吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1515-1522.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201505206

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

有机氯代烃在壤土中的吸附和解吸特性

张凤君1, 贾晗1, 刘佳露1, 董佳新1,2, 卢伟1, 吕聪1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室, 长春 130021;
    2. 北京晓清环保工程有限公司, 北京 100000
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-10 发布日期:2015-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 吕聪(1984),女,副教授,博士,主要从事土壤污染修复技术研究,E-mail:lvcong@jlu.edu.cn。 E-mail:lvcong@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张凤君(1957),男,教授,博士,主要从事水处理技术研究,E-mail:zhangfengjun@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41302182,41472214)

Sorption and Desorption of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons onto Loam Soil

Zhang Fengjun1, Jia Han1, Liu Jialu1, Dong Jiaxin1,2, Lu Wei1, Lü Cong1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
    2. Beijing Xiaoqing Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100000, China
  • Received:2014-11-10 Published:2015-09-26

摘要:

选取三氯乙烯(TCE)、顺-1,2-二氯乙烯(cis-1,2-DCE)、1,1,1-三氯乙烷(1,1,1-TCA)、1,2-二氯乙烷(1,2-DCA)4种常见的有机氯代烃,通过批次实验研究其在壤土中的吸附和解吸特性。结果表明:4种有机氯代烃在壤土中的吸附平衡时间约为3 d;在本文研究的整个浓度范围内,4种有机氯代烃的吸附等温线基本呈线性趋势,但更符合Freundlich模型。对于有机氯乙烯而言,TCE在壤土中的吸附特性较为显著,线性分配系数Kd为0.624 L/kg,其次是cis-DCE,Kd为0.238 L/kg;对于有机氯乙烷而言,1,1,1-TCA在壤土中的吸附特性较为显著,Kd为0.520 L/kg,其次是1,2-DCA,Kd为0.353 L/kg。这进一步表明4种有机氯代烃化合物在壤土中的吸附特性与化合物本身的疏水性有关。通过Abdul、Dobbs、Rao和Cong经验公式估算lgKoc值发现,Abdul估算所得lgKoc比实测值偏小,Cong估算lgKoc比实测值偏大,Dobbs和Rao与实测值更为接近;说明 Dobbs和Rao经验公式更适用于预测有机氯代烃化合物在壤土的吸附特性。另外,研究发现有机氯代烃的解吸过程具有明显的滞后性,吸附特性较强的物质,其解吸较为缓慢。

关键词: 有机氯代烃, 壤土, 1, 2-二氯乙烷, 顺-1, 2-二氯乙烯, 吸附, 解吸

Abstract:

The sorption and desorption characteristics of the four organic chlorinated hydrocarbons (trichloroethylene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (cis-1,2-DCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA)) onto loam soil are investigated by a batch of experiments in this study. The results indicate that the sorption equilibrium time of the four chlorinated hydrocarbons onto the loam soil is about three days. The sorption isotherm for all compounds is nearly linear, and fits to Freundlich isotherm slightly over the entire concentration range. As for chloroethylenes, TCE is strongly sorbed to the loam samples (Kd = 0.624 L/kg), and followed by cis-DCE (Kd = 0.238 L/kg). For chloroethanes, 1,1,1-TCA is strongly sorbed (Kd=0.520 L/kg), and followed by 1,2-DCA (Kd=0.353 L/kg). This is consistent with the order of hydrophobicity of the compounds. In addition, the lgKoc value is estimated by Abdul, Dobbs, Rao and Cong empirical regression formula respectively in this study, and the results show that the estimated lgKoc value determined by Abdul regression is significantly lower than the calculated value, and the estimated lgKoc value determined by Cong regression is significantly higher than the calculated value, while the estimated lgKoc values determined by Dobbs and Rao regression are much closer to the calculated values. This demonstrates that the Dobbs and Rao regression is more suitable for lgKoc estimation for chlorinated hydrocarbons. Besides, it is found that there is a certain lag in desorption of chlorinated hydrocarbons from the loam soil; and the higher the sorption capacity of chlorinated hydrocarbon, the lower the desorption capacity of chlorinated hydrocarbon.

Key words: chlorinated hydrocarbons, loam soil, 1, 2-DCA, cis-1, 2-DCE, sorption, desorption

中图分类号: 

  • X523

[1] Doherty R E. A History of the Production and Use of Carbon Tetrachloride, Tetrachloroethylene, Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in the United States: Part 1:Historical Background; Carbon Tetrachloride and Tetrachloroethylene[J]. Environmental Forensics, 2000, 1(2): 69-81.

[2] 丁培杰, 王秀娟. 三氯乙烯、四氯乙烯生产技术及市场分析[J]. 氯碱工业, 2012, 48(12): 1-5. Ding Peijie, Wang Xiujuan. Production Technologies and Market Analysis of Trichloroethylene,Tetrachloroethylene[J]. Chlor-Alkali Industry, 2012, 48(12): 1-5.

[3] 康春莉, 何冲, 熊鹰, 等. 典型石油烃组分在地下水中的自然衰减规律[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2012, 42(1):206-211. Kang Chunli, He Chong, Xiong Ying, et al. Natural Attenuation of the Typical Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Aquifer[J]. Journal of Jilin University :Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42(1):206-211.

[4] 杨悦锁, 雷玉德, 杜新强, 等. 当地下水邂逅DNA:石油类有机污染及其生物降解[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2012, 42(5):1434-1445. Yang Yuesuo, Lei Yude, Du Xinqiang, et al. When Groundwater Meets DNA: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Stress vs Biodegradation[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42(5):1434-1445.

[5] Mattes T E, Alexander A K, Coleman N V. Aerobic Biodegradation of the Chloroethenes: Pathways, Enzymes, Ecology, and Evolution[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2010, 34(4): 445-475.

[6] EPA. 126 Priority Pollutants[J/OL].(2010-10-01)[2014-02-03].http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/methods/pollutants.cfm.

[7] 高存荣, 王俊桃. 我国69个城市地下水有机污染特征研究[J]. 地球学报, 2011, 32(5): 581-591. Gao Cunrong, Wang Juntao. Research on Groundwater Organic Contamination Characteristics in 69 Cities of China[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2011, 32(5): 581-591.

[8] 胡林, 邱兆富, 何龙, 等. 土壤组分对四氯乙烯吸附解吸行为的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(12): 4635-4641. Hu Lin, Qiu Zhaofu, He Long, et al. Effects of Soil Compositions on Sorption and Desorption Behavior of Tetrachloroethylene in Soil[J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(12): 4635-4641.

[9] 孟凡勇. 挥发性氯代烃在我国典型土壤中的吸附-解吸特性研究[D].上海:上海师范大学, 2011. Meng Fanyong. Study on the Adsorption-Desorption Characteristics of Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Typical Soil of China[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Normal University, 2011.

[10] 刘明亮. 土壤/沉积物对三氯乙烯的吸附行为研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2007. Liu Mingliang. Study on Sortion Behavior of TCE by Natural Soils and Sediments[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2007.

[11] 张坤峰, 何江涛, 刘明亮, 等. 土壤有机质形态对有机污染物三氯乙烯(TCE)的吸附影响研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(1): 286-288. Zhang Kunfeng, He Jiangtao, Liu Mingliang, et al. Effect of the Organic Matter in Soil on the Adsorption of the Organic Pollutant-Trichloroethene[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(1): 286-288.

[12] 刘玉龙, 缪德仁, 刘菲, 等. 1,2-二氯乙烷和1,2-二氯丙烷在某污染场地包气带的吸附-解吸特性[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(6): 185-191. Liu Yulong, Miao Deren, Liu Fei, et al. Adsorption and Desorption of 1, 2-Dichloroethane and 1, 2-Dichloropropane by Soils in an Unsaturated Zone[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(6): 185-191.

[13] Lu C, Bjerg P L, Zhang F J, et al. Sorption of Chlorinated Solvents and Degradation Products on Natural Clayey Tills[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 83(11): 1467-1474.

[14] Allen R M, Groenevelt H, Mackay D M. Analytical Method for the Sorption of Hydrophobic Organic Pollutants in Clay-Rich Materials[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1995, 29(1): 148-153.

[15] Mazari-Hiriart M,Hernandez-Eugenio C,Rojo-Callejas F, et al. Vertical Variability of PCE Sorption in the Lacustrine Clays of Mexico City[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000, 39(6): 595-602.

[16] Binger C A,Martin J P,Allen-King R M,et al.Variability of Chlorinated-Solvent Sorption Associated with Oxidative Weathering of Kerogen[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1999, 40(2): 137-158.

[17] 刘锐, 孟凡勇, 文晓刚, 等. 挥发性氯代烃在土壤中的吸附行为研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(1): 165-172. Liu Rui, Meng Fanyong, Wen Xiaogang, et al. The Research Progress of Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Adsorption Behavior in the Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(1): 165-172.

[18] Allen-King R M, McKay L D, Trudell M R. Organic Carbon Dominated Trichloroethylene Sorption in a Dlay-Rich Glacial Deposit[J]. Ground Water, 1997, 35: 124-130.

[19] Abdul A, Gibson T L, Rai D N. Statistical Correlations for Predicting the Partition Coefficient for Nonpolar Organic Contaminants Between Aquifer Organic Carbon and Water[J]. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 1987, 4(3):211-222.

[20] Dobbs R A, Wang L, Govind R. Sorption of Toxic Organic Compounds on Wastewater Solids: Correlation with Fundamental Properties[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1989, 23(9): 1092-1097.

[21] Rao P S C, Davidson J M. Estimation of Pesticide Retention and Transformation Parameters Required in Nonpoint Source Pollution Models[C]//Overocash M R,Davidson I M.Environmental Impact of Nonpoint Source Pollution.New York:Arbor,1980:23-67.

[22] Ukrainczyk L, Rashid N. Irreversible Sorption of Nicosulfuron on Clay Minerals[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1995, 43(4): 855-857.

[1] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[2] 赵金童, 牛瑞卿, 姚琦, 武雪玲. 雷达数据辅助下的滑坡易发性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1182-1191.
[3] 胥为, 周云轩, 沈芳, 田波, 于鹏. 基于Sentinel-1A雷达影像的崇明东滩芦苇盐沼植被识别提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1192-1200.
[4] 李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[5] 宋志伟, 李婷, 易宏云, 邱杰, 张迪, 陈丹凤. 好氧颗粒污泥对有机污染物的吸附机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 868-873.
[6] 张兴洲, 刘洋, 曾振, 张宏涛, 崔维龙. 大兴安岭北部±130 Ma火山岩的地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 1-13.
[7] 刘娜, 杨亚冬, Alberto Bento Charrua, 王航, 叶康, 吕春欣. 响应曲面法优化生物质炭去除水溶液中的阿特拉津[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1199-1207.
[8] 王飞宇, 冯伟平, 关晶, 贺志勇. 湖相致密油资源地球化学评价技术和应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 388-397.
[9] 孙荣涛, 赵京涛, 李军, 胡邦琦. 辽东湾LDD7孔晚更新世以来的沉积层序与古环境演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1460-1469.
[10] 徐如刚,黎哲君,张玮晶,张毅,谈昕,王雷,袁洁浩,翟洪涛. EMM2010模型在中国大陆的精度评估及其适用性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 1018-1030.
[11] 危润初, 肖长来, 张余庆, 梁秀娟. 中国降水混沌识别及空间聚类[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 626-635.
[12] 何雨江,蔺文静,王贵玲. 利用TDR100系统原位监测深厚包气带水热动态[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(6): 1972-1979.
[13] 白静,赵勇胜,陈子方,孙勇军. 利用Tween80溶液冲洗修复萘污染地下水模拟实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 552-557.
[14] Alkali Mohammed,杨悦锁,杜新强,杨明星,Abdullahi Musa. 内分泌干扰物的环境危害:雌激素及其硫酸盐在土壤中的吸附规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 573-0581.
[15] 柴社立, 高丽娜, 邱殿明, 柴源, 郭佳, 徐学纯. 吉林省西部月亮湖沉积物的210Pb和137Cs测年及沉积速率[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 134-141.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!