吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 48-60.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201701105

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄骅坳陷北部马头营凸起馆陶组砂体成因及展布特征

张建坤, 杨国涛, 吴吉忠, 吴鑫, 王方鲁   

  1. 中国石油冀东油田公司勘探开发研究院, 河北 唐山 063004
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-06 出版日期:2017-01-26 发布日期:2017-01-26
  • 作者简介:张建坤(1984),男,工程师,博士研究生,主要从事开发地震地质综合研究,E-mail:sparkler1984@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05006-006)

Genesis and Distribution Characteristics of Sandstone Bodies in the Guantao Formation of Matouying Uplift, the Northern Huanghua Depression

Zhang Jiankun, Yang Guotao, Wu Jizhong, Wu Xin, Wang Fanglu   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Jidong Oilfield, PetroChina, Tangshan 063004, Hebei, China
  • Received:2016-03-06 Online:2017-01-26 Published:2017-01-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported bythe National Science and Technology Major Project(2016ZX05006-006)

摘要: 综合运用钻井岩心、测井、三维高分辨率地震等资料,对渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷北部马头营凸起馆陶组砂体成因及展布特征进行了系统的研究。结果表明:馆陶组沉积前期发育2条规模大、延伸较远,呈近NS、NNWSSE展布的沟槽,指示物源主要来源于北部燕山褶皱带。馆陶组为冲积扇-辫状河-曲流河沉积序列;馆三下段为冲积扇扇中辫状河道和河道间漫流相,发育扇中辫状河道成因砂体;馆三上段为辫状河道和泛滥平原相,发育河床滞留沉积和心滩成因砂体;馆二段和馆一段为曲流河沉积,河床滞留沉积、边滩、决口扇和天然堤是主要的砂体成因类型。馆陶组可划分为3个长期旋回,7个中期旋回,16~19个短期旋回;以短期旋回为单元,建立了馆二段等时地层对比的高分辨层序地层格架;层序格架控制着砂体的分布模式,馆二段短期旋回的下部砂岩发育,是主要的储集层。层控测井约束反演提高了馆二段薄互层河道砂体预测的精度,馆二段各砂层组反演预测平面砂地比反映河道砂体呈NE-SW向的展布特征。

关键词: 冲积扇-辫状河-曲流河, 高分辨率层序地层, 薄互层河道砂体, 馆陶组, 马头营凸起, 黄骅坳陷北部

Abstract: Genesis and distribution characteristics of sandstone bodies in the Guantao Formation of Matouying uplift was made by means of the core data, logging data and three-dimensional seismic data. The results show that two valleys, being large-scale, extending far, and near north-south and NNWSSE direction, had developed in the presedimentation of Guantao Formation (Ng) of Matouying uplift. The deposition is controlled by north provenance. Alluvial fan, braided river and meandering river sedimentary sequence was formed in the Guantao Formation, among which the lower Member 3 of Guantao Formation is made up of braided channel and interchannel debris flow facies in the middle fan of alluvial fan, and braided channel of middle fan is the genesis of sand body; the upper Member 3 of Guantao Formation consists of braided channel and flood plain facies of braided river, channel lag deposit and channel bar are the genesis of sand bodies; the Member 2 and Member 1 of Guantao Formation are meandering river deposit, and channel lag deposit, point-bar, crevasse splay, and natural levee are the main genetic types of reservoir sand-body. Guantao Formation can be identified as three long-term datum plane cycles, seven middle-term datum plane cycles, and sixteen to nineteen short-term datum plane cycles. The high-resolution isochronous stratigraphic framework can be built using short-term sequence cycles as an isochronous stratigraphic correlation unit. The distribution of sand body model is controlled by sequence stratigraphic framework, and the lower part of short-term sequence cycles with the larger thickness of sandstone is the main reservoir in the Member 2 of Guantao Formation. Well loging constrainted high-resolution inversion improves the reservoir prediction accuracy of thin-layer channel sand body based on high-resolution sequence framework, and the plain distribution of net to gross ratio reflects the NE-SW spreading characteristics of meandering channel sand bodies in the Member 2 of Guantao Formation.

Key words: alluvial fan-braided river-meandering river, high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, thin interbedded channel sand bodies, Guantao Formation, Matouying uplift, northern Huanghua depression

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 张秀丽, 姜岩, 郝兰英, 等. 密井网条件下随机地震反演及其在河道砂体预测中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014, 49(5):954-963. Zhang Xiuli, Jiang Yan, Hao Lanying, et al. Stochastic Seismic Inversion and Channel Sandbody Prediction in Dense Well Pattern Areas[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014, 49(5):954-963.
[2] 陈飞, 胡光义, 范廷恩, 等. 渤海海域W油田新近系明化镇组河流相砂体结构特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(2):207-213. Chen Fei, Hu Guangyi, Fan Ting'en, et al. Sandbody Architecture and Sequence Stratigraphy of Fluvial Facies, Neogene Minghuazhen Formation, W Oilfield, Bohai Bay[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(2):207-213.
[3] Pranter M J, Sommer N K. Static Connectivity of Flu-vial Sandstones in a Lower Coastal-Plain Setting:An Example from the Upper Cretaceous Lower Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(6):899-923.
[4] Fabuel-Perez I, Hodgetts D, Redfern J. A New App-roach for Outcrop Characterization and Geostatistical Analysis of a Low-Sinuosity Fluvial-Dominated Succession Using Digital Outcrop Models:Upper Triassic Oukaimeden Sandstone Formation, Central High Atlas, Morocco[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(6):795-827.
[5] Dong Y, Zhu X, Xian B, et al. Seismic Geomor-phology Study of the Paleogene Hetaoyuan Formation, Central-South Biyang Sag, Nanxiang Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 64:104-124.
[6] Bridge J S, Jalfin G A, Georgieff S M. Geometry, Lithofacies, and Spatial Distribution of Cretaceous Fluvial Sandstone Bodies, San Jorge Basin, Argentina:Outcrop Analog for the Hydrocarbon-Bearing Chubut Group[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2000, 70(2):341-359.
[7] Zhu H, Chen K, Liu K, et al. A Sequence Stra-tigraphic Model for Reservoir Sand-Body Distribution in the Lower Permian Shanxi Formation in the Ordos Basin, Northern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2008, 25(8):731-743.
[8] Lin C S, Zheng H R, Ren J Y, et al. The Control of Syndepositional Faulting on the Eogene Sedimentary Basin Fills of the Dongying and Zhanhua Sags, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Science in China:Series D:Earth Sciences, 2004, 47(9):769-782.
[9] Jiang S, Henriksen S, Wang H, et al. Sequence-Stratigraphic Architectures and Sand-Body Distribution in Cenozoic Rifted Lacustrine Basins, East China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(9):1447-1475.
[10] Fohrmann M, Pecher I A. Analysing Sand-Dominated Channel Systems for Potential Gas-Hydrate-Reservoirs Using an AVO Seismic Inversion Technique on the Southern Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 38(1):19-34.
[11] 魏立花, 杨占龙, 韩小锋, 等. 薄砂体-窄河道地震识别技术研究及其在吐哈盆地SN地区应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(12):2025-2033. Wei Lihua, Yang Zhanlong, Han Xiaofeng, et al. Research and Application of Thin Sand Body-Narrow Channel Seismic Identification Technology in the SN Area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(12):2025-2033.
[12] 边树涛, 狄帮让, 董艳蕾, 等. 地质统计反演在东濮凹陷白庙气田沙三段储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2010, 45(3):398-405. Bian Shutao, Di Bangrang, Dong Yanlei, et al. Application of Geostatistical Inversion in Reservoir Prediction in the Third Member of Shahejie Formation, Baimiao Gas-Field, Dongpu Depression[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 45(3):398-405.
[13] 赵玉新. 黄骅坳陷马头营凹陷带潜山成藏前提剖析[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2014. Zhao Yuxin. The Analysis of Hydrocarbon Accumulation Conditions of the Buried Hill in Matouying-Uplift-Belt in Huanghua Depression[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2014.
[14] 王玉满, 袁选俊, 黄祖熹, 等. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新近系馆陶组沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2004, 5(4):404-413. Wang Yuman, Yuan Xuanjun, Huang Zuxi, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics of the Guantao Formation of Neogene in Nanpu Sag of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2003, 5(4):404-413.
[15] 董月霞, 汪泽成, 郑红菊, 等. 走滑断层作用对南堡凹陷油气成藏的控制[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(4):424-430. Dong Yuexia, Wang Zecheng, Zheng Hongju, et al. Control of Strike-Slip Faulting on Reservoir Formation of Oil and Gas in Nanpu Sag[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(4):424-430.
[16] 丛良滋, 周海民. 南堡凹陷主动裂谷多幕拉张与油气关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1998, 19(4):296-301. Cong Liangzi, Zhou Haimin. Polyphase Pulls and Aparts of Active Rift in Nanpu Depression and Their Relationship with Oil and Gas[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1998, 19(4):296-301.
[17] 刘强虎, 朱红涛, 舒誉, 等. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷古近系恩平组物源体系及其对滩坝的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(3):286-299. Liu Qianghu, Zhu Hongtao, Shu Yu, et al. Provenance Systems and Their Control on the Beach-Bar of Paleogene Enping Formation, Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(3):286-299.
[18] 林畅松, 夏庆龙, 施和生, 等. 地貌演化、源汇过程与盆地分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2015, 22(1):9-20. Lin Changsong, Xia Qinglong, Shi Hesheng, et al. Geomorphological Evolution, Source to Sink System and Basin Analysis[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1):9-20.
[19] 刘士林, 刘蕴华, 林舸, 等. 南堡凹陷新近系馆陶组砂岩地球化学、构造背景和物源探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007, 37(3):475-483. Liu Shilin, Liu Yunhua, Lin Ke, et al. Tectonic Background and Provenance of the Neogene Sandstones Evidenced from Their Chemical Composition, Guantao Formation of Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2007, 37(3):475-483.
[20] 邓宏文, 王洪亮, 李小孟. 高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1997, 18(2):90-95. Deng Hongwen, Wang Hongliang, Li Xiaomeng. Application of High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphic Correlation to Fluvial Facies[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1997, 18(2):90-95.
[21] 邓宏文, 王红亮. 高分辨率层序地层学:原理及应用[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2002. Deng Hongwen, Wang Hongliang. High Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy:Theory and Application[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2002.
[22] 李国永, 徐怀民, 路言秋, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘八区克下组冲积扇高分辨率层序地层学[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 41(3):1124-1131. Li Guoyong, Xu Huaimin, Lu Yanqiu, et al. High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy for Alluvial Fan on Lower Karamay Formation in 8th Zone of Northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2010, 41(3):1124-1131.
[23] 李劲松, 郑晓东, 高志勇, 等. 高分辨率层序地层学在提高储集层预测精度中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(4):448-455. Li Jinsong, Zheng Xiaodong, Gao Zhiyong, et al. Application of High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy in Improving the Precision of Reservoir Prediction[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(4):448-455.
[1] 刘海, 林承焰, 张宪国, 王宏伟, 付晓亮, 李佳. 孔店油田馆陶组辫状河储层构型及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 665-677.
[2] 谭聪, 于炳松, 阮壮, 刘策, 朱玺, 谢灏辰, 罗忠. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组高分辨率层序地层划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 336-347.
[3] 姜洪福,张世广. 复杂断块油田高分辨率层序地层学及砂体几何学特征--以海塔盆地贝尔凹陷呼和诺仁油田贝301区块南屯组二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1419-1431.
[4] 薛林福, 孙晶, 白烨, 潘保芝, 王建强. 黄骅坳陷孔南地区沙河街组井震基准面旋回匹配[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 935-940.
[5] 张世广, 柳成志, 卢双舫, 张雁, 吴高平, 刘秋宏. 高分辨率层序地层学在河、湖、三角洲复合沉积体系的应用--以朝阳沟油田扶余油层开发区块为例[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 361-368.
[6] 王 蛟. 山东沾化凹陷孤岛油田馆上段浅水湖泊沉积[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 500-0505.
[7] 刘士林,刘蕴华,林 舸,周 叶,龚发雄,张德圣. 南堡凹陷新近系馆陶组砂岩地球化学、构造背景和物源探讨[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 475-0483.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!