吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 804-814.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210010

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

疏水材料处理吉林西部乾安地区盐渍土的力学强度试验

王清, 汪洲, 韩梦霞, 刘经   

  1. 吉林大学建设工程学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-12 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-07
  • 作者简介:王清(1959—),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土体工程地质方面的研究,E-mail:wangqing@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41820104001,41627801);吉林省水利厅资助项目(126002-2020-0001)

Mechanical Strength of Saline Soil Treated by Hydrophobic Soil Material in Qian’an Area,Western Jilin Province

Wang Qing, Wang Zhou, Han Mengxia, Liu Jing   

  1. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2021-01-12 Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-07
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41820104001,41727801) and the Program of Jilin Provincial Water Resources Department (126002-2020-0001)

摘要: 为了给吉林西部乾安地区盐渍土边坡水渠工程施工提供理论依据及施工参考,利用新型泥土超疏水乳液(CN)对该区盐渍土进行了处理,研究了不同处理条件下CN对盐渍土土体力学强度的影响,将经过不同处理的素土与CN土无侧限抗压强度进行对比,结果表明:1)在不同含水率条件下,CN土的无侧限抗压强度均有较大提升,且在14.86%含水率时取得最大提升率98.90%;随着含水率的增加,素土与CN土应力-应变曲线均存在由硬化型向软化型的转变,其阈值在最优含水率附近。2)随着压实度的增加,CN土无侧限抗压强度逐渐增强,在90%压实度条件下取得最大提升率130.77%;且CN处理后,原本呈塑性硬化型的素土转变成脆性软化型。3)盐分的增加对于CN土无侧限抗压强度起到了抑制作用,在0.3%含盐量条件下取得最大无侧限抗压强度1.33 MPa;过量的盐分结晶会破坏CN形成的纳米结构疏水膜,使得在高含盐量条件下,CN土的抗压强度低于素土。4)扫描电镜实验对CN土微观机理探讨,CN处理后使得土颗粒团聚呈大颗粒,颗粒表面光滑,孔隙发育减少。结构单元体和孔隙单元体的分析证明了处理后土体连结更为紧密,从而提升抗压强度。

关键词: 盐渍土, 超疏水材料, 无侧限抗压强度, 微观分析, 吉林西部乾安地区

Abstract: The degree of saline soil in Qian’an area, western Jilin Province increases gradually with the change of climate. Especially in the rainy season in July and August, the local engineering buildings are easily damaged due to the long-term impact of rain erosion and river erosion. In order to prevent from this damage, a new type of hydrophobic material (CN) was used to treat saline soil, and the effect of CN on the mechanical strength of saline soil under different treatment conditions was studied, and the unconfined compressive strength of soaked soil and CN soil was compared. The results show that: 1) Under different water content, the unconfined compressive strength of CN soil has been greatly improved, and the maximum rate of increase is 98.90% at 14.86% moisture content. With the increase of water content, the stress-strain curves of plain soil and CN soil change from hardening type to softening type, and the threshold value is near the optimal water content. 2) With the increase of compactness, the unconfined compressive strength of saline soil improved by CN increased gradually, and the maximum improvement rate of 130.77% was achieved under the condition of 90% compactness. After CN treatment, the original plastic hardening type of plain soil is transformed into brittle softening type. 3) The increase of salt content can inhibit the unconfined compressive strength of CN soil, the maximum unconfined compressive strength of CN soil is 1.33 MPa at 0.3% salt content. Excessive salt crystallization will destroy the nanostructured hydrophobic membrane formed by CN, which makes the compressive strength of CN soil lower than that of plain soil under the condition of high salt content. 4) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) test was used to explore the micro mechanism of CN soil. After CN treatment, the soil particles agglomerate into large particles, the surface of particles is smooth, and the pore development is reduced. The analysis of structural units and pore units proves that the soil is connected more closely after treatment, thereby improving the compressive strength.

Key words: saline soil, super-hydrophobic material, unconfined compressive strength, microanaly-sis, Qian’an area,western Jilin Province

中图分类号: 

  • TU411
[1] 王清,刘宇峰,刘守伟,等.吉林西部盐渍土多场作用下物质特性演化规律[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(3):807-817. Wang Qing,Liu Yufeng,Liu Shouwei,et al. Evolution Law of the Properties of Saline in Western Jilin Province Under Multi Field Effect[J]. Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2017,47(3):807-817.
[2] 马冰.冻融循环条件下石灰处理盐渍土物理力学性质研究及机理分析[D].长春:吉林大学,2018. Ma Bing. Physico-Mechanical Properties and Mechanism Analysis of Lime-Solidified Saline Soil Under Freeze-Thaw Cycle Conditions[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018.
[3] Yan Han,Qing Wang,Ning Wang, et al. Effect of Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Shear Strength of Saline Soil[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology,2018,154(10):42-53.
[4] 王遵亲.中国盐渍土[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1993. Wang Zunqin. Saline Soil of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1993.
[5] 李芳.SH固土剂与石灰改性处理滨海盐渍土的路用性能及机理试验研究[D].天津:天津城市建设学院,2007. Li Fang. Experimental Study on the Properties and Mechanism of Solidified Saline Soil in Inshore with SH Agent and Lime for Construction of Road Embankment[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin Institute of Urban Construction, 2007.
[6] 王清,陈慧娥,蔡可易.水泥土微观结构特征的定量评价[J].岩土力学,2003,28(增刊1):12-16. Wang Qing, Chen Hui’e, Cai Keyi. Quantitative Evaluation of Microstructure Features of Soil Contained Some Cement[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2003,28(Sup.1): 12-16.
[7] 刘孔杰.滨海地区高速公路盐渍土路基填料改性技术研究[J]. 交通世界,2005,12(增刊1):36-38. Liu Kongjie. Study on the Modify Technology of Base Fillings Expressways on Saline Soil in Binhai Region[J]. Transpo World, 2005,12(Sup.1): 36-38.
[8] 李宏波,田军仓,南红兵,等.几种固化剂对渠道盐渍土地基力学性能影响的试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(12):94-99. Li Hongbo, Tian Juncang, Nan Hongbing,et al. Efficacy of Four Consolidation Agents in Improving Mechanical Properties of Salinized Foundation Soil of Channels[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018,37 (12): 94-99.
[9] 王勇,李国芬,黄凯健,等.水泥/石灰对滨海盐渍路基土性能的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(5):165-169. Wang Yong, Li Guofen, Huang Kaijian, et al. Effect of Cement and Limestone on Performance of Inshore Saline Subgrade Soil[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2014,38 (5): 165-169.
[10] 谢玉洁,许超.石灰改良硫酸盐渍土盐碱量优化研究[J].工业建筑,2018,48(增刊):694-697. Xie Yujie, Xu Chao. Study on Salinization Amount Optimization of Lime-Improved Sulphate Salty Soil[J]. Industrial Construction,2018,48(Sup.):694-697.
[11] 李敏,董一凡,上官中华,等.石灰、粉煤灰改性对盐渍土吸附石油污染物行为的影响[J].土木与环境工程学报,2019,41(2):53-59. Li Min, Dong Yifan, Shangguan Zhonghua, et al. Influence of Property-Modified Lime and Fly Ash on Oil Absorption Behaviors of Saline Soil[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2019,41 (2): 53-59.
[12] 周冬梅,张远芳,叶鸣.粉煤灰掺量对天然盐渍土强度和变形的影响[J].粉煤灰综合利用,2017(5):13-16. Zhou Dongmei, Zhang Yuanfang, Ye Ming. Effect of Fly Ash Content on Strength and Deformation of Natural Saline Soil[J]. Fly Ash Comprehensive Utilization, 2017 (5): 13-16.
[13] 崔伟.石灰粉煤灰改良过湿盐渍土试验研究[J].山西建筑,2017,43(22):62-64. Cui Wei.Experimental Research on Lime Fly Ash Improving Super-Wet Salinized Soil[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2017,43 (22): 62-64.
[14] 刘成宝,李敏佳,刘晓杰,等.超疏水材料的研究进展[J].苏州科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,35(4):1-8. Liu Chengbao, Li Minjia, Liu Xiaojie, et al. Review of Suoer-Hydrophobic Materials Research[J]. Journal of Suzhou University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2018,35 (4): 1-8.
[15] Bae S,Inyang H I,De Brito G T C, et al. Soil Desiccation Rate Integration into Empirical Dust Emission Models for Polymer Suppressant Evaluation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2006,132(1):111-117.
[16] 刘瑾,施斌,黄河,等.STW型生态土壤稳定剂改良工程黏性土胀缩性试验研[J].工程地质学报,2008,16(6):820-825. Liu Jin, Shi Bin, Huang He, et al. Experimental Study on Swelling and Shrinking Property of Clay Treated with STW Polymer Soil Stabilizer[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2008,16 (6): 820-825.
[17] Liu Jin, Shi Bin, Lu Yi, et al. Effectiveness of a New Organic Polymer Sand-Fixing Agent on Sand Fixation[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2012,65(3):589-595.
[18] 廖晓兰,杨久俊,张磊,等.丙烯酰胺聚合固化盐渍土试验研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(8):2216-2222. Liao Xiaolan, Yang Jiujun, Zhang Lei, et al. An Experimental Study of Acrylamide Polymerized Solidification of Saline Soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015,36 (8): 2216-2222.
[19] 王宗鹏.超疏水涂层对混凝土抗冻性及防冰性影响研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2015. Wang Zongpeng. Effect of Superhydrophobic Coating on the Frost Resistance and Anti-Icing Properties of Concrete[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015.
[20] Horgnies M,Chen J J. Superhydrophobic Concrete Surfaces with Integrated Microtexture[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 52: 81-90.
[21] Jasperson F B. Waterproof Coating Composition: US,4256804 A[P]. 1981-03-17.
[22] 孙顺杰,洪永顺,张琳.建筑表面用有机硅防水剂的制备及性能研究[J].化学建材,2008,24(3):32-35. Sun Shunjie, Hong Yongshun, Zhang Lin.Preparation and Performance Study of Silicone Water Repellent for Building Surface[J]. Chemical Building Materials, 2008,24 (3): 32-35.
[23] 王清,孔元元,张旭东,等.结构性土体固结压力的力学效应[J].西南交通大学学报,2016,51(5):987-994. Wang Qing, Kong Yuanyuan, Zhang Xudong, et al. Mechanical Effect of Pre-Consolidation Pressure of Structural Behavior Soil[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016,51 (5): 987-994.
[24] 罗烈日,郑俊杰.不同模式下抗剪强度参数对路堤稳定性的影响[J].土木工程与管理学报,2012,29(4):50-54. Luo Lieri, Zheng Junjie. Effects of Shear Strength on Embankment Stability Under Different Patterns[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2012,29 (4): 50-54.
[25] 梅岭,梅国雄,易宗发.K0≠1时的地基临塑载荷和临界载荷近似计算公式[J].计算力学学报,2010,27(6):1090-1095. Mei Ling, Mei Guoxiong, Yi Zongfa. Approximate Formulas of Critical Edge Pressure and Critical Load of Subsoil with K0≠1[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2010,27 (6): 1090-1095.
[26] 赵吉坤,温娇娇.填土含水率对挡土墙土压力影响的实验分析[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2012,34(增刊2):155-160. Zhao Jikun, Wen Jiaojiao.Analysis of the Effect of Filling Soil Moisture Content to the Gravity Retaining Wall’s Performance[J]. Journal of Civil,Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2012,34 (Sup.2): 155-160.
[27] 徐新木,张耀平,付玉华,等.冻融循环下含节理类岩石试样剪切破坏特性[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2021,51(2):483-494. Xu Xinmu, Zhang Yaoping, Fu Yuhua, et al.Shear Failure Characteristics of Rock-Like Specimens Containing Joints Under Freezing-Thawing Cycles[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021,51(2):483-494.
[28] 鲍硕超.吉林西部季冻区盐渍土冻胀特性及三维颗粒流数值模拟[D].长春:吉林大学,2015. Bao Shuochao. Frost Heaving Characteristics and Three-Dimensional Particle Flow Numerical Simulation of Saline Soil in Seasonally Frozen Area of Western Jilin[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2015.
[29] 岩土工程勘察规范:GB 50021—2001[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1994. Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering: GB 50021—2001[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,1994.
[30] 建筑防水涂料中有害物质限量:JC 1066—2008[S].北京:国家发展和改革委员会,2008. Limit of Harmful Substances of Building Waterproof Coatings: JC 1066—2008[S]. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission, 2008.
[31] 土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123—2019[S]北京:中国计划出版社,2019. Standard for Soil Test Method:GB / T 50123—2019[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2019.
[32] 陈剑平,刘经,王清,等.含水率对分散性土抗剪强度特性影响的微观解释[J/OL].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021:1-12. Doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200318 Chen Jianping, Liu Jing, Wang Qing, et al.Microscopic Interpretation of Water Content Influence on Shear Strength of Dispersive Soil[J/OL]. Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021:1-11. Doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200318
[33] 于庆博. 崇明东滩多期吹填区地面沉降与土体固结特征分析[D].长春:吉林大学,2020. Yu Qingbo. Analysis of Land Subsidence and Soil Consolidation Characteristics in the Multi-Phase Reclamation Area,Chongming East Shoal[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020.
[34] 王清,王凤艳,肖树芳.土微观结构特征的定量研究及其在工程中的应用[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28(2):148-153. Wang Qing, Wang Fengyan, Xiao Shufang.A Quantitative Study of the Microstructure Characteristics of Soil and ITS Application to the Engineering[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2001,28(2): 148-153.
[35] 李超月,王清,刘守伟,等. 吉林西部盐渍土孔隙特征的试验研究[J].工程地质学报,2018,26(增刊):518-524. Li Chaoyue, Wang Qing, Liu Shouwei, et al. Experimental Study on Pore Characteristics of Saline Soil in Western Jilin[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2018,28(Sup.):518-524.
[36] 柴寿喜,王沛,韩文峰,等.高分子材料固化滨海盐渍土的强度与微结构研究[J].岩土力学,2007,28(6):1067-1072. Chai Shouxi, Wang Pei, Han Wenfeng, et al. Research on Strength and Microstructure Feature of Solidified Saline Soil in Inshore with Polymer[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007,28(6): 1067-1072.
[37] 王春雷,姜崇喜,谢强,等.析晶过程中盐渍土的微观结构变化[J].西南交通大学学报,2007,42(1):66-69. Wang Chunlei, Jiang Chongxi, Xie Qiang, et al. Change in Microstructure of Salty Soil During Crystallization[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007,42(1): 66-69.
[1] 高金花, 徐阳, 闫雪莲, 王岩, 杨金良. 吉林省西部湖泊地带苏打盐渍土溶陷性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1104-1111.
[2] 苟富刚, 龚绪龙, 王光亚. 连云港海相软土不排水强度特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1165-1173.
[3] 王清, 刘宇峰, 刘守伟, 张旭东, 彭玮, 李超月, 徐新川, 范建华. 吉林西部盐渍土多场作用下物质特性演化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 807-817.
[4] 赵天宇, 张虎元, 严耿升, 李锦. 河西寒旱区盐渍土地层温湿度变化模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1466-1474.
[5] 宿晓萍,王清,王文华,孙昊月. 季节冻土区盐渍土环境下混凝土抗冻耐久性机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1244-1253.
[6] 王生新, 柴寿喜, 王晓燕. 加筋条件和含水率对加筋土抗压强度和应力应变的影响[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 784-790.
[7] 石茜, 柴寿喜, 李敏, 魏丽. 潮湿环境中稻草的防腐效果及极限拉伸性能[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 200-206.
[8] 周丽萍, 申向东, 李学斌, 白忠强. 天然浮石粉水泥土力学性质的试验研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 492-497.
[9] 李长洪,张吉良,林清华,张永生,方雪松. 西藏扎布耶盐田盐渍土的改性配比试验[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 273-0278.
[10] 王俊臣,李劲松,王常明. 硫酸(亚硫酸)盐渍土单次盐胀和冻胀发育规律研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 410-416.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程祖锋,孙秀娟,崔吉馨. 混凝土腐蚀的正交试验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 978 -0982 .
[2] 单敬福, 王峰, 孙海雷, 孙继刚, 蒙启安. 蒙古国境内贝尔湖凹陷早白垩世沉积充填演化与同沉积断裂的响应[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 509 -518 .
[3] 李智强, 范宜仁, 邓少贵, 季秀峰, 李虎. 基于改进差分进化算法的阵列侧向测井反演[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 1199 -1204 .
[4] 贾大成,邢立新, 潘 军, M. J. van Bergen, H. van Roermund. 伊通上地幔剪切带捕虏体中富铝尖晶石的地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 497 -502 .
[5] 刘少玉,张光辉,张翠云,周晓妮. 黑河流域水资源系统演变和人类活动影响[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 806 -0812 .
[6] 董贵明, 束龙仓, 田娟, 季叶飞. 西南岩溶地下河系统水流运动数值模型[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1136 -1143 .
[7] 胡大千,初凤友,姚 杰. 中太平洋YJA海山富钴结壳矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 32 -0037 .
[8] 李春柏,张新涛,刘 立,任延广,孟 鹏. 布达特群热流体活动及其对火山碎屑岩的改造作用--以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 221 -0226 .
[9] 谢忠雷,杨佰玲,包国章,董德明. 茶园土壤不同形态镍的含量及其影响因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 599 -604 .
[10] 卢进才,魏仙样,李玉宏,魏建设. 产气率:油页岩工业品质评价值得重视的指标--以鄂尔多斯盆地何1井三叠系延长组油页岩为例[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 60 -0064 .