吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 824-830.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201603204

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

水文地质条件对页岩气开采控制

邹友琴1,2, 刘莉3, 李宏卿4, 颜春5, 曾马荪5, 兰盈盈6   

  1. 1. 南昌大学资源环境与化工学院, 南昌 330031;
    2. 鄱阳湖环境与资源利用教育部重点实验室(南昌大学), 南昌 330047;
    3. 吉林大学学报编辑部, 长春 130026;
    4. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026;
    5. 江西省勘察设计研究院, 南昌 330095;
    6. 南昌工程学院水利与生态工程学院, 南昌 330099
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-23 出版日期:2016-05-26 发布日期:2016-05-26
  • 作者简介:邹友琴(1973),女,副教授,博士,主要从事水资源与环境方面的研究,E-mail:zouyouqin@ncu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41173115);江西省重大科研专项计划项目(20124ABE02104)

Hydrogeological Conditions Control of Shale Gas Exploration

Zou Youqin1,2, Liu Li3, Li Hongqing4, Yan Chun5, Zeng Masun5, Lan Yingying6   

  1. 1. School of Resources, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
    2. Key Lab. of Poyang Lake Ecology and Bio-Resource Utilization(Nanchang Univ. ) Ministry of Education, Nanchang 330047, China;
    3. Editorial Department of Journal, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    4. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    5. Jiangxi Province Investigation, Design & Research Institute, Nanchang 330095, China;
    6. Academy of Hydraulic and Ecological Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China
  • Received:2015-09-23 Online:2016-05-26 Published:2016-05-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(41173115) and Key Project in Achievements in Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province (20124ABE02104)

摘要:

通过对比页岩气定压开采与承压水定降深开采的相似性,建立起二者指标之间的对应关系;借鉴美国页岩储层典型参数及Barnnet页岩年产量变化规律,从水文地质的角度,建立起水文地质概念模型;利用GMS软件,对页岩气开采进行数值模拟。从模型结果看,11个拟合值中,6个相对误差在5%之内,4个在10%之内,只有一个接近20%,拟合结果较为理想。说明用水文地质方法研究页岩气开采是合理的;也表明开采过程中页岩气产量由游离气和吸附气组成,当游离气开采完毕后,产量主要由吸附气维持,解吸气还有再吸附现象。当盖层开启程度由微裂缝区的25%,50%,75%到100%依次增加时,开采年限按6 a,4 a,2 a,1 a依次减少;不同开启程度下,相同开采年的开采量也依次降低;在每种开启程度下,年产量与原来的年产量的比值也依次降低。任何侧向边界若出现断层,不论其开启程度为微裂缝区的25%,50%,75%还是100%,均达不到定压开采条件。从敏感分析可知,当页岩压裂达到一定程度时,页岩气的析出对页岩气产量影响是最关键的。最后对页岩气开采提出相应的建议。

关键词: 页岩气定压开采, 类比, 承压水定降深开采, GMS

Abstract:

By comparing the similarities between constant pressure exploration of shale gas and fixed drawdown exploitation of confined groundwater, through the establishment of correspondence indicators between the two, exampled by typical shale reservoir parameters from the USA Barnett shale annual production variation pattern, studying from a hydrogeology perspective, a hydrogeological conceptual model was established to stimulate shale gas exploitation by using GMS(groundwater modeling system) software. The result of model identification and verification shows that, among the 11 fitting values, 6 relative errors are within 5%, 4 relative errors are within 10%, and only 1 is approximately 20%, which indicates that the fitting results are quite desired; it also illustrated that hydrogeological methods in shale gas exploitation are reasonable, and it also showed that in the process of mining, shale gas production is composed of free gas and adsorbed gas, after the entire collection of free gas, the gas yield is supported by the desorbed gas basically; the desorption gas will be re-adsorbed. If there exist fractures in the overlying layer, the number of years and yield for mining decrease along with the fracture increasing. If the fractures in the overlying layer increase as many as 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of microfractures zone (Ⅱ/Ⅲ zone), the number of years for mining will decrease to 6 years, 4 years, 2 years, and 1 year accordingly; in different circumstances, with the same mined year, the yield decreases accordingly too. In each case, the ratio of the annual output to that of the original decreases accordingly too. When the boundary conditions change, the lateral boundary (the lower boundary or the right boundary) is set to permeable fault respectively, whether its permeable abilities are 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of the microfractures zone (Ⅱ/Ⅲ zone), the fixed drawdown (constant pressure) mining conditions can't be met. Thus, the boundary conditions have more influence on shale gas with respect to the overlying/underlying rock. The sensitivity analysis showed that the change of source and sink terms has much greater influence on the gas yield than that of permeability.It is concluded that to promote by all means the desorption of the adsorbed gas is crucial, even determinable, to shale gas production in a certain degree of fracturing. Some suggestion is proposed to exploit shale gas.

Key words: shale gas constant pressure exploitation, analogy, confined groundwater fixed drawdown exploitation, GMS (groundwater modeling system)

中图分类号: 

  • P641

[1] Watson A, Gatens T, Michael L, et al. An Analytical Model for History Matching Naturally Fractured Reservoir Production Data[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1990, 5(3):384-388.

[2] Warren J E, Root P J. The Behavior of Naturally Fracture Reservoirs[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1963, 3(3):245-255.

[3] Carlson Eric S, James C Mercer. Devonian Shale Gas Production:Mechanisms and Simple Models[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1991, 43(4):476-482.

[4] Ozkan E, Raghavan R. Modeling of Fluid Transfer from Shale Matrix to Fracture Network[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Florence:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010:1-18.

[5] Bustin A M M,Bustin R M,Cui X. Importance of Fabric on the Production of Gas Shale[C]//SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference. Colorado:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2008:1-29.

[6] Wu Yushu,George Moridis,Bai Baojun. A Multi-Continuum Method for Gas Production in Tight Fracture Reservoirs[C]//SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. Woodlands:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2009:1-16.

[7] Moridis G J, Blasingame T A,Freeman C M. Analysis of Mechanisms of Flow in Fractured Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoirs[C]//SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Lima:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010:1-22.

[8] Freeman C M, Moridis G, Ilk D, et al. A Numerical Study of Transport and Storage Effects for Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoirs[C]//International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China. Beijing:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010:1-20.

[9] Freeman C M, Moridis G, Ilk D, et al. A Numerical Study of Performance for Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoir Systems[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2009:1-13.

[10] Wang F P,Reed R M,John A,et al. Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Orleans:Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2009:1-8.

[11] 李建秋,曹建红,段永刚,等.页岩气井渗流机理及产能递减分析[J].天然气勘探与开发,2011,34(2):34-37. Li Jianqiu,Cao Jianhong,Duan Yonggang,et al. Seepage Mechanism and Productivity Decline of Shale Gas Well[J].Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2011,34(2):34-37.

[12] 张焕芝,何艳青. 世界页岩气资源潜力及开发现状[J].石油科技论坛,2010,29(6):53-57,73. Zhang Huanzhi, He Yanqing. The Resource Potential and Development Status of Global Shale Gas[J]. Oil Forum,2010,29(6):53-57,73.

[13] 郭为,熊伟,高树生,等. 页岩气等温吸附/解吸特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(7):2836-2840. Guo Wei,Xiong Wei,Gao Shusheng, et al.Isothermal Adsorption/Desorption Characteristics of Shale Gas[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2013,44(7):2836-2840.

[14] Biryukov D,Kuchuk F J. Transient Pressure Behavior of Reservoirs with Discrete Conductive Faults and Fractures[J]. Transport in Porous Media,2012,95(1):239-268.

[15] 林腊梅,张金川,唐玄,等.南方地区古生界页岩储层含气性主控因素[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(增刊2):88-94. Lin Lamei,Zhang Jinchuan,Tang Xuan, et al. Gas-Bearing Characteristics of Paleozoic Gas Shale Reservoir in South China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2012,42(Sup.2):88-94.

[16] 刘福春,程日辉,解启来,等.松辽盆地梨树断陷页岩气资源潜力评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(3):762-773. Liu Fuchun, Cheng Rihui,Xie Qilai,et al. The Potential Evaluation of Shale Uas Resources of Lishu Fault Depression in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014,44(3):762-773.

[1] 谭家华, 雷宏武. 基于GMS的三维TOUGH2模型及模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1229-1235.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!