ultra-low permeable reservoir,micro pore structure,oil and water seepage characteristics,micro residual oil ,"/> <span>超低渗储层微观孔隙结构及剩余油分布特征——以吴起油田白豹地区长4+5为例</span>

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 1338-1351.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220158

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

超低渗储层微观孔隙结构及剩余油分布特征——以吴起油田白豹地区长4+5为例

熊安亮1,程国峰2,李东涛2,丁维盼2,刘宇羲2,陈刚3,杨磊3,袁耀利3,朱玉双1,刘林玉1   

  1. 1.西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室/地质学系,西安710069

    2.中国石油长庆油田分公司第五采油厂,西安710018

    3.延长油田股份有限公司吴起采油厂勘探开发研究所,陕西 延安717699

  • 出版日期:2023-09-26 发布日期:2023-10-17
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05008-004-004-001);国家自然科学基金项目(41972129)


Micropore Structure and Micro Residual Oil Distribution of Ultra-Low Permeable Reservoir: A Case Study of Chang 4+5 of Baibao Area,Wuqi Oilfield

Xiong Anliang1,Cheng Guofeng2,Li Dongtao2,Ding Weipan2,Liu Yuxi2,Chen Gang3,Yang Lei3,Yuan Yaoli3,Zhu Yushuang1, Liu Linyu1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Continental Dynamics/Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China

    2. Fifth Oil Production Plant of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China

    3. Wuqi Oil Production Plant Exploration and Development Research Institute, Yanchang Oilfield Co., Ltd., Yan’an 717699,Shaanxi, China

  • Online:2023-09-26 Published:2023-10-17
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the  National Science and Technology Major Project (2017ZX05008-004-004-001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972129)

摘要:

储层的微观孔隙结构定性定量表征可以为油藏后期高效开发奠定地质基础。本次研究利用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、高压压汞等实验手段,对吴起油田白豹地区长4+5超低渗储层的微观孔隙结构进行表征,并建立起研究区孔隙结构划分标准。在此基础上,制作真实砂岩模型,通过油水两相渗流实验反映孔隙结构好坏,通过微观可视化油水驱替实验对不同孔隙结构水驱后微观剩余油存在类型及成因进行分析。结果表明:Ⅰ类孔隙结构组合类型为粒间孔-溶孔,油水两相渗流特征最好,水驱后微观剩余油主要以小面积连片簇状形式存在,驱油效率为35%;Ⅱ类孔隙结构组合类型为溶孔-残余粒间孔,油水两相渗流特征接近Ⅰ类,储渗能力及水驱效果最好,驱油效率为43%,水驱后微观剩余油主要以簇状、环状形式存在;Ⅲ类孔隙结构组合类型为晶间孔-溶孔,其物性最差,油水两相渗流特征最差,驱油效率仅为21%,水驱后微观剩余油以连片簇状形式存在。研究区成岩作用及孔隙中的填隙物含量主要影响孔隙结构发育,从而影响不同孔隙结构在水驱过后的微观剩余油分布。

关键词: 超低渗储层, 微观孔隙结构, 油水渗流特征, 微观剩余油

Abstract:

 The qualitative and quantitative characterization of the microscopic pore structure of the reservoir can benefit the efficient development of the reservoir in the later stage. In this study, the microscopic pore structure of Chang 4+5 ultra-low permeable reservoir was characterized in  Baibao area of Wuqi oilfield by using blue-dye thin section, SEM, high pressure mercury penetration. A local pore structure classification standard of the study area was established. Based on the experimental results, a real sandstone model is built up to evaluate the quality of the pore structure by the oil-water two-phase seepage experiment, and the existence types and causes of the micro residual oil in different pore structures are analyzed through the microscopic visualization of the oil-water displacement experiment. The results show that the combination type of class Ⅰ pore structure is intergranular pore-dissolved pore, oil and water two-phase seepage characteristics are the best, after water flooding, the micro residual oil mainly exists in the form of small contiguous clusters, oil displacement efficiency is 35%; Type Ⅱ pore structure is dissolved pore-residual intergranular pore, oil-water two-phase seepage characteristics is similar to class Ⅰ, water storage capacity and water flooding effect are the best, oil displacement efficiency is 43%, after water flooding, the micro-residual oil mainly exists in cluster and ring form; Class Ⅲ pore structure combination type is intercrystalline pore-dissolved pore, it has the worst physical properties, oil and water have the worst seepage characteristics, oil displacement efficiency is only 21%, after water flooding, the micro residual oil exists in the form of contiguous clusters. The diagenesis and the pore filling content in the study area mainly affect the pore structure development, thus affecting the microscopic residual oil distribution of different pore structures after water flooding.


Key words: ultra-low permeable reservoir')">

ultra-low permeable reservoir, micro pore structure, oil and water seepage characteristics, micro residual oil

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 吴蒙, 秦勇, 王晓青, 李国璋, 朱超, 朱士飞. 中国致密砂岩储层流体可动性及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 35-51.
[2] 李易霖, 张云峰, 丛琳, 谢舟, 闫明, 田肖雄. X-CT扫描成像技术在致密砂岩微观孔隙结构表征中的应用——以大安油田扶余油层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 379-387.
[3] 魏虎, 孙卫, 晏宁平, 刘舵. 靖边气田富水区扩大原因及控水措施[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 1014-1019.
[4] 宋广寿,高 辉,高静乐,孙 卫,任国富,齐 银,路 勇,田育红. 西峰油田长8储层微观孔隙结构非均质性与渗流机理实验[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 53-0059.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .