查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201704107

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1047-1059.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201704107

查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析

牛子铖^1,2, 柳广第^1,2, 国殿斌³, 王朋⁴, 张家舲⁵, 赵其磊³

1. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京) 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
3. 中国石化中原油田分公司勘探开发科学研究院, 河南濮阳 457001;
4. 中国石油长庆油田分公司第十采油厂, 甘肃庆阳 745600;
5. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球物理与信息工程学院, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2016-09-25 出版日期:2017-07-26 发布日期:2017-07-26
作者简介:牛子铖(1989),男,博士研究生,主要从事油气藏形成机理与分布规律研究,E-mail:zichengniu@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41472114）

Maturity Difference of Crude Oil and Its Cause Analysis Between Different Fault Steps in the Central Structural Belts of Chagan Sag

Niu Zicheng^1,2, Liu Guangdi^1,2, Guo Dianbin³, Wang Peng⁴, Zhang Jialing⁵, Zhao Qilei³

1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Zhongyuan Oilfield Branch Company, SINOPEC, Puyang 457001, Henan, China;
4. Tenth Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Changqing Qilfield Company, Qingyang 745600, Gansu, China;
5. College of Geophysics and Information Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2016-09-25 Online:2017-07-26 Published:2017-07-26
Supported by:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(41472114)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 查干凹陷中央构造带被巴润断裂系分隔成多个断阶，东侧第一断阶和第二断阶含油范围小而西侧第三断阶和第四断阶含油范围大。东部断阶原油成熟度高而西侧断阶原油成熟度低，表现为：第一断阶和第二断阶CPI大多数大于1.20，OEP多数大于1.30，Pr/Ph多数在0.60以下，Ph/nC₁₈普遍高于1.00；第三断阶和第四断阶CPI和OEP小于1.20，Pr/Ph多数在0.60以上，Ph/nC₁₈普遍小于1.00。通过规则甾烷分布特征和原油成熟度特征的分析，确定靠近洼陷的第三和第四断阶的原油更多来自于洼陷中心的烃源岩供烃，而第一断阶和第二断阶则主要是构造带本地烃源岩供烃。钻井、测井资料表明，断层发育诱导裂缝带和滑动破碎带，其中滑动破碎带物性较差，具有良好的封堵性能。非线性随机反演结果表明，巴润3号断层南段致密滑动破碎带稳定发育。断层生长指数研究表明，断层主要在苏二晚期活动，并且巴润3号断层活动性较弱。研究区断层SGR普遍在25%以上，在断层静止期具有良好的封闭性。烃源岩生排烃史模拟和流体包裹体均一温度分析表明，中央构造带主要成藏时间为苏二末期—银根早期，成藏期巴润3号断层由于活动强度较弱，同时沿着断层致密滑动破碎带发育，导致洼陷中形成的原油不易穿过3号断层继续向构造带东侧运移；因此第一断阶和第二断阶主要依赖本地烃源岩供烃，而第三第四断阶为洼陷中心供烃，烃源岩的差异最终导致了不同断阶带原油成熟度的差异。

关键词: 查干凹陷, 原油成熟度, 断裂带结构, 断裂活动性, 成藏模式

Abstract: The central structural belt of Chagan Sag is cut into several fault steps by the Barun fault system, and the oil bearing range in western fault steps is larger than that in the eastern fault steps. The oil CPI in the western fault steps is higher than 1.20, OEP higher than 1.30, Pr/Ph lower than 0.60, and Ph/nC₁₈ higher than 1.00; while the oil CPI and OEP in the eastern fault steps are lower than 1.20, Pr/Ph higher than 0.60, and Ph/nC₁₈ lower than 1.00, indicating the oil maturity is high in the western fault steps. The regular sterane distribution and maturity demonstrate that the oil in the western fault steps was derived from source rocks in the central structure belt; while the oil in the eastern fault steps was derived from source rocks in Hule sub-sag. Internal structures of the fault zones were analyzed using drilling and logging data, and the results reveal that the fault zones are composed of central sliding breaking zones and their induced fractures zones. The sealing capacity of the central sliding breaking zones is better than that of the induced as a result of low permeability. The tight sliding breaking zone is steadily distributed based on a seismic velocity data analysis on the fault that separates the western and eastern fault steps. The faults were active during the deposition of the second member of Suhongtu Formation according to the fault activity analysis. SGR values of the faults are greater than 25%, indicating their excellent sealing capacity. Hydrocarbons accumulated in k₁s²-k₁y according to the result of source rock generation history modeling and fluid inclusion analysis. Since the activity of Barun 3 fault was weak during the hydrocarbon accumulation period and the tight sliding breaking zone is steadily distributed, hydrocarbons expulsed from the Hule sub-sag cannot migrate to the western fault steps. Different source rocks led to the maturity difference of crude oil in different fault steps.

Key words: Chagan sag, maturity of oil, fault structure, fault activity, hydrocarbon accumulation model

中图分类号:

TE122.3

牛子铖, 柳广第, 国殿斌, 王朋, 张家舲, 赵其磊. 查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1047-1059.

Niu Zicheng, Liu Guangdi, Guo Dianbin, Wang Peng, Zhang Jialing, Zhao Qilei. Maturity Difference of Crude Oil and Its Cause Analysis Between Different Fault Steps in the Central Structural Belts of Chagan Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1047-1059.

参考文献

[1] 王朋, 柳广弟, 曹喆, 等. 查干凹陷下白垩统有效烃源岩识别及其控藏作用[J]. 岩性油气藏,2015, 27(2):18-25. Wang Peng, Liu Guangdi, Cao Zhe,et al. Identification of Effective Source Rocks of Lower Cretaceous and Its Controlling on Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Chagan Depression [J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2015, 27(2):18-25.
[2] 张放东, 王学军, 饶蕾, 等. 查干凹陷巴二段有效储层控制因素分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(3):35-44. Zhang Fangdong, Wang Xuejun, Rao Lei,et al. Main Controlling Factors of Effective Reservoir in the Second Section of Bayingebi of Chagan Sag [J] Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(3):35-44.
[3] 魏巍, 朱筱敏, 谈明轩, 等. 查干凹陷下白垩统扇三角洲相储层特征及物性影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3):447-455. Wei Wei, Zhu Xiaomin, Tan Mingxuan, et al. Reservoir Characteristics and Influenceson Poroperm Characteristics of the Lower Cretaceous Fan-Delta Faciesin Chagan Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(3):447-455.
[4] 刘鑫金, 冯阵东, 李聪, 等. 近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨:以查干凹陷祥6井区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017,47(2):393-404. Liu Xinjin, Feng Zhendong, Li Cong, et al. Discussion of Secondary Dissolved Pore Origin in Near Source Sandy Conglomerate Reservoir: A Case Study of Xiang 6 Well Area in Chagan Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017,47(2):393-404.
[5] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 等. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用:以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2017,47 (2):370-381. Zhang Bowei, Fu Guang, Zhang Juhe, et al. Fracture Development in Oil Migrating Fault Transition Zones Its Control on Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation: A Case Study of Es₂ Oil Formation of Yilunpu Structure of Wen'an Slope of Jizhong Depression[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2):370-381.
[6] 王冠民, 庞小军, 张雪芳, 等. 渤中凹陷古近系石南断层活动性及其对油气成藏条件的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(6):859-866. Wang Guanmin, Pang Xiaojun, Zhang Xuefang, et al. Activity of Shinan Fault and Its Controlon Hydrocarbon Accumulationin the Paleogene in Bozhong Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(6): 859-866.
[7] 许新明, 陈胜红, 王福国, 等. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷断层特征及其对新近系油气成藏的影响[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(3):543-550. Xu Xinming, Chen Shenghong, Wang Fuguo, et al. Structure Features and Its Impactson Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Neogene Enping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2014, 28 (3):543-550.
[8] 郭彦如, 王新民, 樊太亮, 等. 层序地层框架下的含油气系统:以查干凹陷下白垩统为例[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2006,25(3):1-4. Guo Yanru, Wang Xinmin, Fan Tailiang, et al. Petroleum System Basedon Sequence Stratigraphic Setting: A Case Study on Lower Cretaceous in Chagan Sag [J]. Petroleum Geology & Oil Field Development in Daqing, 2006,25(3): 1-4.
[9] Peters K E, Walters C C, Moldowan J M. The Biomarker Guide: Volume 2: Biomarkers and Isotopes in Petroleum Systems and Earth History[M]. 2nd ed. London: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[10] Huang W Y, Meinschein W G. Sterols as Ecological Indicators [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1997, 43: 739–745.
[11] Choi J, Edwards P, Ko K, et al. Definition and Classification of Fault Damage Zones: A Review and a New Methodological Approach [J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 152:70-87.
[12] 付晓飞, 方德庆, 吕延防, 等. 从断裂带内部结构出发评价断层垂向封闭性的方法[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2005, 30(3):328-336. Fu Xiaofei,Fang Deqing, Lü Yanfang, et al. Method of Evaluating Vertical Sealing of Faults in Terms of the Internal Structure of Fault Zones [J]. Earth Science: Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2005, 30 (3): 328 -336.
[13] 陈伟, 吴智平, 侯峰, 等. 断裂带内部结构特征及其与油气运聚关系[J]. 石油学报, 2010 31(5):774-780. Chen Wei, Wu Zhiping, Hou Feng, et al. Internal Structure of Fault Zones and Their Relationship with Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(5): 774-780.
[14] 金强, 周进峰, 王端平, 等. 断层破碎带识别及其在断块油田开发中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(1):82-89. Jin Qiang, Zhou Jinfeng, Wang Duanping, et al. Identification of Shattered Fault Zones and Its Application in Development of Fault-Block Oilfields [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(1):82-89.
[15] 黄捍东, 罗群, 付艳, 等.地震相控非线性随机反演研究与应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2007, 42(6): 694-698. Huang Handong, Luo Qun, Fu Yan, et al. Study and Application of Seismic Phase-Controlled Non-Linear Random Inversion [J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2007, 42 (6): 694 -698.
[16] 刘培, 蒋有录, 刘华, 等. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷断层活动与新近系油气成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013,24(3):541-547. Liu Pei, Jiang Youlu, Liu Hua, et al. The Relationship Between Fault-Activity and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Neogene in Zhanhua Depression, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(3):541-547.
[17] 孟令东, 付晓飞, 吕延防. 碎屑岩层系中张性正断层封闭性影响因素的定量分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32(2):15-28. Meng Lingdong, Fu Xiaofei, Lü Yanfang. Quantitive Analysis of Fault Seal Influencing Factors of Extensional Normal Fault in Clastic Rock Formations [J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(2):15-28.
[18] Yielding G. Shale Gouge Ratio-Calibration by Geohi- story [J]. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 2002, 11:1-15.
[19] 杨智, 何生, 王锦喜,等. 断层泥比率(SGR)及其在断层侧向封闭性评价中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学,2005,16(3):347-351. Yang Zhi, He Sheng, Wang Jinxi, et al. Shale Gouge Ratio and Its Application in the Fault Seal Estimation Across the Faulted Zone [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2005, 16(3):347-351.
[20] 王学军, 苏惠, 曾溅辉,等. 东濮凹陷西部斜坡带长垣断层封闭性及其输导模式[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2012,19(4):5-9. Wang Xuejun, Su Hui, Zeng Jianhui, et al. Fault Sealing and Oil-Gas Migration Patterns of Changyuan on Western Slope, Dongpu Depression [J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(4):5-9.
[21] 魏艳萍. 渤南洼陷断层封闭性评价:以义37断块为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2008,15(4):36-38. Wei Yanping. Evaluation of Fault Sealing Capacity in Bonan Sag-Taking Yi 37 Fault Block as an Example [J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(4):36-38.
[22] 左银辉, 张旺, 李兆影, 等. 查干凹陷中、新生代构造-热演化史[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(7):2366-2379. Zuo Yinhui, Zhang Wang, Li Zhaoying, et al. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Tectono-Thermal Evolution History in the Chagan Sag, Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal Geophysics, 58(7):2366-2379.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析

Maturity Difference of Crude Oil and Its Cause Analysis Between Different Fault Steps in the Central Structural Belts of Chagan Sag

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘鑫金, 冯阵东, 李聪, 周艳, 王亚明. 近源湖盆砂砾岩储层次生溶孔成因探讨——以查干凹陷祥6井区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 393-404.
[2]	林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[3]	高帅, 马世忠, 庞雄奇, 巩磊, 陈昶旭, 高昂, 秦旗. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系油气成藏主控因素定量分析及有利区预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 36-45.
[4]	冯方, 王晓杰, 吕本勋, 吴小斌, 李海燕. 亚诺斯前陆盆地MM油田成藏规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1269-1277.
[5]	孙忠军，杨志斌，秦爱华，张富贵，周亚龙. 中纬度带天然气水合物地球化学勘查技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1063-1070.
[6]	郄莹，付晓飞，孟令东，许鹏. 碳酸盐岩内断裂带结构及其与油气成藏[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 749-761.
[7]	付晓飞，肖建华，孟令东. 断裂在纯净砂岩中的变形机制及断裂带内部结构[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1): 25-37.
[8]	刘华，蒋有录，徐浩清，宋国奇，蔡东梅. 东营凹陷民丰地区深层裂解气藏成因类型与成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1638-1646.
[9]	李军辉. 海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷下白垩统层序构成样式及油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 961-969.
[10]	梁积伟, 蔡玥, 付国民, 宋岩, 张放东, 刘绍光. 白音查干凹陷桑合地区油气来源[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 327-334.
[11]	范泓澈, 黄志龙, 袁剑, 高岗, 童传新. 富甲烷天然气溶解实验及水溶气析离成藏特征[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1033-1039.
[12]	杨光, 赵占银, 张伟. 松辽盆地南部无机CO₂成藏机理与分布[J]. J4, 2010, 40(4): 932-938.
[13]	张雷, 卢双舫, 张学娟, 付广, 刘国志, 何欣. 松辽盆地三肇地区扶杨油层油气成藏过程主控因素及成藏模式[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 491-502.
[14]	刘宗堡, 吕延防, 付晓飞, 付广, 李迪, 李晓伟. 三肇凹陷扶余油层沉积特征及油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 998-1006.
[15]	王文明，王成文. 尚家地区葡萄花油层成藏模式及主控因素[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 37-0044.