J4 ›› 2010, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1104-1109.

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽西地区黄土的强度与本构特性

王常明|马栋和|林容|王科|宋朋燃   

  1. 吉林大学 建设工程学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-24 出版日期:2010-09-26 发布日期:2010-09-26
  • 作者简介:王常明(1966-)|男|浙江绍兴人|教授|博士|主要从事岩土力学及地质灾害防治方面的研究|E-mail:wangcm@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40972171);吉林大学种子基金(40870433)

Shear Strength and Constitutive Characteristics of Loess in West Liaoning

WANG Chang-ming, MA Dong-he, LIN Rong, WANG Ke, SONG Peng-ran   

  1. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026
  • Received:2010-01-24 Online:2010-09-26 Published:2010-09-26

摘要:

采用应变控制式三轴仪对取自辽宁西部地区阜新-朝阳段黄土的力学性质进行了试验,获得了黄土的应力-应变关系和抗剪强度的变化规律;采用人工制备不同含水率试样的方法,测试并分析了含水率对黄土本构和强度特征的影响。结果表明:(1)试样的应力-应变关系在不排水剪条件下呈强软化型,表现为脆性破坏;在固结不排水剪条件下随初始含水率的增加由弱软化型向硬化型转变;而在排水剪条件下低含水率时呈软化型,随含水率增加,呈弱硬化型和硬化型。(2)饱水后试样的抗剪强度有很显著的降低:cUU为13.7~363.3 kPa时,φUU为18.6°~40.2°;而cUU为0.2~29.6 kPa时,φCU则为4°~23.4°。(3)土的有效抗剪强度指标均随含水率增加呈非线性减小的关系,粘聚力与含水率呈半对数函数关系,内摩擦角则与含水率呈幂函数关系。给出了黄土本构的数学模型和黄土抗剪强度指标的取值方法。

关键词: 含水率, 黄土, 应力-应变关系, 抗剪强度

Abstract:

The stress-strain relation and shear strength characteristics of loess, which is taken from west area of Liaoning, are tested by trixial compression instrument in laboratory. The influence of water content to constitutive relation and shear strength of loess is tested and analyzed by means of remodeled samples with a series of different water content. The results show that (a) the stress-strain relation is softening type under unconsolidated-undrained condition, which exhibits a way of brittle failure. It is changed from strain-softening into strain-hardening with increasing of water content in consolidated-undrained shearing condition. And in the condition of drained shearing test, the stress-strain relation is strain-softening in a low water content, it will be strain-hardening and slightly strain-hardening with increase of water content. (b) The shearing strength of samples will obviously decrease after saturated, namely, cUU  is between 13.7 kPa and 363.3 kPa and φUU is between 18.6° and 40.2°, but cCU can be changed from 0.2 kPa to 29.6 kPa, and φCU is from 4° to 23.4°. And (c) there is a nonlinear decreasing relationship of shear strength indexes to water content. The cohesion and the internal frictional angle are changed in a semi-logarithm and a power function with water content, respectively. Consequently, a mathematical model to describe the constitutive relation of loess and a method to determine the index of shearing strength is suggested.

Key words: water content, loess, stress-strain relation, shearing strength

中图分类号: 

  • P642.131
[1] 苟富刚, 龚绪龙, 王光亚. 连云港海相软土不排水强度特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1165-1173.
[2] 彭湘林, 范文, 魏亚妮, 田陆, 邓龙胜. 黄土高原城市工程地质分区——以铜川地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1480-1490.
[3] 洪勇, 车效文, 郑孝玉, 刘鹏, 周蓉. 陕西泾阳南塬滑坡干湿黄土快速大剪切力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1207-1218.
[4] 韩朋, 翟云峰, 栗粲圪, 张运, 杨会会, 靳春胜. 末次间冰期以来洛川黄土天然剩磁记录的可靠性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 793-806.
[5] 张泽, 周泓, 秦琦, 邴慧, 武俊杰, 周攀峰. 冻融循环作用下黄土的孔隙特征试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 839-847.
[6] 李杨, 王清, 王坛华. 冻土水热耦合模型数值求解及结果检验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 207-213.
[7] 张立原. 中国黄土高原洛川剖面S5以来的孢粉学记录[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1): 222-229.
[8] 吴谦,王常明,马栋和,宋朋燃. 辽西黄土陡坡的冲刷破坏机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1563-1571.
[9] 庄建琦,彭建兵,张利勇. 不同降雨条件下黄土高原浅层滑坡危险性预测评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 867-876.
[10] 刘维明,杨胜利,方小敏. 川西高原黄土记录的末次冰期气候变化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 974-982.
[11] 李滨, 殷跃平, 吴树仁, 石菊松. 多级旋转黄土滑坡形成机理及失稳模式[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 760-769.
[12] 程东会, 王文科, 侯光才, 杨红斌, 李瑛, 张二勇. 毛乌素沙地植被与地下水关系[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 184-189.
[13] 武彩霞, 戴福初, 闵弘, 涂新斌, 邝国麟, 周跃峰. 台塬塬顶裂缝对黄土斜坡水文响应的影响[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1512-1519.
[14] 王生新, 柴寿喜, 王晓燕. 加筋条件和含水率对加筋土抗压强度和应力应变的影响[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 784-790.
[15] 王跃, 朱祥坤. 铜同位素在矿床学中的应用:认识与进展[J]. J4, 2010, 40(4): 739-751.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!