Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1630-1637.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587X.20250618
• Research in clinical medicine • Previous Articles Next Articles
Chuwen WU,Mengling PENG,Yu FU,Shanshan ZHOU(
)
Received:2024-12-14
Accepted:2025-02-22
Online:2025-11-28
Published:2025-12-15
Contact:
Shanshan ZHOU
E-mail:36581940@qq.com
CLC Number:
Chuwen WU,Mengling PENG,Yu FU,Shanshan ZHOU. Comparison of clinical characteristics and prognostic influence factors between patients with or without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated by microvascular dysfunction[J].Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), 2025, 51(6): 1630-1637.
Tab.1
Clinical characteristics of patients in two groups"
| Group | n | Age (x±s, year) | Male [n(η/%)] | Palpitation [n(η/%)] | Hypertension [n(η/%)] | Diabetes [n(η/%)] | Tachycardia [n(η/%)] | Troponin [ρB/(μg·L-1)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCM complicated with CMD | 68 | 52.72±12.97 | 47 (69.12) | 25 (36.76) | 19 (27.94) | 5 (7.35) | 10 (14.71) | 0.05 (0.05,0.07) |
| HCM complicated without CMD | 143 | 55.48±14.56 | 88 (61.54) | 33 (23.08) | 66 (46.15) | 20 (13.99) | 5 (3.50) | 0.05 (0.04,0.05) |
| t/Z/χ2 | 1.333 | 1.149 | 4.332 | 6.355 | 1.941 | 7.154 | -2.346 | |
| P | 0.184 | 0.284 | 0.037 | 0.012 | 0.164 | 0.007 | 0.019 |
Tab.2
Electrocardiographic data of patients in two groups"
| Group | n | Abnormal Q wave[n(η/%)] | ST segment depression[n(η/%)] | Inverted T-wave[n(η/%)] | PR interval(t/ms) | QRS waveduration(t/ms) | Corrected QTinterval(t/ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCM complicated with CMD | 68 | 13 (19.12) | 14 (20.59) | 30 (44.12) | 160 (148,181) | 94 (86,104) | 452 (431,469) |
| HCM complicated without CMD | 143 | 8 (5.59) | 27 (18.88) | 84 (58.74) | 158 (146,174) | 94 (86,100) | 453 (438,476) |
| Z/χ2 | 9.404 | 0.086 | 3.968 | -1.447 | -0.695 | -1.434 | |
| P | 0.002 | 0.770 | 0.046 | 0.148 | 0.487 | 0.152 |
Tab.3
Cardiac imaging results of patients in two groups"
| Group | n | EF (η/%) | LAD (l/mm) | LVDD (l/mm) | RVDD (l/mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCM complicated with CMD | 68 | 61.50 (54.00,63.75) | 41.15±6.77 | 46.00(43.00,50.00) | 21.72±2.52 |
| HCM complicated without CMD | 143 | 63.00 (59.00,65.00) | 38.68±6.12 | 47.00(44.00,50.00) | 21.73±2.67 |
| t/Z | -2.325 | -2.646 | -0.457 | 0.017 | |
| P | 0.020 | 0.009 | 0.648 | 0.986 | |
| Group | n | CO (L·min-1) | E peak (cm·s-1) | A peak (cm·s-1) | MWT (l/mm) |
| HCM complicated with CMD | 68 | 4.60 (3.53,5.73) | 65.50(52.00,72.00) | 77.56±22.47 | 21.00 (18.00,25.75) |
| HCM complicated without CMD | 143 | 4.80 (3.60,5.90) | 65.50(59.00,79.00) | 82.84±21.64 | 20.00 (17.00,23.00) |
| t/Z | -1.116 | -1.645 | 1.637 | -2.171 | |
| P | 0.265 | 0.100 | 0.103 | 0.030 |
Tab.4
Multivariate Logistic analysis of risk factors of HCM complicated with CMD"
| Risk factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95%CI) | P | OR(95%CI) | P | |
| Palpitation | 1.94 (1.03-3.63) | 0.039 | 1.72 (0.82-3.60) | 0.153 |
| Hypertension | 0.45 (0.24-0.84) | 0.013 | 0.40 (0.20-0.80) | 0.010 |
| Tachycardia | 4.76 (1.56-14.53) | 0.006 | 2.23 (0.60-8.23) | 0.229 |
| Troponin | 1.07 (1.01-1.18) | 0.018 | 1.05 (0.95-1.17) | 0.355 |
| Inverted T-wave | 0.56 (0.31-0.99) | 0.047 | 0.67 (0.35-1.30) | 0.240 |
| Abnormal Q wave | 3.99 (1.57-10.16) | 0.004 | 2.39 (0.85-6.72) | 0.099 |
| EF | 0.96 (0.93-0.99) | 0.014 | 0.97 (0.94-1.01) | 0.146 |
| LAD | 1.06 (1.02-1.12) | 0.010 | 1.05 (1.00-1.11) | 0.048 |
| MWT | 1.09 (1.02-1.16) | 0.010 | 1.11 (1.03-1.19) | 0.007 |
Tab.5
MACE results of patients in two groups"
| Group | n | MACE | All-cause mortality | New/recurrent heart failure | New angina/MI | New arrhythmias | New stroke |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCM complicated with CMD | 68 | 12 (17.65) | 2 (2.94) | 2 (2.94) | 3 (4.41) | 5 (7.35) | 0 (0.00) |
| HCM complicated without CMD | 143 | 15 (10.49) | 3 (2.10) | 3 (2.10) | 3 (2.10) | 4 (2.80) | 2 (1.40) |
| P | 0.146 | 1.000* | 1.000* | 0.616* | 0.244* | 1.000# |
Tab.6
Multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis of risk factors for MACE in patients with HCM"
| Risk factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR(95%CI) | P | RR(95%CI) | P | |
| Age | 1.02 (0.99-1.05) | 0.132 | ||
| Female | 1.18 (0.56,2.51) | 0.658 | ||
| Hypertension | 0.70 (0.32-1.54) | 0.374 | ||
| Diabetes | 2.35 (1.04-5.32) | 0.041 | 2.34 (1.09,5.06) | 0.030 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 1.27 (0.54,2.98) | 0.582 | ||
| Arrhythmia | 4.99 (2.27,10.97) | <0.001 | 4.00 (1.82,8.83) | 0.001 |
| Smoking | 0.99 (0.45,2.18) | 0.979 | ||
| Drinking alcohol | 0.99 (0.36,2.71) | 0.987 | ||
| Troponin | 1.07 (1.04-1.11) | <0.001 | 1.04 (0.97,1.11) | 0.244 |
| EF | 0.95 (0.93-0.98) | <0.001 | 0.96 (0.94,0.99) | 0.001 |
| MWT | 0.97 (0.90-1.05) | 0.497 | ||
| CMD | 1.40 (0.67-2.96) | 0.375 | ||
| [1] | 国家心血管病专家委员会心力衰竭专业委员会, 中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会, 中华医学会心血管分会心力衰竭学组, 等. 中国肥厚型心肌病指南2022[J]. 中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志, 2022, 6(2): 80-105. |
| [2] | KWON D H, SMEDIRA N G, RODRIGUEZ E R, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance detection of myocardial scarring in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: correlation with histopathology and prevalence of ventricular tachycardia[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 54(3): 242-249. |
| [3] | 陈梓娴, 张 莉, 南 江, 等. 心脏磁共振评估肥厚型心肌病微循环障碍的研究进展[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2023, 31(2): 180-184. |
| [4] | TODIERE G, AQUARO G D, PIAGGI P, et al. Progression of myocardial fibrosis assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(10): 922-929. |
| [5] | CECCHI F, OLIVOTTO I, GISTRI R, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349(11): 1027-1035. |
| [6] | 国家心血管中心心肌病专科联盟, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会心血管病精准医学分会“中国成人肥厚型心肌病诊断与治疗指南 2023”专家组. 中国成人肥厚型心肌病诊断与治疗指南2023[J]. 中国分子心脏病学杂志, 2023, 23(1): 5115-5149. |
| [7] | ABULAITI A, ZHANG Q, HUANG H Y, et al. The value of the cardiac magnetic resonance intravoxel incoherent motion technique in evaluating microcirculatory dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2023, 2023: 4611602. |
| [8] | 胡 瑞, 刘 峰, 安小霞, 等. 心脏磁共振心肌灌注成像定量评估微循环障碍的研究进展[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2023, 31(8): 892-896. |
| [9] | ZHAO Y, HUANG L, LI C H, et al. Improvement in coronary microvascular dysfunction evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after transapical beating-heart septal myectomy[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10: 1233004. |
| [10] | LU Y H, XUE Z K, GAO W Q, et al. Microcirculatory dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with chest pain assessed by angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 16977. |
| [11] | KELSHIKER M A, SELIGMAN H, HOWARD J P, et al. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Heart J, 2022, 43(16): 1582-1593. |
| [12] | KIM E K, LEE S C, CHANG S G, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance adenosine stress-induced myocardial perfusion defect in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2020, 22(1): 30. |
| [13] | CHITTURI K R, KUMAR S, HILL A P, et al. Prevalence of arrhythmias in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2025, 105(2): 483-490. |
| [14] | HAMASAKI S, SUWAIDI JAL, HIGANO S T, et al. Attenuated coronary flow reserve and vascular remodeling in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000, 35(6): 1654-1660. |
| [15] | TOMANEK R J. Response of the coronary vasculature to myocardial hypertrophy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990, 15(3): 528-533. |
| [16] | TIMMER S A J, KNAAPEN P. Coronary microvascular function, myocardial metabolism, and energetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insights from positron emission tomography[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 14(2): 95-101. |
| [17] | AGUIAR ROSA S, THOMAS B, FIARRESGA A, et al. The impact of ischemia assessed by magnetic resonance on functional, arrhythmic, and imaging features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 8: 761860. |
| [18] | HUANG L, HAN R, AI T, et al. Assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: First-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T[J]. Clin Radiol, 2013, 68(7): 676-682. |
| [19] | AGUIAR ROSA S, LOPES L R, BRANCO L, et al. Blunted coronary flow velocity reserve is associated with impairment in systolic function and functional capacity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2022, 359: 61-68. |
| [20] | GARCIA BRÁS P, ROSA S A, CARDOSO I, et al. Microvascular dysfunction is associated with impaired myocardial work in obstructive and nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multimodality study[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2023, 12(8): e028857. |
| [21] | MARON B J. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review[J]. Jama, 2002, 287(10): 1308-1320. |
| [22] | OLIVOTTO I, CECCHI F, GISTRI R, et al. Relevance of coronary microvascular flow impairment to long-term remodeling and systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47(5): 1043-1048. |
| [23] | BRAININ P, FRESTAD D, PRESCOTT E. The prognostic value of coronary endothelial and microvascular dysfunction in subjects with normal or non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2018, 254: 1-9. |
| [24] | BRIASOULIS A, MALLIKETHI-REDDY S, PALLA M, et al. Myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a meta-analysis[J]. Heart, 2015, 101(17): 1406-1411. |
| [25] | RAPHAEL C E, MITCHELL F, KANAGANAYAGAM G S, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance predictors of heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the role of myocardial replacement fibrosis and the microcirculation[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2021, 23(1): 26. |
| [1] | Tao SUN,Zhiyin DAI,Xuan LI,Chaopu ZHANG,Shu DING,Jianwei ZHAO. Predictive value of pan-immune-inflammation index for major adverse cardiovascular events within 1 year after PCI in elderly patients with coronary heart disease [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), 2025, 51(6): 1655-1660. |
| [2] | Shengmin ZHANG,Xinyu MENG,Yingzhen XU,Jingwen SUN,Zhikang MAO,Shuzhe ZHOU,Tianhang ZHOU,Yilin YUAN,Chenmei XIE,Xinrui ZHAO,Yantao MA,Hong MA,Xin YU,Lili GUAN. Clinical characteristics analysis on clinical high-risk patients with bipolar disorder [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), 2025, 51(4): 1061-1071. |
| [3] | XU Xiaoyan, SONG Zikai, ZHANG Yang, QIN Ling. Changes of serum NT-pro BNP and Lp(a) levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction after emergency PCI and their clinical significances [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), 2020, 46(01): 132-137. |
| [4] | GU Sanwei, MA Hongshuang, ZHAO Ling, JIANG Zhenyu. Analysis on clinical characteristics of PM/DM combined with thyroid disease [J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2016, 42(05): 999-1004. |
| [5] | CHEN Ling,JIN Nan,LI Ge. Meta-analysis on association between angiotensinogen gene M235T polymorphism and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2014, 40(01): 132-136. |
| [6] | CUI Xiao-Feng, ZHANG Hai-Shan, ZHAO Hang, LI Mo. Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of young patients with rectal carcinoma [J]. J4, 2009, 35(4): 726-730. |
|