吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1458-1465.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201605201

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

顶管施工引起土体变形的计算方法及应用

潘建立1,2   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院, 北京 100044;
    2. 中铁十八局集团有限公司, 天津 300222
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-08 出版日期:2016-09-26 发布日期:2016-09-26
  • 作者简介:潘建立(1970-),男,博士研究生,高级工程师,E-mail:panyino@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    交通运输部项目（2013318J11300）

Calculation Method and Application of Soil Deformation Induced by Pipe Jacking Construction

Pan Jianli1,2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;
    2. China Railway 18 Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300222, China
  • Received:2016-03-08 Online:2016-09-26 Published:2016-09-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China (2013318J11300)

PDF (PC)

463

摘要：

顶管施工技术已经广泛用于给排水管道和小直径隧道工程中，同时其施工扰动引起的土体变形问题也越来越受到重视。顶管施工引起周围土体变形的主要因素有：刀盘正面附加推力、顶管机及后续管道与土体之间的摩阻力、注浆压力和土体损失。针对上述影响因素，分析各影响因素单独作用产生的土体变形，然后叠加得出土体总变形计算公式，最后结合港珠澳大桥珠海连接线工程中0#试验管的工程实例分析了其适用性。工程实例分析结果表明：土体损失、注浆压力和顶管机与土体间摩阻力产生的最大土体变形分别为-8.000、2.500和±2.020 mm，这三者是引起土体变形的主要因素；而正面附加推力和后续管道与土体摩阻力产生的最大变形量分别为±0.075和±0.230 mm，影响程度不显著。与Peck公式对比，本文公式除了在最大沉降值处偏差较大以外，其他位置土体变形比Peck公式更接近实测值。

关键词: 顶管施工, 正面附加推力, 注浆压力, 土体损失, 摩阻力, 土体变形

Abstract:

Pipe jacking has been widely applied to water supply and drainage pipelines and small-diameter tunnels; however, the soil deformation induced by pipe jacking may increase the risk of serious construction problems. The main factors causing soil deformation include positive additional thrust of cutter, friction between jacking machine or subsequent pipes and soil, grouting pressure and soil loss. This research focused on and analyzed the soil deformation caused by above factors. The feasibility of deformation formula was proposed by addition of all deformation formula, and was applied to 0# test pipe jacking of Zhuhai connection highway in Hongkong-Zhuhai-Macao bridge project. The results show that the maximum soil deformation induced by soil loss, grouting pressure and frictional resistance between soil and jacking machine is respectively -8.000、2.500 and ±2.020 mm. It also indicates that they are major factors to influence soil deformation. However, the maximum soil deformation induced by positive additional thrust and frictional resistance between soil and subsequent pipes is only ±0.075 and ±0.230 mm respectively, which is non-significant. Except that the deviation is larger at maximum subsidence, the soil deformation calculated value is more close to measured value, compared to Peck formula.

Key words: pipe jacking, positive additional thrust, grouting pressure, soil loss, frictional resistance, soil deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TU433

[1] 付延玲,金玮泽,陈兴贤,等.高层建筑荷载引发地面沉降与隆起变形三维数值模拟[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(5):1587-1594. Fu Yanling, Jin Weize, Chen Xingxian, et al. Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Land Subsidence and Upheaval Deformation Caused by High-Rise Building Load[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(5):1587-1594.

[2] Peck R B. Deep Excavations and Tunneling in Soft Ground[C]//Proceeding of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Enginee-ring. Mexico City:Sociedad Mexicana de Mecanica de Suelos, 1969:225-290.

[3] Attewell P B, Woodman J P. Predicting the Dynamics of Ground Settlement and Its Derivatives Caused by Tunneling in Soil[J]. Ground Engineering, 1982, 15(8):13-20, 36.

[4] Loganathan N, Poulos H G. Analytical Prediction for Tunneling-Induced Ground Movement in Clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Enginee-ring, 1998, 124(9):846-856.

[5] Sagaseta C. Analysis of Undrained Soil Deformation due to Ground Loss[J]. Geotechnique, 1987, 37(3):301-320.

[6] Verruijt A, Booker J R. Surface Settlements due to Deformation of a Tunnel in an Elastic Half Plane[J]. Geotechnique, 1996, 46(4):753-756.

[7] 施成华,黄林冲.顶管施工隧道扰动区土体变形计算[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,36(2):323-328. Shi Chenghua, Huang Linchong. Calculation of Soil Deformation in Area of Disturbance due to Pipe-Jacking Construction[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2005, 36(2):323-328.

[8] 黄宏伟,胡昕.顶管施工力学效应的数值模拟分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(3):400-406. Huang Hongwei, Hu Xin. 3D Numerical Analysis of Construction Mechanics Effect of Pipe-Jacking[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(3):400-406.

[9] 冯海宁,龚晓南,徐日庆.顶管施工环境影响的有限元计算分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(7):1155-1162. Feng Haining, Gong Xiaonan, Xu Riqing. Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Pipe-Jacking Construction on Environments[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(7):1158-1162.

[10] 魏纲. 顶管工程土与结构的性状及理论研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2005. Wei Gang. Theoretical Study on Behavior of Soil and Structure During Pipe Jacking Construction[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2005.

[11] 李方楠,沈水龙,罗春泳. 考虑注浆压力的顶管施工引起土体变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(1):204-208. Li Fangnan, Shen Shuilong, Luo Chunyong. Prediction Approach of Ground Deformation Induced by Pipe Jacking Construction Considering Grouting Pressure[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(1):204-208.
[1] 卫凌云，秦胜伍，陈慧娥. 基坑开挖对单桩及群桩回弹位移的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 584-590.
[2] 沈世伟, 佴磊, 徐燕. 准等时距QGM(1|1)模型分段预测法及其在草炭土路基沉降预测中的应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1098-1103.
[3] 石少敏. 动力法计算振冲碎石桩桩体压缩模量[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 172-176.
Viewed
Full text
366
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 366

  From Others local
  Times 113 253
  Rate 31% 69%

Abstract
583
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 583
  From Others local
  Times 558 25
  Rate 96% 4%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发