天然气水合物开采过程甲烷气泄漏海床基高密度电阻率法监测效果模拟与分析

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170292

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 1854-1864.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170292

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇

天然气水合物开采过程甲烷气泄漏海床基高密度电阻率法监测效果模拟与分析

吴景鑫¹, 郭秀军^1,2,3, 贾永刚^1,2,3, 孙翔¹, 李宁¹

1. 中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院, 山东青岛 266100;
2. 山东省海洋环境地质工程重点实验室, 山东青岛 266100;
3. 海洋环境与生态教育部重点实验室, 山东青岛 266100

收稿日期:2018-09-07 发布日期:2018-11-26
通讯作者: 郭秀军(1972-),男,教授,主要从事海洋地质环境监测技术研究及装备开发,E-mail:guojunqd@ouc.edu.cn E-mail:guojunqd@ouc.edu.cn
作者简介:吴景鑫(1993-),男,助理研究员,主要从事水合物开采监测技术研究,E-mail:656264243@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发项目（2017YFC0307701）；国家自然科学基金项目（41772307，41427803）

Numerical Evaluation of Electrical Resistance Tomography Monitoring of Sea Bed Basement Effect on Methane Leaks During Hydrate Production

Wu Jingxin¹, Guo Xiujun^1,2,3, Jia Yonggang^1,2,3, Sun Xiang¹, Li Ning¹

1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China;
2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Geological Engineering(Ocean University of China), Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China

Received:2018-09-07 Published:2018-11-26
Supported by:
Supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0307701) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772307, 41427803)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为实现天然气水合物开采过程沉积物内甲烷气泄漏过程有效监测，设计了一种海床基原位电学监测方法。为界定该方法对不同模式泄露甲烷气的探测能力，以南海神狐海域天然气水合物试采区为研究区，构建相应地质及电阻率模型，模拟利用设计电学系统对其进行监测，计算得到不同采集参数的电阻率剖面，并对其进行对比分析。研究结果表明：海水层会在探测剖面上某深度区间内形成层状低阻异常带，对该深度区间有效电信号形成压制。将该异常带顶界深度定义为系统有效探测深度后，发现该深度受电极距直接影响，10 m极距偶极装置有效探测深度约为50 m。电学探测剖面对有效探测深度内分布的层状和团状甲烷气聚集区、慢速甲烷气泄露区、沿断层泄露的甲烷气区具有良好反映能力，数据处理得到的相对电阻率剖面与电学探测剖面相比能更好地反映甲烷气聚集区边界。该监测方法能够实时监测含气区空间变化。

关键词: 天然气水合物, 甲烷气泄漏, 电阻率成像法, 探测剖面异常特征

Abstract: In order to effectively detect methane leakage of a sedimentary layer, we designed an in situ electricity monitoring system used in sea floor. The Shenhu gas hydrate production area in South China Sea was selected as the target area, and the corresponding geological models and resistivity models were established to evaluate the detection the capability of the system for methane leakage. The resistivity profiles with different acquisition parameters were calculated and analyzed by simulating and monitoring them with the designed electrical system. The simulation results indicate that the seawater forms a low-resistance stripe concomitant anomaly in a depth range of the detection profile, which suppress electrical signals in corresponding to its position. The top position of the concomitant anomaly can be defined as the effective monitoring depth. The effective monitoring depth is directly affected by the electrode distance, and the effective monitoring depth of the 10 m dipole-dipole array is about 50 m. Within the effective monitoring depth, the detection profile has a good reflection in a layered, agglomerate methane gathering area and a slow methane leaking area. The relative resistivity profiles obtained from the data processing can better reflect the boundaries of methane accumulation zones than electrical profiles. This in situ electricity monitoring system can effectively monitor the spatial variation of a methane leakage area in real time.

Key words: gas hydrate, methane leakage, electrical resistivity tomography, abnormal characteristics of detection profile

中图分类号:

P738

吴景鑫, 郭秀军, 贾永刚, 孙翔, 李宁. 天然气水合物开采过程甲烷气泄漏海床基高密度电阻率法监测效果模拟与分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1854-1864.

Wu Jingxin, Guo Xiujun, Jia Yonggang, Sun Xiang, Li Ning. Numerical Evaluation of Electrical Resistance Tomography Monitoring of Sea Bed Basement Effect on Methane Leaks During Hydrate Production[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1854-1864.

参考文献

[1] Li X S, Xu C G, Zhang Y, et al. Investigation into Gas Production from Natural Gas Hydrate:A Review[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 172:286-322.
[2] Nagakubo S, Arata N, Yabe I, et al. Environmental Impact Assessment Study on Japan's Methane Hydrate R&D Program[J]. Fire Ice, 2011, 11:4-11.
[3] Waarum I K, Sparrevik P, Kvistedal Y, et al. Innovative Methods for Methane Leakage Monitoring near Oil and Gas Installations[C]//Offshore Technology Conference. Houston:Offshore Technology Conference, 2016:OTC-27036-MS.
[4] Takahashi H, Asakawa E, Hayashi T, et al.Development of Ocean Bottom Multi-Component Seismic System for Methane Hydrate Dissociation Monitoring[C]//Offshore Technology Conference. Houston:Offshore Technology Conference, 2013:OTC-24115-MS.
[5] Schütze C, Sauer U, Beyer K, et al. Natural Analogues:A Potential Approach for Developing Reliable Monitoring Methods to Understand Subsurface CO₂ Migration Processes[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 67(2):411-423.
[6] Mendonça C A, Doherty R, Amaral N D, et al. Resistivity and Induced Polarization Monitoring of Biogas Combined with Microbial Ecology at a Brownfield Site[J]. Interpretation, 2015, 3(4):SAB43-SAB56.
[7] Terry N, Slater L, Comas X, et al. Free Phase Gas Processes in a Northern Peatland Inferred from Autonomous Field-Scale Resistivity Imaging[J]. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(4):2996-3018.
[8] Breen S J, Carrigan C R,LaBrecque D J, et al. Bench-Scale Experiments to Evaluate Electrical Resistivity Tomography as a Monitoring Tool for Geologic CO₂ Sequestration[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 9:484-494.
[9] 尚可旭, 郭秀军, 吴景鑫,等. 冷泉气体渗漏过程海洋多电极电阻率法探测效果模拟分析[J]. 海洋学报, 2017, 39(11):85-96. Shang Kexu, Guo Xiujun, Wu Jingxin, et al. Detecting Cold Spring Gas Leakage in Seabed Sediment with Marine Multi-Eletrode Resistivity Method:Numerical Simulation and Experiment[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2017, 39(11):85-96.
[10] Zhang H Q, Yang S X, Wu N Y, et al. Successful and Surprising Results for China's First Gas Hydrate Drilling Expedition[J]. Fire in the Ice:Methane Hydrate Newsletter, 2007, 7(3):6-9.
[11] 吴时国, 董冬冬, 杨胜雄,等. 南海北部陆坡细粒沉积物天然气水合物系统的形成模式初探[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009,52(7):1849-1857. Wu Shiguo, Dong Dongdong, Yang Shengxiong, et al. Genetic Model of the Hydrate System in the Fine Grain Sediments in the Northern Continental Slope of South China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(7):1849-1857.
[12] 杨胜雄, 张明, 梁金强,等. 神狐海域钻探发现大型天然气水合物矿体[J]. 中国地质调查成果快讯, 2016, 3(21):6-8. Yang Shengxiong, Zhang Ming, Liang Jinqiang, et al. Discovery of Large Natural Gas Hydrate Orebody in Drilling of the Shenhu Area[J]. News of the Achievements of China's Geological Survey, 2016, 3(21):6-8.
[13] 苏丕波, 尉建功. 神狐海域首次发现Ⅱ型天然气水合物[J]. 中国地质调查成果快讯, 2016,3(21):23-26. Su Pibo, Wei Jiangong. First Discovery of Type Ⅱ Gas Hydrates of the Shenhu Area[J]. News of the Achievements of China's Geological Survey, 2016, 3(21):23-26.
[14] 胡高伟, 李彦龙, 吴能友, 等. 神狐海域W18/19站位天然气水合物上覆层不排水抗剪强度预测[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2017, 37(5):151-158. Hu Gaowei, Li Yanlong, Wu Nengyou, et al. Undrained Shear Strength Estimation of the Cover Layer of Hydrate at Site W18/19 of Shenhu Area[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2017, 37(5):151-158.
[15] Sun J, Ning F, Li S, et al. Numerical Simulation of Gas Production from Hydrate-Bearing Sediments in the Shenhu Area by Depressurising:The Effect of Burden Permeability[J]. Journal of Unconventional Oil & Gas Resources, 2015, 12:23-33.
[16] 尚久靖, 郭依群, 龚跃华,等. 神狐海域天然气水合物钻探区沉积体系研究[J]. 中国地质调查成果快讯, 2016, 3(21):19-22. Shang Jiujing, Guo Yiqun, Gong Yuehua, et al. Study on Sedimentary System of Gas Hydrate Drilling Area of the Shenhu Area[J]. News of the Achievements of China's Geological Survey, 2016, 3(21):19-22.
[17] 陈忠, 颜文, 陈木宏,等. 海底天然气水合物分解与甲烷归宿研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(4):394-400. Chen Zhong, Yan Wen, Chen Muhong, et al. Advances in Gas Hydrate Dissociation and Fate of Methane in Marine Sediment[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2006, 21(4):394-400.
[18] 乔少华, 苏明, 杨睿,等. 运聚体系:天然气水合物不均匀性分布的关键控制因素初探[J]. 新能源进展, 2013(3):245-256. Qiao Shaohua, Su Ming, Yang Rui, et al. Migration and Accumulation System:The Key Control Factors of Heterogeneous Distribution of Gas Hydrate[J]. Advances in New and Renewable Energy, 2013(3):245-256.
[19] Naudts L, Greinert J, Poort J, et al. Active Venting Sites on the Gas-Hydrate-Bearing Hikurangi Margin, off New Zealand:Diffusive-Versus Bubble-Released Methane[J]. Marine Geology, 2010, 272(1/2/3/4):233-250.
[20] 王秀娟, 吴时国, 王吉亮,等. 南海北部神狐海域天然气水合物分解的测井异常[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(8):2799-2807. Wang Xiujuan, Wu Shiguo, Wang Jiliang, et al. Anomalous Wireline Logging Data Caused by Gas Hydrate Dissociation in the Shenhu Area, Northern Slope of South China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(8):2799-2807.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

天然气水合物开采过程甲烷气泄漏海床基高密度电阻率法监测效果模拟与分析

Numerical Evaluation of Electrical Resistance Tomography Monitoring of Sea Bed Basement Effect on Methane Leaks During Hydrate Production

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	龚跃华, 杨胜雄, 王宏斌, 梁金强, 梁劲. 琼东南盆地天然气水合物成矿远景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1030-1042.
[2]	安振芳, 张进, 张建中. 海洋三维VC观测系统优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 271-284.
[3]	陈树旺，甄甄，黄欣，周永恒，鲍庆中，段瑞炎. 俄罗斯东部地区油气资源远景分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1768-1778.
[4]	孙忠军，杨志斌，秦爱华，张富贵，周亚龙. 中纬度带天然气水合物地球化学勘查技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1063-1070.
[5]	王霄飞, 李三忠，龚跃华，刘鑫，索艳慧，戴黎明，马云，张丙坤. 南海北部活动构造及其对天然气水合物的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 419-431.
[6]	莫修文, 陆敬安, 沙志彬, 马龙. 确定天然气水合物饱和度的测井解释新方法[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 921-927.
[7]	郭威, 孙友宏, 陈晨, 张祖培. 陆地天然气水合物孔底冷冻取样方法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1116-1120.
[8]	刘云鹤, 陈玉玲, 翁爱华. 多层介质点电流源磁场响应计算[J]. J4, 2009, 39(5): 918-922.