吉林大学学报(地球科学版)

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽西葫芦岛东部表层结构调查及速度建模

葛利华1,2,姜弢1,2,徐学纯3,贾海青1,2,杨志超1,2   

  1. 1.吉林大学地球信息探测仪器教育部重点实验室,长春130026;
    2.吉林大学仪器科学与电气工程学院,长春130026;
    3.吉林大学地球科学学院,长春130061
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-20 出版日期:2014-05-26 发布日期:2014-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 姜弢(1969-),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地震仪器及信号处理研究 E-mail:jiang_t@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:葛利华(1984-),女,博士研究生,主要从事可控震源技术及地震信号处理研究,E-mail:gelh09@mails.jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家深部探测技术与实验研究专项项目(SinoProbe-09-06 201011083,201311197);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20110061110053)

Surface Survey and Velocity Model Building in Eastern Huludao of Western Liaoning Province

Ge Lihua1,2, Jiang Tao1,2, Xu Xuechun3, Jia Haiqing1,2,Yang Zhichao1,2   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Geo-Exploration Instrumentation of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun130026,China;
    2.College of Instrument Ation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University,Changchun130026,China;
    3.College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University,Changchun130061,China
  • Received:2013-07-20 Online:2014-05-26 Published:2014-05-26

摘要:

针对国家深部探测项目地震数据采集及表层速度结构模型建立的需求,在辽西葫芦岛东部二维地震勘探工区开展了表层结构调查工作。该地区地表起伏大,表层结构复杂,低、降速层厚度和速度多变,静校正问题突出,做好表层结构速度建模工作成为该区地震勘探的关键问题之一。由该工区实验点多种表层调查方法对比实验结果,确定了该工区表层调查工作方式:以井中微测井方法为主,在满足小折射地表条件的区段辅以成本较低的小折射方法作为补充;同时对留作微测井的生产井进行岩性录井。基于以上方法,分析了表层调查野外施工的难点和对策,确定了微测井采集参数。本次表层调查工作测线长度16.9 km,设计了8口微测井,根据微测井解释成果得到如下结果:该测线表层分2~3层;低速层厚度为1.68~4.33 m,速度为350~1 000 m/s;降速层厚度为5.00~12.00 m,速度为1 000~2 800 m/s;高速层主要为岩性致密的花岗岩,速度为2 800~4 900 m/s。根据井中微测井结果及层间相似系数,建立了该测线的表层模型,设计激发井深13.00~15.00 m,并获得静校正量数据。

关键词: 微测井, 表层调查, 近地表建模, 地震勘探, 辽西

Abstract:

To meet the demands of seismic exploration acquisition and near-surface velocity modeling in deep exploration in China, surface survey was carried out in 2D exploration area of eastern Huludao in western Liaoning. The topography of this region is undulating, surface structure is complex, the thickness and speed of low-velocity layer and slow-down-velocity layer is unstable, leading to a prominent static correction problem. Therefore, it is a key problem to complete the job of nearsurface modeling in this region. By comparing the different results from a variety of methods, we choose following surface survey methods. Uphole survey method is given priority; then refraction method, which costs lower, in the region that meets the refraction surface conditions; at last, as a complement, lithology log method at production well reserved for uphole survey. With these methods, we analyze the difficulty and countermeasure of surface survey and determine the parameters of field construction. In this surface survey, along the profile of 16.9 km, 8 loggings is laid out. According to the micro log interpretation results, the near surface is of two or three layers; low-velocity layer thickness is 1.68-4.33 m with a speed about 350-1 000 m/s; the thickness of low velocity zone is about 5-12 m, whose speed ranges from 1 000 to 2 800 m/s; the high speed layer is pyknotic granite, whose speed is 2 800-4 900 m/s. According to the results of micro logging and the coefficiency similarity between each layer, the authors establish a near-surface model, suggest the depth of shot hole, and obtain the statics data. These works effectively guide the design of field seismic acquisition, provide the reliable basis for data processing, and supply a reference to the surface survey in other region.

Key words: uphole survey, surface survey, near-surface modeling, seismic exploration, western Liaoning Province

中图分类号: 

  • P631.4
[1] 安振芳, 张进, 张建中. 海洋三维VC观测系统优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 271-284.
[2] 葛利华, 姜弢, 徐学纯, 贾海青, 杨志超. 辽西葫芦岛东部表层调查方法比对实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 616-625.
[3] 徐学纯, 张行行, 郑常青, 崔芳华, 高源, 高峰. 辽西杨家杖子侵入岩地球化学和年代学特征及其与成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 804-819.
[4] 陈井胜, 李崴崴, 刘淼, 邢德和, 杨佳林. 辽西建平马场义县组火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 471-482.
[5] 贾海青,姜弢,徐学纯,葛利华,杨志超. 辽西深反射地震勘探采集试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1357-1368.
[6] 李健,金巍,郑培玺,张霞. 辽西台里黑云母二长花岗岩地球化学特征及锆石U-Pb年代学[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1219-1230.
[7] 王志强,韩立国,巩向博,凌云. 起伏地表检波器组合响应[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 694-703.
[8] 吴谦,王常明,马栋和,宋朋燃. 辽西黄土陡坡的冲刷破坏机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1563-1571.
[9] 秦宁,李振春,杨晓东,张凯,王俊. 共散射点道集与角道集串级优化叠前偏移速度分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 623-631.
[10] 周辉, 谢春临, 王尚旭, 李国发. 复杂地表地震资料叠前深度偏移成像[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 262-268.
[11] 王俊秋, 林君, 姜弢, 巩向博, 张林行. 可控震源地震方法在金昌铜镍矿区的应用实验[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1617-1622.
[12] 林红波, 李月, 徐学纯, 马海涛. 减小离散误差的时频峰值滤波算法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 572-578.
[13] 马见青, 李庆春. 面波压制的TT变换法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 565-571.
[14] 石颖, 刘洪, 历玉英. 逆数据域表面多次波压制方法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 271-276.
[15] 聂鹏飞, 曾谦, 马海涛, 李月, 林红波. 消减地震勘探随机噪声:导数算子约束下的维纳滤波[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1471-1478.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!