吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 659-673.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201703102

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

断陷湖盆早期浅水三角洲沉积——以高邮凹陷永安地区戴一段为例

朱兆群1, 林承焰1, 张宪国1, 李志鹏2, 谢晶晶3, 魏肃东4, 程平5   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580;
    2. 中国石化胜利油田勘探开发研究院, 山东 东营 257061;
    3. 中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司, 上海 200030;
    4. 中海油田服务股份有限公司, 河北 廊坊 065200;
    5. 中国石化江苏油田分公司试采一厂, 江苏 江都 225265
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-10 出版日期:2017-05-26 发布日期:2017-05-26
  • 作者简介:朱兆群(1986-),男,博士研究生,主要从事油气储层沉积学及石油地质方面的研究,E-mail:zzq86@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05009-003)

Shallow-Water Delta Deposits in a Rifting Lacustrine Basin During Early Stage:A Case Study of the First Member of Dainan Formation at Yong'an Area, Gaoyou Sag

Zhu Zhaoqun1, Lin Chengyan1, Zhang Xianguo1, Li Zhipeng2, Xie Jingjing3, Wei Sudong4, Cheng Ping5   

  1. 1. School of Geosiences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
    2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield, SINOPEC, Dongying 257061, Shandong, China;
    3. Shanghai Branch Company, CNOOC Ltd, Shanghai 200030, China;
    4. China Oilfield Service Limited, Langfang 065200, Hebei, China;
    5. No.1 Oil Production Factory, Jiangsu Oilfield Company,SINOPEC, Jiangdu 225265, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2016-08-10 Online:2017-05-26 Published:2017-05-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project (2011ZX05009-003)

摘要: 浅水三角洲作为沉积学和油气勘探领域的热点,目前研究主要集中在大型拗陷型盆地内,对断陷湖盆关注较少。通过充分调研区域地质背景并结合永安地区戴一段的岩心、录井、测井、地震、分析化验等资料进行系统研究后认为,戴一段处于断陷早期,地形较为平缓,水体宽浅且波动频繁,气候温暖湿润,物源供给充足,具备形成浅水三角洲的有利沉积条件。研究区浅水三角洲为近源沉积,以牵引流为主;砂岩中多见强水动力沉积构造;垂向上发育进积、加积的沉积序列,具平行、亚平行及叠瓦状地震反射特征;以前缘亚相为主体,相带宽阔,可分为内、外前缘沉积,水下分流河道构成主要骨架砂体;在向湖推进过程中受沉积物可容纳空间与沉积物补给量比值(A/S)变化的影响较大,不同成因砂体类型及沉积样式呈现有规律的分布。基于以上分析,最终建立了断陷湖盆早期浅水三角洲的沉积模式,在一定程度上对丰富浅水三角洲的沉积学认识并拓展永安地区乃至整个高邮凹陷斜坡带油气勘探的领域和范围具有一定指导意义。

关键词: 浅水三角洲, 断陷湖盆, 沉积模式, 高邮凹陷, 戴一段

Abstract: Shallow-water delta, as a focus of sedimentology and hydrocarbon exploration, has gotten more attentions in depression lacustrine basin than in rift lacustrine basin. Based on the systematic study of regional geological background in combination with the analysis of cores, well logging, seismic, and test data, it is inferred that when the first member of Dainan Formation was deposited in early rifting stage, the geological conditions with gentle terrain, wide and shallow water, frequently fluctuant lake level, warm and humid climate, and adequate sediment supply were favorable for the formation of shallow-water delta. The shallow-water delta deposits are near to the sediment source and dominated by traction current. Plenty of sedimentary structures caused by strong hydrodynamics have been commonly found in cores. It developed sedimentary sequences of progradation and aggradation vertically and it is characterized by paralleling, sub-paralleling and imbricated seismic reflections. The shallow-water delta front is composed of the main type of sedimentary subfacies, which is widely distributed and can be divided into inner front and outer front. The major sand bodies come from the subaqueous distributary channels in delta front. Different types of sand bodies and sedimentary styles exist and evolve regularly towards the center of lake, which is deeply affected by the change of the ratio of accommodation to sediment supply (Abbr. A/S). Based on above, the sedimentary model of shallow-water delta in rifting lacustrine basin during the early stage was built up, which could contribute to enriching the understanding of shallow water delta in sedimentary perspective and broadening the hydrocarbon exploration domain to certain extent for the study area and even the whole slope belt of Gaoyou sag.

Key words: shallow-water delta, rifting lacustrine basin, depositional model, Gaoyou sag, the first member of Dainan Formation

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] Fisk H N. Sedimentary Framework of the Modern Mississippi Delta [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1954, 24(2):76-99.
[2] Donaldon A C. Pennsylvanian Sedimentation of Central Appalachians [J]. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 1974, 148:47-48.
[3] Lemons D R, Chan M A. Facies Architecture and Sequence Stratigraphy of Fine-Grained Lacustrine Delta along Eastern Margin of Late Pleistocene Lake Bonneville, Northern Utah and Southern Idaho [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1999, 83:635-665.
[4] 邹才能,赵文智,张兴阳,等. 大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布[J]. 地质学报,2008,82(6):813-825. Zou Caineng, Zhao Wenzhi, Zhang Xingyang, et al. Formation and Distribution of Shallow-Water Deltas and Central–Basin Sandbodies in Large Open Depression Lake Basins [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(6): 813-825.
[5] 孙靖,薛晶晶,吴海生,等. 远源、细粒型浅水三角洲沉积特征与演化:以准噶尔盆地腹部莫索湾地区八道湾组为例[J]. 沉积学报,2016,34(1):129-136. Sun Jing, Xue Jingjing, Wu Haisheng, et al. Distal Fine-Grain Shallow-Water Delta Sedimentary Characteristics and Evolution: A Case from Badaowan Formation in the Central Junggar Basin [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(1):129-136.
[6] 楼章华,袁笛,金爱民. 松辽盆地北部浅水三角洲前缘砂体类型、特征与沉积动力学过程分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版),2004,31(2):211-215. Lou Zhanghua, Yuan Di, Jin Aimin. Types,Characteristics of Sandbodies in Shallow-Water Deltafront and Sedimentary Models in Northern Songliao Basin, China [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2004, 31(2): 211-215.
[7] 孙雨,赵丹,于利民,等. 浅水湖盆河控三角洲前缘砂体分布特征与沉积模式探讨:以松辽盆地北部永乐地区葡萄花油层为例[J]. 沉积学报,2015,33(3):439-447. Sun Yu, Zhao Dan, Yu Limin, et al. Sandbody Distribution and Sedimentary Model in Shallow Lacustrine Fluvial-Dominated Delta Front:A Case Study from Putaohua Oil Layer of Yongle Area in Songliao Basin [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2015, 33(3):439-447.
[8] 李顺明,宋新民,刘曰强,等. 温米退积型与进积型浅水辫状河三角洲沉积模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(3):665-672. Li Shunming, Song Xinmin, Liu Yueqiang, et al. Depositional Models of Regressive and Progressive Shoal Braided Deltas in Wenmi Oilfield [J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(3):665-672.
[9] 朱筱敏,刘媛,方庆,等. 大型坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲形成条件和沉积模式:以松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶余油层为例[J]. 地学前缘,2012,19(1):89-99. Zhu Xiaomin, Liu Yuan, Fang Qing,et al. Formation and Sedimentary Model of Shallow Delta in Large-Scale Lake: Example from Cretaceous Quantou Formation in Sanzhao Sag, Songliao Basin [J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(1): 89-99.
[10] 蔡全升,胡明毅,胡忠贵,等. 退积型浅水三角洲沉积演化特征及砂体展布规律:以松辽盆地北部临江地区下白垩统泉头组四段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2016,37(6):903-914. Cai Quansheng, Hu Mingyi, Hu Zhonggui, et al. Sedimentary Evolution and Distribution of Sand Bodies of Retrogradational Shallow-Water Delta: A Case Study from 4th Member of the Cretaceous Quantou Formation in the Linjiang Area, Songliao Basin [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(6): 903-914.
[11] 刁帆,文志刚,邹华耀,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长8油层组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2013,38(6):1289-1298. Diao Fan, Wen Zhigang, Zou Huayao,et al. Sedimentary Characteristics of Shallow-Water Deltas in Chang 8 Oil-Bearing Interval in Eastern Gansu, Ordos Basin [J]. Earth Science: Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2013, 38(6): 1289-1298.
[12] 纪友亮,卢欢,刘玉瑞. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组一段浅水三角洲和滩坝沉积模式[J]. 古地理学报,2013,15(5):729-740. Ji Youliang, Lu Huan, Liu Yurui. Sedimentary Model of Shallow Water Delta and Beach Bar in the Member 1 of Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15(5):729-740.
[13] 高志勇,周川闽,董文彤,等. 浅水三角洲动态生长过程模型与有利砂体分布:以鄱阳湖赣江三角洲为例[J]. 现代地质,2016,30(2):341-352. Gao Zhiyong, Zhou Chuanmin, Dong Wentong, et al. Sedimentary Processes,Depositional Model and Sandbody Prediction of Lacustrine Shallow Water Delta: A Case Study of Ganjiang River Delta in Poyang Lake [J]. Geoscience, 2016, 30(2): 341-352.
[14] 张昌民,尹太举,朱永进,等. 浅水三角洲沉积模式[J]. 沉积学报,2010,28(5):933-944. Zhang Changmin, Yin Taiju, Zhu Yongjin,et al. Shallow-Water Deltas and Models [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(5): 933-944.
[15] 赵伟,邱隆伟,姜在兴,等. 断陷湖盆萎缩期浅水三角洲沉积演化与沉积模式:以东营凹陷牛庄洼陷古近系沙三段上亚段和沙二段为例[J]. 地质学报,2011,85(6):1019-1026. Zhao Wei, Qiu Longwei, Jiang Zaixing,et al. Depositional Evolution and Model of Shallow-Water Delta in the Rifting Lacustrine Basins During the Shrinking Stage: A Case Study of the Third Member and Second Member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Niuzhuang Subag, Dongying Sag [J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2011, 85(6): 1019-1026.
[16] 陈诚,朱怡翔,石军辉,等. 断陷湖盆浅水三角洲的形成过程与发育模式:以苏丹Muglad盆地Fula凹陷Jake地区AG组为例[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(12):1508-1517. Chen Cheng, Zhu Yixiang, Shi Junhui, et al. The Forming Process and Development Pattern of Shallow Water Delta in Fault Depression Lacustrian Basin: A Case Study of AG Formation in the Jake Area in Fula Sag, Muglad Basin, Sudan [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(12): 1508-1517.
[17] 谭聪,于炳松,阮壮,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组高分辨率层序地层划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(2):336-347. Tan Cong, Yu Bingsong, Ruan Zhuang, et al. High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy Division of Yanchang Formation in Southwestern Ordos Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2):336-347.
[18] 周健,林春明,张霞,等. 江苏高邮凹陷古近系戴南组一段物源体系和沉积相[J]. 古地理学报,2011,13(2):161-174. Zhou Jian, Lin Chunming, Zhang Xia,et al. Provenance System and Sedimentary Facies of the Member 1 of Paleogene Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13(2): 161-174.
[19] 张喜林,朱筱敏,钟大康,等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷第三系—上白垩统层序地层格架特征[J]. 沉积学报,2004,22(3):393-399. Zhang Xilin, Zhu Xiaomin, Zhong Dakang,et al. The Character of Sequence Framework of Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2004, 22(3):393-399.
[20] 杨彦敏,奥立德,刘金华,等. 高邮凹陷深凹带戴一段古水体特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2012,19(4):27-30. Yang Yanmin, Ao Lide, Liu Jinhua,et al. Study on Characteristics of Connate Water in the First Member of Dainan Formation, Deep Concave Belt of Gaoyou Sag [J]. Petroleum Geology & Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(4):27-30.
[21] 董荣鑫. 高邮凹陷戴南—三垛组古生物与沉积环境演变[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),1999,27(3):366-370. Dong Rongxin. Evolution of Paleontology and Sedimentary Environment in Dainan-Sanduo Formation of the Tertiary Gaoyou Depression[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 1999, 27(3): 366-370.
[22] 刘滢,吴朝东,张顺. 松辽盆地北部上白垩统地层颜色变化及其沉积环境指示意义[J]. 地质科学,2012,47(1):139-153. Liu Ying, Wu Chaodong, Zhang Shun. Color Changes of Upper Cretaceous Stratum and the Depositional Environment Implication in Northern Songliao Basin [J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2012, 47(1): 139-153.
[23] 薛良清. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷戴南组高导泥岩的高导成因与沉积环境探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1988, 9(4):356-362. Xue Liangqing. High-Conduct Origin and Environment of the High Conductive Mudstones in Dainan Formation,Gaoyou Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1988, 9(4): 356-362.
[24] 马文睿,傅强,董桂玉,等. 高邮凹陷始新统戴南组古环境演化及沉积特征[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2012,40(3):478-484. Ma Wenrui, Fu Qiang, Dong Guiyu,et al. Paleoenvironment Evolution and Sedimentary Characteristics of Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2012, 40(3): 478-484.
[25] Nelson C H. Modern Shallow-Water Graded Sand Layers from Storm Surges, Bering Shelf: A Mimic of Bouma Sequences and Turbidite Systems [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1982, 52(2): 537-545.
[26] 刘玉瑞. 苏北后生断陷层序地层格架与沉积体系[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2010, 3(1):10-14. Liu Yurui. Sequence-Stratigraphic Framework and Depositional System in Subei Epigenetic-Faulted Basin [J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2010, 3(1): 10-14.
[27] 操应长,韩敏,王艳忠,等. 济阳坳陷车镇凹陷沙二段浅水三角洲沉积特征及模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2010,31(5):576-582. Cao Yingchang, Han Min, Wang Yanzhong,et al. Sedimentary Characteristics and Models of Shallow-Water Delta Deposits in the Second Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Chezhen Sag, the Jiyang Depression [J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(5): 576-582.
[28] 孙思敏,季汉成,刘晓,等.断陷盆地边界断层分段的层序地层响应特征:以南堡凹陷西南庄断层上盘陡坡带东营组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(2):382-392. Sun Simin, Ji Hancheng, Liu Xiao, et al. Architecture of Sequence Stratigraphy Responding to Segmentation of Boundary Fault: Taking an Example of Dongying Formation on Hanging Wall of Xinanzhuang Fault in Nanpu Sag [J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2):382-392.
[29] 张新涛,周心怀,李建平,等. 敞流沉积环境中"浅水三角洲前缘砂体体系"研究[J]. 沉积学报,2014,32(2):260-269. Zhang Xintao, Zhou Xinhuai, Li Jianping,et al. Unconfined Flow Deposits in Front Sandbodies of Shallow Water Deltaic Distributary Systems [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(2): 260-269.
[30] 施辉,刘震,张勤学,等. 柴达木盆地西南区古近系浅水三角洲形成条件及砂体特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(1):188-198. Shi Hui, Liu Zhen, Zhang Qinxue,et al. Shallow Delta Forming Condition and Sand Body Characteristics in Paleogene of Southwestern Qaidam Basin [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2015, 46(1): 188-198.
[31] 李洁,陈洪德,林良彪,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西北部盒8段浅水三角洲砂体成因及分布模式[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2011,38(2):132-139. Li Jie, Chen Hongde, Lin Liangbiao, et al. Genesis and Distribution Pattern of Shallow Water Delta Sandbodies in Member 8 of Lower Shihezi Formation in the Northwest of Ordos Basin [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science and Technology Edition), 2011, 38(2):132-139.
[32] 赵俊峰,屈红军,林晋炎,等. 湖泊三角洲沉积露头精细解剖:以鄂尔多斯盆地裴庄剖面为例[J]. 沉积学报,2014,32(6):1026-1033. Zhao Junfeng,Qu Hongjun, Lin Jinyan, et al. Outcrop-Based Anatomy of a Lacustrine Delta Succession: A Case Study from Peizhuang Section, Ordos Basin [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(6): 1026-1033.
[33] 朱伟林,李建平,周心怀,等. 渤海新近系浅水三角洲沉积体系与大型油气田勘探[J]. 沉积学报,2008,26(4):575-582. Zhu Weilin, Li Jianping, Zhou Xinhuai,et al. Neogene Shallow Water Deltaic System and Large Hydrocarbon Accumulations in Bohai Bay [J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2008, 26(4): 575-582.
[1] 赵汉卿, 张建民, 李栓豹, 周连德, 江远鹏. 渤海湾盆地A油田新近系明下段沉积特征及演化模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1021-1029,1046.
[2] 单敬福, 张吉, 王继平, 赵忠军, 李浮萍, 陈治华, 石林辉, 刘利峰. 苏里格气田西区盒8亚段辫状河沉积论证与分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1597-1607.
[3] 张晶, 刘化清, 李双文, 冀虎山, 袁淑琴, 洪忠. 断陷湖盆深水重力流水道的识别标志及沉积模式——以歧口凹陷歧南斜坡沙一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 701-711.
[4] 李顺明, 宋新民, 刘曰强, 王友启, 李艳明, 唐后军. 温米退积型与进积型浅水辫状河三角洲沉积模式[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 665-672.
[5] 伊振林, 吴胜和, 杜庆龙, 张保国, 岳大力, 李艳平. 冲积扇储层构型精细解剖方法--以克拉玛依油田六中区下克拉玛依组为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(4): 939-946.
[6] 孔庆莹, 程日辉. 塔里木盆地孔雀河地区寒武系-下奥陶统沉积特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 527-534.
[7] 王 蛟. 山东沾化凹陷孤岛油田馆上段浅水湖泊沉积[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 500-0505.
[8] 张 晶,王伟锋,荣启宏,史文东. 东营凹陷永55区块沙四上亚段深水浊积扇沉积与油气[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 519-0524.
[9] 张健,刘招君,杜江峰,柳蓉,王伟涛,柳世友,荆保泽. 黑龙江省依兰盆地古近系达连河组油页岩沉积特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 980-0985.
[10] 王 蛟,姜在兴,操应长,邢焕清,王艳忠,罗文生. 山东东营凹陷永921地区沙四上亚段扇三角洲沉积与油气[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 725-0731.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!