吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 619-632.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220170

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于AHP的海峡沿岸地区生态地质环境质量评价——以马六甲海峡北岸马来西亚西南沿海地区为例

吴栋哲1,姜琦刚1,顾宗瑞1,张森1,付长亮2   

  1. 1.吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院,长春130026

    2.中国自然资源航空物探遥感中心,北京100083

  • 出版日期:2024-03-26 发布日期:2024-04-09
  • 基金资助:

    中国地质调查局项目(DD20191011)


Evaluation of Eco-Geological Environment Quality in Strait Coastal Areas Based on AHP:Taking Southwest Coastal Areas of Malaysia

of North Coast of Malacca Strait as an Example

Wu Dongzhe1, Jiang Qigang1,Gu Zongrui1,Zhang Sen1,Fu Changliang2

#br#   

  1. 1. College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology,Jilin University,Changchun 130026,China

    2. China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Natural Resources,Beijing 100083,China

  • Online:2024-03-26 Published:2024-04-09
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Project of China Geological Survey (DD20191011)

摘要:

生态地质环境质量显示一个区域地质作用与生态空间分布的整体情况。为了给马六甲海峡北岸马来西亚西南沿海地区的生态保护修复及“一带一路”投资建设提供依据,将地理信息系统技术与层次分析法相结合,以马来西亚基础地质、地质灾害遥感地质专题应用及编图项目成果数据集为基础数据,构建了该区的生态地质环境质量评价指标体系并进行综合评价。通过分析结果将研究区的生态地质环境质量划分为优等、良好、中等、较差4个等级,其中:优等区和良好区面积较大,分别为2 753.31 km2和2 960.33 km2,占研究区总面积的34.19%和36.76%,主要分布在北部平原地区及沿海地区;中等区和较差区面积分别为1 702.72 km2和618.57 km2,占研究区总面积的21.37%和7.68%,主要分布在雪兰莪州中部、森美兰州南部及马六甲州北部地区。从评价结果上看,该地区总体上生态地质环境质量较好,优等区和良好区总和占研究区总面积的70.00%以上,中等区和较差区主要受地层构造和生态条件的限制,需要针对具体问题进行环境保护及生态修复。



关键词: 层次分析法, 生态地质环境, 地理信息系统, 质量评价, 海峡地区

Abstract:

The eco-geological environment quality shows the overall situation of regional geological action and ecological spatial distribution. In order to provide the basis for the ecological protection and restoration of the southwest coastal areas of Malaysia of the north coast   of Malacca Strait and the investment and construction of “One Belt and One Road”, GIS technology and hierarchical analysis method are combined. Based on the data set of Malaysia basic geology and geological disaster remote sensing geological application and mapping project results, the eco-geological environment quality evaluation index system of the southwest coastal area of Malaysia along the north coast of  Malacca Strait was constructed and comprehensively evaluated. Through the analysis of the results, the eco-geological environment quality of the study area was divided into four grades: excellent, good, medium and poor. The area of excellent and good area was larger, which was 2 753.31 km2 and 2 960.33 km2, respectively, accounting for 34.19% and 36.76% of the total area of the study area, and mainly distributed in the hilly areas of the northern coastal plain. The medium and poor districts are 1 702.72 km2 and 618.57 km2, accounting for 21.37% and 7.68% of the total area of the research area, respectively, and are mainly distributed in southern Sembilan central , Selangor and northern Malacca. According to the evaluation results, the eco-geological environment quality of this area is good on the whole. The  excellent area and good area account for 70.00% of the total area of the study area. The medium  area and poor area are mainly restricted by the stratigraphic structure and ecological conditions, so it is necessary to carry out environmental protection and ecological restoration according to specific problems.

Key words: analytic hierarchy process, eco-geological environment, geographic information system;quality evaluation;straits

中图分类号: 

  • TP79
[1] 丁宇雪, 毛龙, 周向斌, 初炜钰. 基于高分影像的松嫩低平原地区生态环境问题解析——以黑龙江省肇源县为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1240-1248.
[2] 卢文喜, 郭家园, 董海彪, 张宇, 林琳. 改进的支持向量机方法在矿山地质环境质量评价中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1511-1519.
[3] 叶水盛, 乔金海, 叶育鑫, 郭利军, 蔡红军. 基于GIS的矿产预测地质解译空间信息集成[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 1214-1222.
[4] 叶润青, 牛瑞卿, 邓清禄, 张良培, 赵艳南, 吴婷, 江齐英. 基于多源数据三维可视化集成的高切坡解译[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 161-168.
[5] 王利花, 周云轩, 田波. 基于TM和ETM+影像数据的东沙环礁珊瑚礁监测[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1630-1637.
[6] 邢宇, 姜琦刚, 王坤, 王耿明, 杨佳佳. 20世纪70年代以来东北三省湿地动态变化[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 600-608.
[7] 霍艾迪, 张骏, 卢玉东, 成玉祥, 姚以亮. 地质灾害易发性评价单元划分方法——以陕西省黄陵县为例[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 523-528.
[8] 段福州, 赵文吉, 李家存, 蔡文博, 刘连刚. 基于三维地理信息系统的岩层产状测量方法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 310-315.
[9] 佴磊, 王日勖. 地理信息滑坡监测预报系统及其在抚顺西露天矿滑坡中的应用[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1359-1364.
[10] 王永志, 潘懋, 何文娜. 基于ArcGIS和SOA的国家级油气资源数据库管理系统的设计与实现[J]. J4, 2009, 39(5): 953-958.
[11] 姜玲玲,熊德琪,张新宇,张弘. 大连滨海湿地景观格局变化及其驱动机制[J]. J4, 2008, 38(4): 670-0675.
[12] 邱道宏,陈剑平,阙金声,安鹏程. 基于粗糙集和人工神经网络的洞室岩体质量评价[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 86-0091.
[13] 胡卓玮,朱琳,宫辉力. 虚拟地理信息技术的地下水动态模拟分析应用[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 759-0766.
[14] 湛邵斌,陈圣波,孙珂,孟治国,史本伟. 遥感地质可视化解译知识库建设[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 174-0178.
[15] 张伟红,赵勇胜,邸志强,郭晓东,张文静,张 楠. 基于ArcGIS Engine的地下水资源及其地质环境信息系统设计与实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 574-577.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .