农业土壤,重金属,污染特征,生态风险,污染指数,危害指数,水乡地区,东莞市


,"/> <span>东莞市水乡地区农业土壤重金属污染特征及</span>风险评价

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 587-600.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230259

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

东莞市水乡地区农业土壤重金属污染特征及风险评价

谭晓辉1,黄灏1,胡荣光1,邓奕球1,曾经文2,王秀娟2
  

  1. 1.广东省东莞生态环境监测站,广东东莞523000

    2.生态环境部华南环境科学研究所,广州510655

  • 出版日期:2025-03-26 发布日期:2025-05-10
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1800304)


Pollution Characteristics and Risk Evaluation of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soils in  Water Town Area of Dongguan City

Tan Xiaohui1, Huang Hao1, Hu Rongguang1, Deng Yiqiu1, Zeng Jingwen2, Wang Xiujuan2   

  1. 1. Dongguan Ecological Environment Monitoring Station in Guangdong Province, Dongguan 523000, Guangdong, China

    2. South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China,

    Guangzhou 510655, China

  • Online:2025-03-26 Published:2025-05-10
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1800304)

摘要:

为了解东莞市水乡地区农业土壤重金属污染状况及生态与暴露风险,选择水乡地区蔬菜基地和大型交通干线两侧农田为研究区,分别采集蔬菜基地研究点和大型交通干线两侧农田研究点的土壤和蔬菜样品各32件进行研究。首先采用单因子污染指数(IP)和内梅罗综合污染指数(PN)评价CdHgAsPbCrCuZnNi 等八种重金属的污染特征,并进行生态风险评价和农产品质量安全评价,然后对重金属污染成因进行探究。结果表明:蔬菜基地土壤除Ni外,其余七种重金属质量分数的平均值均低于该市土壤背景值;大型交通干线两侧农田土壤除PbNi外,其余六种重金属质量分数的平均值均低于水乡地区平均值,除PbZnNi外,其余五种重金属质量分数的平均值均低于该市土壤背景值。单因子污染指数显示,蔬菜基地和大型交通干线两侧农田土壤均存在重金属累积现象,其中蔬菜基地存在6.67%的研究点中Cd质量分数超过农用土壤污染风险筛选值,大型交通干线两侧农田分别存在17.64%23.53%5.88%的研究点中CdPbCu质量分数超过农用土壤污染风险筛选值,以上污染值均未超过污染风险管制值。内梅罗综合污染指数评价显示,蔬菜基地和大型交通干线两侧农田土壤均存在不同程度的轻微污染,处于轻度污染等级的比例分别为40.00% 64.70%。生态风险评价显示:蔬菜基地中有6.67%的研究点中Hg的单因子潜在生态风险指数(Ie)达到中等潜在生态风险水平,6.67%的研究点中综合潜在生态风险指数(Ir)处于中等潜在生态风险水平;大型交通干线两侧农田中有11.76%Cd17.64%的研究点中HgIe达到中等潜在生态风险水平,有5.58%的研究点中Ir处于中等潜在生态风险水平。农产品质量安全评价显示,蔬菜基地土壤和大型交通干线两侧农田农产品中均存在Cd超标。蔬菜基地中重金属超标的原因与化肥、农药的施加有关,大型交通干线两侧农田土壤除农业源的污染外,还存在交通源带来的重金属污染。


关键词: agricultural soils, heavy metals, pollution characteristics, ecological risk, pollution index,  , hazard index,  , water town area, Dongguan City

Abstract:

To investigate the heavy metal pollution status and ecological and exposure risks in agricultural soils of the water town area in Dongguan City, vegetable bases and agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides within the water town area were selected as study sites. A total of 32 soil and vegetable samples each were collected from vegetable bases and agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides for analysis. Firstly, the pollution characteristics of eight heavy metals, including Cd, Hg, As, Pb, Cr, Cu, Zn, and Ni, were evaluated using the single-factor pollution index (IP) and the Nemerow comprehensive pollution index (PN). And then, ecological risk assessment and agricultural product quality and safety assessment were conducted, and the causes of heavy metal pollution were finally investigated. The results showed that the mean values of the mass fractions of the remaining seven heavy metals in vegetable bases soils were lower than the city’s soil background values, except for Ni; The mean values of the mass fractions of the remaining six heavy metals in agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides were lower than the  mean values in the water town area, except for Pb and Ni; And the mean values of the mass fractions of the remaining heavy metals, except for Pb, Zn, and Ni, were lower than the city’s soil background values. Based on the single-factor pollution index, heavy metal accumulation is observed in the soil of vegetable bases and agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides. Within the vegetable bases, 6.67% of the sampling sites exhibit Cd mass fraction surpassing the risk screening values for agricultural soil. In agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides, 17.64%, 23.53%, and 5.88% of the sampling sites display Cd, Pb, and Cu mass fraction exceeding the risk screening values for agricultural soil, all remaining below the regulatory thresholds for pollution risk. Evaluation of the Nemerow comprehensive pollution index showed that agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides were slightly polluted to varying degrees, with 40.00% and 64.70% in the mildly polluted category, respectively. The ecological risk evaluation showed that the potential ecological hazard index (Ie) of Hg reached the medium ecological risk level in 6.67% of the study sites in the vegetable bases, and the ecological risk hazard index (Ir) was at the medium ecological risk level in 6.67% of the study sites. For agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides, 11.76% of the study sites had Cd Ie at medium ecological risk level, 17.64% of the study sites had Hg Ie at medium ecological risk level, and 5.58% of the study sites had Ir at medium ecological risk level. The evaluation of the quality and safety of agricultural products showed that there were Cd exceedances in the soil of vegetable bases and in agricultural products in agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides. The reason for the excess of heavy metals in vegetable bases is related to the application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides and agricultural land of large traffic arteries both sides have heavy metal pollution from transportation sources and pollution inputs from agricultural sources.


Key words: 农业土壤')">

农业土壤, 重金属, 污染特征, 生态风险, 污染指数, 危害指数, 水乡地区,
')">东莞市


中图分类号: 

  • X53
[1] 龚辉, 高福红, 贾啸宇.

吉林省通化地区南芬组地球化学特征对新元古代大氧化事件的响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 438-449.

[2] 王民水, 王明常, 王婧瑜, 刘子维.

融合注意力机制和权重平衡算法的遥感图像分类 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 697-704.

[3] 周舰. 冀北大囫囵古元古代花岗岩地球化学特征、岩石成因及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 828-839.
[4] 冯波, 曹云龙, 齐晓飞 , 崔振鹏, 张兰新. 增强型地热系统开发热-水动力-力学(THM)耦合模拟:以河北马头营凸起区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1892-1906.
[5] 李忠城, 李丹丹. 山西沁水寿阳ST区块煤储层三维精细地质建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 635-.
[6] 黄 睿, 张 颖, 史 骁, 孙跃武. 新疆准噶尔盆地东缘中—晚二叠世植物群及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 403-.
[7] 李小兰, 曾献奎, 王栋, 吴吉春. 基于优化-自适应稀疏网格替代模型的地下水模拟参数不确定性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1234-.
[8] 张军华, 常健强, 王作乾, 胡逸甫, 芦凤明, 孟瑞刚.

90°相移薄互层解释技术理论诠释与实际应用 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1348-.

[9] 张辉, 王志章, 杨亮, 李忠诚, 邢济麟. 松南上白垩统青山口组一段不同赋存状态页岩油定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 315-327.
[10] 房亚军, 于川淇, 金鑫. 基于SWMM-CCHE2D耦合模型的海绵城市内涝管控效果评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 582-591.
[11] 李忠潭, 薛林福, 冉祥金, 李永胜, 董国强, 李玉博, 戴均豪. 基于卷积神经网络的智能找矿预测方法:以甘肃龙首山地区铜矿为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 418-433.
[12] 仉涛, 郭智奇, 刘财, 刘喜武, 刘宇巍, . 盐间页岩油韵律层地震响应模拟及页岩薄储层厚度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 281-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[2] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[3] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[4] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[5] 王谦,吴志芳, 张汉泉,莫修文. 随机分形在刻划储层非均质特性中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .
[6] 杨晓平,李仰春,柳 震, 汪 岩,王洪杰. 黑龙江东部鸡西盆地构造层序划分与盆地动力学演化[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 616 -621 .
[7] 赵宏光,孙景贵,陈军强,赵俊康,姚凤良,段 展. 延边小西南岔富金斑岩铜矿床的含矿流体起源与演化——H,O,C,S,Pb同位素示踪[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 601 -606 .
[8] 梁秀娟, 林学钰, 于 军. 虚拟现实技术在水文地质研究中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 636 -640 .
[9] 殷 文,印兴耀, 张繁昌. 基于并行遗传算法的地震属性优化研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 672 -676 .
[10] 赵 峰,范海峰,田竹君,王志刚. 吉林省中部不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀强度变化分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 661 -666 .