driver-injury severity in single-vehicle crashes in California: a mixed logit analysis of heterogeneity due to age and gender[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2013, 50: 1073-1081.
[3]	Alqatawna A, Álvarez A M R, García-Moreno S S C. Comparison of multivariate regression models and artificial neural networks for prediction highway traffic accidents in Spain: a case study[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2021, 58: 277-284.
[4]	Yu L, Du B, Hu X, et al. Deep spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for traffic accident prediction[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 423: 135-147.
[5]	Ouyang P, Wu J, Xu C, et al. Traffic safety analysis of inter-tunnel weaving section with conflict prediction models[J]. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 2022, 14(4): 630-654.
[6]	Guo M, Zhao X, Yao Y, et al. A study of freeway crash risk prediction and interpretation based on risky driving behavior and traffic flow data[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 160: 106328.
[7]	袁振洲, 胡嫣然, 杨洋. 考虑多维动态特征交互的高速公路实时事故风险建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3): 215-223.
	Yuan Zhen-zhou, Hu Yan-ran, Yang Yang. Modeling towards freeway real-time traffic crash prediction considering multi-dimensional dynamic feature interactions[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2022, 22(3): 215-223.
[8]	潘恒彦, 王永岗, 李德林, 等. 基于交通冲突的长纵坡路段追尾风险评估及预测[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2023, 53(5): 1355-1363.
	Pan Heng-yan, Wang Yong-gang, Li De-lin, et al. Evaluating and forecasting rear-end collision risk of long longitudinal gradient roadway via traffic conflict[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(5): 1355-1363.
[9]	温惠英, 何梓琦, 李秋灵, 等. 高速公路货车换道冲突预测及其影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2024, 54(10): 2827-2836.
	Wen Hui-ying, He Zi-qi, Li Qiu-ling, et al. Traffic conflict prediction and influencing factors analysis of truck lane change on expressway[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(10): 2827-2836.
[10]	董亚冰, 李瑞敏, 张萌佳, 等. 基于多元线性回归的匝道路段行车风险预测[J]. 公路, 2024, 69(9): 219-229.
	Dong Ya-bing, Li Rui-min, Zhang Meng-jia, et al. Traffic risk prediction on ramp sections based on multiple linear regression[J]. Highway, 2024, 69(9): 219-229.
[11]	程国柱, 王婉琦, 王连震, 等. 车辆换道行为风险评价方法研究进展[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2023, 55(3):139-150.
	Cheng Guo-zhu, Wang Wan-qi, Wang Lian-zhen, et al. Research progress on risk assessment of vehicle lane-changing behavior[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2023, 55(3): 139-150.
[12]	Li L H, Gan J, Yi Z W, et al. Risk perception and the warning strategy based on safety potential field theory[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 148: 105805.
[13]	朱顺应, 蒋若曦, 王红, 等. 机动车交通冲突技术研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(2): 15-33.
	Zhu Shun-ying, Jiang Ruo-xi, Wang Hong, et al. Review of research on traffic conflict techniques[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(2): 15-33.
[14]	胡立伟, 陈琛, 赵雪亭, 等. 基于行车风险场的快速路短交织区车辆交互风险识别[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(3): 221-231.
	Hu Li-wei, Chen Chen, Zhao Xue-ting, et al. Identification of vehicle interaction risk in short weaving areas of expressways based on driving risk field[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(3): 221-231.
[15]	何晖宇, 丁瑞, 应聃, 等. 苜蓿叶立交交织区冲突特征及严重程度影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(5): 246-258.
	He Hui-yu, Ding Rui, Ying Dan, et al. Conflict features and impact factors of severity in weaving area of cloverleaf interchange[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(5): 246-258.
[16]	戢晓峰, 徐迎豪, 普永明, 等. 山区双车道公路货车移动遮断小客车跟驰风险预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2024, 54(5): 1323-1331.
	Ji Xiao-feng, Xu Ying-hao, Pu Yong-ming, et al. Risk prediction model of passenger car following behavior under truck movement interruption of two-lane highway in mountainous area[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(5): 1323-1331.

Related Articles 15

[1]	Qi-yue ZHANG,Hao YUE,De-lin MENG,Qiu-shi QU. Traffic user equilibrium assignment model with congestion space queuing and spillover [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(9): 2302-2316.
[2]	Yi-yong PAN,Sai-sai YANG. Analysis of correlation between self⁃driving car takeover mode and accident severity [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(8): 2077-2083.
[3]	Rui-jun GUO,Chao-ran FAN,Ming-di FU. Vehicle lane change intention recognition based on PSO⁃GRU model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(8): 2084-2094.
[4]	Zhuang-lin MA,Yu-ming BI,Wen-jian JIA,Ya-juan DENG,Xiao-wei TAN. Analysis of residents' transfer behavior mechanisms under transit transfer preferential policy [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(8): 2116-2126.
[5]	Xin-hui LIU,Zhuo-qun CHEN,Yan LYU. Review of industrial fault diagnosis based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(7): 1759-1779.
[6]	Yun-wei MENG,Zhi-peng LI,Yin ZHANG,Zhen-yu QUAN,Guang-qing YANG,Fang CHEN,Si-jing LAI,Jun QIAO. Driving comfort in tunnel groups based on longitudinal spacing and brightness difference [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(7): 1904-1914.
[7]	Hui-ling ZHANG,Jing-fan WANG,Yi-shuo CAO,Gu-chang AO. Two⁃layer optimization modelling on expressway differentiated tolling for trucks based on benefit⁃cost [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(7): 1958-1969.
[8]	Yu-zhao ZHANG,Xin-ru DING,Chang-xiao HOU,Hu-lin CHEN. Research status and prospects of resilience for transportation networks [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(3): 585-602.
[9]	Zhuang-lin MA,Yu-ming BI,Bei ZHOU,Ya-juan DENG,Xue ZHAO. Heterogeneity analysis of residents’ transfer intentions under transit transfer preferential policy [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(1): 158-169.
[10]	Lin-hong WANG,Yu-yang LIU,Zi-yu LIU,Ying-jia LU,Yu-heng ZHANG,Gui-shu HUANG. Defect recognition of lightweight bridges based on YOLOv5 [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 2958-2968.
[11]	Yun-xiang ZHANG,Xian-min SONG,Yu XIE,Tian-shu ZHAN. Agent⁃based behavioral simulation of parking reservation services driven by user satisfaction [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 2978-2984.
[12]	Zheng-lei YU,Chao-lei ZHANG,Li-xin CHEN,Ping HU,Tao XU,Bin-kai GUO. Bionic structure design and acoustic and mechanical properties of expressway sound barrier panels [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 3079-3088.
[13]	Shu-shan CHAI,Zhi-qiang ZHOU,Hai-tao LI,Jiong-yang XU. Real-time road network traffic anomaly incident detection based on graph spatial-temporal pattern learning network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(7): 2145-2161.
[14]	Jiang-bo YU,Jian-cheng WENG,Peng-fei LIN,Yu-xing SUN,Jiao-long CHAI. Passenger flow prediction model of external transportation hub based on hybrid Transformer [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(7): 2251-2259.
[15]	Hong-zhuan ZHAO,Ze-jian WU,Xin ZHANG,Sheng-wen SHI,Wen-yong LI,Xin ZHAN,En-yong XU,Jia-ming WANG. Curve lattice model for connected commercial vehicles based on density dispersion and information transmission delay [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(6): 2015-2029.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

时间t/s	横坐标x/m	纵坐标y/m	横向速度v_x/ （m·s^-1）	纵向速度v_y/ （m·s^-1）	速度v/（m·s^-1）	车辆航向角ψ/（°）	横向加速度a_x/ （m·s^-2）	纵向加速度a_y/ （m·s^-2）	加速度a/ （m·s^-2）
98.6	9.82	1.22	0.25	9.78	9.78	1.40	0.26	0.77	0.81
98.8	9.90	3.20	0.31	9.96	9.97	1.80	0.37	0.64	0.74
99.0	9.95	5.21	0.34	10.05	10.05	1.90	0.19	0.60	0.63
99.2	10.03	7.22	0.42	10.17	10.18	2.40	0.15	0.61	0.63
99.4	10.11	9.28	0.39	10.32	10.33	2.50	0.23	0.67	0.71
99.6	10.19	11.34	0.50	10.42	10.43	2.60	0.35	0.54	0.64
99.8	10.31	13.44	0.57	10.55	10.56	3.10	-0.13	0.66	0.68

序号	符号	描述	单位
1	X₁	主线交通流量	pcu
2	X₂	匝道交通流量	pcu
3	X₃	目标车横向位置	m
4	X₄	目标车纵向位置	m
5	X₅	目标车速度	m/s
6	X₆	目标车与交互车速度差	m/s
7	X₇	目标车与交互车横向间距	m
8	X₈	目标车与交互车纵向间距	m
9	X₉	目标车是否主线驶入主线驶出（是1，否0）
10	X₁₀	目标车是否主线驶入匝道驶出（是1，否0）
11	X₁₁	目标车是否匝道驶入主线驶出（是1，否0）

RF模型		XGBoost模型
参数	数值	参数	数值
n_estimators	100	learning_rate	0.3
max_depth	10	max_depth	3
min_samples_leaf	1	n_estimators	100
min_samples_split	2	min_child_weight	1
max_features	none	subsample	1
random_state	42	random_state	42

模型	评价指标
模型	准确率/%	精确率/%	召回率/%	F₁分数/%
XGBoost	92.92	92.87	92.95	92.91
随机森林	90.22	90.17	90.14	90.19

Risk prediction and influencing factors analysis of vehicle interaction in short weaving areas of expressway

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)