吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 857-865.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190095

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    

土石围堰中混凝土防渗墙设计方案的数值优化

王常明1, 鲁鋆1, 马栋和2   

  1. 1. 吉林大学建设工程学院, 长春 130026;
    2. 中水东北勘测设计研究有限责任公司, 长春 130061
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-22 发布日期:2020-05-29
  • 作者简介:王常明(1966-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学和大坝渗流方面的教学与研究,E-mail:wangcm@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41572257,41972267)

Numerical Optimization of Design Schemes for ConcreteCutoff Wall in Earth-Rock Cofferdam

Wang Changming1, Lu Yun1, Ma Donghe2   

  1. 1. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    2. China Water Northeastern Investigation, Design and Research Co., Ltd., Changchun 130061, China
  • Received:2019-05-22 Published:2020-05-29
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572257,41972267)

摘要: 土石围堰中防渗墙的结构对坝基渗流量及坝体稳定性具有重要的影响,因此优化防渗墙的尺寸十分有必要。本文以珠江流域某水利枢纽工程施工中的土石围堰为例,采用有限元法,对防渗墙的厚度和嵌入弱风化层基岩的深度进行了优化研究,分别模拟了有防渗墙和无防渗墙两种情况下围堰的防渗效果,共设计了33种计算方案。将坝基单宽渗流量、防渗墙后作用水头、防渗墙底部和坝脚溢出点的水力比降分别与其允许值进行了对比分析,提出了防渗墙的优化尺寸。研究结果表明:防渗墙厚度的变化对防渗效果影响较小;增大防渗墙的入岩深度,可以有效控制本围堰工程的单宽渗流量和防渗墙后作用水头;防渗墙底部水力比降的变化与防渗墙入岩深度有关,当入岩深度在0~8 m时,水力比降随入岩深度的增大而减小并呈先快后慢的趋势,当入岩深度在8~12 m时,水力比降随入岩深度的增大而增大,超过10 m时水力比降骤增。考虑经济因素和施工的方便性,满足防渗设计要求的防渗墙最优设计参数为厚度0.8 m、嵌入弱风化层基岩深度2 m。

关键词: 土石围堰, 混凝土防渗墙, 优化设计, 水力比降, 渗流量

Abstract: It is necessary to select an optimal scheme of cutoff wall for earth-rock cofferdams, because the structure of the cutoff wall in the earth-rock cofferdam has an important influence on the seepage flow and the stability of cofferdam. In this paper, the optimal design of the thickness and depth of cutoff wall is studied by finite element method (FEM) taking as an example of a certain earth-rock cofferdam for construction, which is located in the Pearl River basin. The seepage fields based on 33 types of cutoff wall scheme which is composed of no concrete cutoff wall and 32 types of concrete cutoff wall about its thickness and its embedded depth within the weakly weathered rock were simulated. Then the control index, such as the seepage per unit width of cofferdam, the water head behind the cutoff wall, the hydraulic gradient at the bottom of cutoff wall and the cofferdam foot, were calculated and compared with the allowable value. Finally, the optimized anti-seepage scheme of cutoff wall was obtained. The conclusions made are as follows:1) Comparing with the thickness of cutoff wall, increasing the embedded depth within the rock can control more effectively the seepage per unit width of cofferdam and the height of the water head behind cutoff wall. 2) The change of hydraulic gradient at the bottom of cutoff wall is related to the depth of cutoff wall within the weakly weathered rock. Increasing the depth of cutoff wall from 0 to 8 m, the hydraulic gradient will decrease and will change from fast to slow. When the depth increases from 8 to 12 m, the hydraulic gradient will increase with the embedded depth and there is a significant increase after 10 m. 3) The cutoff wall with 0.8 m in thickness and 2 m in embedded depth within weakly weathered rock is regarded as the optimal anti-seepage scheme for this project after considering the project input and construction convenience. The results not only provide a basis for the design of the earth-rock cofferdam, but also provide a reference for the anti-seepage system of proposed earth-rock cofferdam projects under the same geological conditions.

Key words: earth-rock cofferdam, concrete cutoff wall, optimal design, hydraulic gradient, seepage flow

中图分类号: 

  • TV223.4
[1] 毛昶熙. 渗流计算分析与控制[M]2版.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003. Mao Changxi. Seepage Computation Analysis and Control[M].2nd ed. Beijing:China Water & Power Press,2003.
[2] 王学武,党发宁,蒋力,等.深厚复杂覆盖层上高土石围堰三维渗透稳定性分析[J].水利学报,2010,41(9):1074-1078,1086. Wang Xuewu, Dang Faning, Jang Li, et al. Three-Dimensional Seepage Stability Analysis of High Earth-Rock Cofferdam Built on Complex Layer of Deep Coverage[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010,41(9):1074-1078,1086.
[3] Soleymani S, Akhtarpur A. Seepage Analysis for Shurijeh Reservoir Dam Using Finite Element Method[J]. Geo-Frontiers Advances in Geotechnical Engineering,2011,4:3227-3234.
[4] Fan Yunyun, Tang Chuan, Wang Enzhi. Seepage Calculation and Analysis of the Upstream Earth-Rock Cofferdam of the Pinecone Hydropower Station[J/OL]. Applied Mechanics and Materials.2012,343:2017-2022.doi:10.4028/www.scientific. net/AMM.170-173.2017.
[5] 冶雪艳,杜新强,杨悦锁.绥化市红兴水库渗漏分析及渗控方案模拟预测[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2010,40(1):128-133. Ye Xueyan, Du Xinqiang, Yang Yuesuo. Seepage Analysis and Forecast of the Seepage-Control Schemes of Hongxing Reservior in Suihua City[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2010,40(1):128-133.
[6] 王恩志,鲁岐峰,孙雄.软基重力坝防渗帷幕优化设计分析[J].水利水电技术,1999(12):25-27. Wang Enzhi, Lu Qifeng, Sun Xiong. Impervious Wall Optimization Design of Gravity Dam on Pebble Foundation[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,1999(12):25-27.
[7] Xie Xinghua, Lu Jun, Tan Yefei, et al. A Study on Optimal Depth of Impervious Wall in Deep Overburden Under Earth Dam Basement[C]//Wang Zhaoyin, Li Xingwei, Gao Jizhang, et al. 35th IAHR World Congress.Chengdu:Sichuan University, 2013:396-397.
[8] 辛欣.防渗墙深度优化及其防渗效果研究[J].水电能源科学,2017,35(12):131-134,147. Xin Xin. Study on Optimization of Anti-Seepage Wall Depth and Seepage Control Effect[J]. Water Resources and Power,2017,35(12):131-134,147.
[9] Sainov M P,Soroka V B. Ultra-High Rockfill Dam with Combination of the Reinforced Concrete Face and Clay-Cement Diaphragm[J]. Magazine of Civil Engineering,2018,81(5):135-148.doi:10.18720/MCE.81.14.
[10] 张宜虎,尹红梅,杨裕云,等.燕山水库坝基防渗墙优化设计[J].岩土力学,2005,26(7):1161-1164. Zhang Yihu, Yin Hongmei, Yang Yuyun, et al. Optimized Design of Anti-Seepage Wall of Yanshan Reservoir's Dam Foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2005,26(7):1161-1164.
[11] 王德咏,罗先启,张振华,等.王庆坨水库坝基防渗墙优化研究[J].人民长江,2009,40(15):77-79. Wang Deyong, Luo Xianqi, Zhang Zhenhua, et al. Optimized Design of Anti-Seepage Wall of Wangqingtuo Reservoir's Dam Foundation[J]. Yangtze River,2009,40(15):77-79.
[12] 郑重阳,彭辉,闫秦龙,等.吊江岩水电站覆盖层地基防渗墙优化设计[J].水力发电,2012,38(12):31-34. Zheng Chongyang, Peng Hui, Yan Qinlong, et al. Design Optimization of Cutoff Wall in Dam Foundation with Deep Overburden in Diaojiangyan Hydropower Station[J]. Water Power,2012,38(12):31-34.
[13] 侯晓萍,徐青,杨志明.黄河山坪电站船闸地基渗控措施优化[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2012,45(5):584-589. Hou Xiaoping, Xu Qing, Yang Zhiming. Seepage Control Measure Optimization for Shanping Ship Lock Foundation in Yellow River[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University,2012,45(5):584-589.
[14] 党发宁,田红梅,王振华.基于平衡防渗原理的土石坝防渗帷幕优化设计[J].水利水电科技进展,2015,35(4):44-48,64. Dang Faning, Tian Hongmei, Wang Zhenhua. Optimal Design of Embankment Dam Anti-Seepage Curtain Based on Equilibrium Seepage Control Principle[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources,2015,35(4):44-48,64.
[15] 曹先玉,钱双强,路世贵.均质土坝土工膜防渗渗流有限元计算[J].山东水利,1999(5):29-30. Cao Xianyu, Qian Shuangqiang, Lu Shigui. Finite Element Calculation of Seepage Prevention of Geomembrane in a Tomogeneous Earth Dam[J]. Shandong Water Resources,1999(5):29-30.
[16] 《土工合成材料工程应用手册》编写委员会.土工合成材料工程应用手册[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000:130. Engineering Application Manual for Geosynthetic Materials Compilation Committee. Engineering Application Manual for Geosynthetic Materials[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2000:130.
[17] 许季军,张家发,程展林.堤防半封闭式防渗墙防渗机理及设计参数研究[J].人民长江,2001(5):42-43,48. Xu Jijun, Zhang Jiafa, Cheng Zhanlin. A Study on Anti-Seepage Mechanism and Design Parameters of Semi-Enclosed Cutoff Wall in Dike Construction[J]. Yangtze River,2001(5):42-43,48.
[18] 高钟璞.大坝基础防渗墙[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2000:22,31. Gao Zhongpu. Cutoff Wall of Dam Foundation[M]. Beijing:China Electric Power Press,2000:22,31.
[19] 刘豪杰,任杰,杨杰,等.深厚覆盖层土石坝渗流控制及三维数值分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2018,29(2):219-228. Liu Haojie, Ren Jie, Yang Jie, et al. The Seepage Control and Three-Dimensional Numerical Analysis of Earth-Rock Dam on Deep Overburden Foundation[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering,2018,29(2):219-228.
[20] 张景秀.坝基防渗与灌浆技术:[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1992. Zhang Jingxiu. Anti-Seepage Grouting Technology in Dam Foundation[M]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press,1992.
[21] 刘杰.土的渗透破坏及控制研究[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2014:65-70. Liu Jie. Study on the Seepage Failure and Control of Soil[M]. Beijing:China Water & Power Press,2014:65-70.
[22] 王正成,毛海涛,姜海波,等.基于流固耦合的坝基中弱透水层对渗流的影响分析[J].水动力学研究与进展,2017,32(3):316-324. Wang Zhengcheng, Mao Haitao, Jiang Haibo, et al. Analysis on the Influence of Weak Aquifer in Dam Foundation on Seepage Based on Fluid-Soild Coupling[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics,2017,32(3):316-324.
[23] 水利水电工程地质勘察规范:GB50287-99[S].北京:中国计划出版社,1999. Code for Geological Surveying of Water Resources and Hydroelectric Engineering:GB50287-99[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press,1999.
[24] 李宗坤,李彩芳,王建有.燕山水利枢纽土石坝三维渗流分析[J].人民黄河,2008(7):92-94. Li Zongkun, Li Caifang, Wang Jianyou. 3-D Seepage Analysis of Earth-Rock Dam in Yanshan Water Control Project[J]. Yellow River,2008(7):92-94.
[25] 王正成.深厚覆盖层坝基中弱透水层对渗流场与应力场的影响研究[D].石河子:石河子大学,2017:31. Wang Zhengcheng. Study on the Influence of Weak Aquifer in Thick Overburden Dam Base on Seepage Field and Stress Field[D]. Shihezi:Shihezi University,2017:31.
[1] 余楚, 张翼龙, 孟瑞芳, 曹文庚. 河套平原浅层地下水动态监测网优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1173-1179.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!